₦airaland Forum

ZombieDredd:
you are barking up the wrong tree.........................................

There’s a reason silence is golden—especially when your words do more harm than good.
Every time Peter Obi opens his mouth, he chips away at the carefully packaged image his supporters worked so hard to build.
Obi’s political appeal thrives on curated outrage, not grounded reform. His message is often clean, but conspicuously empty.

saintkel:
omo I just tire for una.....who's voice has bin condemning d attacks in almost all part of Nigeria if not Obi.....make una free d man abeg

Peter Obi is a master of moral posturing—loud on virtue, but vague on verifiable substance. His politics is less about solutions and more about sentiments dressed as strategy.

You don’t get to fool the people twice. The illusion is over. The audit has just begun.

coputa:
Peter Obi, a former governor of Anambra state and a presidential contender for the Labour Party (LP) in 2023, has defended his decision not to leave the UK to visit Benue state. One of Peter Obi's advisers, Dr. Moses Paul, made this claim in a Monday post on his official X account. This follows a spate of terrorist attacks in Benue State, where multiple lives were lost in invasions.


Dr. Moses expressed his biggest concern in a phone chat with the former governor of Anambra state—that Hyacinth Alia, the governor of Benue state, would refuse to let him enter the state if he decided to conclude his vacation in the UK—in the post that went viral online.


Following the murders in Benue State, the ex-governor of Anambra state spoke out against them. He made it clear that the governor should know that his compassion, not politics, is driving his travel to the state. Here is what Peter Obi said, according to Dr. Moses Paul


“Mo, if I cut short my UK trip to return to Benue, my greatest worry is, just as it happened when I tried to visit grieving people in Plateau, Niger, and other places, what if the Governor refuses me entry again?".

From Opera News

Typical arrant nonsense from peter obi....
Peter Obi’s penchant for swooping in on national tragedies to score cheap political points is as shameless as it is despicable. Time and again, he has shown a disturbing pattern—surfacing only when blood has been spilled, not to offer real solutions or long-term engagement, but to issue teary statements, chase headlines, and posture for the cameras. His response to the Benue crisis follows this tired script: empty outrage, performative empathy, and not a shred of genuine effort to understand or address the complex roots of the conflict. This isn’t leadership—it’s opportunism draped in pious soundbites. Nigeria deserves better than a man who treats national grief as a campaign strategy.

When Nigerian music legend Innocent "2Baba" Idibia asked, “What is really going on in Benue?”—he gave voice to the collective heartbreak of a people who have watched their ancestral land turn into a recurring battlefield.

It is both shameless and despicable when political opportunists like Peter Obi, Atiku Abubakar, and their ilk swoop in to exploit the bloodshed in Benue for cheap political gain. These are men who have offered no concrete solutions, no sustained engagement, and no sincere empathy—only press statements, photo ops, and crocodile tears. They weaponize tragedy, not to heal or build, but to score fleeting media points and manipulate public emotion. It is the height of moral bankruptcy to politicize pain while ignoring the complex, deeply rooted issues at the heart of the crisis. Nigeria deserves better than vultures in agbada.

But the truth is, there is no simple answer. What’s happening in Benue is not just a headline—it’s a layered tragedy built on land, identity, and decades of unresolved conflict.

Benue is a state caught between shrinking resources and growing populations. As climate change dries up rivers and erodes grazing routes, Fulani herders push south into fertile farmland now cultivated by native Tiv and Idoma farmers. That clash—once seasonal—has become bloody and permanent.
Add to that deep-seated ethnic and religious divisions: a predominantly Christian farming population versus largely Muslim herdsmen. The result? Distrust, vengeance, and politicized identities.
Anti-grazing laws exist—but enforcement is either weak or nonexistent. Security forces arrive late, and sometimes not at all. With each fresh attack in places like Guma, Agatu, and Aondona, revenge killings follow, and the cycle of violence is renewed.
So what’s the way forward?
Local solutions. Benue needs ranching policies that work: secure grazing reserves, not political tokenism. Dispute-resolution must return to communities—through local councils, traditional rulers, and neutral mediators. And our security system must shift from reaction to prevention, with real intelligence and early intervention.

aswani:
I still am not exactly sure why very intelligent Nigerians mistake The Israel in the Bible with the modern Country israel.

