KngGezy:


Obviously as far as it was shot with the same device. Applying the same methods will result in the same way.

I think there is someone posting shots of MI Note 10 all over the phone section. They didn't accuse him of fraud or scam oo

LOL.

I'm sure CHESTER48 didn't explicitly say he took the shots but I feel he implied that he did and that's why people are coming for his head. And to say that for someone that has stood for originality (Stock camera issue for example,) it's a little disappointing having to snatch up a picture from the internet and trying to paint it as his shots.

I'll just say people coming for his head should please take a chill pill and let this slide (..although the hatred for GCAM on Xiaomi by CHESTER has forged red-hot enemies for him...) Please continue to drop good shots for the 'non-picture people' like us.

KEY WORDS: Implied. Explicitly.


...and please don't try to justify that seeming wrong by going the "the same method, the same device" way. He could've prevented the "bursting" by saying he's trying to replicate the concept of the picture while stating that the original picture was lifted off the internet.

It's a case of accept your error and move on. I know accepting that you're wrong is not what you do even in the face of obvious errors, but keep the energy to yourself. Don't fuel the flame.

It's a really funny thread filled with lies, deceit and inferiority complex.

To all whom it may concern. He didn't say see my photo.

CHESTER48:
Concept.

And this is another person who did the same thing

BestAccessories:
ShotWithMiNote10 shared by Xiaomi Nigeria page on FB & Twitter.

BoluwajiPieters:


LOL.

I'm sure CHESTER48 didn't explicitly say he took the shots but I feel he implied that he did and that's why people are coming for his head. And to say that for someone that has stood for originality (Stock camera issue for example,) it's a little disappointing having to snatch up a picture from the internet and trying to paint it as his shots.

I'll just say people coming for his head should please take a chill pill and let this slide (..although the hatred for GCAM on Xiaomi by CHESTER has forged red-hot enemies for him...) Please continue to drop good shots for the 'non-picture people' like us.

KEY WORDS: Implied. Explicitly.


...and please don't try to justify that seeming wrong by going the "the same method, the same device" way. He could've prevented the "bursting" by saying he's trying to replicate the concept of the picture while stating that the original picture was lifted off the internet.

It's a case of accept your error and move on. I know accepting that you're wrong is not what you do even in the face of obvious errors, but keep the energy to yourself. Don't fuel the flame.

He should admit he is guilty of what? He didn't pass the image off as his. The person that asked him a question wanted to know how the shot was achieved. Any person with standard photography knowledge will be able to discern how that shot was taken

I went back to read his comment. Only once did he mistakenly use the personal pronoun "I". Which to any non judgemental mind will be seen as a mistake.

And being that the device that captured this image is the same thing he is using. He can pass this off as his image

DlawTECHY:


It's a really funny thread filled with lies, deceit and inferiority complex.

Inferiority Complex?

He is using the only Google recognized Gcam to snap. And others are using a modified, unapproved, back door Gcam and with most of the key functions either non existent or crashing. So now who is the inferiority complex affecting?

Victoronah1:
Oya naw go and arrest him since nairaland is your father's land

Lol. Both of una dey the same boat. No words for you

vickthorious:

you said we should post pictures of our stock gcam that gcam is decieving that the thread is for stock cam ..buh why you posting online pictures?? u didn't indicate..bsides those pic are digital camera shots nor phone
guy! ur a fake person

Don't mind him

KngGezy:


See someone who is using modified Gcam without the official license of Google Inc.

Everyone is a scam then

At least, we no form holy. Your Oga wey been dey form holy, na him pirate pass. So STFU

Victoronah1:
don't mind them. Even the pix the op posted is a free photo which is even non copyrighted from pexels. It means you can post it, use it claim it is even your own.

You really don't have sense

KngGezy:
To all whom it may concern. He didn't say see my photo.



And this is another person who did the same thing

You be mumu. That guy clearly mentioned he took that Mi Note 10 pic from Xiaomi Facebook page. Chester was even telling people how he achieved a shot that wasn't his. So pls, STFU

Victoronah1:
don't mind them. Even the pix the op posted is a free photo which is even non copyrighted from pexels. It means you can post it, use it claim it is even your own.

you must be silly. Non copyright doesn't mean you can use and claim it as your own. Try it and land in jail. It means it can be used if you give adequate credits to the owner and chester didn't do that.

Trex4:
you must be silly. Non copyright doesn't mean you can use and claim it as your own. Try it and land in jail. It means it can be used if you give adequate credits to the owner and chester didn't do that.

Don't just mind these people.

BoluwajiPieters:


LOL.

I'm sure CHESTER48 didn't explicitly say he took the shots but I feel he implied that he did and that's why people are coming for his head. And to say that for someone that has stood for originality (Stock camera issue for example,) it's a little disappointing having to snatch up a picture from the internet and trying to paint it as his shots.

No offence bro but those are lies. Someone asked how he did that and he replied with self-possession pronouns Like I. Chester is nothing less than a scam.

This thread is becoming a bag of rubbish.

Can you guys pls post any pictures you want from any phone you have. Gcam or not, post it, except photos from the internet. What's with the discrimination and posting of fake pictures?

I've once used a techno device, I've used Xiaomi, and I've used several Samsung and HTC phones, even Motorola android devices. People choose to use a particular device for reasons best known to them, and we should respect that. If this continues, I'll stop posting pictures and unfollow this thread.

ityP:



You be mumu. That guy clearly mentioned he took that Mi Note 10 pic from Xiaomi Facebook page. Chester was even telling people how he achieved a shot that wasn't his. So pls, STFU

I don't even know what to say. KngGezy is trying to defend what's not. It shows the kind of a person he is, really. Even after putting "keywords" under my post, he's still not getting the point. He's tagging someone that clearly stated he got the pictures from Xiaomi's FB page. He's not even defending CHESTER with strong points.

