Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,162,148 members, 7,849,575 topics. Date: Tuesday, 04 June 2024 at 02:39 AM

Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? - Religion (3) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? (5983 Views)

Why Don’t Jehovah’s Witnesses Accept Blood Transfusions? / Jehovah's Witnesses: Why Are Blood Transfusions So Bad? / Why Don’t Jehovah’s Witnesses Accept Blood Transfusions? (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by budaatum: 4:28pm On Jul 15, 2019
OLAADEGBU:


Conclusion

It is a noble thing to be willing to die rather than do evil; however, it is a tragic thing when a false teaching and misrepresentation of Scripture causes lives to be needlessly lost. This is, unfortunately, the case with the Jehovah's Witness doctrine on blood transfusions. Scripture, not to mention medical science and common sense, teaches us that eating blood and receiving a blood transfusion is not practically or morally equivalent; they are, in fact, the opposite. It is a heavy thing to consider how those who have promoted this false teaching will have to give an account before a holy God of the lives it has needlessly cost if they do not repent.

We must all the same now consider some of our own beliefs to ensure we don't make the same mistake of adopting false doctrines and teachings.
Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by OLAADEGBU(m): 4:47pm On Jul 15, 2019
budaatum:


We must all the same now consider some of our own beliefs to ensure we don't make the same mistake of adopting false doctrines and teachings.

At least you can now see how dangerous these "false doctrines and teachings" that I refute on this thread can be and why they should be called out. smiley

1 Like

Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by Nobody: 4:58pm On Jul 15, 2019
budaatum:


We must all the same now consider some of our own BELIEFS to ensure we don't make the same mistake of adopting false doctrines and teachings.

Eeeeewoooo! undecided
When did buda become a BELIEVER so that you now have BELIEFS?
Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by Nobody: 5:03pm On Jul 15, 2019
budaatum:

Don't patronize me Max. You know very well that buda is definitely not a "BELIEVER".

Please buda, are you now a believer? cheesy

Well to God be the glory! wink
Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by budaatum: 5:09pm On Jul 15, 2019
Maximus69:


Please buda, are you now a believer? cheesy

Well to God be the glory! wink
Have you got a difficulty reading or is understanding the problem here max? I hope it's one or the other because the alternative is you are being devious!

budaatum:

If buda were a believer buda would believe your version or that which some others say buda must believe instead of using buda's very own brain and mind and senses and being that the Lord God Almighty has given buda and which shall be [url=https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+25%3A14-30&version=ESV]taken away[/url] from buda if buda uses them not!

Don't patronize me Max. You know very well that buda is definitely not a "believer".
Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by Nobody: 5:31pm On Jul 15, 2019
budaatum:

Have you got a difficulty reading or is understanding the problem here max? I hope it's one or the other because the alternative is you are being devious!

I no sabi grammar Ma,
Are you now a BELIEVER,as in one having BELIEFS? cheesy
Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by budaatum: 5:36pm On Jul 15, 2019
Maximus69:

I no sabi grammar Ma,
Are you now a BELIEVER,as in one having BELIEFS? cheesy
buda's attitude to believing is written here. buda is not a believer! There is no virtue in emulating satan.

If there's anything you need explaining please simply ask.
Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by budaatum: 5:49pm On Jul 15, 2019
OLAADEGBU:


At least you can now see how dangerous these "false doctrines and teachings" that I refute on this thread can be and why they should be called out. smiley
Whenever I see the twig in another person's eyes, I find the forest is growing in my own. This helps me focus on removing that which blinds me instead of blindly trying to cure those who might be less blind than I am.

We all have false doctrines and teachings Degbu. Unless we wish to claim we alone are righteous, which is a forest itself.
Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by OLAADEGBU(m): 5:52pm On Jul 15, 2019
budaatum:


Whenever I see the twig in another person's eyes, I find the forest is growing in my own. This helps me focus on removing that which blinds me instead of blindly trying to cure those who might be less blind than I am.

We all have false doctrines and teachings Degbu. Unless we wish to claim we alone are righteous, which is a forest itself.

