Search
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (of 20 pages)
 Business / Re: Football (+/Other Sports) Betting Season 18 ➜ ➜ ➜ by abba190: 7:11pm |
DiskJokeyManic:the games go cut |
| Romance / Sexual Compatibility. You & Her Thing May Not Be Connecting by CandyOps(m): 7:09pm |
Come let me show you why testing the goods is vital before final purchase is not such a bad idea. If you're like me who is single and searching you must have come in contact with a lot of women. You may have to kiss a fair share of toads to find the charming princess. I've come across girls with loads of past Trauma hanging around their sexual life and it has completely affected the way they perceive sexual activities. Once you play reach the Kontus Arena her brains will automatically shut down her entire reproductive organs in response to past traumatic events. She'll stay having uncontrollable muscle spasms. Especially if she experienced some sort of abuse or pain in her first sexual experience. Another group of women who have this condition of sexual incompatibility are those whose first sexual experience was in within a cultural or religious setting. Where they pay little attention to pleasure. Giving young girls the don't play with the Kontus and don't even look at it rule. This pain associated with sex can be as a result of other things that are not an illness. Maybe dryness. Lack of sex, big sized dick or an underlying illness like and STD or pelvic wall issues. Or sometimes it's as simple as a yeast infection. Where she feels the pains and how long she feels it is important. Is it at the vulva or entrance of her vagina or deep in her pelvic floor? Do you experience pains and how long did it last? What positions did you notice it more? If the pains continues after sex then it could be something more serious. or could be as a result of past abuse. Most of cases of abuse goes unreported so the victims don't really process the info and hence they don't heal. If left untreated... ...This will lead to cases like Vaginismus or Painful Sex a.k.a Dyspareunia in med terms. Is dyspareunia bad? The medical term for painful intercourse. It is lasting or recurrent genital pain that occurs just before, during or after sex.[/i] talk with your healthcare professional if you're having painful intercourse. Treatments focus on the cause and can help stop or ease this common problem. Vaginismus on the other hand is a condition in which involuntary muscle spasm interferes with vaginal intercourse or other penetration of the vagina. You'll try to penetrate no way You'll apply lubricant, coconut oil or Olive oil yet no way in. It'll almost seem like that Kontus entrance is blocked. This often results in pain with attempts at sex. Often it begins when vaginal intercourse is first attempted. Vaginismus may be considered an older term for pelvic floor dysfunction For example, I have met 3 girls in my entire adult life who had a form of Vaginismus and it completely killed their sexual life and urges psychologically. The only girl I dated who was able to grow past that did so because she wasn't abused on her first try at sex. When you get taken advantage of sexually like Diddy and Kelz does ... It's like when something shocking happens to you and you can't seem to snap out of it . Your brain didn't even have time to process it. .. Girls who whose first sexual experience was unfortunately a rape usually have that issue. Another likely cause of sexual incompatibility is allergy to latex. You can be perfectly fine with latex condoms from the start but grow into the allergy. Run check before final purchase because no be hand wey dem take the give monkey water dem take dey collect cup back. |
| European Football (EPL, UEFA, La Liga) / Re: Official Chelsea Fan Thread: Champions Of Europe 2021 by Android17: 7:08pm |
Yeah, the ref helped City by calling Kyle Walker to talk to him and then allowed Arsenal play a quick freekick. But stopped the game because Jurrien Timber went down for play acting. |
| European Football (EPL, UEFA, La Liga) / Re: Manchester City Vs Arsenal (2 - 2) On 22nd September 2024 by ReacherSaidNoth: 6:57pm |
Ekaka14:Truly incredible display from Arsenal. 1 Like |
| Politics / Re: Governor Godwin Obaseki Has Lost His Local Government To The APC. by Nkl4u: 6:54pm |
| Romance / Re: DNA Test Results Are Lies: There Is No Such Thing As DNA, Claims Muslim Cleric by JessicaRabbit(f): 6:50pm |
I was warned that my post was "too long", so here's PART 2 of my original reply: DevilsEqual: This position undermines the primary argument for intelligent design, which often relies on the premise that complexity cannot arise through natural processes. As for your assertion that natural selection explains "small changes and adaptations within species" but not the "origin of life and the emergence of large systems," I'd argue that this distinction is arbitrary and does not have any empirical basis, so I'm not really sure how you came up with that. The scientific consensus is clear: natural selection, coupled with genetic drift, mutation, and gene flow, has been instrumental in shaping the diversity of life on Earth. As for your claim that "the fundamental complexity of life itself suggests a higher design": this is where the argument