Slaz's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Slaz's Profile › Slaz's Posts
1 2 (of 2 pages)
You are an undergraduate who is dependent on his
parents for finances.
And you have a girlfriend who is also dependent
on her parents (plus you and other hosts of
innumerable angels in joyful assembly) for finances
too.
Now you are always calling her on phone. Not
night call o. You call the call of your life while it is
day because night cometh when no man shall call
(or when no girl shall pick).
You call her every one hour. And each time you
call her, you are dragging who will say bye-bye
first. You are busy arguing who will end the call.
On the very top of your credit o! Ok.
I'm not complaining for you o. It is not none of my
business. My only problem is that you think it is
love that is doing you.
My brother, behold, this post is knocking at the
door of your sense. If you open, it will come in and
dine with you. If you don't, the feet of the men who
buried your colleagues are at the door, and they
will carry you out also.
Many are the afflictions of a poor man, but a
wedding invitation from the girl he loves addeth
more sorrows.
A post is enough for the wise.
A sense is enough for the fool.
A call is enough for the day.
And a card is enough for the call. |
DAAR Communications Plc, the owner of African
Independent Television, on Friday apologised to
the National Leader of the All Progressives
Congress, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu, over “Lion of
Bourdillon” claim.
Tinubu consequently withdrew the N150bn libel
suit he instituted against AIT for allegedly
defaming his reputation.
Tinubu filed the suit last March in protest against
a documentary titled “Lion of Bourdillon” aired
repeatedly on AIT in the build-up to the 2015
general elections.
The former Lagos State governor had, through his
lawyer, Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN), claimed that
the documentary was targeted at lessening him in
the estimation of the public, to the effect that he
corruptly enriched himself while holding public
office.
Justice Iyabode Akinkugbe, who presided over the
case, had on April 1, last year, granted Tinubu an
interlocutory injunction barring AIT from further
airing “Lion of Bourdillon” pending the
determination of the suit.
The defendant, through its lawyer, Chief Mike
Ozekhome (SAN), had claimed that “Lion of
Bourdillon” did not defame Tinubu and that all its
content was not false and had been in the public
domain before AIT started airing the documentary.
In addition, DAAR Communications filed a
counter-claim demanding N200bn as “aggravated,
punitive and exemplary damages” from Tinubu for
what it termed damage to its corporate image.
But at the resumed hearing of the case on Friday,
both lawyers told the judge that their clients had
settled the case out of court and prayed the court
to adopt the terms of settlement they filed as the
judgement of the court in the case.
Ozekhome said, “We are before My Lord this
morning to do what the court has always
encouraged litigants to do.
“We have come here today that every war that is
fought is finally resolved at the round table.
“Parties have decided to settle amicably to enable
both parties to continue with the good relationship
that they have always had before the devil struck.”
Olanipekun aligned himself with Ozekhome and
urged the court to adopt the said settlement
terms dated January 29, 2016.
Consequently, Justice Akinkugbe, in a short
ruling, adopted the settlement terms as the
judgement in the suit.
The judge said DAAR Communications Plc would
publicly and unequivocally retract the said
documentary “three times, once daily.”
She asked the defendant to tender an unreserved
apology to Tinubu, “three times, once daily.”
She ordered them to withdraw their claims and
counter-claims respectively and held that they
would respectively bear the cost spent by them
on the suit.
The terms of settlement was backed with a letter
of apology, in which DAAR Communications
begged Tinubu and described him as an
“outstanding political leader of unblemished
character and integrity” and prayed that he would
live long “to make more enormous contributions
to the advancement of our nation, Nigeria.”
The letter read in part, “DAAR Communications Plc
acknowledges that Asiwaju Bola Tinubu is an
outstanding political leader of unblemished
character and integrity, as well as a leading public
figure and opinion-moulder, who has made and
continuously make immense contributions to the
progress and development of the nation in general
and Lagos State in particular.
“DAAR Communications Plc admits that in airing
the said documentary, it had no intention,
whatsoever, to embarrass or diminish the high
reputation of Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu which it
respects and attests to.”[b]DAAR Communications Plc, the owner of African
Independent Television, on Friday apologised to
the National Leader of the All Progressives
Congress, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu, over “Lion of
Bourdillon” claim.
Tinubu consequently withdrew the N150bn libel
suit he instituted against AIT for allegedly
defaming his reputation.
Tinubu filed the suit last March in protest against
a documentary titled “Lion of Bourdillon” aired
repeatedly on AIT in the build-up to the 2015
general elections.
