Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . - Foreign Affairs (695) - Nairaland
Nairaland Forum › Nairaland General › Politics › Foreign Affairs › Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . (3663328 Views)
1 2 3 ... 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 ... 2282 Reply (Go Down)
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by SuperSixOne: 11:46am On Oct 05, 2018*. Modified: 12:14pm On Oct 05, 2018 |
Please ignore kindly if you feel offended by Off-Topic content. It is one of my favourite military units. ![]() 2nd French Foreign Legion Parachute Regiment (Special Forces Battalion) assaulting a compound. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjcuwoReUDk |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by bidexiii(op): 12:20pm On Oct 05, 2018 |
jakeporeshenko:Good to hear; especially when we just lost some aircraft ![]() |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by bidexiii(op): 1:04pm On Oct 05, 2018 |
#NA
|
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Odunayaw(m): 1:09pm On Oct 05, 2018 |
jakeporeshenko:I once said it that NAF's rationale in the beginning for the JF was COIN related. As the Tucs came into the pic NAF had to develop another rationale hence the seeming relaxation on the JF's case. It would come but not right away |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Odunayaw(m): 1:16pm On Oct 05, 2018 |
joshingjosh:1) Its hypocritical to call the Super Tucano a trainer, you know its role even with a minute of Google 2) What do we need another type of Attack Helo for? 3) Hope its not what I am thinking you want to use the CH-47 for o ![]() 4) Anything sold by the US comes in a full package,there is no flyaway deal. I expect another moniker to come between 5-10pages from this one to ask/opine the same thing |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Odunayaw(m): 1:20pm On Oct 05, 2018 |
Perfectdanny:Depends on the Op. If its CQB (10-50m) engagement, why not? These guys fight in ranges of 100m upward engagement. What's the effective range of a pistol's bullet? 50m?-70m? How useless will it be then. Just carry extra mag for your rifle. You've seen a lot of these Nigerian special forces.. In real life or on the pages of nairaland? if its the latter you sure as hell should have seen them with side arms |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by bidexiii(op): 1:25pm On Oct 05, 2018 |
Perfectdanny:The point of a PDW is usually to give non combat-arms types a primary weapon that is compact and easy to carry around, so that it doesn't waste space and bother them like a full-sized weapon would. It will also (hopefully) increase the chances that they have it on them in any given situation. However, the common issue of carbines or bullpup weapons in many modern armies fulfils most of those requirements while also allowing parts, training (for use and maintenance) and ammo commonality, which saves money. Pistols have pretty narrow usage on the battlefield; aside from specialized SF units there's little purpose for them in infantry combat. They're often issued to officers, but that's as much tradition as real utility, given that most combat-arms officers have the same issue weapon as the soldiers under them. Practically speaking, the only people in an infantry platoon who might have much use for a pistol are the MG gunners, who can benefit from having a small, light backup weapon. Of course pistols also see a ton of non-combat duty, most notably by military police units, and that's not something to be ignored. There are pictures posted on these thread/other thread of Nigerian military SF with there riffles and sidearms (pistol). Have only seen special security details assigned to Mr president and other top government officials, the military/security chiefs carry P.D.W. |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by bidexiii(op): 1:28pm On Oct 05, 2018 |
. |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by bidexiii(op): 1:29pm On Oct 05, 2018 |
[quote author=Odunayaw post=71805852]1) Its hypocritical to call the Super Tucano a trainer, you know its role even with a minute of Google 2) What do we need another type of Attack Helo for? 3) Hope its not what I am thinking you want to use the CH-47 for o ![]() 4) Anything sold by the US comes in a full package,there is no flyaway deal. I expect another moniker to come between 5-10pages from this one to ask/opine the same thing[/quote] ![]() |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by bidexiii(op): 1:35pm On Oct 05, 2018 |
Perfectdanny:These what I have on my phone for now. I'll post SF with there riffles & sidearms later when I go through my system . Please don't mind the finger.
|
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by rugged7(m): 2:22pm On Oct 05, 2018 |
Lol. Go and argue with Mandela. Screw you and the federal government. BabaOwen: |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Nobody: 2:36pm On Oct 05, 2018 |
Odunayaw:Actually you may be right, the biggest priority for NAF right now are the COIN aircrafts but you can also see NAF expressing frustration over the delayed acquisition of the JF17 that is obviously being caused by PAC. |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by joshingjosh(m): 6:21pm On Oct 05, 2018 |
Odunayaw:1) If you think that we should be consistent with our purchase, then don't you think more MI-35M would be more better?? 2) Shed more light on your No.3 cause I don't understand. |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Nobody: 6:51pm On Oct 05, 2018*. Modified: 11:38pm On Oct 05, 2018 |
Military Industry Corporation of Sudan https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=169&v=P1CCOvC8WCA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkleUxAmm4Y |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Kalapizim(m): 7:18pm On Oct 05, 2018 |
joshingjosh:I have also suggested the k52 alligator in the past here, make we just close eye buy 24 join the tucano abi |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Xbee007(m): 7:24pm On Oct 05, 2018 |
Kalapizim:Okay .Lmao, how will you get past the senate that screamed blue murder when the Tucano deal was signed?? |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by ugo4u: 7:48pm On Oct 05, 2018 |
Xbee007:It will be good if we get our facts right. The senate lamented because the process didnt follow due proess/ legislative approval, which is very unconstitutional. |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by ugo4u: 8:21pm On Oct 05, 2018 |
Oya oo!!! Time don reach. To all the arm chair critics, "Tactical Geniuses", military strategy experts and patroits alike. Here is a golden opportunity to join oga aliexpensive and other soldiers alike to prove your loyalty to your nation. Godspeed everyone. Goodluck.