from ignorance creeps in. Just because we currently don't fully understand the origins of life or the emergence of complex systems doesn't mean we must invoke supernatural explanations. The scientific community is actively exploring alternative explanations, such as abiogenesis, RNA world hypothesis, and others. I'll continue to repeat this obvious banality until it finally registers on your subconscious. In his book "The Grand Design" by Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow. In Chapter 1, "The Rules of the Game," on page 7 of the 2011 edition, Hawkings said something about Law of Universe and the Principle guiding them The quotes you've cited here only serve to highlight the universe's governable principles and organization. Okay, cool. But this is merely a statement of an obvious fact. Once again, this doesn't even come close to establishing a supernatural designer. The laws of physics, while remarkable, are just the rules of the game. They don't explain why the game is being played. You're working with guesses and assumptions based on gaps in knowledge which is the very definition of an ad ignorantiam fallacy. Hawking also argued that the universe's origins can be explained through spontaneous creation, where the laws of physics are self-contained and require no divine intervention. As for Einstein, he was a pantheist and his views were mostly inspired by Spinoza, and Spinoza's philosophy, as outlined in his work "Ethics," describes God or Nature as a unified, underlying substance that governs the universe through necessary laws and principles, rather than through purposeful design or intervention. Einstein's own views on the nature of God and the universe closely mirrored this perspective. My point is that , I'm trying to Appeal to Authority here to show you that not only the laymen with zero understanding of Science would biasedly see everything as Intelligent design, but that even the most highly revered and most notable Scientists agreed that our Universe and everything in it is so structured that everything screams a "Grand Design" and they did this even in their unbelief You can't just commit a fallacy and handwave the fact like it doesn't matter. We call them fallacies because they're flaws in logical reasoning that can undermine your entire argument. The term "Grand Design" can refer to the elegant laws and structures of the universe, not necessarily implying a designer. There's a subtle difference there. If you observe closely, many scientists who use that term do not even endorse intelligent design or creationism outrightly. They may just use the term as a colorful expression in a literature. It doesn't matter how many scientists you can selectively quote in isolation to make your point, you are still ignoring the broader scientific consensus supporting natural evolution and cosmology. "Assume you were informed that an unabridged dictionary was created when ink from the explosion splattered onto the walls and ceiling of a printing company. Could you believe it? How much more incredible is it that a random big bang created the ordered universe and everything in it?" We already know that dictionaries are human creations, compiled through meticulous effort and intelligence. How do we know this? Because we have witnessed the creation of dictionaries. We know how they're made and we know that the processes involved are repeatable. So the analogy in this question is dead on arrival because it is predicated on a false equivalence. The universe is much greater and larger in scope than a human dictionary. According to our current understanding of physics and human knowledge, the universe's evolution from the Big Bang is well-supported by scientific evidence and our understanding of natural laws, and it is the best theory we've got so far to explain how our universe came to be. If you've got something better, you'll have to show it. Okay, lets move away from big bang, let explore Richard Dawkins Organic Soup formation theory Actually, the theory of evolution doesn't propose that life emerged randomly or spontaneously. It only suggests that life arose through a series of chemical reactions and interactions governed by physical and chemical laws. It relies only on the predictable outcomes of these laws. I mentioned this in previous posts, but the conditions on early Earth were very different from those today, with a reducing atmosphere, intense radiation, and frequent chemical reactions. As for the "organic soup", that concept is mostly outdated. Research suggests life likely emerged in hydrothermal vents or other environments with energy gradients. Nucleotides and proteins aren't complicated substances that suddenly appeared; they're the result of gradual chemical evolution. Calculating probabilities for these events definitely won't be easy due to the vastness of time, chemical diversity and complexity of interactions involved. However, scientists have demonstrated in experiments and simulations that (1) simple organic compounds can form through abiogenic processes, (2) RNA and DNA nucleotides can assemble and replicate without enzymes, and that (3) Vesicles and membranes can self-assemble from lipid molecules. The probability of life emerging may be low, but definitely not impossible. Have you considered how vast the universe is, and the number of potentially habitable planets? I would have like to break them down from you using already carried out experiments but u go talk say I dey poke holes for Science, I just wanna debunk the "Undesigned" myth or can i carry on? Looking at your bullet points, I can take a good guess where you're going with each of those points but I'll wait to see if you might surprise me this time. |