Apart from the spelling, and I guess the fact that they are always at war with someone or the other, there is zero relationship between both entities.

The same Israel doesn't practise the Christianity we carry on our head here.

I am not saying Iran's leaders have any sense either before this crazy black people come and confuse matters.

This confusion often stems from a shallow reading of both scripture and history. No one is equating modern Israel with ancient Israel in a theological sense—we're fully aware that today's Israel is a sovereign, secular nation-state. But it is disingenuous to pretend there's “zero relationship” between the two. Modern Israel’s existence is deeply connected to Jewish heritage, much like modern Greece draws from ancient Athens, or Egypt from the Pharaohs.

Moreover, acknowledging Israel’s right to exist or defend itself does not mean we’re “carrying Christianity on our heads.” It’s about recognizing a democracy surrounded by regimes that sponsor terror and suppress dissent—including Iran.

Yes, Israel is imperfect. But false equivalence between it and Iran—the leading state sponsor of terrorism—is either dishonest or lazy. Criticize policies, yes—but do it with context, not cheap cynicism. Intelligent discourse deserves more than dismissive one-liners and confused relativism.

favor914:
Absolute complete nonsense, you are still oblivious to the fact on what is going on?

U are here basing your premise on religious bigotry that Christian is good because oyibo man told u so, black man follow follow so, Islam is bad, yet the irony is that those Jews no send you purported Christians, especially those famished ones in Africa.

First, let’s get something straight: I was raised by a Muslim father and a Christian mother. That mix is not just personal—it’s deeply cultural.

No true Yoruba man, brought up in the richness of our traditions, defines relationships along religious lines. In fact, it is alien to our ethos. We attend each other’s naming ceremonies, Eid celebrations, and Christmas feasts without drawing a line in the sand.

So, to accuse me of religious bigotry is not just lazy—it’s laughably ignorant.

As for your jumbled tirade about “oyibo-man Christianity” and famished Africans, perhaps take a moment to reflect before typing. Your argument lacks coherence, logic, or even the basic courtesy of constructive engagement. If intellect were a currency, your comment wouldn’t afford small change.

Try again—with facts this time.

Talking About Peter Obi Isn’t Fear—It’s the Forensic Audit of a Failed Illusion
Peter Obi’s supporters love to say, “If he’s not a threat, why do you keep talking about him?” But let’s set the record straight: this isn’t fear—it’s a necessary post-mortem.
In 2023, Nigerians were desperate. Youths were angry, tired, and fed up with the system. And into that vacuum stepped Peter Obi, wrapped in borrowed robes of humility and competence. He was packaged like a miracle drug. But what we got was a placebo—a shiny label with no substance.
Now, the dust has settled. The youth are wiser. The emotion has cooled. And those of us asking questions are not afraid—we are holding the receipts.
You can't sell a product that failed in 2023 and expect no feedback. In fact, the scrutiny is just beginning. As 2027 approaches, every word, every move, and every policy dodge will be dissected.
And yes, Obi will be discussed—because he asked to lead a nation of over 200 million people. That comes with eternal inspection.
If Obidients want silence, here’s a simple strategy: find a candidate with substance, not just sentiment. Stop recycling a man who built his 2023 run on vibes, hashtags, and unverifiable claims.
2027 will not be about volume—it will be about value. Not emotion, but execution.
You don’t get to fool the people twice. The illusion is over. The audit has just begun.

ERockson:
The little fame Oriyomi got has enter his head. I believe he will know his level thereafter. Nigeria politics is beyond Gbenusi mic. Apart from Mr Oriyomi's little philanthropic gesture, the man is more or less an illiterate individual with a lot of illiterates on his side. I like him but he crosses lines many times with his excessiveness.

He possess tyrant quality and maybe that's what Oyo state need anyway. Good luck Mr Oriyomi but can we say all the good works and philanthropic works you've done were politically motivated

Public acclaim does not translate to popularity at all and the story of gani fawehinmi presidential election contest in 2003 provides eloquent commentary. Despite his popularity , he lost that so galantly that he even lost in the polling booth in front of his house in GRA and in all the areas of lagos populated by the 'masses', he scored zero votes in most polling units.

Krak:
Many of the Western MSM are tacitly against Israel, you don't have a point.

