Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,153,752 members, 7,820,589 topics. Date: Tuesday, 07 May 2024 at 05:47 PM

Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA - Satellite TV Technology (874) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Entertainment / TV/Movies / Satellite TV Technology / Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA (2071482 Views)

UPS Back-up, Also A Complement To FTA / FTA Frequency / Cctv Installation A Complement To Fta And Solar Energy (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) ... (871) (872) (873) (874) (875) (876) (877) ... (1698) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by Abdomox: 8:42am On Oct 17, 2020
ojeysky:


You can reach the guy that coupled my first 200AH LFP, check my previous posts for his contact. He sells the 200AH 24v (25.6v norminal) at 500k now.

Meanwhile you can ask him to use a BMS with user management interface (he now does that), it will take your cost up by a few amount but it's better to be able to see how each of your cells is performing. It helps for troubleshooting.

Thanks for this info. Can't see previous posts. Please help with his contact details.
Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by desiji: 8:45am On Oct 17, 2020
adrusa:



This is what is called FUD, Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt and it is used by many to fight new technologies they either don't like or understand.
Yes, Lead acid batteries have been tested, but not trusted. Its glaring failures is the reason why the world has constantly being trying to find better alternative since the turn of the centuries and Lithium in its various iterations have been shown to be better in all ways than Lead acid.

For me, while longevity is an important attraction for Lithium, what I like most about it is its ability to hold up its voltage until it is almost completely drained. It is the reason why it is possible to take the advertised AH out of a lithium battery while that is difficult for lead acid. Of course there are so many other advantages, but I will recommend that anyone interested should read up about them.

As to BMS, BMV, Special Chargers etc, most batteries including lead acid requires all of these except a BMS. And the reason why lead acid don't require BMS is because the owners serve as the BMS. With a good BMS, your battery is protected from OVERVOLTAGE, OVERDISCHARGE, OVERCHARGE and even sometimes Short Circuit. With lead acid, the owners will have to do these by babysitting the battery. Every battery require adjustable charger. That some peope use chargers with stock parameters is because the chargers are cheaper and the owners do not know better. If you can not adjust the voltage and current of your charger to match the specifications of your battery, you will soon destroy the battery, lead acid more quickly than lithium as the BMS will always protect your lithium.

Anyone starting off, who has the capacity to get lithium should get it without hesitation, it is your best bet. You will not have to change it in 8 months to 2 years like most lead acid battery. And no one should be deceived by the hype of 10 year old lead acid batteries. In some rare cases that can happen, if the battery bank is large and rarely deeply discharged. For most people with a small bank that sees regular deep discharges, if your lead acid batteries last 4 years, you have done well. And don't be deceived by those 15 years design life. You can only get that from most if the batteries are mostly floating as it happens in some settings especially for telecoms.

And FYI, I currently have two battery banks. A 540AH lead acid that I have had for about 5 years and a 340AH LFP of about a year duration. If I have the means I have now and know what I know now about LFP more than 10 years ago when I started my solar journey, I would have started out with lithium.

Can't explain it better

1 Like

Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by ojeysky(m): 8:52am On Oct 17, 2020
Abdomox:


Thanks for this info. Can't see previous posts. Please help with his contact details.

https://www.nairaland.com/390522/solar-energy-complement-fta/828#93176197

1 Like

Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by adrusa: 9:08am On Oct 17, 2020
NiyiOmoIyunade:
All the Lithium vs Lead Acid discussions, interesting ideas and takes coming up.

I think some of people's experiences are driven by bias in how they obtained their measurements.

I have heard it said repeatedly that voltage will sag beyond useable levels before you get Lead Acid beyond 50% DoD - this is not true at all. A premium inverter like Victron, the lowest Low Voltage Disconnect is around 37v in a 48v nominal system. You can drain your Lead Acid to 100% DoD if you so wish just that it will have a much shorter service life.