| Business / Re: Football (+/Other Sports) Betting Season 18 ➜ ➜ ➜ by Reloadedisraelp: 6:49pm |
DiskJokeyManic:wait o  ,na wetin cashout do u the oda time mk u get this mind? .. see mind |
| Properties / Re: Decent Standard 2 Bedroom Flat For Rent at Ijesha by njelrapheal: 6:49pm |
santaclaws: na why i de talk say make no body complain when them go abroad and them discriminate against them, |
| Romance / Re: DNA Test Results Are Lies: There Is No Such Thing As DNA, Claims Muslim Cleric by JessicaRabbit(f): 6:48pm |
I was warned that my post was "too long", so here's PART 1 of my original reply: DevilsEqual: I don't see how I've "gish galloped" you anywhere in this discussion. I presented specific questions, targeted towards your understanding of the word "design". They're not a barrage of random, unrelated points -- which would have made it an actual gish gallop fallacy. So once again, you have no idea what you're talking about. My question was intended to uncover your understanding of design, and how complexity is supposed to demonstrate design. That's literally it. Now back to your questions. Well at least you've conceded that alternative explanations may exist, although your concession is promptly undermined by the assertion that these alternatives are inherently flawed. Your criticism of alternative theories as "incoherent" and "full of gaps" is a curious case of pot-and-kettle logic. You do realize that intelligent design, your preferred explanation which you've been touring as superior, relies heavily on an untestable, supernatural entity -- a notion that is, by definition, incoherent within the scientific framework. You realize this, right? The "gaps" in other scientific theories like Natural Selection and Evolution are, at the very least, acknowledged and actively researched. Intelligent Design's gaps, on the other hand, are fundamental and irreconcilable with empirical evidence. Also, kindly spare me the blatant appeal to popularity. The truth of a scientific theory isn't determined by its popularity, but rather by the strength of its empirical evidence and predictive power. I would have expected you to know this since you claim to value science so much. Lets assume we go with Big Bang: The Big Bang theory explains the creation of the universe but falls short in explaining how life first evolved. Furthermore, some scientists have stated that the Big Bang theory is insufficient to explain how the universe came into being. Some even went so far as to say that "to explain the original creation of the universe, another theory describing even earlier times will be needed." The Big Bang actually has nothing to do with the origins of life. You should probably learn the distinction between cosmology and abiogenesis to understand this. Cosmology focuses on the origins and evolution of the universe as a whole, while abiogenesis explores the emergence of life from non-living matter. Conflating these two fields will only create unnecessary confusion. The Big Bang makes a good case explaining the formation of subatomic particles, atoms, and eventually, the large-scale structures we observe today. However, it does not, nor does it pretend to, address the origin of life. So to suggest that the Big Bang theory "falls short" in explaining life's origin is a misplaced criticism. Regarding the claim that some scientists find the Big Bang theory insufficient, this is a classic case of cherry-picking. A handful of dissenting voices do not undermine the overwhelming consensus among cosmologists and physicists. The Big Bang theory has withstood decades of rigorous testing and observation. The fact that a handful of scientists acknowledge the limitations of the theory doesn't render it useless. In fact, it just serves to reflect the inherent nature of scientific inquiry. Theories are refined or expanded as new evidence emerges, and scientists actively explore areas beyond the Big Bang, such as quantum gravity, inflationary theory, and multiverse hypotheses. These investigations are simply meant to refine our understanding, not force us to simply pick and choose between competing scientific theories. Also, when you consider most of the things written in Stephen Hawkings books like the A brief history of time or On the origin of the universe, you'd see man made more bogus claims than Bible Believers. Interesting. According to you, a work backed by extensive scientific evidence has little merit compared to a book about talking bushes and men turning into pillars of salt. It's quite remarkable how some of you guys don't see the ridiculousness in statements like this. Plus(I know you'd cancel this but make i still talk)...When a nuclear bomb explodes, matter is converted uncontrollably into energy, leading to chaos, as was demonstrated in 1945 when these bombs