₦airaland Forum

DIVINEEVIDENCE:
Those who sent the N10 are not complaining and don't care whether it aggregates to 100 billion in his account.

They are only interested in passing their message across and if the weyrey professor thinks he just struck gold by this development, he should ask Judas Iscariot how far.

Chivisee:
Where is the erro? Obi and his people think it’s this okpa way they do opposition. He needs to go learn.

Smithofawka:
Enemies of the East will attack this post.

aworatak:
Keep barking louder.
It's your stock in trade.
You have reduced yourself into a laughing stock and a comedy relief.
The funniest part is that the person you claim to have made governor have since moved on.

Omoboricash:
Among the three you mentioned, it was only Obi that his name was mentioned i. Pandora paper. He was only one that paid 250 million naira cash to contractor.

Atiku boss described the kind of person Atiku is during his tenure as vice president .

He Atiku also agreed and apologised to nigeria for selling nigeria assest as peanut

Tinubu was allegedly pocketed Lagos, nobody has ever proof this. During campaign in 2023, he said in one of his campaign that he collected or bidded for contract under federal government, can we say the same of Atiku. Atiku was running Onne port thru Intel. The evidence was there. You can fact check me.

Precious201010:
So since 2023 na only 15 Km Tinubu fit do for the whole of south East

givedemwotowoto:
Tinubu’s trip benefited U.K. a lot. No benefit to Nigerians. We wasted billions for a red carpet reception.

First, we spent billions of naira to lobby for it which benefited U.K lobbyists.

Then we spent more billions for prepping for the trip, which benefited UK based event management companies, hotels, restaurants, and luxury car rental companies.

The deal we “supposedly” secured will benefit U.K. contractors, construction companies, suppliers, engineers, and the U.K. government in general.

Macphenson:
How many of these Nations are oil producing nations? With a local refinery?
Let's see the one of Libya?

nairalanda1:
Yeah, I'm sure that most of the Marxists on this site who believe in cheap stuff would criticize me

But if a fuel subsidy is brought back at this time, it would amount to using tomorrow's money to pay for today's problem. And tomorrow's money would be replaced by a loan, which would generate more debt , which would create more problems...which means more loans.

Nigeria has had a history of using subsides to avoid creating a proper welfare net, because doing that would mean changing our economic paradigm from resource dependency to industrialization...and fighting corruption. It also means taxing more of the gdp...heavily

At the end of the day, however, years of doing the above have led to a lot of debt and put us in a large mess, and have encouraged the corruption that is messing up our economy

It's time we dropped sloganeering from both the oppisiton and the government, and faced the fact that if we want a working economy, we have to let it make a profit.

If we want consumption subsides now, then the government should tax everyone at 40% rates to pay for the subsidy. No ifsand buts.

If consumption subsides worked, wewould have been a developed nation by 2022. As we are not....

Ye are free to criticise me, but this is my opinion. I have held it since 2012, when I woke up to how I had been supporting the destruction of my country's economy by supporting subsides. And calling me a...g..bad..o would not change the facts.


FCK APC AND PDP AND ADC.

omenka:
Nobody offered you any asylum, baby Nnamdi Kanu.

SmartPolician:
Stop comparing America and Nigeria. Even the budget of states like Maryland is bigger than our federal budget. At the end of the day, Nigerian politicians will still loot the money once the fund is released!

9jatriot:
LOL.... this one na typical hoebient people, normal normal, they non de too get sense.

Comparing Apples with Mangoes