KngGezy:


He should admit he is guilty of what? He didn't pass the image off as his. The person that asked him a question wanted to know how the shot was achieved. Any person with standard photography knowledge will be able to discern how that shot was taken

I went back to read his comment. Only once did he mistakenly use the personal pronoun "I". Which to any non judgemental mind will be seen as a mistake.

And being that the device that captured this image is the same thing he is using. He can pass this off as his image

He can pass it off as his image? Just wow!

DExponential:

He can pass it off as his image? Just wow!

E shock you ba

ityP:



At least, we no form holy. Your Oga wey been dey form holy, na him pirate pass. So STFU

Your bashing of other devices is called what?

Pirate? Do you actually know what piracy means? Because if you do, you wouldn't mention it here. And obviously your followers don't know either. He has every right to use that image. And he never said it was his

ityP:



E shock you ba

Calm down small, make king of truth show.

Kenobeteze:
bro pls how did you achieved this

It's an artificial spring in Millennium Park Abuja, I just took the picture as the water was springing out

ityP:



You be mumu. That guy clearly mentioned he took that Mi Note 10 pic from Xiaomi Facebook page. Chester was even telling people how he achieved a shot that wasn't his. So pls, STFU

How he achieved the shot? or how to achieve the shot?

These are two different things. He has probably tried getting the shot before and that's why he put I. And the Concept tag on the pictures clearly indicates it's not his. But a concept ie something that is to be followed.

BoluwajiPieters:


I don't even know what to say. KngGezy is trying to defend what's not. It shows the kind of a person he is, really. Even after putting "keywords" under my post, he's still not getting the point. He's tagging someone that clearly stated he got the pictures from Xiaomi's FB page. He's not even defending CHESTER with strong points.

We can only solve this by getting the meaning of the Caption "Concept" . And Concept is an Idea to get other ideas. A thing to be followed.

DExponential:

He can pass it off as his image? Just wow!

Correct me if I'm wrong. I'm quite busy this morning but enroute to my destination.

He didn't pass it off as his image from the beginning. So sir there is really nothing to make him guilty of anything. The picture was captioned as a Concept picture. For any well versed person that shows that the idea might not have generated from him.

KngGezy:


We can only solve this by getting the meaning of the Caption "Concept" . And Concept is an Idea to get other ideas. A thing to be followed.

Whatever makes you sleep, bruvv!

CHESTER implied that the picture is his and that's the problem. Did you even ready response at all or you're just happily displaying ignorance? Na wah oh! We even appreciated the picture and he never for once mention that he isn't the one who took the shot! Mistakenly using "I" also shows he intends to take the credits for the picture.

What do they teach you guys in your law school?

Trex4:
you must be silly. Non copyright doesn't mean you can use and claim it as your own. Try it and land in jail. It means it can be used if you give adequate credits to the owner and chester didn't do that.

lol. Oga please go and sit down. Here is the pix, he doesn't need to attribute anybody. It is not piracy. He stated it as concept. Never claimed he was the owner. And the owner of the pix doesn't need attribute go and check yourself. Illiterates everywhere.

Using Gcam on a phone that is not pixel is illegal. Don't try to justify yourself by claim he posted fake pictures not from his phone. Go to the first page, he made it clear that you should post and tag your phone. He never said you can't post pix from the internet if it is beautiful. He did it and wrote concept on every one. Never claimed he owned them. English is hard to understand. All the pictures are non copyrighted. He has sole right to even claim it as his own.

Post pictures and forget all this arguments. Nobody is perfect jesus said throw stone if you have never sinned before. Let's bring back this thread to where it was simple. Over hundred posts. Longest camera thread and the first, he was the person who brought the idea before the other guy went to start.

KngGezy:


Inferiority Complex?

He is using the only Google recognized Gcam to snap. And others are using a modified, unapproved, back door Gcam and with most of the key functions either non existent or crashing. So now who is the inferiority complex affecting?

I didn't tag you oga.. I pointed out what I noticed on the thread..
It's really disgusting.. Tuehhh

Victoronah1:
Using Gcam on a phone that is not pixel is illegal. Don't try to justify yourself by claim he posted fake pictures not from his phone. Go to the first page, he made it clear that you should post and tag your phone. He never said you can't post pix from the internet if it is beautiful. He did it and wrote concept on every one. Never claimed he owned them. English is hard to understand. All the pictures are non copyrighted. He has sole right to even claim it as his own.

we agree say e dey illigal
try go call police abeg.
Or u comot bodi.

Victoronah1:
lol. Oga please go and sit down. Here is the pix, he doesn't need to attribute anybody. It is not piracy. He stated it as concept. Never claimed he was the owner. And the owner of the pix doesn't need attribute go and check yourself. Illiterates everywhere.

Do you read and understand posts? He claimed he was the owner indirectly when someone asked how he did it. The owner needs the attribute but it is not posted because the owner did not apply for pexels original license. And then you explicitly said he can use it as his own.

.

Trex4:
Do you read and understand posts? He claimed he was the owner indirectly when someone asked how he did it. The owner needs the attribute but it is not posted because the owner did not apply for pexels original license.

go and read that particular picture young man. The owner of the pix says not attributes is required. You can post a pic to a site that requires attributes and decide not to take credit.