By all means please point out any false doctrine(s) you think I may have so that we can trash them out on a separate thread. cheesy

1 Like 1 Share

Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by budaatum: 7:11pm On Jul 15, 2019
OLAADEGBU:


By all means please point out any false doctrine(s) you think I may have so that we can trash them out on a separate thread. cheesy
No Deg. Pointing them out would be an assumption of my own righteousness and I assure you righteous I am not. How about you and I reason together instead of each trying to prove their own speculation alone can be the right one? Who knows. We may end up removing trees from our forest if not the entire forest itself.
Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by OLAADEGBU(m): 1:31pm On Jul 18, 2019
budaatum:


No Deg. Pointing them out would be an assumption of my own righteousness and I assure you righteous I am not. How about you and I reason together instead of each trying to prove their own speculation alone can be the right one? Who knows. We may end up removing trees from our forest if not the entire forest itself.

It is up to you to remove the trees in your own forest before you can see the speck in mine. Meanwhile, let us entertain ourselves with the issue at hand on this thread. smiley
Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by OLAADEGBU(m): 1:42pm On Jul 18, 2019
OLAADEGBU:


It is up to you to remove the trees in your own forest before you can see the speck in mine. Meanwhile, let us entertain ourselves with the issue at hand on this thread. smiley

The Crisis:

https://www.chick.com/default

1 Share

Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by OLAADEGBU(m): 4:49pm On Jul 19, 2019

1 Share

Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by OLAADEGBU(m): 11:48pm On Jul 20, 2019

1 Share

Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by OLAADEGBU(m): 4:27pm On Jul 22, 2019

1 Share

Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by OLAADEGBU(m): 2:26pm On Jul 23, 2019

1 Share

Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by OLAADEGBU(m): 9:03pm On Jul 26, 2019
The Crisis: Conclusion.

https://www.chick.com/default

1 Share

Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by OLAADEGBU(m): 2:32pm On Jul 29, 2019
johnw47:


Joh 8:44  Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

Rev_21:8  But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, [u]shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone[/b]: which is the second death.

Rev_20:15  And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.

@bold, no that's not the bible cheesy

Well stated. smiley

1 Like

Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by OLAADEGBU(m): 4:29pm On Jul 30, 2019
OLAADEGBU:


The verses your Watchtower Society uses when forbidding you to do blood transfusion are Genesis 9:4; Leviticus 7:26-27; Acts 15:19-29 and the like. What God is addressing in those verses has nothing to do with blood transfusion it was about the eating of animal's blood and blood transfusion is not the same thing as eating animal blood. So you cannot use those verses as proof that God is against blood transfusion, they do not apply at all. This is what Jesus said:

"There is nothing from without a man, that entering into him can defile him: but the things which come out of him, those are they that defile the man" (Mark 7:15).

And if you are saying that 'the Watchtower have never done that' here is the proof:

Blood transfusion are a sin, Reasoning from Scriptures, 1985, page 72-73

It is also true that the Watchtower deceive you to earn your salvation by selling their magazines door to door trying to make the quotas. Do you really believe that their magazines them is from God and are infallible? Are they inspired? Here is proof that you think it is from God and not to be questioned:

Salvation is by faith and works you do, Studies in the Scriptures, vol. 1 page 150, 152 (You asked for proof, you got proof).

And because of the fear of being slaughtered in the Battle of Armageddon you have to be a good 'missionary' working yours socks off as a 'faithful witness.'

Some of you may even be called upon to be undercover agents (One of your new recruits here on NL will become handy here because of his previous experience of working as Mafia). Who will be called upon to follow members who appear to be suspect and thereby reports them to the elders who will in turn send the information to the Headquarters in New York to be placed in their files.

You guys must be a miserable lot and your hearts really empty. You need to begin to doubt if your elders really received this so called "new light" from the 'angels' sitting comfortably at the headquarters in NY.

You need to begin to seriously study the Bible independently. The Watchtower has led you down the alley to believe another gospel and the God you are serving is not the God of the Bible. You can't earn your salvation by works (See Galatians 2:16; Ephesians 2:8,9) like selling watchtower materials.