If you had an indian type inverter with LVD at 11.5v per 12v nominal, it would appear the battery has given all useable energy early whereas the real bottleneck is the inverter cutoff.

In practice, to safely deep discharge Lead Acid, you must understand how amps rise as voltage drops for thesame amount of power and size your cables, busbars, breakers and fuses appropriately.

I went for LFP because of superior safety and stability. I went for a premium pylontech as I am entirely offgrid and needed a product that could deliver under heavy duty daily use.

For my chemistry, 3.2v per cell is about the safe discharge limit before destructive chemical processes and imbalances begin in the cells. This is about 80% DoD. I routinely did 75% DoD for almost a year until I added the last set of 4 bricks.

This precise cutoff is also helped by having an inverter capable of invoking a disconnect based on SoC. In the Victron world, the PylonTech battery can broadcast its precise SoC to the Victron GX who then communicates to the MultiPlus or Quattro's inbuilt battery monitor. So even as my batteries age, I can assure I always cutoff at 25% SoC/75% DoD and a little above 3.2v per cell.

This is far more reliable than voltage based cutoffs especially in situations where you do not/cannot put in a full charge into the battery. Once I discovered Victron's shutdown on SoC feature, I visited all sites I support (even the lead acid ones) and performed the settings change for free. For lead acid, I can ignore voltage based cutoff and simply set a true 50 to 55% DoD limit.

These value added features not easily recreated el cheapo are the justification for a premium inverter with comms and a premium battery that can speak to the inverter and charge controllers directly.

We all have experience with lead acid batteries. This is probably where we are almost all (experience) experts. But, some of us are even more experienced with lead acid than others. If you don't have adequate monitoring and just allow your inverter to switch off when it gets to its factory set LVD, your expertise is limited. You need a proper capacity gauge like Victron BMV or Outback FNDC to monitor the proper capacity of your batteries and from that background, I insist that unless your load is small, you are unlikely to ever drain your lead acid battery pass the 30-50% mark. I will like to hear from anyone with a proper monitor who is able to discharge his lead acid pass 30% at 0.5-1C.

Most inverters set the LVD at a reasonable level of about 11v. Under tough weather I used to take my lead acid bank to 10v, but that is basically to run some lights and FAN in the night, I can not run anything that uses much power including my TV. Even with that, I will only drive my SOC to about 40-50% for about an hour or so before the inverter shuts off as the battery sags under 10v. And if your batteries ever get to this volt, don't ever let it sit there for long. They will become irreparably damaged.

The only excuse for a war between LFP and lead acid is emotion and maybe commercial interests. LFP is way better. That is the consensus of all solar enthusiasts. The only major disadvantage is short term cost, because on long-term, the cost is even better than for lead acid.

Those with huge lead acid banks who rarely drain beyond 70-90% will vouch for lead acid and organise thanksgiving for it. But how many of us were ever able to be in that category safe for @GeorgeD1 and @NiyiOmoIyunade?

I have a friend who bought into the Monbat hype. He paid close to a million (at the time) for 400AH of it at 48V and he set his LVD to 48v or DoD of not more than 20% (80% SOC). After about 2 years he started complaining that he is not happy with the bank's performance. Today he has complemented his Monbat with 220AH of LFP for peace of mind. And no one should say anything about his battery management skills. He is a pro and he has all that is needed to manage his batteries properly.

3 Likes

Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by ojeysky(m): 9:13am On Oct 17, 2020
adrusa:



This is what is called FUD, Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt and it is used by many to fight new technologies they either don't like or understand.
Yes, Lead acid batteries have been tested, but not trusted. Its glaring failures is the reason why the world has constantly being trying to find better alternative since the turn of the centuries and Lithium in its various iterations have been shown to be better in all ways than Lead acid.

