₦airaland Forum

newbornmacho:
Kai! You no dey sleep? Make you no die on top this kanu matter oo

Don't mind him. This is what enemies do: they will be peeping through their window when a harmless innocent man is passing. They will be there squirming and tearing their clothes in hatred while the innocent man is going on his own oblivious of his enemies' travails.

More picture.

Knife massages are drawing hard-core spa enthusiasts to have cleavers chopped across their faces and bodies in a bizarre new wellness trend.

The cutting edge craze sees customers 'relaxing' as sharpened cleavers are pressed in rhythmic motions all over them - with nothing but a thin piece of material separating their skin from the blade.
Hsiao Mei Fang, the owner of Ancient Art Of Knife Therapy Education Centre, in Taipei, Taiwan, has been performing the strange procedure for more than 13 years.
She said: 'The treatment is originally from China and is 2500 years old. But here we have created an original new knife therapy.
'Everything has a Yin and a Yang, so instead of using one knife we use two - this represents the Yin and Yang.'..

Copyright：This content comes from dailymail

pyyxxaro:
See as the bweeast stand like say wen she comot her old bra, e go still stand

Bweast when don flat like fried egg

Savagery!
Who told you fried egg must be flat.

fresherdanU:
she does that to enhance the shape of her curves and make it obvious.
you can try it too.

its therapeutic.

You say it's Thera what?

Op can lie for Africa.

eagleeye2:
Ok Sir.
In practice, I will love to see how many landlords saying I am wrong.

Trust me, most of the things done by landlords can't scale through the legitimacy test in any court. They only bank on the ignorance of tenants. That's why most of them do not want lawyer-tenants.

The people holding the country to ransom are known. The people preventing Nigeria from moving forward are known. We must do something about it otherwise we will remain where we are.

eagleeye2:
Mr lawyer, have you ever thought of why quit notice reads from say; 1st of May to 31st October? And not 14th of May to 13th of October.
The same rule that applies in counting the duration of tenancy from 1st of the month (1st of January) to the 31st of the 12th month (31st December), applies in quit notices.

With due respect, you are wrong. Different rules apply to duration of tenancy and notice to quit.

A yearly tenancy must be for a duration of 365 days ( or 366 as the case may be). Anything less than that cannot be regarded as a yearly tenancy in law.

Mynd44:
The OP refers to when the rent starts to count from the first day of the month (I think)

In this case, your receipt will most likely say "July 2015 to June 2016" which is valid. Cos July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016 is one year. Saying it should be "July 2017 to July 2018" is wrong as that can be assumed to be the end of July eg. If the rent is paid July 14. You dont expect the landlord to give you through July 31 do you?

If the yearly rent was paid In January 1st, your receipt will read "Rent from January to December 2017"

As regards to the reference on birthday. If you were born March 1st, a year runs through to February 28/29 not March 1st. March 1st marks the start of a new year.

Bros, are you a lawyer? Your reasoning is so sound and logical. Nice.

That number 3 is crazy. You must vote but it must be for the same person. Crazy. Crazy I tell you.

This golden brown gown again?

After filling up all the strategic offices with their people. No froblem.

Seriously?

Onyoshi.

Observing. In the kneseth.

Seen. Next!

See the change I've been waiting for...
Humble Smith

Abeg make una spell Michael Jackson's name well.

Lol.

I want some.

You can't put this possibility past the northern cabal. In fact, it's the kind of thing they are more likely to do than not.

Op, you too like bwest.

Terribly sacrilegious things we condone and tolerate from pastors. Even those whose silence emboldens the excesses of these pastors, and thereby allow the name of God to be made a mockery of, will not be spared from the wrath of God to come.

laudate:
See another long epistle from this twerp that is stylishly begging me to cite a case, so he can get a free tutorial. How many times must I tell you to get off my mentions? Or can't you understand English anymore? Your incoherent ramblings mean nothing to me. Relate whatever cases you want to yourself. It does not make you any less empty, than you already are. Everyone on this board can read your meaningless rhetoric. Now buzz off!