The former Lagos State governor had, through his
lawyer, Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN), claimed that
the documentary was targeted at lessening him in
the estimation of the public, to the effect that he
corruptly enriched himself while holding public
office.
Justice Iyabode Akinkugbe, who presided over the
case, had on April 1, last year, granted Tinubu an
interlocutory injunction barring AIT from further
airing “Lion of Bourdillon” pending the
determination of the suit.
The defendant, through its lawyer, Chief Mike
Ozekhome (SAN), had claimed that “Lion of
Bourdillon” did not defame Tinubu and that all its
content was not false and had been in the public
domain before AIT started airing the documentary.
In addition, DAAR Communications filed a
counter-claim demanding N200bn as “aggravated,
punitive and exemplary damages” from Tinubu for
what it termed damage to its corporate image.
But at the resumed hearing of the case on Friday,
both lawyers told the judge that their clients had
settled the case out of court and prayed the court
to adopt the terms of settlement they filed as the
judgement of the court in the case.
Ozekhome said, “We are before My Lord this
morning to do what the court has always
encouraged litigants to do.
“We have come here today that every war that is
fought is finally resolved at the round table.
“Parties have decided to settle amicably to enable
both parties to continue with the good relationship
that they have always had before the devil struck.”
Olanipekun aligned himself with Ozekhome and
urged the court to adopt the said settlement
terms dated January 29, 2016.
Consequently, Justice Akinkugbe, in a short
ruling, adopted the settlement terms as the
judgement in the suit.
The judge said DAAR Communications Plc would
publicly and unequivocally retract the said
documentary “three times, once daily.”
She asked the defendant to tender an unreserved
apology to Tinubu, “three times, once daily.”
She ordered them to withdraw their claims and
counter-claims respectively and held that they
would respectively bear the cost spent by them
on the suit.
The terms of settlement was backed with a letter
of apology, in which DAAR Communications
begged Tinubu and described him as an
“outstanding political leader of unblemished
character and integrity” and prayed that he would
live long “to make more enormous contributions
to the advancement of our nation, Nigeria.”
The letter read in part, “DAAR Communications Plc
acknowledges that Asiwaju Bola Tinubu is an
outstanding political leader of unblemished
character and integrity, as well as a leading public
figure and opinion-moulder, who has made and
continuously make immense contributions to the
progress and development of the nation in general
and Lagos State in particular.
“DAAR Communications Plc admits that in airing
the said documentary, it had no intention,
whatsoever, to embarrass or diminish the high
reputation of Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu which it
respects and attests to.”[/b]DAAR Communications Plc, the owner of African
Independent Television, on Friday apologised to
the National Leader of the All Progressives
Congress, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu, over “Lion of
Bourdillon” claim.
Tinubu consequently withdrew the N150bn libel
suit he instituted against AIT for allegedly
defaming his reputation.
Tinubu filed the suit last March in protest against
a documentary titled “Lion of Bourdillon” aired
repeatedly on AIT in the build-up to the 2015
general elections.
The former Lagos State governor had, through his
lawyer, Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN), claimed that
the documentary was targeted at lessening him in
the estimation of the public, to the effect that he
corruptly enriched himself while holding public
office.
Justice Iyabode Akinkugbe, who presided over the
case, had on April 1, last year, granted Tinubu an
interlocutory injunction barring AIT from further
airing “Lion of Bourdillon” pending the
determination of the suit.
The defendant, through its lawyer, Chief Mike
Ozekhome (SAN), had claimed that “Lion of
Bourdillon” did not defame Tinubu and that all its
content was not false and had been in the public
domain before AIT started airing the documentary.
In addition, DAAR Communications filed a
counter-claim demanding N200bn as “aggravated,
punitive and exemplary damages” from Tinubu for
what it termed damage to its corporate image.
But at the resumed hearing of the case on Friday,
both lawyers told the judge that their clients had
settled the case out of court and prayed the court
to adopt the terms of settlement they filed as the
judgement of the court in the case.
Ozekhome said, “We are before My Lord this
morning to do what the court has always
encouraged litigants to do.
“We have come here today that every war that is
fought is finally resolved at the round table.
“Parties have decided to settle amicably to enable
both parties to continue with the good relationship
that they have always had before the devil struck.”
Olanipekun aligned himself with Ozekhome and
urged the court to adopt the said settlement
terms dated January 29, 2016.