The Bible says that we will all stand before God and be judged by the Word (John 12:48). We should all make sure that the Word of God is our final authority and not the Watchtower or any other sort of material. Who are you going to believe? God or the Watchtower Society? Jesus is Jehovah, repent of your sin and accept Him as your Saviour to be set free.
Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by PublicHealthNig: 3:05pm On Sep 01, 2019

1 Like 1 Share

Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by OLAADEGBU(m): 3:18pm On Sep 02, 2019
Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by OLAADEGBU(m): 9:53pm On Jan 15, 2020
OLAADEGBU:


Are Blood Transfusions Sinful?

The Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, or those who call themselves "Jehovah's Witnesses," have long insisted that blood transfusions are contrary to the direct commands of Scripture regarding blood. They have held to a firm commitment that their people should refuse blood transfusions, even if it costs them their lives (and for very many it has done just that). While the organization has wrestled with exactly which procedures of modern medicine do and do not fall into this violation, the basic premise that blood transfusions are contrary to Scripture has persisted since the early 20th century on into the 21st. The alleged biblical case for this has also stayed largely the same. The July 1, 1951, Watchtower magazine presented the case as follows:

https://carm.org/are-blood-transfusions-sinful

Let's revisit this death-cult called JW's stand on blood transfusion. cool
Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by Janosky: 12:28am On Jan 16, 2020
OLAADEGBU:


Let's revisit this death-cult called JW's stand on blood transfusion. cool

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/transfusions-kill-patients-say-doctors-1070012.html

Transfusions kill patients, say doctors
Jeremy Laurance |
@
jeremylaurance
|
|
BLOOD TRANSFUSIONS given routinely to
tens of thousands of critically ill patients
may be killing them, doctors have found.
Canadian researchers have found that giving
extra blood, despite its essential role in
maintaining life, can cause more harm than
good in those who have been thought in
greatest need of it.
The unexpected finding, from a study of
more than 800 critically ill patients, will
deliver a serious blow to the idea of accident
victims being stretchered into hospital with
a bag of life-giving blood suspended above
them.
Doctors had assumed that any means of
boosting oxygen supply to the body's
tissues in those who were seriously ill
would improve their chances of survival. But
the Canadian research shows that critically
ill patients who received more blood were
up to twice as likely to die as those who
received less.
In Britain, an estimated 800,000 patients
receive blood transfusions each year, most
after routine surgery, and demand for blood
is rising. Using less blood would also save
costs and conserve a scarce resource.
The aim of a transfusion is to restore levels
of haemoglobin, the oxygen- carrying
constituent of red blood cells. Normal levels
of haemoglobin range from 14 to 17 grams
per decilitre. In the Canadian study, half of
the 838 seriously unwell patients were given
enough blood to raise their haemoglobin
over 10 grams per decilitre, while the other
half were restricted to only 7-9 grams per
decilitre, half the normal level. One third of
the restricted group received no blood at
all.On average the restricted group received
three units of blood (one and a half litres)
less than the unrestricted group - but more
of them survived. Among patients under 55
and the less severely ill, those who received
less blood (or no blood at all) were half as
likely to die as those who received more.
The only exceptions were patients with heart
attacks and unstable angina (chest pain).
Dr Paul Hebert and his colleagues from the
University of Ottawa say in the New England
Journal of Medicine: "Our findings indicate
that the use of a threshold ... as low as 7
grams of haemoglobin per decilitre ... was at
least as effective as and possibly superior to
a liberal transfusion strategy ... in critically
ill patients."
It is well-known that giving too much blood
or other infusions can cause heart attacks
or water on the lungs because of the effort
required to pump the extra liquid round the
body. But the researchers found these
factors could not explain the differences
they found.
In a commentary on the findings, Wesley Ely
and Gordon Bernard of the Vanderbilt
School of Medicine, Nashville, say it is
difficult to explain the harm caused by
liberal transfusion. One possibility is that a
transfusion, like a transplant, delivers a
shock to the immune system. "Harmless"
viruses in the blood may also be implicated.
They say more trials are needed to
determine the best treatment for critically ill
patients. "With such knowledge, more
physicians will be able to adhere to the
dictum `first do no harm', and we will have
a surplus of blood for transfusion rather
than a shortage."
***************
OLAADEGBU, triune pagan gods devotee, "
Medical science says blood transfusions KILLS.