For me, while longevity is an important attraction for Lithium, what I like most about it is its ability to hold up its voltage until it is almost completely drained. It is the reason why it is possible to take the advertised AH out of a lithium battery while that is difficult for lead acid. Of course there are so many other advantages, but I will recommend that anyone interested should read up about them.

As to BMS, BMV, Special Chargers etc, most batteries including lead acid requires all of these except a BMS. And the reason why lead acid don't require BMS is because the owners serve as the BMS. With a good BMS, your battery is protected from OVERVOLTAGE, OVERDISCHARGE, OVERCHARGE and even sometimes Short Circuit. With lead acid, the owners will have to do these by babysitting the battery. Every battery require adjustable charger. That some peope use chargers with stock parameters is because the chargers are cheaper and the owners do not know better. If you can not adjust the voltage and current of your charger to match the specifications of your battery, you will soon destroy the battery, lead acid more quickly than lithium as the BMS will always protect your lithium.

Anyone starting off, who has the capacity to get lithium should get it without hesitation, it is your best bet. You will not have to change it in 8 months to 2 years like most lead acid battery. And no one should be deceived by the hype of 10 year old lead acid batteries. In some rare cases that can happen, if the battery bank is large and rarely deeply discharged. For most people with a small bank that sees regular deep discharges, if your lead acid batteries last 4 years, you have done well. And don't be deceived by those 15 years design life. You can only get that from most if the batteries are mostly floating as it happens in some settings especially for telecoms.

And FYI, I currently have two battery banks. A 540AH lead acid that I have had for about 5 years and a 340AH LFP of about a year duration. If I have the means I have now and know what I know now about LFP more than 10 years ago when I started my solar journey, I would have started out with lithium.


You've done a better explanation. By this morning I have already done 400AH on my bank and check my voltage status. Note that the voltage is now slightly higher, that is because my freezer load went off when set SOC limit of 35% was reached(thanks to Sonoff and nodered).

I think this completes my capacity test on those new cells of mine, with that voltage level and load, they may even exceed capacity if I continued the discharge but with current bad utility and not smiling weather I don't want to risk that. grin

Once again let he who wants to do LFP go for it and he who wants to remain with lead acid do so as well plus all the "so called" premium version of the duo. However both should do so diligently.

Now make I pray for bright sunny day jare!!!

3 Likes

Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by wilmaria14: 9:30am On Oct 17, 2020
funshyboi:
Good evening guys,

I’m a little bit worried about my LifePo4 battery that last 5 hours when I Do charge it with electricity. But when I use solar panel it doesn’t last up to 2hours.

Even The controller shows It that That the panel stops charging battery at 95% Instead of it to be at 100%

kiekie1 eleojo23 wilmaria14 GeorgeD1 ceaser your vast experience and suggestions are needed.
what type of controller do u use MPPT or PWM
Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by chris81964(m): 9:46am On Oct 17, 2020
babniyen:
Good morning house, I am being offered considering a 100ah 24v Lithium battery as a replacement for my 24v 200ah Lead acid. I want to know if it will standup to the same service levels.. Thanks
You can discharge your Lithium to 90%. Your lead to 50%. If you followed the 50% formula for lead acid batteries then you are in a good place. 90 ah from Lithium vs 100 ah from your lead acid. The Lithium charges much faster and is more efficient. Lower internal resistance between cells. It is a no Brainer if you get a good quality battery

2 Likes

Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by Lovelynife(m): 10:47am On Oct 17, 2020
babniyen:
Good morning house, I am being offered considering a 100ah 24v Lithium battery as a replacement for my 24v 200ah Lead acid. I want to know if it will standup to the same service levels.. Thanks
location and pls how much are you offered for the 100ah 24v?
Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by NiyiOmoIyunade(m): 10:51am On Oct 17, 2020
Boss you quoted me say 'In most systems 100% DoD is not feasible' na. Surely there are exceptions.

