nyarlathotep:

How is the comparison not the same.

The Rock is in more ''big'' movies, which is the entire basis of your argument.

You just don't like me pointing out your flawed logic. Otherwise, you'd be able to come back with more than ''it's not the same!'' Well, explain your position then?

Since you're not, then I assume you can't. Therefore, I'd exit this argument. You are starting to look foolish.

pu7pl3:
I can't even..with you guys anymore... someone that claims to know how Hollywood works is saying that Cavill gets more roles just because he is good looking

There is nothing else to add here...run from it all you want, deny it all you want Cavill is the better actor and he will continue to be more prominent and relevant than Cox..

Cox can stick to his usual music videos and short films..it's what he is really good at...

Cottonmouth:
I’m so bored, I’m actually starting Inhumans. Who this quarantine even epp?

Barely halfway into the second episode and I feel like tossing my laptop out the window. In God's name, what was the reason for cutting Medusa’s invincible hair or for even doing this without having the fantastic four? Nawa oo

pu7pl3:


Actually, your talent speaks for you..if you are talented enough and show it you would always be called on for these kind of projects..

If Cox is as talented as y'all claim he would have been a bigger deal than he is now..it's simple

All of you here backing Cox as a better actor are just talking about his role in Daredevil..that's his highest point/level, that's where his range stops..Cavill on the other hand has alot of range Comedy, Action, thrillers and almost all prominent roles...we have seen him helpless, we have seen him as a spy, we have seen him handle swords etc and he looks to just be getting started

Again this comparison isn't the same as comparing Daniel Day to the Rock in any way, they are totally different comparisons

Cottonmouth:
I’m so bored, I’m actually starting Inhumans. Who this quarantine even epp?

Barely halfway into the second episode and I feel like tossing my laptop out the window. In God's name, what was the reason for cutting Medusa’s invincible hair or for even doing this without having the fantastic four? Nawa oo

Vic2Ree:

It's probably to cut production costs IMO

pu7pl3:
I can't even..with you guys anymore... someone that claims to know how Hollywood works is saying that Cavill gets more roles just because he is good looking

There is nothing else to add here...run from it all you want, deny it all you want Cavill is the better actor and he will continue to be more prominent and relevant than Cox..

Cox can stick to his usual music videos and short films..it's what he is really good at...

Shittaakeem:

AfricaGalactic:

Easily one of Marvel’s best casting decisions ever.

Shittaakeem:

nyarlathotep:

How is the comparison not the same.

The Rock is in more ''big'' movies, which is the entire basis of your argument.

You just don't like me pointing out your flawed logic. Otherwise, you'd be able to come back with more than ''it's not the same!'' Well, explain your position then?

Since you're not, then I assume you can't. Therefore, I'd exit this argument. You are starting to look foolish.

Rorschach1:

I don't think it's always that simple.

Samuel L Jackson, for example, is a great actor but he didn't become a star until he was in his mid-forties.
Granted, I'm sure that has a lot to do with there being less opportunities for black actors, but I think it still shows that lot of factors beside just talent affect one's success in show business.

Cottonmouth:

Pupl3 is a dumbo from an alternate universe where people are rewarded only on talent with no other factor determining success

AfricaGalactic:

actually, I said that you had no knowledge of how Hollywood works. The latter half of your second sentence is further proof of the claim.

it's hilarious how you accuse other people of running away when you haven't countered one argument. I think the cordials are messing with your head, my guy. Be safe, bro.

pu7pl3:


Unless you are blind or you just pretending to be you would have seen where I said that using big movies isn't 100% reliable as a metric for measuring acting talent before I also brought up range.. you on the other hand have just been trying hard to correlate things that doesn't even make sense talmbout "a flaw in your logic"...I'm not making any other explanations on this matter cos as far as I'm concerned there was no arguement there in the first place

It's easy to join the crowd and throw jabs but when I throw back I'm being condescending..y'all are just hypocritical lots with delusions of intelligence..y'all are actually the ones that look and sound foolish especially you thinking that the Rock Vs DDL is the same comparison as Cavill Vs Cox

Cottonmouth:
Guys abeg don't bother replying to Pu7pl3

He'll look back at this topic and feel very embarrassed. Don't give him more reason to.

