kahal29:


Let the issuing authority come forward and give evidence in court and this matter will be settled once and for all. Issuing press releases or going to press to curry sympathy won't be of any significant help.

They will definitely come to court when the defendant (Obaseki) open his defence, when the need arises, but I see the case ending at "no case submission".

Something tells me the "prof" certificate is the forged one, that is while he don't want to dropped his original with the court. By the way, how did he know the original when he doesn't work with the issuing institution? If APC was unable to produce any witness from UI, then they don't have any valid argument. Just like the case of Dino Malaye.

Dansuqi:


The defence won't call any witness from what am seeing,they will only be cross examining

Let's see how it goes. But I feel they should call a witness from UI and maybe inec.

kahal29:


Let the issuing authority come forward and give evidence in court and this matter will be settled once and for all. Issuing press releases or going to press to curry sympathy won't be of any significant help.

I wasn’t going to comment before but you got my attention!

Most of these sympathetic fellows here don’t know that press release isn’t enough for this case on ground moreover anybody anywhere could say something to massage his/her ego.

So not until the institution come to the court to give evidences on how someone with two credits was given admission into a premier university and the discrepancies in issuing of their certificates this case won’t be settled.

moodyguy:
So if u had a degree result to tender would u just trash it to the bin.For history sake I bet u wud tender it.

You only tender the minimum requirement UNLESS YOU ARE SURE the higher qualifications will stand up to scrutiny. ALL the cases of certificates in court are based on degrees and WAEC. Yet you dont need both to contest for office and I'm sure every body went to primary school which is the minimum requirement. Bayelsa APC candidate won an election and was disqualified because of oversabi. If all he tendered was his primary school leaving certificate, he will be governor now.

Don27tiky:
hope u told bayelsa and zamfara people to also defend their mandate then.I know ur interest though

Zamfara and Balyasa Judgments were according to the law of our electorial act. Have you seen the reason given for the imo judgment?? That INEC and pdp should produce "original" result in the disputed area even when inec said there was no election and other parties agent did not sign the result shit!! The judgment was based solely on what Hope wanted and the judges disregarded the electorial act!! In Zamfara, it was APC internal rancor that gifted pdp the victory. Apc decided to ignore it own law because Adams wanted to "show" himself. Leave sentiment and don't be a zombified person.

ogmask:


Let's see how it goes. But I feel they should call a witness from UI and maybe inec.

Calling a witness from ui will worsen their case further.apc called a witness from inec and pdp really attacked him

Harrynight:
Where was all dis idiiot wen this guy contested the first election, won and he was decleared Winner?


Btw, they should channel these same energy to dethrone a president who doesn't have ordinary WAEC

In politics, the more u look the less u see, don't bother yourself on them, they know their secrets, the people that took him to court knows what we don't know, relax, the day will soon break for either of the parties, don't forget PDP=APC, is only gullible followers I pity

Kindledlight:


I wasn’t going to comment before but you got my attention!

Most of these sympathetic fellows here don’t know that press release isn’t enough for this case on ground moreover anybody anywhere could say something to massage his/her ego.

So not until the institution come to the court to give evidences on how someone with two credits was given admission into a premier university and the discrepancies in issuing of their certificates this case won’t be settled.

My brother,you are too much.most of those commenting here are doing so based on sentiments.the press release has no bearing on the case except pdp tenders it in court and demonstrate how it affects the case.see atiku vs buhari supra 2019 per JSC tanko...
Pdp must also bring an official from ui who will not only affirm it but must demonstrate the authenticity of the cert.see uzodinma vs ihedioha anor supra 2020.by the way,pdp bringing a ui authority is dicey as it may compound the case.from the way pdp objected and attacked the inec official who tendered documents for apc,I dont think pdp will bring anyone from ui.

Finally,as it stands,apc has the advantage.they have established three solid evidences proving forgery.they have established the burden of proof and it has swung over to pdp just like in imo.if pdo does not disprove it,obaseki is gone.cc fergie,kahal,adegborogbaye,aaa569,moody,ogmask,ejimatic

Awoo88:

Zamfara and Balyasa Judgments were according to the law of our electorial act. Have you seen the reason given for the imo judgment?? That INEC and pdp should produce "original" result in the disputed area even when inec said there was no election and other parties agent did not sign the result shit!! The judgment was based solely on what Hope wanted and the judges disregarded the electorial act!! In Zamfara, it was APC internal rancor that gifted pdp the victory. Apc decided to ignore it own law because Adams wanted to "show" himself. Leave sentiment and don't be a zombified person.

You lie sir.if pdp did not go to court in bayelsa and zamfara,will they not be in power? Why are you pdp guys angry with apc going to court? Do you realize that the accusations against obaseki borders on the electoral act also and if he is found guilty,he goes.this obaseki case is almost like that of bayelsa...