Oga Dapsyra's cells look more like specialized, industrial grade product that you would see in aerospace or similar applications not a general comsumer battery

Even so, I am not sure he does 100% DoD on routine basis, it is simply poor design to max out your battery and let the BMS cutoff - the elegant way is to let the inverter neatly disconnect AC output at the preset LVD point and neatly resume AC supply once some charge has made it into the battery


ceaser:


@bolded
What about LTO that claims 100% DoD without significant negative impact on cycle life? cheesy

I think one of us here uses LTO. Dapsyra, I think. He does not come online here much. Him feeding peeps his experience too will not be bad.

2 Likes

Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by funshyboi(m): 12:38pm On Oct 17, 2020
wilmaria14:
what type of controller do u use MPPT or PWM
I’m using PWM
Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by funshyboi(m): 1:05pm On Oct 17, 2020
kiekie1:


Hello, I guess we've had a private chat few days ago .. I don't basically know the loads?
The make , origin & picture of your battery ?
Solar to pwm & pwm to battery guage ?
Are your mismatched panels brand new or refurbished? What're individual panel voltages on your DC meter ?

Yes we chatted but not on this issue
The main loads on the battery is 32 inches LG TV
Attached are the pictures of the battery And the connection with the PWM CC

Both voltage on the DC meter reads 18V

I got the 80 watts 3 weeks earlier than the 160w

1 Like

Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by babniyen(m): 1:30pm On Oct 17, 2020
420K
Lovelynife:

location and pls how much are you offered for the 100ah 24v?
Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by dapsyra(m): 1:46pm On Oct 17, 2020
You cannot only discharge LTO batteries to 100% DoD routinely without any damage, you can also discharge them to 0v without dire consequences. Some of my cell actually arrived at 0v sealed in a packet from the manufacturer. They were in storage for 10years before I bought them.

LTO batteries simply don't burst into flames no matter the abuse. It is the safest Lithium chemistry available today. It is superior to LFP.

I concur with Niyi that it is poor design to max out your battery capacity and rely on BMS to cutoff. I did 100% DOD a few times just to verify the true capacity of the batteries and they over performed on every occasion.

When many people do the Lithium Vs Lead Acid comparison, they leave out so many important factors. Coulombic Efficiency is one such factor.
Most Lithium batteries have Coulombic efficiency greater than 99% while that of Lead acid is about 85%. This implies that every time you cycle your lead acid battery, 15% of the energy is lost to battery inefficiency as against 1% loss in Lithium. This is real energy you could have used to power your home wasted by Pb batteries.

Another important factor is the charge C rate. Most lead acid batteries are rated at C10 or less. Lithium on the other hand can do 1C or higher. This become very important in Solar applications because of the limited sun hours available daily. You can easily over size your array to fully recharge the Lithium batteries in 1-2 hours. Try this with lead acid batteries and watch your battery become a heater.

You can also benefit from the high charge rate of Lithium batteries even if you rely on PHCN to recharge your battery. With adequate fast charger, you can easily recharge your Lithium battery within 1-2hours window when PHCN is available in your area. No need to run expensive generator.

Today's Lead Acid vs Lithium debate is similar to the Carburetor vs Injector and Automatic vs Manual transmission debate of late '80s and early '90.
The new vs the old. The old had never won and it will not in this instance also.

When people talk about the Lithium hype, I smile. It is not a hype; it is real! You need to experience Lithium to appreciate it. Some of the die hard Lead acid fans on this platform that eventually took the Lithium plunge can attest to this.

Ignore Lithium at your detriment.


NiyiOmoIyunade:
Boss you quoted me say 'In most systems 100% DoD is not feasible' na. Surely there are exceptions.

Oga Dapsyra's cells look more like specialized, industrial grade product that you would see in aerospace or similar applications not a general comsumer battery

Even so, I am not sure he does 100% DoD on routine basis, it is simply poor design to max out your battery and let the BMS cutoff - the elegant way is to let the inverter neatly disconnect AC output at the preset LVD point and neatly resume AC supply once some charge has made it into the battery


6 Likes 1 Share

Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by ojeysky(m): 3:22pm On Oct 17, 2020
These brand new 4 x 3.2v 280AH LFP cells are still available for grabs.