Consequently, Justice Akinkugbe, in a short
ruling, adopted the settlement terms as the
judgement in the suit.
The judge said DAAR Communications Plc would
publicly and unequivocally retract the said
documentary “three times, once daily.”
She asked the defendant to tender an unreserved
apology to Tinubu, “three times, once daily.”
She ordered them to withdraw their claims and
counter-claims respectively and held that they
would respectively bear the cost spent by them
on the suit.
The terms of settlement was backed with a letter
of apology, in which DAAR Communications
begged Tinubu and described him as an
“outstanding political leader of unblemished
character and integrity” and prayed that he would
live long “to make more enormous contributions
to the advancement of our nation, Nigeria.”
The letter read in part, “DAAR Communications Plc
acknowledges that Asiwaju Bola Tinubu is an
outstanding political leader of unblemished
character and integrity, as well as a leading public
figure and opinion-moulder, who has made and
continuously make immense contributions to the
progress and development of the nation in general
and Lagos State in particular.
“DAAR Communications Plc admits that in airing
the said documentary, it had no intention,
whatsoever, to embarrass or diminish the high
reputation of Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu which it
respects and attests to.” |
I am sure it must be Most Useless Subject In Class… MUSIC |
A man who had guts enough to try to kidnap one
of the pet dogs of US President, Barack Obama,
has had more than he bargained for.
US police have arrested a man who allegedly
plotted to kidnap one of President Obama's two
pet dogs. Officials say Scott Stockert who is from
the state of North Dakota, was planning to snatch
one of the dogs, either Bo or Sunny.
Police in Washington DC found weapons in
Stockert's vehicle, including a shotgun, a rifle and
a machete. Agents say he made several
outlandish claims during his arrest, including that
he intended to run for president.
He also said he was the son of former President,
John F Kennedy and actress Marilyn Monroe,
according to court documents.
Stockert has been charged with violating the
District of Columbia's gun laws.
The First Family acquired Bo in 2009, with Sunny,
referred to by the family as Bo's "little sister",
following in 2013. |
Ekiti State Governor, Ayodele Fayose, has
challenged President Muhammadu Buhari to direct
the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission
to charge the National Publicity Secretary of the
Peoples Democratic Party, Chief Olisa Metuh, to
court if the commission has evidence of fraud
against him.
The governor, who restated his support for the
anti-corruption war, bemoaned a situation where
the commission would first arrest and detain a
person before shopping for evidence against him.
“The EFCC appears to be operating a system in
which an accused person is first arrested,
detained endlessly while the anti-corruption
agency goes about looking for evidence.”
Fayose, who spoke through his Special Assistant
on Public Communications and New Media, Lere
Olayinka, challenged the EFCC to also act on
petitions submitted to it against All Progressives
Congress chieftains and the President’s election
sponsors.
He cautioned that nothing untoward must happen
to Metuh, adding that the APC’s desperation to
decimate and silence the opposition had dragged
the Buhari-led government in the mud of
lawlessness.
“In saner climes, you don’t arrest people for
alleged fraud and start to look for evidence to
prosecute them. Rather, before you arrest anyone
for fraud, anti-corruption agencies must have
established a prima facie case and arresting the
suspect will only be for his or her arraignment in
court.
“However, what we are witnessing in Nigeria today
is a situation whereby the EFCC will arrest PDP
leaders, humiliate them by subjecting them to
media trial, detain them for weeks in the process
of trying to force them to make statements during
which the commission will be looking for
evidence.
“For instance, in the case of Metuh, we are told
that the EFCC is insisting that he must write
statements and one begins to wonder if it has
now become mandatory for an accused to write
statements in law enforcement agent’s custody.
Shouldn’t the EFCC have simply charged Metuh to
court based on its own evidence? Or is Metuh’s
statement the evidence the EFCC requires to
prosecute him?
“The international community, especially the
United Nations, African Union, European Union,
and others are put on notice on this condemnable
act of arresting and detaining opposition leaders
by agents of the Buhari-led government before
fishing for evidence.”
While challenging the President to extend his
anti-corruption crusade to those who sponsored
his election, Fayose added that “any anti-
corruption effort that targets only members of the
opposition and those with axe to grind with the
government of the day can never succeed.
“If President Buhari does not wait for any petition
to move against PDP chieftains, asking people to
come forward with allegations of corruption
against APC chieftains, especially those who
sponsored President Buhari’s election is clearly
hypocritical.” |
1 2 (of 2 pages)