I have always wonder about this for a while now and like to get opinion from nairalanders. They say men demand sex for financial favours, Is it possible for ladies to role with men without demanding financial favour?

Dong2:
I have always wonder about this for a while now and like to get opinion from nairalanders. They say men demand sex for financial favours, Is it possible for ladies to role with men without demanding financial favour?

Yes. Red pill authors like Rollo Tomassi wrote reams on transactional (purchased) sex vs validational (desire) sex in his 3 part book; The Rational Male.. You can read up on it.

Basically, women do have validational sex, but never in the long term; only until they realise that the relationship with that 'bad boy' is never going to become transactional. This is because they are naturally hardwired to give up sex for long term material comfort. Of course, this does not mean that they cannot occasionally be persuaded to foray back into the realm of validational sex every once in a while (especially when they're ovulating). This is because they are also hardwired to breed only with the most dominant survivalist males (that 'bad boy' again). In times past, the alpha hunter was also the best provider, so a woman could have validational and transactional sex at the same time. Nowadays, with obese investment bankers and timid stockbrokers being the best providers, women are forced to choose between validational and transactional sex. Because they have no real desire for their husbands, they go back to their drifter exes in dingy motel rooms every time the urge to breed hits them. This is what redpillers refer to as "alpha bleeps/beta bucks".

But the redpillers are wrong in thinking that a man cannot be an alpha and still provide for his woman at the same time, thereby satisfying her requirements for both types of sex. That is precisely how our forefathers lived in harmony with their women and adultery/paternity fraud was almost unthinkable then. The modern man has to find that middle path once more.

RisenPhoenix1:


Yes. Red pill authors like Rollo Tomassi wrote reams on transactional (purchased) sex vs validational (desire) sex in his 3 part book; The Rational Male.. You can read up on it.

Basically, women do have validational sex, but never in the long term; only until they realise that the relationship with that 'bad boy' is never going to become transactional. This is because they are naturally hardwired to give up sex for long term material comfort. Of course, this does not mean that they cannot occasionally be persuaded to foray back into the realm of validational sex every once in a while (especially when they're ovulating). This is because they are also hardwired to breed only with the most dominant survivalist males (that 'bad boy' again). In times past, the alpha hunter was also the best provider, so a woman could have validational and transactional sex at the same time. Nowadays, with obese investment bankers and timid stockbrokers being the best providers, women are forced to choose between validational and transactional sex. Because they have no real desire for their husbands, they go back to their drifter exes in dingy motel rooms every time the urge to breed hits them. This is what redpillers refer to as "alpha bleeps/beta bucks".

But the redpillers are wrong in thinking that a man cannot be an alpha and still provide for his woman at the same time, thereby satisfying her requirements for both types of sex. That is precisely how our forefathers lived in harmony with their women and adultery/paternity fraud was almost unthinkable then. The modern man has to find that middle path once more.

That middle path is, Going where you are celebrated.

Regex:


That middle path is, Going where you are celebrated.

More like learn how to make others celebrate you wherever you go

RisenPhoenix1:


More like learn how to make others celebrate you wherever you go

This is even better.