Please now. Just one case.

laudate:
Prove what? Were you on planet Mars, when I cited Article 46 of the UN Protocol on Indigenous Persons to you? Were you on planet Jupiter, when I told you what the ICJ relied upon in order to arrive at its ruling, in the Nigeria vs. Cameroun case concerning the ownership of Bakassi? Apart from that, there are several other threads on NL, which I have contributed to, in areas that deal with international law. I do not have time to school you, or bring you up to speed in those areas in which you are deficient. I told you a while ago to get off my mentions, but instead of doing that, you are still here begging me for a tutorial. Receive sense, abeg!

I believe it takes more effort to embark on your ego massage than doing the needful. Anyone, especially in Nigeria, can access the judgemental of ICJ on the Cameroun case due to different things it represents (particularly a reminder of the consequences of putting your worst foot forward in contests). As for the UN Charters, all you need is to browse the net and you will find whatever you need; anyone can do any of that. Even school children, youths in religious enclaves are taught these things these and as can cite articles in UN Charters. I don't even want to mention historian journalists like you whose job requires smattering knowledge of relevant UN Charters or the Cameroun case.

The only point of difference between these groups and those schooled in the art of the law is the ability to relate with CASES (plural and not singular).

Just give us a case and you are here blabbing about your Nairaland achievements as if Nairaland has some academic rating. If you are grounded on the subject, just give us ONE case as requested (there are tons of such cases). And to indulge you further, you may wish to provide a link to your Nairaland post where you treated an issue on self determination wherein you cited a case to back your argument

laudate:
This comment you made has just exposed how empty you are. In fact, your emptiness is 'irremediable.' You cited a case, but when reference was made to that case, you digressed and started rambling. You were even asked to questions pertaining to the ruling on that case, but you dodged the question and started perambulating. Now you are claiming you cited cases! You are just a wasted comedian. Oya, continue entertaining us with your incoherent ramblings. You want people to think you are knowledgeable, meanwhile you are empty as a zero. You are NL's online clown....

Nwokem, put your money where your mouth is. Prove your so-called mettle in international law by citing a case on the principles of the place of domestic legislative instruments in international obligations and basic human rights. You are there calling me a clown as if being a clown is degrading. Shut up there, my friend. Shameless noisemaking impostor. Just provide something tangible to back your claims and you are here yakking nonsense.

My friend, kobinua. Shut your mouth

But this same Adeosun was there when Buhari wanted to borrow over 30 billion dollars to rebuild North East. Only God saved us through the house of Senate.

Behold the disciples and followers of Barack Obama.

laudate:
Look at this clown. You keep proving me right, with each comment you make. Now continue entertaining everyone here with your rants. Don't stop...

Oga, if you have the faintest idea what you are arguing about as you claim, tell us another case on the subject. I earlier on gave us two. Show us your international law prowess and give us a case on international law other than the one I'd given. I am not even asking you for the facts or a narrative of the issues in the case. Just the name of the case.

If you don't do that then your case is irremediable.

laudate:
Didn't I tell you before that the more comments you make, the more you allow us to see that our mind is actually empty? Didn't I also tell you that you are only good for nothing, except to provide entertainment? You just proved it. Oya, resume your ranting....and continue the show.

Didn't I this, didn't I that. You always prove true to type - only good at asking questions like the historian journalist you're. It's only emptiness and inability to discern that compel people of your ilk to be obsessed with endless questions. And to make matters worse, they won't even recognize the answers when they are proffered.

Nnamikot.

laudate:
Anuofia! The reenactment you could NOT provide several pages back, when you were asked to do so? The reenactment of the ICJ ruling, that you dodged before deciding to take refuge in banalities, when you were asked to substantiate your views? See this efulefu!

You thought I would indulge your lack of substance and perpetuate your shortcut sensibilities. Tell me, of what use will it be for me to refer you to authorities on a subject and then turn round to tell you exactly what I expected you to gain from the referred material. People like you have the habit of asking their teachers to help them in solving assignments.

It's not surprising, after all you like to be spoon fed.

Osochiegbu like you.

laudate:
Oh dear, you are still here ranting and showing us how shallow your mind is. Please continue... keep providing us with good entertainment! Daalu zi!

Are you leaving? You don't want a reenactment of the facts and issues in the Cameroun case anymore?

Ojele.