Intravenous fluids infusion = blood transfusions= taking blood oath= feeding., it's all going into your body.
*********
"ABSTAIN FROM BLOOD" Acts 15:28-29.
Simple and straight forward, OBEDIENCE.
Matt10:32-39. Hebrew 11:17-19. Phil2:8. 1Sam15:22,Abraham and Jesus Christ knew that Obedience has it's price.
It's above the levels of triune pagan gods devotees and NL Churchians to comprehend.
Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by Janosky: 1:49am On Jan 16, 2020
OLAADEGBU:


That is why I am alerting unsuspecting folks as to the danger of joining this deadly cult, many have died as a result of this evil theology.
Mumu post.
The same blood transfusions mumu, deceptive theology you promoted killed thousands ,if not millions of people worldwide.
Over 5,000 in France alone are probably resting in their graves because of your mumu deceptive theology.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1993/05/29/transfusion-of-death/3ed7e15d-ee76-46b6-ad1b-13d133fcbf93/
Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by Janosky: 2:12am On Jan 16, 2020
OLAADEGBU:


If Jesus shed His precious blood to give me life, what stops me from giving life (blood) to those who need it to survive? undecided
LIAR .
You're twisting the biblical narrative.

Name the persons who received blood transfusions from Jesus Christ..
Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by OLAADEGBU(m): 12:22pm On Jan 16, 2020
Janosky:

LIAR .
You're twisting the biblical narrative.

Name the persons who received blood transfusions from Jesus Christ..

The life of the flesh is in the blood. Name the person(s) who gave or received life? undecided
Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by OLAADEGBU(m): 12:24pm On Jan 16, 2020
Janosky:


https://www.independent.co.uk/news/transfusions-kill-patients-say-doctors-1070012.html

Transfusions kill patients, say doctors
Jeremy Laurance |
@
jeremylaurance
|
|
BLOOD TRANSFUSIONS given routinely to
tens of thousands of critically ill patients
may be killing them, doctors have found.
Canadian researchers have found that giving
extra blood, despite its essential role in
maintaining life, can cause more harm than
good in those who have been thought in
greatest need of it.
The unexpected finding, from a study of
more than 800 critically ill patients, will
deliver a serious blow to the idea of accident
victims being stretchered into hospital with
a bag of life-giving blood suspended above
them.
Doctors had assumed that any means of
boosting oxygen supply to the body's
tissues in those who were seriously ill
would improve their chances of survival. But
the Canadian research shows that critically
ill patients who received more blood were
up to twice as likely to die as those who
received less.
In Britain, an estimated 800,000 patients
receive blood transfusions each year, most
after routine surgery, and demand for blood
is rising. Using less blood would also save
costs and conserve a scarce resource.
The aim of a transfusion is to restore levels
of haemoglobin, the oxygen- carrying
constituent of red blood cells. Normal levels
of haemoglobin range from 14 to 17 grams
per decilitre. In the Canadian study, half of
the 838 seriously unwell patients were given
enough blood to raise their haemoglobin
over 10 grams per decilitre, while the other
half were restricted to only 7-9 grams per
decilitre, half the normal level. One third of
the restricted group received no blood at
all.On average the restricted group received
three units of blood (one and a half litres)
less than the unrestricted group - but more
of them survived. Among patients under 55
and the less severely ill, those who received
less blood (or no blood at all) were half as
likely to die as those who received more.
The only exceptions were patients with heart
attacks and unstable angina (chest pain).
Dr Paul Hebert and his colleagues from the
University of Ottawa say in the New England
Journal of Medicine: "Our findings indicate
that the use of a threshold ... as low as 7
grams of haemoglobin per decilitre ... was at
least as effective as and possibly superior to
a liberal transfusion strategy ... in critically
ill patients."
It is well-known that giving too much blood
or other infusions can cause heart attacks
or water on the lungs because of the effort
required to pump the extra liquid round the
body. But the researchers found these
factors could not explain the differences
they found.
In a commentary on the findings, Wesley Ely
and Gordon Bernard of the Vanderbilt
School of Medicine, Nashville, say it is
difficult to explain the harm caused by
liberal transfusion. One possibility is that a
transfusion, like a transplant, delivers a
shock to the immune system. "Harmless"
viruses in the blood may also be implicated.
They say more trials are needed to
determine the best treatment for critically ill
patients. "With such knowledge, more
physicians will be able to adhere to the
dictum `first do no harm', and we will have
a surplus of blood for transfusion rather
than a shortage."
***************
OLAADEGBU, triune pagan gods devotee, "
Medical science says blood transfusions KILLS.