I’m fully aware MSM means “mainstream media”—but blanket dismissal of every report as “anti-Israel” doesn’t make facts disappear. The truth doesn’t lose credibility just because it’s inconvenient. If even MSM outlets—many of which are often critical of Israel—acknowledge Iran’s terror sponsorship or Israel’s military precision, then perhaps reality is too loud to ignore. Bias cuts both ways, but facts are stubborn things. You can’t shout “media bias” every time evidence doesn’t flatter your narrative. Try countering facts with facts—not lazy deflections. If MSM doesn’t matter, why do their headlines suddenly bother you when they get one thing right?

From Tehran to the Lake Chad Basin: Why Defending Iran’s Terror Links Echoes the Pain of Boko Haram’s Terror

In any nation scarred by terrorism, the idea of applauding a known sponsor of violent extremism should raise alarm bells. Yet today, some voices—whether out of ideology or ignorance—are defending Iran’s role in global conflict as if it were heroic resistance rather than what it truly is: state-sponsored destabilization.

Iran is not merely a geopolitical actor. It is a government that openly funds and arms groups like Hezbollah, Hamas, and Islamic Jihad—militias that have killed thousands of civilians, suppressed freedom, and turned children into frontline soldiers. These are not liberation movements; they are war machines, often operating with Iran’s blessing, money, and weapons.

To defend this is no different in spirit from praising those who once enabled Boko Haram—the terrorist group that has ravaged northeastern Nigeria, kidnapped schoolgirls, bombed churches and mosques, and left communities in ruins.

If Nigerians recoil at the thought of a government backing Boko Haram, why applaud Iran for doing the same in other regions of the world?
This is not a call for blind allegiance to any country—it is a call for consistency in condemning terror, wherever it sprouts. No narrative—religious, ethnic, or political—should justify support for regimes that thrive on bloodshed and chaos.
Let’s not dress up terror as resistance. Let’s call it what it is.

Femi Fani-Kayode’s Gospel of Hypocrisy: When a ‘Pastor’ Praises Terror and Demonizes Democracy

Let’s begin with the messenger himself—Femi Fani-Kayode, a man who parades as a Christian pastor but pens sermons that pander to Islamist propaganda. In his recent tirade, FFK launches fiery condemnation at Israel, branding it with every inflammatory label imaginable—“genocidal,” “child-killing,” “racist”—yet offers nothing but praise for Iran, the world’s top state sponsor of terrorism. That’s not balance. That’s betrayal—of facts, of logic, and of faith.

Iran has long empowered violent non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis—groups with blood-soaked histories of attacking civilians, bombing markets, firing rockets at kindergartens, and using human shields. These are not freedom fighters. They are foot soldiers of tyranny, financed and equipped by Tehran’s brutal regime. Yet FFK, ever eager to impress a certain audience, chooses to glorify Iran’s “courage” and lament its “victimhood.”

When a man claims to be a servant of Christ but lionizes a regime that jails Christians, sponsors global terror, and executes dissenters, his pulpit becomes a podium of hypocrisy. Fani-Kayode’s selective outrage reeks not of principle but of opportunism. It’s as if he preaches holiness by day, and by night, whispers oaths in the shadows of the Ayatollah.
Let’s be clear: one can criticize Israeli policy without embracing Iran’s darkness. But when you cheer for a theocracy known for exporting bloodshed while demonizing the only liberal democracy in the region, you’ve lost the plot—and perhaps your soul.

Rebuttal to Pastor FFK ]—Exposing the Hypocrisy and True Face of Iran
Let’s start with the messenger:Femi Fani Kayode, a self-proclaimed Christian pastor pandering to Islamist audiences, condemning Israel while giving a free pass to Iran—the world’s top state sponsor of terrorism . That’s hypocrisy dressed in piety.
Iran’s Global Terror Web
Iran doesn’t merely “resist”—it funds and controls groups actively targeting civilians:
Hezbollah: Iranian proxy with a history of suicide bombings, notably the 1983 Beirut barracks and 1994 AMIA bombings double-tapped Argentina’s Jewish community

Hamas: Receives $70–100 million annually from Iran, responsible for indiscriminate rocket fire targeting Israeli civilians and massacres in October 2023

Houthi militants in Yemen and Shia militias in Iraq and Syria: Trained and equipped by Iran to wage sectarian wars and terror

These are not resistance fighters—they are terror networks exporting violence worldwide, killing innocent civilians to advance Tehran’s agenda.
Israel’s Precision vs. Iran’s Barbarism
By contrast, Israel’s latest strikes—150+ airstrikes and Mossad operations—targeted nuclear and military leaders in Iran, eliminating IRGC commanders and nuclear scientists like Salami, Bagheri, and Hajizadeh . Yes, civilian casualties occurred; no military action is flawless—but these were collateral, not intentional mass terror.

