Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission - Politics - Nairaland
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission (3277 Views)
Judiciary May Treat Tinubu Better Than INEC Did. Reno Omokri / INEC Did Not Extend Voting Period In 16 States / Ekiti Election: PDP Nwc Gets Hard Facts, Reconfirms That INEC Doctored Results (2) (3) (4)
| Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by Nobody: 5:41am On Jun 16, 2019 |
. 4 Likes |
| Re: Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by Nbote(m): 5:47am On Jun 16, 2019 |
What is wrong with some of U... INEC is claiming it doesn't have servers but U are here talking about d same servers dey claim not to have 4 Likes |
| Re: Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by Nobody: 5:50am On Jun 16, 2019 |
Nbote: Read my post again, watch video before commenting. I'm perfectly sure even my title doesn't insinuate the use of server. But you can be forgiven, maybe you just woke up and commented without opening your eyes. 5 Likes 1 Share |
| Re: Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by royal200: 6:01am On Jun 16, 2019 |
Wailer children right now������.....Them go still shout Atiku is taken his Dubai mandate back.... Make the Judge just dismiss his petition, it lack merit 6 Likes 2 Shares |
| Re: Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by Karlovich: 6:07am On Jun 16, 2019 |
The unrepentant jihadist is responsible for all these, useless dullard |
| Re: Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by kenzo25(m): 6:17am On Jun 16, 2019 |
Na PDP get the server from Dubai, that’s why they insisted on checking on INEC server which has already been manipulated by the PDP which does not exist at INEC. Atiku just wasted money on paying the IT guys 5 Likes |
| Re: Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by legitnow: 6:25am On Jun 16, 2019 |
[s] zayidhs:[/s] ur not talking to children, ok! There was a server as u noted and that server must be produced. 4 Likes |
| Re: Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by princeade86(m): 6:31am On Jun 16, 2019 |
lass lass, na masses go suffer am. |
| Re: Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by Nobody: 6:33am On Jun 16, 2019 |
legitnow: Ok 1 Like |
| Re: Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by tuniski: 6:40am On Jun 16, 2019 |
The video actually proved that there was server and it was used perhaps with challenges. 2 Likes |
| Re: Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by Nobody: 6:42am On Jun 16, 2019 |
tuniski: Go back to school 7 Likes 2 Shares |
| Re: Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by tuniski: 6:51am On Jun 16, 2019 |
zayidhs:That is for you. Prof yakubu highlighting challenges with deployment of e-collation didnt say it wasn't done. INEC don by market. 7 Likes |
| Re: Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by hrykanu231(m): 7:04am On Jun 16, 2019 |
[quote author=kenzo25 post=79373551]Na PDP get the server from Dubai, that’s why they insisted on checking on INEC server which has already been manipulated by the PDP which does not exist at INEC. Atiku just wasted money on paying the IT guys [/quote How daft can one be? PDP get server from Dubai, They insist on checking INEC SERVER, so Inec indeed have one? Which has already been ... You sound incoherent, you resonate to a large extent what your party stands for(confusion). 3 Likes |
| Re: Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by Konki: 7:06am On Jun 16, 2019 |
Nbote: ZoneB.... Because INEC said so....... you believe so ba? |
| Re: Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by Nobody: 7:09am On Jun 16, 2019 |
tuniski: Who is Jega? & why bring up an issue which is totally different from point being discussed as an example? Like I said, go back to school, comprehension is a big problem. 3 Likes 1 Share |
| Re: Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by celeiyke: 7:10am On Jun 16, 2019 |
zayidhs: Go to tribunal and argue that 1 Like |
| Re: Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by Nobody: 7:20am On Jun 16, 2019 |
zayidhs: The man didn't say results will not be transmitted but that they are in a talk with communication company with respect to transmitting results. This is a prove that INEC has sever results. I still maintain that Nigerians are the lowest in comprehension worldwide. 4 Likes |
| Re: Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by mohims(m): 7:28am On Jun 16, 2019 |
Atiku and PDP are dreamers. I wonder which server they want to inspect. It's very obvious that Buhari defeated him squarely! OP thanks for sharing this video. 7 Likes 1 Share |
| Re: Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by tuniski: 8:01am On Jun 16, 2019 |
zayidhs: That was an error Prof Yakubu I meant to say. 1 Like |
| Re: Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by Nobody: 8:24am On Jun 16, 2019 |
soulpeppersoup: What is that your name again? You also need to go back to school like the other guy. Oya, start from 0:03 where he says "as for the reasons why we are NOT going to transmit electronically.." then goes on to itemise the challenges including coverage area, cybersecurity etc . Now go to 1:26 where he says, "I think we need to do a lot more BEFORE we then deploy this technology for the purpose of transmitting results nationwide" I implore you to improve your comprehension and also at being objective. Class is dismissed! 4 Likes |
| Re: Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by Nobody: 8:28am On Jun 16, 2019 |
celeiyke: It's already at the tribunal and I can stake my life PDP's case will be thrown out. This is just a tonic for my people and also a warning to those who are mortgaging their mental and physical health on this issue. Let them surrender all expectations of victory. I don't want heart attacks when tribunal kicks out PDP's case. 2 Likes |
| Re: Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by celeiyke: 8:41am On Jun 16, 2019 |
zayidhs: My village oracle will strike u if the case is not thrown out as u have staked ur life. Thanks |
| Re: Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by Nobody: 8:46am On Jun 16, 2019 |
zayidhs: What is that your name again? It seems you have low comprehension issue. Did he say there was no INEC server? 1 Like |
| Re: Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by Nobody: 8:59am On Jun 16, 2019 |
celeiyke: Let your entire village strike if they like |
| Re: Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by OfficialAPCNig: 9:13am On Jun 16, 2019 |
