₦airaland Forum

fergie001:
Sorry, Please where are you getting the updates from?

kahal29:
https://www.channelstv.com/2020/03/03/updates-supreme-court-begins-hearing-of-pdp-ihediohas-application-on-imo-judgement/

https://mobile.twitter.com/Imo_PDP

https://www.thebreakingtimes.com/scourt-review-imo-on-the-spot-arguments/

Tuns20, globemoney, VIPERVENOM, Jimalicoco, NJPot, openmine, Dangrace01

Wantedmiller:
100million loading......

for stressing chief judge of federation.........

Jimalicoco:
Supreme court cannot reverse its judgement,even as the judgement is full of errors. However, it will be noted so as to avoid future occurrence.

Openmine, Tuns20, globemoney, VIPERVENOM, NJPot

Masculity:
lolz Haba let it be 40 nah

Tuns20:
The supreme court can overturn its own Judgment.. It happened in the USA.. Go and check the records...

desiredhome:
You pray Ihedioha gets justice but celebrate when Lyon of Bayelsa State case was strock out for lack of merit and the layers were fined, for same supreme court error.
How will the supreme Court keep their face to reverse these ruling? That will be a joke of the century

CanadaOrBust:
U people always say this and it is not true.

Olorunfemi v Asho
This is yet another case in which the Supreme Court took the bold position to set aside its earlier decision. The Supreme Court set aside its judgment delivered in January 8, 1999 on the ground that, it failed to consider the respondents’ cross–appeal before allowing the appellant’s appeal.

Johnson v Lawanson
Coker J.S.C. delivering the court’s judgment held that “when the court is faced with the alternative of perpetuating what it is satisfied is an erroneous decision which was reached per incuriam and will, if followed, inflict hardship and injustice upon the generations in the future or of causing temporary disturbances of rights acquired under such a decision, I do not think we shall hesitate to declare the law as we find it.” The court then ordered that the appeal be re-heard de novo by another panel of Justices of the Supreme Court. Nadio2019



https://www.vanguardngr.com/2020/02/precedents-when-supreme-court-is-asked-to-reverse-itself/

Dangrace01:
What is the latest please

People are already jubililating in my village that ihedioha. Please tell me it's true

Sunnycliff:
Same here but I am telling them ,it's unnecessary.

Till the final verdict is given by the panel

openmine:
I have a question for you.....Does the constitution prevent the supreme court from changing its initial stance? YES or NO?

Tuns20, globemoney, VIPERVENOM, Jimalicoco, NJPot

Conner44:
Ihedioha is victor once again

CanadaOrBust:
NO.
The Supreme Court has the power to set aside its judgement, and rehear same under the following circumstances:
1. Where there is a clerical mistake in the judgement or Order,
2. Where there is an error arising from an accidental slip or omission,
3. Where there arises the necessity for carrying out its own meaning and to make its intention plain,
4. Where any of the parties obtained judgement by fraud or deceit;
5. Where such a decision is a nullity,
6. Where it is obvious that the Court was misled into giving the decision under a wrong belief that the parties consented to it,
7. When the judgement was given without jurisdiction,
8. Where the procedure adopted was such as to deprive the decision or judgement of the character of a legitimate adjudication,
9. Where the writ or application was not served on the other party, or there is denial of fair hearing and
10. Where the decision/judgement is contrary to public policy and will perpetuate injustice.

Dangrace01:
Ihedioha is really the man of the people. I was even thinking someone won bet9ja like 60 million. Even the teachers in a primary school ran outside and started screaming

openmine:
As much as i want Ihedioha to become governor of imo state,the supreme court has made a stance whether right or wrong which can be corrected in subsequent matters similar to this!
Any attempt to reverse their initial stance will throw up more reviews and they will end up being deprived of their supremacy!

CanadaOrBust:
NO.
The Supreme Court has the power to set aside its judgement, and rehear same under the following circumstances:
1. Where there is a clerical mistake in the judgement or Order,
2. Where there is an error arising from an accidental slip or omission,
3. Where there arises the necessity for carrying out its own meaning and to make its intention plain,
4. Where any of the parties obtained judgement by fraud or deceit;
5. Where such a decision is a nullity,
6. Where it is obvious that the Court was misled into giving the decision under a wrong belief that the parties consented to it,
7. When the judgement was given without jurisdiction,
8. Where the procedure adopted was such as to deprive the decision or judgement of the character of a legitimate adjudication,
9. Where the writ or application was not served on the other party, or there is denial of fair hearing and
10. Where the decision/judgement is contrary to public policy and will perpetuate injustice.

openmine:
As much as i want Ihedioha to become governor of imo state,the supreme court has made a stance whether right or wrong which can be corrected in subsequent matters similar to this!
Any attempt to reverse their initial stance will throw up more reviews and they will end up being deprived of their supremacy!

openmine:
If that is the case...then they are no longer supreme!

Dangrace01:
I thought similar stuff happened during Peter obi case

CanadaOrBust:
I’ve already shown u that u r wrong, why keep repeating same thing

globemoney:
And you think the supreme court has jurisdiction over this case? lol.. There has to be an end to litigation

CanadaOrBust:
No. They are supreme but they are also human and live in a fallible world