1 Like

Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by Lovelynife(m): 3:48pm On Oct 17, 2020
babniyen:
420K
Thanks. though it is above my budget now
Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by Lovelynife(m): 3:50pm On Oct 17, 2020
funshyboi:

Yes we chatted but not on this issue The main loads on the battery is 32 inches LG TV Attached are the pictures of the battery And the connection with the PWM CC
Both voltage on the DC meter reads 18V
I got the 80 watts 3 weeks earlier than the 160w
please,how much did you get the battery and where please?
Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by GeorgeD1(m): 4:37pm On Oct 17, 2020
funshyboi:
Good evening guys,

I’m a little bit worried about my LifePo4 battery that last 5 hours when I Do charge it with electricity. But when I use solar panel it doesn’t last up to 2hours.

Even The controller shows It that That the panel stops charging battery at 95% Instead of it to be at 100%

kiekie1 eleojo23 wilmaria14 GeorgeD1 ceaser your vast experience and suggestions are needed.

you got to check your cc settings. obviously your charge controller is not charging your batteries to full capacity hence
the sharp drop in back up hours as compared to when charged with public utility using your inverter charging
function. it could also be you may need to increase your solar array.
Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by GeorgeD1(m): 5:24pm On Oct 17, 2020
we could go on and on with the whole lithium vs lead acid debate but then what's the point?
what works, works and what doesn't work doesn't work. it's as simple as that.
on paper my 260ah zenith batteries were not supposed to last beyond 2yrs. or 4 at most (with careful usage).
but here i was using them for over 7yrs and at a point i even became confused as to whether they were
really lead acid or some other battery chemistry sold off mistakenly to me as such.
as for deception, i think if anyone is trying to deceive anybody it certainly wouldn't be the lead acid camp but
those on lithium. why would a company that has been in business over 50yrs like exide, hoppeke, trojan, etc
risk their reputation by putting a 15yrs label on a product they know would go bust under 3 or 4 years? that
would be suicidal to say the least. lithium on the other hand still remains a grey field and largely untested until
recently. so when you hear glowing number of promised cycles, better be cautious because nobody can really
show proof that it can live up to that.
lithium becomes a hype (in my opinion) when proponents try to play up its supposedly superior qualities
while downplaying the negatives. at least in this thread, i see a pattern emerging where it would seem like if
you're still using lead acid you're regarded as not sophisticated or not moving with the times. how wrong can
that be? no wonder someone is comparing lithium and lead acid to manual vs automatic cars! lolz
truth is that each battery chemistry have their place. depending on its application, none is superior to the other.
crucially, on a price to amp/hr basis and ease of deployment vs maintenance, lead acid wins hands down. it is the
reason why you won't find telecoms base stations or banks installing lithium (yet) as their primary battery banks.
they rather go for trusted and tested technology which don't need tinkering with before it can perform.
that said, nobody is ignoring lithium. far from it. personally i'm all for new technology, never against innovation.
i look forward to a time when lithium becomes mainstream just like lead acid. from li-ion to lifepo4 and now lito.
it can only get better. but anyone thinking lead acid will go away anytime soon better brace up and get ready
to be disappointed!

10 Likes

Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by earthrealm(m): 5:35pm On Oct 17, 2020
Interesting debate, lifepo4 and lead acid.
Serms this is a quarterly debate now, as awareness rises.

Am about to make a leap to lifepo4, and having been doing a ton of research.
Lifepo4 is a bit complex, i must confess, too many moving parts/failure points, the more i research, the more i see where many could be burnt badly, if they jump into lifepo4 without adequate knowledge..i hail those using lithuim without a bms.

