₦airaland Forum

djdutchbrah:
You know about 'Bobo Chicago' $460k forefeiture. How do you think he got the name.

VolvoS60:
^^^
Ok.

According to you, he was never charged, arraigned or convicted for any crime. Fair enough.

And you are also saying on record that you know absolutely nothing about asset forfeiture concerning him, right?

OK.

adelaja70:
TINUBU DIDN'T FORFEIT ANY MONEY... HE GOT THAT NAME CAUSE OF THE CREDENTIALS HE SUBMITTED WHEN HE WAS CONTESTING FOR GOVERNORSHIP ELECTIONS.... TINUBU WAS MOBIL INTERNATIONAL CHIEF ACCOUNTANT FOR MANY YEARS. IF YOU ARE DOUBTING, GOOGLE IS NOT YOUR ENEMY... IRE O. �

plaindealer:
[s][/s]


Was I talking about forfeiture when you quoted me?

Why is reading and comprehension such a huge challenge for you people?

Are you dumb or just paying dumb?

I said the man was never charged with any crime, he was never convicted pr arraigned in any court of law, but this one is shouting forfeiture all over the place?

If forfeiture is your problem, go and start your own topic or ask other people about forfeiture, I made my claim so if you have your own facts to dispute my claim that he was never charged with any crime and was never arraigned or convicted in any court of law, show it or stop quoting me.

djdutchbrah:
.........................

plaindealer:
[s][/s]



I don't go back and forth with ignorant ipob miscreants posting Ignorant internet rubbish.. I ignored you for a reason.

djdutchbrah:
I am Nigerian not an IPOB.

hisexcellency34:
Temidayo Akinsuyi, Lagos



https://www.independent.ng/bullion-vans-tinubu-already-very-rich-before-he-became-governor-sagay/

Jengem:
Lalasticlala

Mynd44

Person insult me

If i insult am bow una go ban person

Pls enforce the rules

Icon79:
For someone who claims to be a SAN, this Sagay man sounds really really dumb! What has all these ranting about Tinubu being rich got to do with the bullion van allegation? How did this man become a SAN in the first place

#Sh!tHoleCountry


O pari

hisexcellency34:
Temidayo Akinsuyi, Lagos



https://www.independent.ng/bullion-vans-tinubu-already-very-rich-before-he-became-governor-sagay/

Deepthoughts:
This sagay is an idiotic old buffoon,he can't say same of deziani who also worked for long in the oil sector for multinationals yet he opens his rag-tag mouth to support tinubu shamelessly because of political crumbs, useless fool.

plaindealer:
He's a SAN not only because he's familiar with the laws of Nigeria, but also because he's aware that banks using BV to transport valuables to and from their customers is not a crime and no crime was committed, but you are free to educate the SAN per what crime was committed and the part of the Nigerian constitution that says banks can not transport valuables to their customers with BV.

The SAN is not dumb, but the people ranting against him are dumb

awuf2008:
People like Sagay should not be taken serious because he has lost touch with reality. Sagay is a political prostitute.

plaindealer:
[s][/s]


Was I talking about forfeiture when you quoted me?

Why is reading and comprehension such a huge challenge for you people?

Are you dumb or just paying dumb?

I said the man was never charged with any crime, he was never convicted pr arraigned in any court of law, but this one is shouting forfeiture all over the place?

If forfeiture is your problem, go and start your own topic or ask other people about forfeiture, I made my claim so if you have your own facts to dispute my claim that he was never charged with any crime and was never arraigned or convicted in any court of law, show it or stop quoting me.

PaChukwudi44:
it was inherited from your grandfather

AtikuNetwork:
You can even discuss how he sex his wife if you like, that is your business. I have already made my point. Now you can crawl back into the hole you came out from.

VolvoS60:
^^^
Striking out the words in my post doesn't change anything. My words are still there and can still be read by all so what's the point?

The name calling and derogatory references show quite clearly that you are losing the argument. You need to stop the violence.

Clear the smoke oozing out your ears and nostrils and re-read what I wrote. Slowly. This matter will be settled by logic and reason - not hormonally driven, emotional outbursts.

My point is simple. I accepted (for now) your assertion that your principal was never charged, arraigned or convicted for any crimes by a foreign country. You also denied knowledge of any forfeiture of assets by your principal to the authorities of a foreign country. I pressed you on this matter of forfeiture and you maintained your position. QED. So where is the anger coming from?

Save your strength - you're going to need it. Cognitive dissonance really does wreak havoc on the mind and the body and that's exactly what's happening here - your fierce defence of an ethically challenged principal - a man with a huge moral deficit - is proving too hard for you to do.

I have yielded the floor. No further questions for now. Just confirm whether that court docket (in which your principal is referred to as 'the defendant') put up by another poster is real or fake.

plaindealer:
[s][/s]



I said the man was never charged with any crime, he was never convicted or arraigned in any court of law, but this one is shouting forfeiture all over the place?

If forfeiture is your problem, go and start your own topic or ask other people about forfeiture, I made my claim so if you have your own facts to dispute my claim that he was never charged with any crime and was never arraigned or convicted in any court of law, show it or stop quoting me.

What is annoying is you yapping on and on about what I wasn't talking about, the point I made is still up there, read and comprehend.

If you want to argue with me, argue based on what I said or asserted, not based on whatever rubbish you keep repeating, go to other people with that, I'm not interested.

Is it by force?

djdutchbrah:
Look at he court order for the 460k forefeiture. America has public records for forfeitures by courts for heroin trafficking.

Icon79:
Listen my friend, his client was being accused of a crime, the simple thing to do would've been for him to provide hard evidence that no crime was committed. Instead he started making the silly argument of how Tinubu was a man of means. As being "a man of means" inoculates one from being a corrupt criminal. BS upon BS!
O pari

VolvoS60:
^^^
So Plaindealer...is the above post fake news?

VolvoS60:
^^^^
I don't know the lady or gentleman who posted the above info referencing plainsite. If he/she passed me on the street I wouldn't know who he/she was. But the info provided is changing things on this thread.

Plaindealer, would you care to respond to the information he/she has so graciously provided?

plaindealer:
[s][/s]



Rubbish.

Was he charged with any drug crime, was he arraigned and convicted in any court of law?

djdutchbrah:
He was not charged but forfeited $460K narcotics proceeds to state of illnois,America. Even American news outlet Daily Beast covered the story. Is the journalist an IPOB member or a wailer?
https://www.thedailybeast.com/nigerian-pres-svengali-tied-to-heroin

hisexcellency34:
Temidayo Akinsuyi, Lagos



https://www.independent.ng/bullion-vans-tinubu-already-very-rich-before-he-became-governor-sagay/

plaindealer:
[s][/s]

I said the man was never charged with any crime, he was never convicted or arraigned in any court of law, but this one is shouting forfeiture all over the place?

If forfeiture is your problem, go and start your own topic or ask other people about forfeiture, I made my claim so if you have your own facts to dispute my claim that he was never charged with any crime and was never arraigned or convicted in any court of law, show it or stop quoting me.

What is annoying is you yapping on and on about what I wasn't talking about, the point I made is still up there, read and comprehend.

If you want to argue with me, argue based on what I said or asserted, not based on whatever rubbish you keep repeating, go to other people with that, I'm not interested.

Is it by force?