Now,the imo judgment was according to the electoral act.that very precedent started in 1983 between the case of ajasin vs omoboriowo.ihedioha and inec's lawyers actually betrayed the case,they misunderstood the case.uzodinma simply went to court saying that results in some units where he won were ignored and not added.he never talked about whether there was election there or not.he was talking about collation.inec and pdp were supposed to argue based on that,produce original copies or rubbish the duplicate result sheets uzodinma provided.they didn't.instead they were busy talking about elections being held which was not what was before the court.infact,no evidence was provided to counter uzodinma's own.so what do you expect the court to do apart from ruling in his favour? If I take you to court claiming that you burgled my house and instead of you defending yourself based on burgling,you are basing on defence on me always womanizing,how will I not win you?

Dansuqi:


?

How did i lied to you?? Did you get the part where the judges ignored the fact that election was canceled because of over voting? If elections were canceled, there should not be any result. But the judges ignored the inec power to declared and only considered the prayer of Hope. Knowing fully well they messed up, they refuse to reconsidered the case. And don't talk about SC not be allowed to review itself because they did against in the case of Obi VS INEC and PDP.
If you don't have a house, you going to court to seek redress against burglary should return a no case submission. You should be fined for wasting the court's time. That Imo judgement will defined Tanko,s legacy. And he is very aware of it. If elections were canceled by the body saddle with the responsibility of conducting elections because part of the electoral act faulted the process, it is criminal for any judge to ignore INEC
Please note, anybody with grievance can approach the court. The court have not right to give private interpretation to an ACT that has become law through the legislation.

Awoo88:

How did i lied to you?? Did you get the part where the judges ignored the fact that election was canceled because of over voting? If elections were canceled, there should not be any result. But the judges ignored the inec power to declared and only considered the prayer of Hope. Knowing fully well they messed up, they refuse to reconsidered the case. And don't talk about SC not be allowed to review itself because they did against in the case of Obi VS INEC and PDP.
If you don't have a house, you going to court to seek redress against burglary should return a no case submission. You should be fined for wasting the court's time. That Imo judgement will defined Tanko,s legacy. And he is very aware of it.

You are still not getting it.the case brought to the court was wrongful computation of result and all parties were bounded by that.over voting,no election or whatever happened during the election is not part of the petition.ihedioha was bound to abide by issues raised by uzodinma and not bring new issues except in a cross petition which he never did.now,only presiding officers can cancel results and once results have been declared,it cannot be canceled.uzodinma clearly took advantage of that.he produced duplicate result sheets,inec could not produce the original.in the eyes of the law,once result sheets which are filled are produced,it is taken that elections held automatically and in the absence of the original,the duplicates will be accepted and the police also produced their copies which finished the matter.inec failed to convincingly thwart the duplicate copies.they were busy talking out of point....

Now,according to the electoral act,wrongful collation is different from normal challenging of election.the standard of proof of wrongful collation includes producing copies if the result sheets and that of the police.it does not involve over voting and other nonsense inec was talking about.inec treated the case as if it was the normal call for election cancellation which is not...


Tanko is a good cjn,just that a lot of people misunderstand him.the man is objective and rigid.he has done well.



Let me make the case simple for you.both ihedioha and uzodinma rigged massively but inec accepted that of ihedioha and rejected that of uzodinma but the court accepted uzodinma which is higher than that of ihedioha.so what is the issue here?

post=97574237:

Fine boy of Nairaland,
Take a look at the year 'Bubu' completed his Masters in Pennsylvania in America,
Were you born then kiddo?
Oshisko!

Wailers, continue asking for his WAEC certificate......

Brigadier-General Muhammadu Buhari with the Commandant of the United States Army War College, Carlisle, Pennsylvania, Major-General DeWitt C. Smith, on completion of his Masters degree in Strategic Studies, class of 1980.

Happy viewing!

You are not correct my friend. PMB never claimed that he has a Master Degree from USA becos the American War College as at then was not conducting such course. It was just a few years ago that it started conducting an equivalent degree. Beside, our Presido never filled such certificate in Inec form. Be guided pls.

Odidigboigbo:
They will definitely come to court when the defendant (Obaseki) open his defence, when the need arises, but I see the case ending at "no case submission".

Boss, do you know the meaning of no case submission and how it works?
If you don't, the defense team would have entered such, since pleading as been exchanged.

Dansuqi:


You are not getting it.apc presented him to bring his certificate since he graduated same year and same dept with obaseki and his degree and that of obaseki have clear differences.how come? If someone from ui is brought to court,he will complicate matters for obaseki

Same year but not the same department. The Prof read Agric Economics while the Gov. read Classical Studies. How did both of them graduated from the same department?

joefelin2345:
Same year but not the same department. The Prof read Agric Economics while the Gov. read Classical Studies. How did both of them graduated from the same department?

Mistake but all the certs should be the same except for names,class and course

Awoo88:

Zamfara and Balyasa Judgments were according to the law of our electorial act. Have you seen the reason given for the imo judgment?? That INEC and pdp should produce "original" result in the disputed area even when inec said there was no election and other parties agent did not sign the result shit!! The judgment was based solely on what Hope wanted and the judges disregarded the electorial act!! In Zamfara, it was APC internal rancor that gifted pdp the victory. Apc decided to ignore it own law because Adams wanted to "show" himself. Leave sentiment and don't be a zombified person.

I don't care about any of that cos I don't see any benefit any of that to us. I am only concern about ur biased comment