|
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by joshingjosh(m): 8:22pm On Oct 05, 2018 |
Kalapizim:Or even at Least 10 Chinook helicopter self |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by oyinpr(m): 8:59pm On Oct 05, 2018 |
joshingjosh:oga you dey dream bah ![]() |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Xbee007(m): 9:04pm On Oct 05, 2018 |
ugo4u:You have a point but the Senate took months just to approve a budget. Only God know how long it would have taken them to approve the proposal even with the deadline USA gave us. I don't trust most of those Senators. |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Nobody: 9:12pm On Oct 05, 2018 |
numbered: Odunayaw: LTGEN:1) numbered's top 5 is correct, however it is too simplistic. Strip away all other expenditure and focus only on capex and the picture changes. 2) Odunayo's point is taken, however even Algeria's position as the legitimate spender has to be tempered by the 10 years of low spend prior to 2005. That is, they were approaching potential block obsolescence across all services (as was the SANDF until 1999 when the Navy & Air Force got new acquisitions - the Army was supposed to be the phase 2 but that hasn't happened for various reasons) and have been replenishing off a low base. 3) LTGEN, I'm afraid you're comparing palm wine to grape wine. a) the SA defence industry is the world's 15th largest exporter; Denel is the government-owned company and the other over 70 companies are privately owned. Does it hamper the sales effort of SA companies that the home military can't afford to buy their wares? Yes. Are they buying cheaper elsewhere? No. Egypt has better EW systems bought from SA than the SANDF, bought in a period when relations between the 2 govts have been decidedly cooling. In the private sector, game recognises game! ![]() b) Algeria, see my point 2) above. c) Morocco: should never have been on this list as they wipe the noses and arses of the EU and US for free donated gear. By the way, it's interesting that of the real Big 5 African states of Africa - Algeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Nigeria & South Africa - only Algeria and South Africa resisted France & US and refused to betray the Polisario and voted against Morocco being admitted to the African Union because of their colonising of Sahrawi(Western Sahara). France is currently pressing her advantage and pushing her West African colonies to admit Marroc to Ecowas to blunt Nigeria's influence. How's that AU vote playing out? d) Egypt: always a peacock. Absent US, Saudi, and UAE funding, their military represents a sand castle. In a shooting war with say, Israel, all the shiny French toys bought with Saudi/UAE leverage cease to work courtesy of Uncle Sam. As for Mother Russia, good luck getting a beneficial financing arrangement under the current sanctions regimen. e) Angola: from bailing out and owning their former coloniser Portugal (my mother is of Portugues/Mozambiquen stock, went back and now lives in Maputo) those fukcers are now cancelling Navy deals with Brazil and taking IMF loans. Again, they were starting off a low base like Algeria. Except with a bigger population, and substantially lager amounts available to pilfer. 4) South Africa: the defence budget might be one of the highest in Africa, but it does NOT[/b]cover capital expenditure. So yes we can barely cover our current expenditure, but here's an example: brigade-level exercises are now a rare occurrence. [b]Nota Bene: Not a single African country has a military which can resist outside aggression by either the US, EU, NATO, Russia and China. Regardless of the posturing, no country on our continent can afford a sustained invasion and occupation of the other. The best we can do is regional intervention - Senegalese military deployed in Gambia as an example - not forgetting, of course, Nigerian and other ECOWAS munificence. |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by ugo4u: 9:17pm On Oct 05, 2018 |
Xbee007:That was because heads of ministries/parastatals refused to come and defend their budget proposals. |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Nobody: 9:17pm On Oct 05, 2018 |
bidexiii:The Algerians pay for their arms purchases. The Egyptians get paid for their arms purchases. Falling in love? |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Odunayaw(m): 9:42pm On Oct 05, 2018 |
joshingjosh:1) Rotor crafts have limitations in persistent CAS 2) hope you aren't thinking of the CH47 as an attack platform, that will point blank hilarious |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by joshingjosh(m): 11:26pm On Oct 05, 2018 |
[quote author=Odunayaw post=71819002]1) Rotor crafts have limitations in persistent CAS 2) hope you aren't thinking of the CH47 as an attack platform, that will point blank hilarious[/quote] No I mean for transportation for deployment a movement of equipments |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by joshingjosh(m): 11:28pm On Oct 05, 2018 |
oyinpr:No, why u dey ask na? The number too much? |
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by ugo4u: 1:24am On Oct 06, 2018 |
If you know you know.. ![]()
|
| Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Kalapizim(m): 4:48am On Oct 06, 2018 |
Xbee007:forget the senate guys, this is even more cheaper and makes sense since we already operate Russian attack helos. Remember we still lack dedicated attack helo s in this category. |
“If Mugabe Dies, We Will Field His Corpse As A Candidate For Election” - Wife • Photos: What Some Countries Gives Their Soldiers To Eat On The Battle Field. • Video Of Frightened Black Man Forced Into A Coffin By White Man Sparks Outrage • 2 • 3 • 4
Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? • African Militaries/ Security Services Strictly Photos Only And Videos Thread • Kenya Is Ahead of Nigeria In All Aspect (Facts Don't Lie)
Viewing this topic: 2 guest(s)