I guess am old school, grin grin

3 Likes

Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by ojeysky(m): 6:12pm On Oct 17, 2020
earthrealm:
Interesting debate, lifepo4 and lead acid.
Serms this is a quarterly debate now, as awareness rises.

Am about to make a leap to lifepo4, and having been doing a ton of research.
Lifepo4 is a bit complex, i must confess, too many moving parts/failure points, the more i research, the more i see where many could be burnt badly, if they jump into lifepo4 without adequate knowledge..i hail those using lithuim without a bms.

I guess am old school, grin grin

Just curious what are they? Lead acid are coupled batteries as well, so If you decide to go for coupled lithium battery banks from trusted sources, those BYDs banks, or the "so called" premiums like plyontech, battle born etc how will there be point of failure. There will actually be lesser point of failure compare to what you will get in lead acid when you don't charge/discharge at certain C level.

However if you want to DIY, that is a different thing entirely and I will say it's much easier to DIY higher capacity prismatic cells. Imagine if you are to DIY the lead acid as well grin

That said, you should certainly go for what you will be comfortable with, lead acid is going no where as someone earlier hinted neither do I wish it does because it's continuous existence further make me find value in my LFP bank investment. tongue

1 Like

Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by wilmaria14: 7:30pm On Oct 17, 2020
GeorgeD1:
we could go on and on with the whole lithium vs lead acid debate but then what's the point?
what works, works and what doesn't work doesn't work. it's as simple as that.
on paper my 260ah zenith batteries were not supposed to last beyond 2yrs. or 4 at most (with careful usage).
but here i was using them for over 7yrs and at a point i even became confused as to whether they were
really lead acid or some other battery chemistry sold off mistakenly to me as such.
as for deception, i think if anyone is trying to deceive anybody it certainly wouldn't be the lead acid camp but
those on lithium. why would a company that has been in business over 50yrs like exide, hoppeke, trojan, etc
risk their reputation by putting a 15yrs label on a product they know would go bust under 3 or 4 years? that
would be suicidal to say the least. lithium on the other hand still remains a grey field and largely untested until
recently. so when you hear glowing number of promised cycles, better be cautious because nobody can really
show proof that it can live up to that.
lithium becomes a hype (in my opinion) when proponents try to play up its supposedly superior qualities
while downplaying the negatives. at least in this thread, i see a pattern emerging where it would seem like if
you're still using lead acid you're regarded as not sophisticated or not moving with the times. how wrong can
that be? no wonder someone is comparing lithium and lead acid to manual vs automatic cars! lolz
truth is that each battery chemistry have their place. depending on its application, none is superior to the other.
crucially, on a price to amp/hr basis and ease of deployment vs maintenance, lead acid wins hands down. it is the
reason why you won't find telecoms base stations or banks installing lithium (yet) as their primary battery banks.
they rather go for trusted and tested technology which don't need tinkering with before it can perform.
that said, nobody is ignoring lithium. far from it. personally i'm all for new technology, never against innovation.
i look forward to a time when lithium becomes mainstream just like lead acid. from li-ion to lifepo4 and now lito.
it can only get better. but anyone thinking lead acid will go away anytime soon better brace up and get ready
to be disappointed!
u killed it bro no more talk
Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by mctfopt: 8:23pm On Oct 17, 2020
funshyboi:


40 amps (480watts) is the size of the battery
The size of the panels are 160 and 80 ways connected in parallel

The type of inverter is attached in the picture

Mainly the load I connected to my system are just one 32inches LG TV and 2 phones charging simultaneously

Thanks as I await your response

I can see my ogas at the top has already done justice to this issue. cool
Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by funshyboi(m): 9:40pm On Oct 17, 2020
Lovelynife:

please,how much did you get the battery and where please?
Someone dashed it off to me 9 years back
Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by funshyboi(m): 9:43pm On Oct 17, 2020
GeorgeD1:


you got to check your cc settings. obviously your charge controller is not charging your batteries to full capacity hence
the sharp drop in back up hours as compared to when charged with public utility using your inverter charging
function. it could also be you may need to increase your solar array.
Thank you the issue with the controller is it has only 3 buttons and it doesn’t seems to me like it’s working cos I keep pressing them and nothing is showing.