So, Pastor FFK !, spare us the moral sermon. You can’t equate a democracy countering nuclear threats with Iran’s Faustian support for war and terror. Israel fights militarily—not systematically target civilians. Iran specializes in sponsoring the slaughter. The pastor’s selective condemnation reveals all: when a regime’s protector claims moral high ground, it’s time to check your compass.

Kushites:
Netanyahu begs Trump for help as Iranian missiles pound Israel.

Trump refuses! Says “Sorry! You are O.Y.O.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v60NZ46wg_A?si=mhxUZjiNXLrP2NQV

You’re hallucinating if you think Iran “attacked Israel’s defense ministry”—that never happened. The reality? Israel struck over 100 strategic targets inside Iran, disabling nuclear sites, missile bases, air-defense systems—and killed at least 20 top commanders

Here’s the body count:

Hossein Salami (IRGC commander‑in‑chief)

Mohammad Bagheri (Chief of Armed Forces staff)

Amir Ali Hajizadeh (IRGC aerospace leader)

Gholamali Rashid, and more
And six nuclear scientists

That’s not “defeat”—that’s a demolition. Meanwhile, Iran launched 270 missiles and drones; only 22 got through, killing just 3 Israelis

So yes, Israel is in “complete control of Iranian airspace”—that’s why Iran’s foreign minister is begging for peace.
Their propaganda is crumbling under the rubble of their own cities. Just you wait: we’ve only seen the tip of their trouble.

Iran thought launching hundreds of missiles and drones would show strength. Instead, they revealed how weak they truly are.
While Israel's air defenses intercepted most threats, Iran’s own cities have paid the price—and the damage has been severe.
Tehran struck—not with symbolism but with devastation. Israel’s Operation Rising Lion pummeled Iran’s Natanz nuclear facility, major military bases, oil refineries, and ballistic missile infrastructure across over 100 strategic sites, killing top IRGC commanders—including Salami and Bagheri—and wiping out key nuclear personnel . Civilian casualties are steep—dozens killed, hundreds injured, including children—plus paralysis of Iran’s gas fields and power blackouts that crippled everyday lives .

What does this tell us? Iran’s beloved rhetoric of resistance has collapsed under real pressure. Their military was exposed as overstretched, their people left to queue for fuel and comfort themselves with Starlink via Elon Musk, and nuclear diplomacy lies in tatters as talks collapse .
In short, Iran tried to flex—and ended up flinching. The regime’s bluff has been called: it isn’t a superpower—it’s a badly mismanaged, gasping giant.

DomPerignon:
Funny how you are more interested in condemning Iranian justified attacks on Israel but have been celebrating Israel bombing Iran and Gaza indiscriminately.

FYI, there are no civilians in Israel as every Israeli is part of the reservists force of the IDF. Each Israeli citizen and chew is expected to serve one year mandatory service in the IDF . The war in Gaza has seen many chews from across Europe and the US return to murder civilians in Gaza.

As per as Israel is concerned there is no civilian there as they are all active reserve combatants in the IDF genocide army and they all endorse the genocide of Palestinians. Last I checked an overwhelming 85% of Israeli chews are in support of genociding the entire Palestinian population

If Germany and the entire German population can be held responsible for the phantom holocaust and Germans 80ys after the war are still expected to pay reparations to so-called Holocaust survivors all these years since WW2 ended then I see no reason why every chew in Israel and beyond can not be held accountable for the ongoing genocide and war crimes of their terrorist state and government.

There’s nothing “justified” about targeting civilians with hundreds of drones and missiles. Iran didn’t strike IDF bases—they hit towns and residential areas. That’s not justice, that’s cowardice wrapped in propaganda.