Intravenous fluids infusion = blood transfusions= taking blood oath= feeding., it's all going into your body.
*********
"ABSTAIN FROM BLOOD" Acts 15:28-29.
Simple and straight forward, OBEDIENCE.
Matt10:32-39. Hebrew 11:17-19. Phil2:8. 1Sam15:22,Abraham and Jesus Christ knew that Obedience has it's price.
It's above the levels of triune pagan gods devotees and NL Churchians to comprehend.
Janosky:

Mumu post.
The same blood transfusions mumu, deceptive theology you promoted killed thousands ,if not millions of people worldwide.
Over 5,000 in France alone are probably resting in their graves because of your mumu deceptive theology.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1993/05/29/transfusion-of-death/3ed7e15d-ee76-46b6-ad1b-13d133fcbf93/

Fake News.

Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by Janosky: 3:11pm On Jan 18, 2020
OLAADEGBU:


Fake News.

Shame on you, OLAADEGBU FRAUD...

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-48596605


BBC News Navigation
Sections
What is the contaminated blood scandal?
By Nick Triggle
Health correspondent
14 June 2019
Share
Related Topics
UK contaminated blood inquiry
Image copyright PA
The infection of up to 30,000 people with
contaminated blood has been called the
biggest treatment disaster in NHS history.
Thousands have died.
A public inquiry is now under way - but
what is already known about the scandal?
Who was affected?
People with haemophilia and other bleeding
disorders were given blood infected with HIV
and hepatitis viruses, during the 1970s and
1980s.
It was the result of a new treatment intended
to make their lives better. A clotting agent
called Factor VIII was introduced to help
their blood clot.
Before this, patients faced lengthy stays in
hospital to have transfusions, even for minor
injuries.
People who had blood transfusions after an
operation, or childbirth, are also thought to
have been exposed.
About 5,000 people are believed to have
been infected - but some estimates put the
number at 30,000. Nearly 3,000 people have
died.
The public inquiry has heard the stories of
some of those affected.
One of the first to take the stand was Derek
Martindale, who has haemophilia . He was 23
when he was diagnosed with HIV and given
a year to live, in 1985. He survived but his
brother - who was also infected with HIV -
did not.
How did it happen?
The UK was struggling to keep up with
demand for the Factor VIII blood clotting
treatment, so supplies began to be imported
from the US.
But much of the human blood plasma used
to make it came from donors such as prison
inmates and drug-users, who sold their
blood.
These groups were at higher risk of blood-
borne viruses.
However, at the time, HIV had not been
diagnosed and understanding about
hepatitis was still developing.
The risk of contamination was raised further
because Factor VIII was made by pooling
plasma from up to 40,000 donors and
concentrating it.
How long did this last?
By the mid-1980s, once it was clear HIV
was blood-borne, the products started to be
heat-treated, to kill the viruses.
But questions remain about how much was
known before this time.
Despite these precautions, some of the
contaminated blood products remained in
circulation and continued to be used.
Screening of all blood products began in
1991.
And by the late 1990s, synthetic treatments
for haemophilia became available, removing
the infection risk.
What are the aims of the inquiry?
This UK-wide inquiry now under way is the
first that can demand that witnesses give
evidence.
It comes after decades of campaigning by
victims, who claim the risks were never
explained and the scandal was covered up.
The government has been strongly criticised
for dragging its heels.
Infected blood victim 'wanted to die'
Blood inquiry seeks answers at last
The secret in my blood
Liz Hooper: The woman who lost two
husbands to the scandal
A previous, privately funded inquiry held no
official status. It could not compel witnesses
to testify, or demand the release of
important documents.
In Scotland, a seven-year investigation was
criticised as a "whitewash" when it was
published in 2015.
The current inquiry, due to last two years,
was announced only after the UK
government faced a possible defeat in a
Commons vote demanding one.
Have people been infected elsewhere in the
world?
There have been thousands of cases of
people being given infected blood in the US.
But other countries also imported blood
products during the 1970s and 1980s.
In Europe, cases in France, Ireland, Portugal
and Italy have been identified. Japan,
Canada, Iran and Iraq have also been
caught up in the scandal.
In the US, companies that supplied infected
products have paid out millions of dollars in
out-of-court settlements.
In other countries, politicians and drug
companies have been convicted of
negligence.
None of that has happened in the UK -
although victims have been given limited
financial support.
At the opening of the inquiry, it was
announced that criminal trials could follow."
**********
OLAADEGBU is FRAUD and bigot.
Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by Janosky: 3:44pm On Jan 18, 2020
OLAADEGBU:
Fake News.
Who Olaadegbu wan deceive?
FACTS DON'T LIE... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/1482021.stm