Ps
The controller shows 100% after 2-3 hours of charging maybe I will contact the seller again
Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by ceaser: 4:56am On Oct 18, 2020
Abdomox:


Please help with his contact. Thanks

It's the same as Ojeysky's. We had the same supplier.

1 Like

Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by ceaser: 5:05am On Oct 18, 2020
dapsyra:
You cannot only discharge LTO batteries to 100% DoD routinely without any damage, you can also discharge them to 0v without dire consequences. Some of my cell actually arrived at 0v sealed in a packet from the manufacturer. They were in storage for 10years before I bought them.

LTO batteries simply don't burst into flames no matter the abuse. It is the safest Lithium chemistry available today. It is superior to LFP.

I concur with Niyi that it is poor design to max out your battery capacity and rely on BMS to cutoff. I did 100% DOD a few times just to verify the true capacity of the batteries and they over performed on every occasion.

When many people do the Lithium Vs Lead Acid comparison, they leave out so many important factors. Coulombic Efficiency is one such factor.
Most Lithium batteries have Coulombic efficiency greater than 99% while that of Lead acid is about 85%. This implies that every time you cycle your lead acid battery, 15% of the energy is lost to battery inefficiency as against 1% loss in Lithium. This is real energy you could have used to power your home wasted by Pb batteries.

Another important factor is the charge C rate. Most lead acid batteries are rated at C10 or less. Lithium on the other hand can do 1C or higher. This become very important in Solar applications because of the limited sun hours available daily. You can easily over size your array to fully recharge the Lithium batteries in 1-2 hours. Try this with lead acid batteries and watch your battery become a heater.

You can also benefit from the high charge rate of Lithium batteries even if you rely on PHCN to recharge your battery. With adequate fast charger, you can easily recharge your Lithium battery within 1-2hours window when PHCN is available in your area. No need to run expensive generator.

Today's Lead Acid vs Lithium debate is similar to the Carburetor vs Injector and Automatic vs Manual transmission debate of late '80s and early '90.
The new vs the old. The old had never won and it will not in this instance also.

When people talk about the Lithium hype, I smile. It is not a hype; it is real! You need to experience Lithium to appreciate it. Some of the die hard Lead acid fans on this platform that eventually took the Lithium plunge can attest to this.

Ignore Lithium at your detriment.



Gbam! The LTO man has spoken. cheesy

1 Like

Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by ceaser: 5:21am On Oct 18, 2020
funshyboi:

Someone dashed it off to me 9 years back
Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by ceaser: 5:31am On Oct 18, 2020
funshyboi:

Someone dashed it off to me 9 years back

Aside GeorgeD1's Zenith outlier LA battery dashed out after 7 years of faithful service, is there any other LA user here that still sustains on 9 years used and passed on storage?

Meanwhile one of the 18/65/0 packs I have lying around says 2003 as production date (I think it's one of those that were used by INEC at the heydays of Nigeria's 4th Republic). The 333kw box still drives a laptop for 7 hours.

funshyboi:

Thank you the issue with the controller is it has only 3 buttons and it doesn’t seems to me like it’s working cos I keep pressing them and nothing is showing.

Clearly you've not referred to the manual else you'd have known the operation of the buttons. Or maybe it's one of those Chinese to English translation manual where you'll not even understand what they are trying to instruct you to do.

But I'll hazard a guess. You got no response cos you keep "short-pressing" the buttons.

Those 3 buttons are likely to be "menu", "up/+" and "down/-ve" function.

You may need to long-press the "menu" button for 3secs, 4secs, 5secs (depending on your device) to enter the menu. Then use the up and down buttons to select your values/function.

