iambabaG:
I laugh in Ole Gunnar Solskjær

omobaba1759:
This is backwardness. They should go for Mourinho instead

Mk93:

there are no world-class players but we were still able to qualify for UCL and win a trophy. how many available players in the market are better than the present players at Chelsea? no coach will last forever in a club so if he fail, he get the sack

dapsoneh:
there are always players in the market who are better, the fact is just that Chelsea cant buy any player now... shikenah

omobaba1759:
This is backwardness. They should go for Mourinho instead

osazsky:
u say within,,,if I give u online slap now,u go say I wicked,tufiakwa good forbid, u think Chelsea is Nigeria,,,,Buhari is a failure mou same,,,football has evolved, he is outdated and should find a job with inter or torino were he can use his outdated method cuz the Italian league is outdated

Paullardricky:



Murinho whaaat?

we don't need him anymore

prodigyhenry:


Sarri was trophyless before he joined Chelsea. Zidane hadn't coached a top division team before a whole real Madrid made him head coach. Guardiola had no experience when he became Barca's most successful coach ever. So it's not about experience if you've got it, you've got it

Austinio:

Zidane and Guaediola were doing well in division 2 then

omobaba1759:
SO YOU TELLING ME LAMPARD IS SMARTER THAN MOURINHO, YOU WANT TO HANDOVER A WHOLE CHELSEA TO A AMATEUR COACH WITH ONE YEAR EXPERIENCE AND NO EXPERIENCE IN COACHING PERMIER LEAGUE TEAM . I STILL PREFER MOURINHO TO LAMPARD

prodigyhenry:


Sarri was trophyless before he joined Chelsea. Zidane hadn't coached a top division team before a whole real Madrid made him head coach. Guardiola had no experience when he became Barca's most successful coach ever. So it's not about experience if you've got it, you've got it

prodigyhenry:


Sarri was trophyless before he joined Chelsea. Zidane hadn't coached a top division team before a whole real Madrid made him head coach. Guardiola had no experience when he became Barca's most successful coach ever. So it's not about experience if you've got it, you've got it

prodigyhenry:


Sarri was trophyless before he joined Chelsea. Zidane hadn't coached a top division team before a whole real Madrid made him head coach. Guardiola had no experience when he became Barca's most successful coach ever. So it's not about experience if you've got it, you've got it

namiji2598:
super Franky, welcome the new zidane of England, the only Chelsea coach that has won a champions league as a player, u ar welcome

uddeze:
Its a gamble. With Zola by his side, he will succeed. Always a blue.

muyiwaadekunle1:


Zidane and Pep were youth team coaches with over 3 years experience under their belts, and at some point they were asked to assist Ancelotti and Rijkaard. Lamps with the help of Judy Morris who knew the Chelsea B team inside- out took care of Derby county . Madrid and Barcelona had game changers (Ronaldo & Messi) and big players( Xavi, Ramos, Iniesta, Marcelo, Benzema& Eto'o) who could turn things around if matches go AWOL, nobody in this current Chelsea squad can step up to that task at the moment, couple with the fact that we can't sign players till 2021. It's a tough choice but am excited to see young prospects (Mason Mount, Tammy Abraham, Recee James,Reuben and Hudson Odoi) ,if he can integrate them into the squad, irrespective of next season's outcome, the fans would be proud of him.

osazsky:
a Chelsea without a coach is better than Mourinho, mou is a destroyer and he is depressed,no ambitious club will employ him, it's over 2 years now he is not on sabbatical yet no job ,can a pep or klopp ever look for job for months the answer is no,so I prefer Lampard, will u want Abacha to rule this country again,na curse u dey swear for us spits

osazsky:
Chelsea gradually taking the same path man u Is taking, spits,,,pls don't expect anything from him,no coaching experience at all,,,maybe abrahinovic thinks d EPL is d same thing as f championship,,una nerve see anything,Chelsea go collect en next season them go tire them go collect them go tire,them go collect them go tire

omobaba1759:
EMPLOYING LAMPARD IS LIKE ASKING AN AMETUER PILOT TO FLY OVER 300 PASSENGER ALONE. YOU MAYBE JUDGING FROM MAN UTD SCENARIO. EVERYONE KNOWS MOURINHO IS NOT THE PROBLEM OF MAN UTD EVEN THOUGH HE WILL HAVE TO SHARE PART OF THE BLAME BUT DON'T BE COMPARING MOURINHO WITH KLOPP OR PEP BECAUSE THEY'RE BOTH DIFFERENT. THEIR STYLE OF PLAY IS DIFFERENT. EMPLOYING LAMPARD WILL BE A BIG MISTAKE BECAUSE OTHER CLUBS ARE NOT SLEEPING EVER YEAR THEY'RE INVESTING, ONE DROP FROM THE CHAMPIONS LEAGUE SPOT YOU MAY NOT BE THERE FOR 3 YEARS AGAIN, CHELSEA IS NOT A TEAM LIKE LIVERPOOL THAT ARE PATIENCE WITH THEIR COACH , THEY WANT RESULTS, THEY WANT TO BE WINNING CUPS. LOOK AT WHAT THEY DID TO SARRI, IF NOT FOR THE MAN IS A STUBBORN PERSON HE WOULD HAVE HAND OVER HIS RESIGNATION LETTER AND LEAVE BECAUSE THE FANS ,BOARD OR PLAYERS ARE PATIENCE WITH HIS STYLE OF PLAY .I STILL PREFER MOURINHO OVER LAMPARD ALL THAT

osazsky:
oga any club mou leaves will never recover,I don't see man u recovering from mou mess in d nxt 20years ,if u own a club will u employ dis present arrogant mou,,? pls b truthful,,,I don't even see torino or nices wanting him even if it's a free contract dat clown is a disaster,he has lost it,football has evolved what is difficult here for u to understand mou should go and learn a new trade maybe Yahoo anything at all provided it's not related to football,, can he even generate 4 odd on bet9ja ,,no .he should just continue with his Yahoo d guy na big scam

prodigyhenry:


Sarri was trophyless before he joined Chelsea. Zidane hadn't coached a top division team before a whole real Madrid made him head coach. Guardiola had no experience when he became Barca's most successful coach ever. So it's not about experience if you've got it, you've got it

osazsky:
was Messi a big player when pep took over,who burn am,,were ronaldinho and deco dey, don't say what u don't know cuz he was just a teen

Anduku:

guardiola was just a youth team coach before he was appointed as barca manager and look what he did?

ntyce:


Zidane and Pep had world class players at their service, a rookie would have achieved with same team.
Sarri was also a very tested coach,he grew thru the ranks and well respected.
I see Chelsea taking this route only if they don't expect to achieve much next season.
With the transfer ban and loss of Hazard, a top 6 with Lampard is dicey.

prodigyhenry:


Sarri was trophyless before he joined Chelsea. Zidane hadn't coached a top division team before a whole real Madrid made him head coach. Guardiola had no experience when he became Barca's most successful coach ever. So it's not about experience if you've got it, you've got it

prodigyhenry:


Sarri was trophyless before he joined Chelsea. Zidane hadn't coached a top division team before a whole real Madrid made him head coach. Guardiola had no experience when he became Barca's most successful coach ever. So it's not about experience if you've got it, you've got it

Mk93:

there are no world-class players but we were still able to qualify for UCL and win a trophy. how many available players in the market are better than the present players at Chelsea? no coach will last forever in a club so if he fail, he get the sack