Thursday, 9 August, 2001, 22:50 GMT 23:50 UK "Aids scandals around the world Many families blamed politicians for the contamination China is the latest country to admit that Aids is cutting a swathe through its population, but Aids-related scandals have dogged many other countries since the 1980s and 1990s. One of the most high-profile cases was that of France's tainted blood scandal, which saw a former health minister convicted for failing adequately to screen blood which led to the deaths from Aids of five people, and the contamination of two others during a key period in 1985. Aids scandals around the world France: About 4,000 given infected blood in the mid-1980s Canada: About 2,000 people infected before blood tests began in 1985 Italy: Some 1,300 people have died from infected blood infusions since 1985 Japan: Over 1,400 haemophiliacs were exposed to HIV through tainted blood; at least 500 thought to have died Two French ministers were acquitted of manslaughter. About 4,000 people, many of them haemophiliacs, were given blood infected with the virus. Many of those contaminated have since died. In most cases they received transfusions before the link between HIV, Aids and blood was fully understood. All three politicians were alleged to have delayed the introduction of a US blood- screening test in France until a rival French product was ready to go on the market. No blood tests In April of this year, Canada's Supreme Court found the Canadian Red Cross guilty of negligence for failing to screen blood donors effectively for HIV infection. Three suits were brought against the Red Cross by people who received tainted blood. Two of them subsequently died of Aids and the third is HIV positive. Blood was not always properly screened About 2,000 people were infected with HIV and up to 60,000 with Hepatitis C before blood tests began in late 1985. Blood tests for Aids had not been developed at the time, so screening of donors was the most effective way of preventing infection. In Italy, a Rome court ordered the Health Ministry in June of this year to pay damages to 351 people who contracted the HIV virus and hepatitis through blood transfusions. The court said the ministry was too slow to introduce measures to prevent the virus being spread by donated blood, and did not establish proper checks on plasma. About 100 of the victims - all haemophiliacs - have already died, but the court ruled that their families were entitled to the compensation. Angelo Magrini, the head of a haemophiliacs' association, said at the time 1,300 people, including almost 150 children, had died in Italy from infected blood infusions since 1985. Cover-up In March this year, a court in Tokyo cleared a former top Aids expert of professional negligence over a scandal that exposed thousands to the HIV virus through tainted blood products. The high-profile scandal, which grabbed headlines in the mid-1990s, shocked Japan with allegations of a government cover-up and unethical links between big business and bureaucrats. Japan's Health Ministry did not ban unheated blood products until December 1985, despite knowing they risked being tainted with HIV. Over 1,400 Japanese haemophiliacs were exposed to HIV as a result, and more than 500 are believed to have died. In February 2000, three former drug company executives accused of selling blood products tainted with HIV were given prison terms. Negligence charges In Iran in the late 1990s, the former head of Iran's blood transfusion centre also went on trial over allegations that patients contracted the HIV virus after receiving contaminated blood. Dr Farhadi and two other doctors faced several charges including negligence in importing HIV-tainted supplies from France. The case followed complaints lodged by families of some 170 people, many of them children, suffering from haemophilia and the blood disease thalassemia. The prosecution at the time said hundreds of people had contracted diseases including HIV and hepatitis through contaminated transfusions. Contagion And in Portugal, a court indicted a former health minister over an Aids scandal dating back to her time in office during the 1980s. The court said the minister, Leonor Beleza, should be tried for propagating a contagious disease. The decision refers back to a case in which more than 100 Portuguese haemophiliacs were infected with the Aids virus after receiving transfusions of contaminated plasma that had been imported and distributed by the public health service. Regional picture Africa devastated European hotspots Background What is Aids? Race to find a cure Aids drugs factfile Case studies Argentina's young victims SA plant 'fights' Aids Bad blood in China Thai Aids fears Russia's crisis CLICKABLE GUIDE Aids in Africa World at a glance TALKING POINT Is enough being done to combat Aids? See also: 19 Jun 01 | Europe Italian Aids victims to get damages 20 Apr 01 | Americas Canadian Red Cross negligent in HIV screening 28 Mar 01 | Asia-Pacific Doctor cleared in HIV scandal 30 Nov 00 | Asia-Pacific Asia's burgeoning Aids epidemic 09 Jun 99 | Middle East Contaminated blood AIDS trial in Iran 09 Mar 99 | Europe Acquittals in French blood trial 19 Nov 98 | Europe Former Portuguese minister indicted over AIDS scandal 08 Apr 99 | Medical notes Blood: The risks of infection
Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by orunto27: 6:54pm On Jan 18, 2020
No. It's give and take. No Agreement breeched.
Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by OLAADEGBU(m): 1:46pm On Jan 19, 2020
Janosky:

Who Olaadegbu wan deceive?

FACTS DON'T LIE...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/1482021.stm




Thursday, 9 August, 2001, 22:50 GMT 23:50
UK
"Aids scandals around the world
Many families blamed politicians for the
contamination
China is the latest country to admit that
Aids is cutting a swathe through its
population, but Aids-related scandals have
dogged many other countries since the
1980s and 1990s.
One of the most high-profile cases was that
of France's tainted blood scandal, which saw
a former health minister convicted for failing
adequately to screen blood which led to the
deaths from Aids of five people, and the
contamination of two others during a key
period in 1985.
Aids scandals around
the world
France: About 4,000
given infected blood in
the mid-1980s
Canada: About 2,000
people infected before
blood tests began in
1985
Italy: Some 1,300
people have died from
infected blood infusions
since 1985
Japan: Over 1,400
haemophiliacs were
exposed to HIV through
tainted blood; at least
500 thought to have
died
Two French ministers were acquitted of
manslaughter.
About 4,000 people, many of them
haemophiliacs, were given blood infected
with the virus.
Many of those contaminated have since
died. In most cases they received
transfusions before the link between HIV,
Aids and blood was fully understood.
All three politicians were alleged to have
delayed the introduction of a US blood-
screening test in France until a rival French
product was ready to go on the market.
No blood tests
In April of this year, Canada's Supreme
Court found the Canadian Red Cross guilty
of negligence for failing to screen blood
donors effectively for HIV infection.
Three suits were brought against the Red
Cross by people who received tainted blood.
Two of them subsequently died of Aids and
the third is HIV positive.
Blood was not always
properly screened
About 2,000 people were infected with HIV
and up to 60,000 with Hepatitis C before
blood tests began in late 1985.
Blood tests for Aids had not been developed
at the time, so screening of donors was the
most effective way of preventing infection.
In Italy, a Rome court ordered the Health
Ministry in June of this year to pay damages
to 351 people who contracted the HIV virus
and hepatitis through blood transfusions.
The court said the ministry was too slow to
introduce measures to prevent the virus
being spread by donated blood, and did not
establish proper checks on plasma.
About 100 of the victims - all haemophiliacs
- have already died, but the court ruled that
their families were entitled to the
compensation.
Angelo Magrini, the head of a
haemophiliacs' association, said at the time
1,300 people, including almost 150 children,
had died in Italy from infected blood
infusions since 1985.
Cover-up
In March this year, a court in Tokyo cleared
a former top Aids expert of professional
negligence over a scandal that exposed
thousands to the HIV virus through tainted
blood products.
The high-profile scandal, which grabbed
headlines in the mid-1990s, shocked Japan
with allegations of a government cover-up
and unethical links between big business
and bureaucrats.
Japan's Health Ministry did not ban
unheated blood products until December