You may need to short-press/long-press the menu button again to register the value(s) you've chosen.

Ps
The controller shows 100% after 2-3 hours of charging maybe I will contact the seller again

This does not automatically imply the CC is faulty. A setting of 13.4v float will show 100% when the set voltage is attained. Same goes for a setting of 14.4v. Understand the CC operation properly first before concluding if it's defective or not.

GeorgeD1:


you got to check your cc settings. obviously your charge controller is not charging your batteries to full capacity hence
the sharp drop in back up hours as compared to when charged with public utility using your inverter charging
function. it could also be you may need to increase your solar array.

Note GeorgeD1's points.

2 Likes

Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by zeestone99(m): 7:05am On Oct 18, 2020
Hello house
I have 5 units brand new Ha02 battery balancers
Price - 24k ( slightly negotiable)

Call - 08117398294
Chat - http:///2348117398294

1 Share

Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by zeestone99(m): 7:08am On Oct 18, 2020
dapsyra:
You cannot only discharge LTO batteries to 100% DoD routinely without any damage, you can also discharge them to 0v without dire consequences. Some of my cell actually arrived at 0v sealed in a packet from the manufacturer. They were in storage for 10years before I bought them.

LTO batteries simply don't burst into flames no matter the abuse. It is the safest Lithium chemistry available today. It is superior to LFP.

I concur with Niyi that it is poor design to max out your battery capacity and rely on BMS to cutoff. I did 100% DOD a few times just to verify the true capacity of the batteries and they over performed on every occasion.

When many people do the Lithium Vs Lead Acid comparison, they leave out so many important factors. Coulombic Efficiency is one such factor.
Most Lithium batteries have Coulombic efficiency greater than 99% while that of Lead acid is about 85%. This implies that every time you cycle your lead acid battery, 15% of the energy is lost to battery inefficiency as against 1% loss in Lithium. This is real energy you could have used to power your home wasted by Pb batteries.

Another important factor is the charge C rate. Most lead acid batteries are rated at C10 or less. Lithium on the other hand can do 1C or higher. This become very important in Solar applications because of the limited sun hours available daily. You can easily over size your array to fully recharge the Lithium batteries in 1-2 hours. Try this with lead acid batteries and watch your battery become a heater.

You can also benefit from the high charge rate of Lithium batteries even if you rely on PHCN to recharge your battery. With adequate fast charger, you can easily recharge your Lithium battery within 1-2hours window when PHCN is available in your area. No need to run expensive generator.

Today's Lead Acid vs Lithium debate is similar to the Carburetor vs Injector and Automatic vs Manual transmission debate of late '80s and early '90.
The new vs the old. The old had never won and it will not in this instance also.

When people talk about the Lithium hype, I smile. It is not a hype; it is real! You need to experience Lithium to appreciate it. Some of the die hard Lead acid fans on this platform that eventually took the Lithium plunge can attest to this.

Ignore Lithium at your detriment.



My oga let me come I join you use this beast... I might need to sell half kidney, can't afford to sell full one. grin
Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by funshyboi(m): 7:46am On Oct 18, 2020
N
Re: Solar Energy, A Complement To FTA by funshyboi(m): 7:48am On Oct 18, 2020
ceaser:



Yes you’re right it’s those INEC battery and possibly it lasted because I’ve been charging it with electricity and using it for just laptops until now
Trust me I’ve gone tru the manual times without number the English there is not explanatory at all.

I’ve long pressed the buttons too but maybe I will still do for a longer time Again

Please can I inbox you?

(1) (2) (3) ... (871) (872) (873) (874) (875) (876) (877) ... (1698) (Reply)

FTA Live Football Matches Announcement Thread / Free To Air Satellite Tv General Thread

Viewing this topic: Jordifoote, mahkanjuh, Janyves(m)

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 133
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.