F0REVERB0SS:
Has anyone got any good suggestions for MCU information sources on either youtube elsewhere?

EVERY time i look for recent updates on youtube, I'm swamped with FAKE "announcements" that have headlines which are DELIBERATELY misleading, and sometimes amount to just an outright LIE.

Particulary annoying are the videos posted on there by...
EmergencyAwesome
and
TheCosmicWonder
...I would suggest people NEVER take their headlines literally or expect the substance of the content to match what it's headed with to draw hits.

I find the likes of Jeremy Conrad at MCUCosmic exercise responsible journalistic practice when it comes to the content matching the headline and the substance of the information not just being unsubstantiated speculation.
Where would people suggest i look for a quality of reporting closer to what I've found from MCUCosmic and less akin to the tactics of these hit-hungry youtubers?

Lala39:

Tell that to all the women who refused to sleep with Harvey Weinstein and got blacklisted from Hollywood.

pu7pl3:
I can't even..with you guys anymore... someone that claims to know how Hollywood works is saying that Cavill gets more roles just because he is good looking

There is nothing else to add here...run from it all you want, deny it all you want Cavill is the better actor and he will continue to be more prominent and relevant than Cox..

Cox can stick to his usual music videos and short films..it's what he is really good at...

pu7pl3:


Unless you are blind or you just pretending to be you would have seen where I said that using big movies isn't 100% reliable as a metric for measuring acting talent before I also brought up range.. you on the other hand have just been trying hard to correlate things that doesn't even make sense talmbout "a flaw in your logic"...I'm not making any other explanations on this matter cos as far as I'm concerned there was no arguement there in the first place

It's easy to join the crowd and throw jabs but when I throw back I'm being condescending..y'all are just hypocritical lots with delusions of intelligence..y'all are actually the ones that look and sound foolish especially you thinking that the Rock Vs DDL is the same comparison as Cavill Vs Cox

dragonflyy:
[s][/s]
look at who's talking of delusions of intelligence

nigga you're on a public forum. if you don't want to look like a clown, next time keep ur pungent opinions to yourself

Mtcheewwwwww

pu7pl3:


You...if you think I'm about to start exchanging words with someone that thinks Affleck and Cavil are on the same acting level then you really are as dumb as you look

dragonflyy:
[s][/s]
look at who's talking of delusions of intelligence

nigga you're on a public forum. if you don't want to look like a clown, next time keep ur pungent opinions to yourself

Mtcheewwwwww

Cottonmouth:

Hahahahahahaha ha... Sorry bro but I wasnt holding my breath to get a reply from you.

Stop being a glutton for punishment

Now ...

pu7pl3:


And you struggling to mask your obvious lack of knowledge and intelligence by hiding behind quips and poorly constructed jabs...what useful point have you made since I quoted you? NADA..that's your own ceiling I guess..talmbout keeping opinions to yourself on a public forum, boy you are clueless

pu7pl3:


Same you that won't agree that your talent speaks for you in Hollywood but will jump and agree to the foolish take on looks...

Go and sit down my friend

dragonflyy:
[s][/s]
i know it pained u but I don't argue against trash.

Next!

pu7pl3:


No,[img]https://media./images/cc6adb2c8b5c88c132f47a600cf878be/tenor.gif[/img] you just don't have anything reasonable to say because you are a clueless mf round the clock...

dragonflyy:
[s][/s]
so I'm supposed to debunk an argument that presence in films = quality in acting lolz

pls manage your L for the sunday

More evidence of your cluelessness...let me dumb it down for you simpleton

In layman's terms:- you can't make a claim of one actor being better than another based on just one project, you have to judge them on different projects

but can you understand this still?

Nah