₦airaland Forum

Racoon:
The problem here is simply a case of a bigger crook outsmarting the smaller crook.FG is the former while the rubberstamp NASS leadership who feel cheated out are the villains.

I know you dislike buhari but in this regard,the fault is from nass and you indirectly admitted to it.it is common know ledge that whenever the fg is carrying out any poverty alleviatiin program or giving out grants or carrying out recruitment or even presenting budgets,the lawmakers usually have a huge slice and they are used to it.fr the first time,the fg stopped them from having any input in the sip program nd they have never hidden their disdain and anger.
This simply presented an opportunity for then to blackmail or take a pound of flesh from the executive.yesterday Mrs uwais gave a summary of account and even promised to give a more indepth and detailed account.
If the lawmakers are really serious,they should ask for the state and lg coordinators and even get directly to the beneficiaries to get first hand info and not hound the executive.
By the way,the statement credited to lawmakers that they dont know the beneficiaries personally should show you their true intent.how can they know 1 million beneficiaries? How many staffs of nass do the lawmakers even know personally? Must they know them? When did lawmakers start knowing fg beneficiaries? the slots usually allocated to each lawmaker to nominate for fg vacancies,how baby do they know?

ODB2:
[s][/s]

2 trillion naira divided by 20,000 naira amounts to 100,000,000 people that is half of Nigeria's population.


Do you know anyone around you who has received any money

You are all evil and insane to defend this rubbish.

No sane fellow should reason with you

Esseite:
Could bank accounts not be opened for them alongside BVN to create a system like it did with Npower and school feeding rather than cash hauling every single time which we all know is prone to corruption?..

And if there is a record of death, the FG is alerted and credit is stopped rather than working without records for an over N2tr scheme..

Senator... "think it naa"

You are right.the planners of this particular scheme did not do it well.i think the thinking was that since the beneficiaries are at the rural areas,it will be stressful and counterproductive subjecting them to bank processes.you know,many rural areas do not have banks.again,this particular process was designed for table payment.even if death occurs,the fg wont know except no one wants to take advantage.since you have indirectly given thumbs up to npower,extend it here.mind you,it has been largely successful

[s]

seunmsg:
https://www.nairaland.com/5782052/maryam-uwais-lawan-gbajabiamila-got

You are crassly ignorant. There is no N2trillion anywhere except in your empty skull.

I have provided a link above, read and get proper understanding of the NSIP. After reading, you can come back to delete some of the meaningless questions you’re asking. If you still have some thing that are not clear to you, ask and I shall indulge you. Before then, go and read first.

[/s]

keep defending your lootocracy

Very soon this govt will varnish away and all of you at BMC will be rounded up and hanged

ODB2:
[s][/s]

keep defending your lootocracy

Very soon this govt will varnish away and all of you at BMC will be rounded up and hanged

*“I have consistently reminded both NASS Committee Chairmen on Poverty Alleviation that there is no social protection programme in the world in which politicians are responsible for selecting the beneficiaries of cash transfers.*

*“All successful social protection programmes extract their beneficiaries from an objective community platform, if only to ensure that the poorest of the poor are supported out of poverty in an inclusive, community-driven and timely manner.*

*"Since poverty knows no ethnicity/religion /political affiliation, the process must be insulated from influences that are likely to deviate from achieving the desired objective of alleviating abject poverty, rather than be used for patronage or as compensation for loyalty.... "*

Maryam Uwais

[s]

senatordave1:
*“I have consistently reminded both NASS Committee Chairmen on Poverty Alleviation that there is no social protection programme in the world in which politicians are responsible for selecting the beneficiaries of cash transfers.*

*“All successful social protection programmes extract their beneficiaries from an objective community platform, if only to ensure that the poorest of the poor are supported out of poverty in an inclusive, community-driven and timely manner.*

*"Since poverty knows no ethnicity/religion /political affiliation, the process must be insulated from influences that are likely to deviate from achieving the desired objective of alleviating abject poverty, rather than be used for patronage or as compensation for loyalty.... "*

Maryam Uwais

[/s]

Esseite:
Yes I have gone through it, it was going well with the Npower program using BVN, school feeding using Banking system, tradermoni with BOI.

But the cash stipend to the poorest,(N5,000 & N20,000) how were they able to determine that category. the villagers can identify anyone, aswell as anyone can claim these are whom the villagers identified.. no control system.

I think that is where the NASS is concentrating on.

The National Cash Transfer Programme derives all the cash transfer beneficiaries from a National Social Register (NSR), comprising State Social Registers that are developed and hosted by the State Ministries of Panning of each State. The process for objective identification of poor and vulnerable households is as provided in the Financing Agreement (F.A) signed between Nigeria and the World Bank, for which purpose the World Bank IDA Credit and the recovered funds from the Abacha family are being utlised. The process involves a poverty mapping of the LGAs in each State, community mobilization, targeting and identification supported by trained enumerators at State and LGA levels, after which each of the households identified by the communities is visited and data collated, which information includes fields such as the size of household, age, gender, persons with disability (if any), assets, vocation of head of household, educational qualifications (if any), dwelling house conditions, etc.

Finally, all the data collated is subjected to a proxy means testing formula to determine those who merit the grants and the accompanying training. Even though each State hosts its own information, all of the data is hosted at the National level as the National Social Register. As at March 31st 2020, the NSR comprised 11,045,537 individuals from 2,644,495 households, collated from 35 States, 453 LGAs, 47,698 communities. Each and every beneficiary has a generated unique number and can be tracked.

In addition, the only reason National Assembly members are complaining is because they want to compromise the National social register. They want to put the names of their political cronies and fronts so that they can start benefiting from the program indirectly.

In fact one of the major reason the program was moved away from the OVP to the humanitarian ministry is because some people in the villa want to compromise the register but Mrs Uwais won’t play ball. If some of you can remember, even the First Lady publicly complained about the program because she cannot put her people on the register. They eventually got a timid lady who will dance to their tune as the minister in charge of the program. Since she took over, it’s been one problem or the other.

ODB2:
[s][/s]

keep defending your lootocracy

Very soon this govt will varnish away and all of you at BMC will be rounded up and hanged

Trust me, Atiku will be hanged before me.

seunmsg:


Trust me, Atiku will be hanged before me.

How can you hang our president Atiku, you no serious.

IghravweIG:
Boss what's happening with Npower stipends?

it will be paid..just be patient