1985, despite knowing they risked being
tainted with HIV.
Over 1,400 Japanese haemophiliacs were
exposed to HIV as a result, and more than
500 are believed to have died.
In February 2000, three former drug
company executives accused of selling
blood products tainted with HIV were given
prison terms.
Negligence charges
In Iran in the late 1990s, the former head of
Iran's blood transfusion centre also went on
trial over allegations that patients contracted
the HIV virus after receiving contaminated
blood.
Dr Farhadi and two other doctors faced
several charges including negligence in
importing HIV-tainted supplies from France.
The case followed complaints lodged by
families of some 170 people, many of them
children, suffering from haemophilia and the
blood disease thalassemia.
The prosecution at the time said hundreds
of people had contracted diseases including
HIV and hepatitis through contaminated
transfusions.
Contagion
And in Portugal, a court indicted a former
health minister over an Aids scandal dating
back to her time in office during the 1980s.
The court said the minister, Leonor Beleza,
should be tried for propagating a contagious
disease.
The decision refers back to a case in which
more than 100 Portuguese haemophiliacs
were infected with the Aids virus after
receiving transfusions of contaminated
plasma that had been imported and
distributed by the public health service.
Regional picture
Africa devastated
European hotspots
Background
What is Aids?
Race to find a cure
Aids drugs factfile
Case studies
Argentina's young victims
SA plant 'fights' Aids
Bad blood in China
Thai Aids fears
Russia's crisis
CLICKABLE GUIDE
Aids in Africa
World at a glance
TALKING POINT
Is enough being done to
combat Aids?
See also:
19 Jun 01 | Europe
Italian Aids victims to get damages
20 Apr 01 | Americas
Canadian Red Cross negligent in HIV
screening
28 Mar 01 | Asia-Pacific
Doctor cleared in HIV scandal
30 Nov 00 | Asia-Pacific
Asia's burgeoning Aids epidemic
09 Jun 99 | Middle East
Contaminated blood AIDS trial in Iran
09 Mar 99 | Europe
Acquittals in French blood trial
19 Nov 98 | Europe
Former Portuguese minister indicted over
AIDS scandal
08 Apr 99 | Medical notes
Blood: The risks of infection


Should we stop eating because some people died from food poisoning? undecided

1 Like

Re: Are Blood Transfusions Sinful? by Janosky: 10:06am On Jan 22, 2020
OLAADEGBU:


Should we stop eating because some people died from food poisoning? undecided


After all your LIES that blood transfusions doesn't KILL....
*spits*
The same lie the System told all the victims who are now enjoying their 'life saving' misery, anguish and death a couple of years later.
Oya qwantirinu 'eating'....
In few years time, you will hear that the portions you ate may claim your life....
***********
But, Why do you go to extremes to want to force another person to eat potentially poisonous food he forbids ?
Olaadegbu Intolerant bigot .

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (Reply)

Easter Day Significance And True Meaning!!! / Picture Collections That Christians Would Not Want You To See. / Checkout These 15 Hilarious Bible Memes

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 123
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.