Your claim that “every Israeli is a combatant” is morally and legally false. Yes, Israel has compulsory service—like many countries—but that doesn’t make babies, children, or elderly civilians legitimate military targets. That's the logic of terrorists, not human rights defenders.

Claiming all Jews (“chews,” as you mockingly write) are fair game because of their ethnicity or nationality is the very definition of bigotry. This is not anti-Zionism—it’s unfiltered antisemitism.

Also, comparing 1940s Germany to Israel today is a false equivalence. The Holocaust was not a "phantom," and equating the victims of Nazi gas chambers with modern warfare is both offensive and ignorant.

Genocide is not determined by your Twitter rage. It is defined by evidence, intent, and legal process—not emotional tribalism. If you justify mass killing based on ethnicity, you’ve already lost the moral argument.

Condemning Iran for targeting civilians isn’t hypocrisy—it’s basic humanity. Two wrongs don’t make justice. They make more graves.

Alaigbo:
Many of you have brain on your shoulders but refuse to make use of it.

Iran that destroyed Isreali defence ministry building is what you claim is targetting civilians.

Why do you think Trump that stated USA as no hand in the attack quickly threatened to enter the war if Iran do not go back to negotiating table.

You’ve got your facts backward. Iran didn’t strike Israel’s defense ministry—it barely hit civilian areas. The IDF reports over 270 missiles fired, yet only about 22 got through, resulting in 13 deaths, including children

Meanwhile, Israel launched airstrikes on over 250 Iranian targets, including nuclear sites, command centers, missile depots, and senior IRGC

That’s not propaganda—it’s a clear imbalance in targeting and precision. Iran’s foreign minister calling for peace? Because they know they just got exposed. Their message isn't strength—it’s surrender under pressure.

So no, your claim that Iran “took out Israel’s defense ministry” is fantasy. The truth: Iran fired hundreds of missiles, but few broke through. Israel smashed 250 high-value targets. Iran is crying peace—because they just got owned militarily and diplomatically.

DomPerignon:
Lol.

Whoever said these people are intelligent needs a brain swap.

From Israel intercepting nearly all of Iran's missiles and drones to civilians are being targeted by Iran


Which one is it ?

Also, Israel celebrates bombing an Iranian apartment complex to get at their targets in Iran killing dozens of civilians . Same chews that hacd been on a genocidal bombing spree in Gaza bombing hospitals, refugee camps, food and aid distribution centres and effectively using starvation as a weapon of war are the ones now accusing Iran of targeting civilians ? The entire war in Gaza has seen Israel label every Palestine above 3ys as a potential Hamas terrorist.

This is same Israel which has declared all Palestinians as Amalek who they intend to wioe of the face of the earth and are televising their genocide in real time to the entire world to see.


The devil is the father of these people.

Selective outrage is not moral clarity. Two wrongs don’t make a right. If you truly condemn the bombing of civilians, then you should be able to say so whether it’s in Gaza or Tehran—without deflection or whataboutism.

Yes, Israel has faced serious criticism for its actions in Gaza, and many of those concerns are valid and ongoing. But that does not give Iran a free pass to intentionally launch missiles at civilian areas, targeting noncombatants in Tel Aviv or elsewhere. You can’t justify that by pointing to someone else’s sins.

Also, equating military strikes with genocide is dangerous and cheapens the word. Not every conflict is genocide, and not every civilian death is intentional extermination.

If your defense of Iran’s actions depends on calling every Israeli “Amalek” or “devils,” you’ve already lost the moral argument. Hate can't be cured with more hate.

Condemn both where both are wrong. But don't cloak tribal rage in moral robes and call it justice. Targeting civilians is cowardice—no matter who does it.

DomPerignon:
Lol.

Whoever said these people are intelligent needs a brain swap.

From Israel intercepting nearly all of Iran's missiles and drones to civilians are being targeted by Iran


Which one is it ?

Also, Israel celebrates bombing an Iranian apartment complex to get at their targets in Iran killing dozens of civilians . Same chews that hacd been on a genocidal bombing spree in Gaza bombing hospitals, refugee camps, food and aid distribution centres and effectively using starvation as a weapon of war are the ones now accusing Iran of targeting civilians ? The entire war in Gaza has seen Israel label every Palestine above 3ys as a potential Hamas terrorist.