completely destroyed Hiroshima and much of Nagasaki in Japan. But the universe is lovely and harmonious, far from chaotic! That theory wouldnt answer many questions about life on a molecular level sef. Sorry, but the transformation of matter into energy is not chaos. It's a fundamental principle of physics, and a predictable, measurable process governed by the laws of thermodynamics. If that's chaos, then I'll have to wonder what your definition of order is? And what does this statement even mean: "the universe is lovely and harmonious"? Are you referring to the aesthetic appeal of, say, supernovae or the movement of planetary orbits, because those are also the result of deterministic physical processes. At the molecular level, I'm still waiting for your explanation of how intelligent design accounts for the myriad inefficiencies, contradictions, and vestigial structures found in living organisms. The vestigial pelvis in whales, the recurrent laryngeal nerve's detour, or the molecular machinery shared across domains of life -- do these scream "design" to you? I also asked you a question about the instincts of a moth which you're yet to reply i.e why do moths constantly feel compelled to endanger themselves by flying into flames? ll) Another one is Panspermia: This one is easily discarded because it also didnt address the topic of how life first began, also, its proposition that life on Earth could not have originated spontaneously but that it had to have come from the outer space and then floated into Earth, only serves to relegate the issue of life's origin to a more distant and forbidding context. We all know that life in the harsh atmosphere of outer space would face several hostile. So, is it possible that life originated on its own somewhere in the cosmos, made it to Earth under extremely difficult circumstances, and eventually evolved into life as we know it? Of course not. Who would lean towards this With all of it's imperfections, panspermia is still an alternative explanation worth exploring. And I wasn't looking for a specific example. I just wanted to know if you're open to the possibility that there might be other explanations beyond your dichotomous view of intelligent design vs. natural selection. Your casual dismissal of the theory is just another reflection of your lack of intellectual curiosity. Theories of life emergence by philosophers(Artists and the Ancient Grecian guys) is total bull crap. That's a nonsensical claim, considering many of the foundational concepts in modern science were first proposed by philosophers. You should really brush up on your science history before uttering such ridiculous pronouncements. There might be a middle stance for one to consider outside Evolution or Creation, it vould even still be under Science but I assume that theory hasnt just been developed by anyone so far, so yea, we all are either for evolution or Creation. No other third stance. The universe is a pretty big place with a lot of room for innovation and the discovery of new knowledge. I think it's highly presumptuous of you to casually assume that we've already exhausted all the possibilities. This isnt from my standpoint and it has nothing to do with my subjective assessment and thats the reason why i dropped multiple Scientific reasech articles to prove to you that even they, in their conclusions agreed that these things are too Complex to be explained away by just fictionally throwing in Natura Selections Those scientists may agree on complexity, but that's where the consensus ends. What's missing is the leap from complexity to intelligent design, which you are struggling to demonstrate so far. Correlation doesn't imply causation, my friend. Don't hide behind "the scientists said so". They're not oracles. Their findings are open to interpretation. Where are your thoughts? Citing studies doesn't absolve you of critical thinking, I hope you know that. By the way, how do you really define fiction, because you seem to be confusing natural selection, an observed, documented and experimentally confirmed process, with intelligent design, which, conveniently, has no testable hypothesis, let alone empirical evidence. How much longer are you going to keep up this wilful self deceit? If a researcher , after all his experiments documented that that Natural selection didnt apply, why why should i agree with you, a zealous Atheists with no known journal written from experimental researches, one who is only wishing that Science should remain perfect with zero failure. You can check those weblinks I dropped If a researcher, after all their experiments, documented that natural selection "didn't apply", then I'd be the first to question the validity of those experiments or the researcher's methodology. But until then, I think I'll just stick to the overwhelming, peer reviewed body of evidence that actually, you know, supports the theory of evolution. And maybe you're right about me being a "zealous atheist". I am quite zealous about the idea that we should base our beliefs on reason and evidence, rather than on ancient texts or creative fantasies. |
| European Football (EPL, UEFA, La Liga) / Re: Manchester City Vs Arsenal (2 - 2) On 22nd September 2024 by Basic(m): 6:46pm |