Being a zombie sucks. Yakubu just admitted there is server. It is not possible that INEC won't have a server, even if it is a shared server. Nairaland has a server, every website in this world is on a server, your email is on a server, a simple cyber cafe has a server. Jamb has a server, banks have a server, INEC has a server. We don't care whether it is dedicated or shared, it is that server we want to inspect. Unfortunately for zombies when you delete data from a server, it leaves digital footprints. |
| Re: Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by Nobody: 9:24am On Jun 16, 2019 |
soulpeppersoup: Now that you're coming back to your senses read the title of the thread. It says "INEC did NOT USE!!! server for result transmission". Moreover, if you have server equipment ready (HW) but not installed, configured and used for a purpose, then you don't have that server. Most of you people have no idea what a server is. You think it's a mainframe comprising of super-computing processing and memory with gargantuan storage, with liquid intercoolers etc. Lol I'll help you: 1. Hardware is just what it is hardware, it isn't a server. Regardless of its high specifications unless it's created specifically for use as one. 2. Having data aggregated or transmitted to a database doesn't make that database a server, it's just a data store 3. You can have a database like oracle, MSSQL, MYSQL, PostgreSQL even excel! etc 4. You can have a server Eg web server, application server 5. You can have a server that handles database and that is a database server. Why did I say the above? Because many people have the notion that since accreditation data is being uploaded, it must be going to a server. This is half true as it may be going to a basic database. Class dismissed! 2 Likes |
| Re: Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by Nobody: 9:26am On Jun 16, 2019 |
OfficialAPCNig: Excerpt below also applies to you zayidhs: |
| Re: Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by Wiseandtrue(f): 9:40am On Jun 16, 2019 |
zayidhs:@ bolded you also admitted that INEC have a server at a point so why are they denying it  Atiku also had a print out from the server, he wouldn't do that if there no server in the first place!!! He knows the weight of what he's doing!!! Instead of this media trial, I expected a competent court to bring in experts to verify if what Atiku have is real or not!!! If true then and then INEC will have a case to answer if not this issue will be laid to rest!!! 1 Like
|
| Re: Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by Wiseandtrue(f): 9:45am On Jun 16, 2019 |
Konki:You are the REAL and perpetual zombie!!! INEC said it and now it is now denying it Did you get the issue now 1 Like |
| Re: Proof That INEC Did Not Use Server For Result Transmission by Nobody: 10:54am On Jun 16, 2019 |
Wiseandtrue: Lol, wise and true. Are you into IT? If yes, it'd be easier for me to explain things to you but here goes. INEC placed order for card readers, HW, SW with guidelines on specifications and desired mode of operation of its devices. Of course there are provisions for uploading results from polling units via card readers. But on realizing the big challenges on using an election result server, INEC decided against employing it for 2019 elections as time frame is too short to address challenges highlighted. Do you know that you can have a million servers in one company/institution? OK, so do you know that you can have a million servers in one building? Now, do you know that you can have a million servers on a single set of hardware equipment? Thanks to virtualization. Now do you understand that accreditation server is different from election results server? Which brings me to something I said to one of you naysayers: hope you know that data can be uploaded to a combination of hardware and software which isn't a server but a mere database. Anyway, let me have a ghost session of questions and answers which will help you understand. First question: Was hardware & some software purchased? Answer: Yes! Presumably, card readers, server reliant hardware, power backups, virtualization environments (Microsoft hyper-V, RedHat, vSphere, Proxmox etc), server software (Microsoft, oracle, IBM, tera data, SAP etc) and other requirements like network backbone choice, ISP, security mechanisms etc. Second question: Do we have a result server? Answer: No Third question: Why would you say that after conceding that we purchased equipment? Answer: After realizing the huge challenges with implementing such voting system, INEC felt it was needless to go ahead and purchase licenses, run installations, train technical staff all within a short period of time for what will not be used rather, they concentrated their efforts and resources towards preparing for conventional voting albeit with contemporary accreditation procedure. Fourth question: Anything else? Answer: Yes, the president refused assent to the ammendment to the electoral act which would have given legality to the use of electronic voting by veto. Fifth question: Are you trying to say electronic voting and transmission is illegal? Answer: Yes, since it has been refused as an amendment, if INEC had used electronic voting or transmission, any losing party can use it as a very strong and valid claim for cancellation of election results and demand new elections because use of electronic voting or transmission would have invalidated the 2019 election ls as it isn't covered as approved procedure and would contravene current electoral act. Sixth question: So, truly no result server? Answer: Yes, no result server at INEC Final question: When can we have such a server or system? Answer: Whenever INEC has constitutional backing and also enabling environment together with mitigating measures on perceived challenges, it'll have to assemble its Hw, install SW, buy licenses, run installations, outsource services, train staff, employ other technical staff, run a mock election, then test on a re-election/by-election, identify weaknesses, re-strategize then implement for general elections. Even that will birth outcries of disenfranchisement, technical difficulties and other issues. On a final note, when you look at the answer to the final question, you'll realize that it's a complicated, time-consuming process (years maybe) which has to be taken in carefully strategized steps. Now, we know that Buhari decline assent to the amendments to the electoral act (chief of which was electronic transmission, which would require a server) in December 2018. Imagine if he had assented to it, now can you tell me that INEC would have had the digital systems up and running in just about two months (February 2019) and successfully ran the elections without failure 2 Likes 1 Share |
Awon IGR People, How Far / Igboho Attacks Ooni, Tinubu And Makinde, Says They Are Fulani Slaves / Imo: I Have Been Wrong, I Will Never Condemn Nnamdi Kanu – Ralph Uwazurike
(Go Up)
| Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 65 |