This is same Israel which has declared all Palestinians as Amalek who they intend to wioe of the face of the earth and are televising their genocide in real time to the entire world to see.


The devil is the father of these people.

There’s nothing heroic about launching missiles at civilians. Iran’s recent attacks haven’t struck fear—they’ve struck homes, schools, markets, and ordinary lives. And that’s the problem: instead of targeting Israeli military infrastructure, Iran has chosen the coward’s route—aiming at the defenseless.

But here’s the uncomfortable truth: if Israel ever retaliated in the same manner, abandoning precision for vengeance, the devastation would be unimaginable. Iran is not equipped to absorb that kind of blow—militarily, economically, or socially.

Iran claims to resist Zionist oppression, but targeting civilians only exposes its lack of discipline, strategy, and legitimacy. Wars aren’t won by terrorizing innocents. They’re won by confronting real power—not dodging it.

If Iran is serious about being a regional force, then it must act like one. That means targeting military assets, not families. Otherwise, it's not resistance—it’s desperation wearing the mask of revolution.

Israel is dealing with iran—not with symbolism but with devastation. Israel’s Operation Rising Lion pummeled Iran’s Natanz nuclear facility, major military bases, oil refineries, and ballistic missile infrastructure across over 100 strategic sites, killing top IRGC commanders—including Salami and Bagheri—and wiping out key nuclear personnel . Civilian casualties are steep—dozens killed, hundreds injured, including children—plus paralysis of Iran’s gas fields and power blackouts that crippled everyday lives . My point is that iran should target israel military targets and not concentrate on civilian targets. If israel does the same , it will be devastating .

There is nothing courageous about launching missiles at civilians. Iran’s recent actions didn’t demonstrate strength—they exposed cowardice at its purest. When you can’t defeat your enemy’s army, and instead rain destruction on apartment blocks, schools, and marketplaces, you’re not waging war—you’re committing a crime.

Iran's so-called “retaliation” against Israel was less a show of power and more a temper tantrum with explosive consequences, targeting innocents who had nothing to do with military decisions. That’s not bravery—it’s brutality.

It’s like a schoolyard bully who can’t fight his match, so he punches a toddler instead. No one applauds that. No one respects it.

Real strength lies in restraint. Real courage targets threat, not the helpless. Iran’s actions have only deepened its global isolation and unmasked the moral bankruptcy behind its fiery speeches.

History will not remember them as defenders—it will remember them as the cowards who targeted the defenseless.

Obainomilano:
and yet u waste so much time and energy on a failure ...atr u too lazy or shameless because I don't waste time to comment on failures or even read their story

Because Peter Obi is a carefully packaged fraud, he keeps spewing half-truths and political garbage to stay relevant. But every time he talks, he exposes the emptiness behind the branding. Someone should advise him: when you have nothing truthful to say, silence is not weakness—it’s wisdom. In his case, silence would be golden. Right now, he’s only unmasking himself—one delusional soundbite at a time.

searchlight:
We are witnessing top leadership and government from Tinubu just after Buhari lolzzzzz😂😂😂😂

Yes, we’re witnessing leadership—real leadership. Not photo ops and pity votes. What you call ‘lolzzz’ is actually the sound of old systems breaking and long-overdue reforms kicking in.”

In just a short time, President Tinubu has:

Removed the fuel subsidy trap that crippled our economy for decades

Unified the exchange rate to close the forex corruption loophole

Kicked off the student loan scheme for Nigerian youths

Revived the national infrastructure plan with targeted investment

Pushed forward the Presidential CNG initiative to lower transport costs

Attracted billions in foreign direct investment by restoring investor confidence

Steadied the naira after years of turbulence under the previous administration

This isn’t business as usual. It’s repair work on a nation mismanaged for decades. Leadership isn’t loud—it’s lasting.

Let’s be clear: if governance were a car stuck in the mud, Atiku and Obi would still be debating who should push. Tinubu grabbed the wheel—and got the engine roaring again.

DmonSlayer10:
Oga broaden your horizon...grow your mind...