Ekaka14:This is pure unbiased analysis. Na person you be jare. 4 Likes |
| European Football (EPL, UEFA, La Liga) / Re: Arsenal Fans Thread: Finally Reborn! The Red & White Army: FA CUP Champions 2020 by Roland17(m): 6:45pm |
Jamiuokolaa: It was over the 7 minute mark and the game should have called. This is absolute madness and something has to give because it is happening way too often. |
| European Football (EPL, UEFA, La Liga) / Re: Manchester City Vs Arsenal (2 - 2) On 22nd September 2024 by Ekaka14: 6:45pm |
abba190:Not an Arsenal fan but they managed this game very well...1 man down against any team is not easy not to talk of a full squad of ManCity players...with an enviable bench... Arsenal played the game, goal keeper was good...really good, all the defending...delay tactics ...antics and all are part of modern football...ref was also high on something....but a team with a man down against City for over 50mins deserves their flowers 13 Likes 1 Share |
| European Football (EPL, UEFA, La Liga) / Re: Arsenal Fans Thread: Finally Reborn! The Red & White Army: FA CUP Champions 2020 by Jamiuokolaa: 6:42pm |
Roland17: Haha Bros I know it's painful to concede at the very end but una try well well, considering the circumstances... I don't think I have seen City neutralised like this in recent times, not to talk of being a man down at the Etihad. Maybe y'all are ready to finally win the league this time around.. Hopefully, una no go lose one important home game vs Crystal Palace or Everton  |
| Crime / Re: NDLEA Arrests 38-year-old Drug Trafficking Suspect At Kano Airport by wickedclown: 6:39pm |
I dey see one name but make I no talk Sha... It is well |
| Politics / Re: Edo People Sing And Dance On The Street, Call Obaseki Goat by Max24: 6:16pm |
Brendaniel:Has Obi used his genius ideas to help Otti pay 30k minimum wage in Abia ? Why not start from there. Is charity not supposed to begin from home. The magic you people said Obi can perform , why can't he help Otti to perform or it's only in Aso Rock it works. Let Abia be a template of what Obi can achieve among states. Otherwise, talk is cheap ! |
| TV/Movies / Re: BBNaija 2024: Live Updates Thread by Oshokhai69: 6:14pm |
creolehunt: Keep! |
| Business / Re: Football (+/Other Sports) Betting Season 18 ➜ ➜ ➜ by kingcisE(m): 6:11pm |
DiskJokeyManic:Telling you to stop na waste of time cuz you are a time bomb, any person weh trigger, go collect wotoporously. I staked your games along with many others but one team just deh cut dem each. Congratulations and don't stop dropping games Biko. |
| Romance / Re: Nigerians Dating Indians What’s Your Experience With Difficult Parents? by Entanglement: 5:59pm |
DuBLINGreenb:exactly what my did to me! With time will start blaming her families as you narrated! But one thing I will advise you! Don't be foolish enough to come back to her! When she said that work is much in India over Canada! That's is a bloody bait lie! Even the India themselves are running away from that country because work is hard there. When I said don't be foolish enough to come back to her or give her chance is because she initiated the breakup and everything! Now she went back to India and can't compare any man as good and as you! What did you think will happen? She will try all means to come back in Which you will be foolish enough to take her back! Just move on even if you can stop answering her call or message! Aldo she will do all such of suicide threats and messages with emotional blackmail saying that you didn't stick up with me during her hard times! ( Don't give in to those temptation) India are very devious and corny people! |
| Business / Re: Football (+/Other Sports) Betting Season 18 ➜ ➜ ➜ by DiskJokeyManic: 5:59pm |
DiskJockeManiac: Ohh,,,, dis kind tin dey pain u??.... U no quick talk na😎😎......U neva even see anytin.... Brace urself up,,, coz dis is jst de beginning😍😍😍😍😍 1 Like
|
| Romance / Re: I Know Many Runs Girls Who Married Their Clients by Baronthecelebri: 5:50pm |
Stupid talk |
| TV/Movies / Re: What Movie Are You Watching Now? by joseph1832(m): 5:49pm |
pu7pl3: |
| Politics / Re: Obaseki Down.fubara Will Be Uncladed In Rivers State. by Sonfethopia: 5:47pm |
Damiantex: Give ur family and friend..we don't need it. 1 Like |
| Nairaland / General / How To Run A Successful Youtube Channel Without Appearing On Camera by Digitisestudio(m): 5:38pm |
"You’ve probably thought about starting a YouTube channel, but the idea of being in front of a camera makes you hesitate. Whether it’s due to camera shyness, privacy concerns, or just the discomfort of being in the spotlight, you’re not alone. Many Nigerians feel the same way. But what if I told you there’s a way to build a successful YouTube channel without ever showing your face? You don’t need to be a celebrity, and you certainly don’t need a fancy studio setup. In fact, some of the biggest YouTube channels run completely on YouTube automation, where the creator stays behind the scenes. Why It’s Okay Not to Show Your Face Let’s be real, many people in Nigeria would prefer to create content that provides value without exposing themselves to unwanted attention. The good news? There are plenty of ways to thrive on YouTube without ever appearing on camera. In this guide, I’m going to show you how to run a