yunafa:
only around mike and ike and when she is flirting with jeff

creolehunt:


No need going philosophical over everything. You'll end up being a nuisance.

Even in the ultimate game of football. Players con the referee all the time to win penalties and draw fouls. They also would do anything to have opposing players sent off. It's wrong, but heck, it's the game.

ibkayee:

Ok if she does it all the time, dunno why I find hers more palatable than Ella’s

garfield1:
Clearly,omatsola's dislike for tacha is now justified

eksbabe:
She doesn’t do it all the time. Most times when she is speaking with Mike, she switches up the accent, I guess unconsciously. But to every other housemate, she speaks normally.

XML33:


I hope you won't mind if someone kidnaps and rapes your daughter and makes a video out of it for the entertainment of Pedophiles on an online porn forum. After all the forum is Pedophiles forum, not what will Jesus do forum, and the people on the forum want to be entertained and don't care if what they watch is morally justified or not.

ibkayee:
I think people are more willing to rationalise/excuse what Ike did than they would be otherwise because Big Brother said stealing was allowed.

Threebear:

First : I didn't say I wouldn't give you a reply , I said I wouldn't give you a lengthy one .

What you view as "ostentatious " words are my everyday vocabularies.
It's not my fault that while I was burning my midnight candles cramming brobdingnagian texts , you were probably busy with whatever you were busy with.

And I still repeat ...CeeC and Tacha are nothing alike .
Anyone who thinks so must be having a dosage of oneirataxia phantasmagoria .

They're incomparable .

ibkayee:
I think people are more willing to rationalise/excuse what Ike did than they would be otherwise because Big Brother said stealing was allowed.

Threebear:

First : I didn't say I wouldn't give you a reply , I said I wouldn't give you a lengthy one .

What you view as "ostentatious " words are my everyday vocabularies.
It's not my fault that while I was burning my midnight candles cramming brobdingnagian texts , you were probably busy with whatever you were busy with.

And I still repeat ...CeeC and Tacha are nothing alike .
Anyone who thinks so must be having a dosage of oneirataxia phantasmagoria .

They're incomparable .

Threebear:
I'm all for honesty and good morals .

XML33:


Legalizing an immoral action doesn't make it moral and anyone who decides to participate in that action within those parameters would definitely participate in that action outside those parameters. And if anyone celebrates the actions of anyone who carries out an immoral action just because it became legalized, such a person shouldn't condemn anyone who carries out such action an against them whether legalized or not, since they've legitimatized such action by their support of it.

It's like the Nazi soldiers during WW2. Hitler authorized the torture and murder of the Jews that were in the concentration camps. But authorizing murder and pointless torture didn't stop it from being wrong. And there were stories of Nazi soldiers who refused to participate for instance in the sadistic torture and murder of pregnant women, even though participating in those actions moved them up the ranks quickly.

Munzy14:

COOL10:
Seems like I'm the only one who likes both Mike and Ike and doesn't see anything wrong in supporting them. I mean,they've got cool and interesting characters. What's there not to like

Munzy14:

Your trap caught a prey this morning, and its giving u out of the world orgasm..

Threebear:
Mike just carried his and Kim's plate to the sink .

A man that sees a woman as an equal , I'm in love .

Three gbosas for the queen that raised this king .

mediocre:
Whew chile. How did we go from stealing virtual currency to something as vile as pedophilia. Are you normal like this

There is no correlation at all

XML33:


If you don't understand my argument, then don't quote me. If you don't have the level of intelligence to debate abstract concepts, then fuçk off my mentions.

XML33:


Legalizing an immoral action doesn't make it moral and anyone who decides to participate in that action within those parameters would definitely participate in that action outside those parameters. And if anyone celebrates the actions of anyone who carries out an immoral action just because it became legalized, such a person shouldn't condemn anyone who carries out such action an against them whether legalized or not, since they've legitimatized such action by their support of it.

It's like the Nazi soldiers during WW2. Hitler authorized the torture and murder of the Jews that were in the concentration camps. But authorizing murder and pointless torture didn't stop it from being wrong. And there were stories of Nazi soldiers who refused to participate for instance in the sadistic torture and murder of pregnant women, even though participating in those actions moved them up the ranks quickly.

creolehunt:

Nothing special.

Seyi did same for Jeff.

ibkayee:
I think people are more willing to rationalise/excuse what Ike did than they would be otherwise because Big Brother said stealing was allowed.

BenNash:


Chaii to think that people were celebrating when you came into this world.

Which mumu argument are you making? The analogies you're making are plain stupid. You even made an analogy with rape. And the fact that you've not realized how wrong you are proves your level of intelligence.

ibkayee:

Stopped reading at ‘Nazi soldiers’ lol

False equivalence

XML33:


Thanks for being honest jare. Not like those ones that will be giving excuse like: "I'm currently driving home from work, I need updates please," around 11pm.

ibkayee:
I think people are more willing to rationalise/excuse what Ike did than they would be otherwise because Big Brother said stealing was allowed.

XML33:


Really? No correlation? Aren't they both immoral actions? Don't they both involve selfishness? Don't they both involve satisfying yourself at the expense of someone else? Don't they both involve a lack of empathy for the victim of the immoral action? Don't they both invoking depriving someone else of what's theirs in other to gratify one's self?

XML33:


Legalizing an immoral action doesn't make it moral and anyone who decides to participate in that action within those parameters would definitely participate in that action outside those parameters. And if anyone celebrates the actions of anyone who carries out an immoral action just because it became legalized, such a person shouldn't condemn anyone who carries out such action an against them whether legalized or not, since they've legitimatized such action by their support of it.

It's like the Nazi soldiers during WW2. Hitler authorized the torture and murder of the Jews that were in the concentration camps. But authorizing murder and pointless torture didn't stop it from being wrong. And there were stories of Nazi soldiers who refused to participate for instance in the sadistic torture and murder of pregnant women, even though participating in those actions moved them up the ranks quickly.