The main Leaders of the OBIdient movement have always been Yorubas and Edos and Middle-beltans and now Hausa/fulanis; The major decision makers; Obasanjo,Akin Osuntokun,Pa Adebayo,Afenifere,That lawyer Activist imprisoned by Afe Babalola,Aisha Yussuf,Pastor Ituah Ighodalo,Saad Abubakar(Sultan of Sokoto),that former SGF from Adamawa,T.Y Danjuma and etc....

No single Igbo leaders are OBIdients; They are all Tinubu supporters..

All Obidients know these leadership and support structures.So they can't be foolish to hate Yorubas as your simple mind thinks...

OBIdients just want people to be principled in bringing a possitive change to Nigeria.Simple

Exactly the kind of false narrative Obidients keep spinning to deceive unsuspecting Yorubas. Let’s be clear: Obasanjo and Pa Ayo Adebanjo’s endorsement of Peter Obi had nothing to do with principle—it was driven by personal bitterness and deep-seated resentment toward Bola Tinubu. There was nothing noble or altruistic about it.

As for the former SGF from Adamawa, his break from Buhari was based solely on religious sentiment over the Muslim-Muslim ticket—not some alignment with Obi’s ideals.

And people like Osuntokun? They’re simply victims of the age-old “Ndigbo tribal consensus con trick”—a political hustle dressed in the robes of reform.

The pattern couldn’t be clearer: Yorubas who tie themselves to Igbo tribal movements—whether in the name of Zikism or Obidientism—almost always end up used, dumped, and forgotten.

Just like the Zikist movement of old, the Obidient movement is not about justice or nation-building. It’s an ethnic project wrapped in populist language—designed to enthrone one group under the guise of national unity.

Yorubas who still fall for this should prepare for the same fate as those before them: betrayal and erasure. The playbook hasn’t changed. Only the actors have.

Wickedfact:
You demand accountability from others but praise your own.

What did Obidients say when Otti praised Tinubu and what did Obidients say when Makinde praised Tinubu?

What did Igbo Obidients say when Ozigbo left LP and what did you say when Okupe left LP?

What did you Obidient Igbos say when Tunde visited Tinubu and what did you say when Cubana Chief priest visited Shettima?

Nobody wey no get brother.
In 2027, you Igbo Obidients will learn painful lessons.

Right on, bro. Let them know—2027 will not be a replay of 2023. The sympathy wave has crashed. The illusion has faded. Nigerians, especially the youths, are wiser now. The next election won't be won on vibes, hashtags, or emotional blackmail. It’ll be about structure, substance, and truth. 2027 will be a reckoning, not a revival tour. So they better brace themselves—because the next social media war won’t be fought with hype, but with receipts. No more free passes. No more victimhood. This time, every lie will be called out, and every fraud will be exposed. Let the games begin.

helinues:
Obidients have been scratching their heads with several attacks on their principal which Peter Obi caused by himself.

Before 2027, Peter Obi would have lost the little relevancy he's currently having

A true leader takes responsibility, not just for success, but for failure, missteps, and missed opportunities. Peter Obi, however, has shown a consistent pattern of blame-shifting and excuse-making—hallmarks of someone unprepared for real leadership.

The more we look closely, the more the fraud reveals itself.

Peakdesign23:
Let's no fastfoward, let's just wait patiently for 2027 election's. Nigerians will do thier thing, politicians will do thier own thing.

The reality is, Peter Obi’s 2023 run thrived on sympathy and protest votes. But by 2027, Nigerians will be more discerning. The hype has faded. If he returns with noise but no real structure, the outcome may be even worse.

Ekpeitut:
It has become clear that the APC’s latest tactic is to use random, unverified social media accounts to falsely label the Obidient movement as hateful. These posts are then amplified by their media allies in a desperate attempt to discredit Peter Obi and distract from the real issues Nigerians are facing.

We must not fall for this cheap manipulation.

The Obidient movement stands for accountability, progress, and peaceful democratic engagement. We do not speak through anonymous trolls, nor do we engage in hate. Every political movement has bad actors—but it is intellectually dishonest and cowardly to use fringe comments to smear an entire group or its leader.

Stay focused. Stay peaceful. And don’t let propaganda define our voice.

