₦airaland Forum

Confirmedzombie:
Im reporting live from the court. Im inside court sir

post photos as evidence

Dansuqi:
It is expected

there's no way in hell obaseki will survive today.

The first ruling favoured obasike but with the way the judge is going I fear the major ruling won't favour obasike.

Fingers crossed.

Reporting live from court

Igbosmoker:
post photos as evidence

Phone not allowed, typing secretly sir

Igbosmoker:
there's no way in hell obaseki will survive today.

Up obaseki

Confirmedzombie:
Phone not allowed, typing secretly sir

thank you bro, more updates please

The judge giving a recap of the testimonies, says the plaintiffs called six witnesses:

First plaintiffs’ witness, Edoba Omoregie, had testified that Governor Obaseki submitted false or forged certificate which he claimed to have obtained from the University of Ibadan in 1979.

Mr Omoregie, a professor, said that the certificate submitted to INEC for the purposes of the September 2020 was without a date of issuance and signature of the registrar. He said the certificate presented by the governor for the 2020 election was different from the one he submitted to INEC when he contested the earlier 2016 election for his first term in office.

He said Mr. Obaseki lied under oath and submitted false or forged certificate to INEC.

The second plaintiffs’ witness, Samuel Omale, an employee and legal officer of INEC, tendered Mr Obaseki’s Form EC9 submitted INEC ahead of the 2020 election.

He said he was not part of INEC team that received documents for the purposes of the election.

Categories: Featured, Politics

Confirmedzombie:
The first ruling favoured obasike but with the way the judge is going I fear the major ruling won't favour obasike.

Fingers crossed.

Reporting live from court

What was the first ruling on?

Confirmedzombie:
Phone not allowed, typing secretly sir

lmao lie kee you there

Confirmedzombie:
The first ruling favoured obasike but with the way the judge is going I fear the major ruling won't favour obasike.

Fingers crossed.

Reporting live from court

Waiting for the final report

Dansuqi:
What is actually happening

Omo the judge the go the side of obaseki, he may likely win

Igbosmoker:
there's no way in hell obaseki will survive today.

Lol....... Obaseki collect ur woman?

Igbosmoker:
The judge giving a recap of the testimonies, says the plaintiffs called six witnesses:

First plaintiffs’ witness, Edoba Omoregie, had testified that Governor Obaseki submitted false or forged certificate which he claimed to have obtained from the University of Ibadan in 1979.

Mr Omoregie, a professor, said that the certificate submitted to INEC for the purposes of the September 2020 was without a date of issuance and signature of the registrar. He said the certificate presented by the governor for the 2020 election was different from the one he submitted to INEC when he contested the earlier 2016 election for his first term in office.

He said Mr. Obaseki lied under oath and submitted false or forged certificate to INEC.

The second plaintiffs’ witness, Samuel Omale, an employee and legal officer of INEC, tendered Mr Obaseki’s Form EC9 submitted INEC ahead of the 2020 election.

He said he was not part of INEC team that received documents for the purposes of the election.

Categories: Featured, Politics

Source? That means his judgment will begin from 3

Dansuqi

I told you the court will look at 2016 election.

Igbosmoker:
Dansuqi

I told you the court will look at 2016 election.

Wetin happen?

Dansuqi:
Wetin happen?

look at the write-up I dropped

Igbosmoker:
The judge giving a recap of the testimonies, says the plaintiffs called six witnesses:

First plaintiffs’ witness, Edoba Omoregie, had testified that Governor Obaseki submitted false or forged certificate which he claimed to have obtained from the University of Ibadan in 1979.

Mr Omoregie, a professor, said that the certificate submitted to INEC for the purposes of the September 2020 was without a date of issuance and signature of the registrar. He said the certificate presented by the governor for the 2020 election was different from the one he submitted to INEC when he contested the earlier 2016 election for his first term in office.

He said Mr. Obaseki lied under oath and submitted false or forged certificate to INEC.

The second plaintiffs’ witness, Samuel Omale, an employee and legal officer of INEC, tendered Mr Obaseki’s Form EC9 submitted INEC ahead of the 2020 election.

He said he was not part of INEC team that received documents for the purposes of the election.

Categories: Featured, Politics

Credit: premium times

Confirmedzombie:
Im reporting live from the court. Im inside court sir

How did you get inside? Are you a counsel? Where is fergie and kahal

Dansuqi:
How did you get inside? Are you a counsel? Where is fergie and kahal

I am present. The guy is right, the judge in his first ruling on eligibility ruled in favour of Obaseki

The judge including 2016 election documents as well as the claim of the company obasike worked of which obaseki didnt bring a witness to defend the claim.

I think this judge has been bribed. Why bring in 2016 election into this matter.

Only God can save obaseki today as his defense was really a weak one.

More details coming.

Live from court reporting

kahal29:
I am present. The guy is right, the judge in his first ruling on eligibility ruled in favour of Obaseki

Very eligible!

kahal29:
I am present. The guy is right, the judge in his first ruling on eligibility ruled in favour of Obaseki

Eligibility how? Did apc question his eligibility

Confirmedzombie:
The judge including 2016 election documents as well as the claim of the company obasike worked of which obaseki didnt bring a witness to defend the claim.

I think this judge has been bribed. Why bring in 2016 election into this matter.

Only God can save obaseki today as his defense was really a weak one.

More details coming.

Live from court reporting

He wasn't bribed.apc presented documentary evidence about the 2016 case as presented by pw5

Confirmedzombie:
The judge including 2016 election documents as well as the claim of the company obasike worked of which obaseki didnt bring a witness to defend the claim.

I think this judge has been bribed. Why bring in 2016 election into this matter.

Only God can save obaseki today as his defense was really a weak one.

More details coming.

Live from court reporting

Those documents were among the 17 documents that were submitted by the plaintiffs. They were part of their documentary evidence. I knew the judge would look at them.

Confirmedzombie:
The judge including 2016 election documents as well as the claim of the company obasike worked of which obaseki didnt bring a witness to defend the claim.

I think this judge has been bribed. Why bring in 2016 election into this matter.

Only God can save obaseki today as his defense was really a weak one.

More details coming.

Live from court reporting

I nor tell una. I tell una now.

How can someone graduate in two different years from the same school, same course.

Oya start bringing excuse. So you want judge to turn a blind eye abi?

Dansuqi:
He wasn't bribed.apc presented documentary evidence about the 2016 case as presented by pw5

I heard APC summited over 5 cases to court and obaseki only defended one with just 3 witness

It's written in inec form.

Have you summited a forged or fraudulent certificate before? Yes or no.

Obaseki bye bye

I told y'all obaseki delay tactics will backfire, apc really came prepared.

How can you defend a case like that with 3 witness lmao

Igbosmoker:
It's written in inec form.

Have you summited a forged or fraudulent certificate before? Yes or no.

Obaseki bye bye

Na u ask or na d judge?

With what I've read here so far,it looks like perjury will be the nail on Obaseki. The judge seems to be so interested in the 2016 issue and he didn't do much to defend that area.