successful YouTube channel using faceless content. You’ll learn which niches work best, the tools you need, and how to make money without showing your face. Let’s dive in! Why You Don’t Need to Appear on Camera to Succeed on YouTube The idea that you must show your face to succeed on YouTube is outdated. Some of the most profitable channels today don’t show the creator at all. So, why does this work? Anonymity: Staying faceless protects your privacy, something many Nigerians value. Focus on Content: Instead of worrying about appearance or performance, you can focus on delivering high-quality content. Lower Barrier to Entry: No need for expensive cameras, lights, or makeup. You can start with just your voice and some simple editing tools. Example: Think of animation channels, AI tutorials, tech review channels, or even music playlists. These creators are building massive audiences without ever stepping in front of a camera. Top Niches for Faceless YouTube Channels Choosing the right niche is crucial for success. Luckily, there are several niches where appearing on camera isn’t necessary. Here are some popular and profitable options for faceless channels: 1. Animation Channels Create fun or educational animated videos. You don’t need to be an artist; tools like Doodly or Toonly can help you produce professional-looking animation videos that will engage and educate your audience and you earn from it. 2. How-To and Tutorial Channels Many people including me and you are always looking for solutions online. I couldn't remember how many videos I have watched on YouTube while I still have a channel on this niche doing extremely well. Whether it’s how to fix a broken phone, any knowledge you have or tutorials on graphic design, you can create simple screen recordings and voiceovers. 3. Product Review Channels You don’t need to appear in front of the camera to review products. Just show the product, talk about its features, and share your thoughts, you will be surprised how people will be using your referring link and subscribing to your channel. 4. Meditation/Music Playlists Create calming meditation or music playlists and let them run in the background. Channels like these are easy to manage and can attract lots of listeners. 5. AI Tools Or Tech Explainers Channels that explain how tech gadgets or software work are growing. All you need is a clear voice and many AI voice generators like Elevenlab, Fliki, and Lovo give you realistic voices for your video and some basic editing skills using capcut. Bonus Tip: There are many great niches you can start but I listed these above as they are still beginner-friendly and easy to create. You can also use keyword research tools like Google Keyword Planner to find high-demand but low-competition niches. Step-by-Step Guide to Starting a Faceless YouTube Channel You’re probably thinking, “How do I start a faceless YouTube channel that actually makes money?” Let’s break it down step by step, so you know exactly what to do. Step 1: Niche Selection and Research The first step is choosing the right niche, one that doesn’t require you to show your face. To make the most of YouTube automation, it’s important to find a niche that not only interests you but also has an audience. How to Pick the Right Niche: Look for Demand: Use tools like Google Trends, Vidiq and Keyword Planner to find topics people are searching for. Check the Competition: Choose a niche with lower competition but high search volume. Niches like top 10 lists, tutorials, or tech explainer videos are good options. Stay Consistent: Once you pick a niche, stick to it. Jumping between topics can confuse your audience and hurt your growth. The provided space is not enough for the article, you can continue reading below. https://medium.com/@ModernLivingVibes/faceless-youtube-automation-e0da17add94b Click the link to learn more about faceless YouTube automation: https:///YouTube-faceless-automation Thanks for reading! We shall all meet at the top only If you take action.
|
| European Football (EPL, UEFA, La Liga) / Re: Manchester City Vs Arsenal (2 - 2) On 22nd September 2024 by Damiantex: 5:37pm |
No Matter how hard things are in this country, we will always be happy by getting ways of making things good. I have good news for all DSTV AND GOTV subscribers. You can now watch DSTV and GOTV for free for 4 months and above. After the high price added to their subscriptions, I went into search and coding to know how I can be watching for free and now I and my friends has been watching for free. I do not want to talk much. I will help you to do yours. All you need to do is to text or call me on +2349069319808. I strongly believe that this will work only in Nigeria but rather all African countries using DSTV. I wish to get someone from other countries to test it for me. The activation only works on Saturdays, Sundays and Mondays, and you will be able to watch free from Monday till Sunday 24/7 for 4months and above. I will only do it for 20persons to avoid disconnection because I don't want to stop watching for free. Free things sweet. |
| Not Satisfied? Click Here To Try Google Search! |
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (of 20 pages)
(Go Up)
| Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 399 |