#Obidient #PeterObi #RejectPropaganda #NigeriansDeserveBetter

You don’t need to call the Obidient movement hateful when it keeps screaming it from every rooftop.
The anger of youths, when channeled constructively, is indeed powerful. But the Obidient movement confused raw rage with strategic reform. What started as a hopeful wave of youth-driven change quickly turned into an online mob—loud, tribal, intolerant, and allergic to dissent.

Instead of building alliances and institutions, the movement relied on insults, cancel culture, and emotional blackmail. You couldn’t criticize Peter Obi without being called a sellout, a tribalist, or worse. That’s not democracy—that’s digital tyranny.

The Obidient movement was misguided because it mistook social media virality for electoral structure. It ignored the real Nigeria—rural voters, political coalitions, and national balance.

Now, it’s unraveling. The hype is fading. The bullying no longer works. And Nigerians, especially the youths, are asking real questions: What exactly did Obi build after 2023?

You can't scream your way into power. Nigeria needs leadership, not loud voices. And those who built their political capital on tribal outrage are watching it crash—under the weight of its own intolerance.

In a recent interview, Kenneth Okonkwo—once Peter Obi’s passionate spokesman—said something that deserves serious attention: what worked for Peter Obi in 2023 won’t work in 2027. What will matter is what he does between 2023 and 2027.
Let’s break it down.
In 2023, Peter Obi rode on a wave of anger, frustration, and youth energy. The #EndSARS generation was hungry for change. The APC and PDP were unpopular. People were ready and desperate to try something new. Obi was that fresh face, and he had social media on fire. The “Obidient” movement became a storm—loud, emotional, and everywhere. Many voted out of hope, not policy.

But 2027 will be different.

By then, the hype would have cooled. Emotions will give way to performance and results. Voters will ask: What did Obi do since 2023? Did he build a party? Did he work with others? Did he offer solutions? Or did he just complain and disappear?

The truth is, 2023 gave Peter Obi sympathy votes and protest votes. In 2027, Nigerians will be more critical. The novelty has worn off. If he comes with the same social media noise and no political structure, the result may be worse than before.

Even Kenneth Okonkwo can see the writing on the wall—and he was once one of Obi’s loudest voices.
If Peter Obi wants a different outcome in 2027, he needs a different approach. Hope alone won’t cut it this time.

Racoon:
Everyone can't just stop talking about Peter Obi both his proponents or opponents.

Every time Peter Obi speaks, he unknowingly removes all doubt about who he truly is.
The tragedy of ignorance is that it parades itself as confidence. And that’s exactly what we see, time and again, with Peter Obi and his inner circle.
Kenneth Okonkwo’s recent outburst is just another exhibit in the growing gallery of dysfunction—proof that Obi lacks the temperament, maturity, and leadership required for high office.
Real leaders unite, guide, and restrain. Obi surrounds himself with noise-makers who expose his emptiness.
Leadership isn’t volume or vibes. It’s vision, structure, and control—qualities glaringly missing from his camp.
The more Peter Obi speaks, the more he strips away the illusion. Silence might be his best strategy.

150 Missiles, 3 Hits: Iran’s ‘Vow’ Turns into a Comedy of Errors
Iran launched Operation Vow of Truth III—a retaliatory strike involving about 100–150 ballistic missiles and over 100 drones aimed at Israel after Israeli "Operation Rising Lion" struck Iranian nuclear and military targets, killing senior command staffs and scientist.

Despite the fanfare, Iran’s barrage inflicted only minor damage —a handful of hits among hundreds of projectiles that were mostly intercepted . Tel Aviv and Jerusalem braced for the storm—and walked away with only shock waves.
Meanwhile, Israel’s Operation Rising Lion, executed with over 200 jets and warplanes, shattered over 100 Iranian nuclear and military sites—including the Natanz enrichment facility—and eliminated top IRGC leaders and nuclear scientists. Iranian officials reported 78–90 killed and over 320 injured .
In short: Iran's much-publicized “revenge” turned into a fireworks show of failure, while Israel’s strikes were surgical and devastating. The gap between boast and breakdown could not be wider.
Iran tried to play chess with slingshots—against a nation that doesn’t miss.

aminauiade:
https://dailypost.ng/2025/06/13/its-just-the-beginning-fani-kayode-hails-irans-retaliation-against-israel/

I guess scoring 2 out of 100 is now a paa mark!!.Call a spade a spade.....Iran is no match to Israel.