₦airaland Forum

Softmirror:
Give me more list of where such happens. And we will compare.

I already gave you two with one common denominator and you're asking for more

Na until e reach ten before you go condemn the evil and the common cause?

Softmirror:
Pakistan is an extract from Indian, Indians by culture have no regard for women. They rape and murder women without remorse. It's an underlining culture. Else this crime of killing women would be so profound in Saudi Arabia, Dubai, even Nigeria in all Muslim dominated countries. But such is very particular with Pakistan.

If there is a verse in the Quran that instructs killing of women please share it to the world.

It happens a lot in Iran, Afghanistan too....what cultures are these ones extracted from?

VicM6:
This is something a white man will never say....rubish l
Black man mentality disturbing almost everybody in africa...Now he is trying to lay the blame on a lay man.

Stop this type of talk,black whites,Asians no one is exempted from saying rubbish

papyjaypaul:
That's something interesting about politicians. In Nigeria, the government convinced us that Ghanaians were the problem, therefore, Ghana must go.

In Western countries, they are making it look like immigrants are the problem but the government knows why they brought in immigrants. For instance, an aging population and workforce but the government does not want to be blamed when there is breakdown of law and order. They want the people to blame law abiding immigrants, they don't want to accept blame that they failed as a government.

In South Africa, migrants are the problem not the locals.

Weren't Nigerians blaming Nigeriens and other nationalities for the Fulani terrorists? Who has the power to defend their own? Government. But they wanted the people to blame them instead of their inefficiencies. That's government for you around the world. The people are fooled to see themselves as enemies instead of the political class that were negligent.

I understand your point. But the Muslims are not exactly painting a good picture of themselves

They're always problematic anywhere they go

Softmirror:
Hmmmmm........ One will think with the rate at which Mosque and churches full this country ehn.

Most likely a traditional priest that requested for organs for rituals....blame babalawos for this

maasoap:
That's the easiest way to make some of you deploy your common sense.


You want me to be discussing inflation in Nigeria under this topic, right? At this point, I should be asking you if something is not really fundamentally wrong with you. There are plenty of topics about Nigeria, Tinubu and his economic policies.


You see, this is foolishness on your part. You are already insulting and abusing me about the topic we're are not even discussing and about which I haven't voiced my opinion yet. By mentioning Tinubu here as analogy, you already assumed that I'm supporting him. Your thought process is wacky

You nor really get sense... you brought up tinubu's name in a discussion not related to him( not the first time you're doing this). And you're asking me if you should discuss tinubu in this topic?... sense is really far from you

You think you're wise. Telling me I don't know who you support. You supporters of tinubu always try to use Trump to deter and take attention away from the cluelessness and useless of tinubu. You always try to use Trump's actions to try and criticize anybody who has anything to say against tinubu... sensible people know the way you dots move here



You're not smart....don't bring your dumb sh*t close to me

So the deal didn't go through?...nawa o

High value woman wey dey look for tfare to go date

Do you people even understand the meaning of words/phrases before using them?

But wait o,na u be dat for dp?... lemme not talk sha

Not surprised itan an Indian

Their men dey behave like rabid dogs

Rip

The far right in that country might use this to further drive their anti-islam sentiment

There's already growing disdain and resentment for Islam and immigrants from Muslim countries in Sweden

Dem don dey hold press conference...nawa o

These rwandes get mind sha

veekid:
Please teach your sons that they don’t have to tolerate bad attitudes from badly raised girls for them to be seen as good men.

God bless you

Thunder faya una

Tell me why I nor go marry Latina😘

EmperorCaesar:
No. You were glad he withdrew it and even gave some shitty excuses

He just proved to be inconsistent in his decision making. A poor leadership trait

A good leader lessons to his people and sometimes has to go back on earlier decisions.

This is not only about trump alone

I know you're not used to leaders reversing decisions after cries from their people,you being Nigerian and all. You're used to wicked politicians who continue with their wicked policies even when it leads to people dying over free food.

You don't understand who or what a good leader is. Not entirely your fault tho

Wallade:
I want to believe that she will approach the court to seek redress and Justice.

I trust the USA judiciary to be the last line of defense for the law even if the Congress is compromised.

Trump's removal of Inspector General is getting a major publicity now because of the manner and approach that Trump applied to to do it. I want to believe every other president that removed Inspector General or career civil servants followed due process. There is a reason for that law that requires the president to follow that process.

Now, we have an understanding.

They actually didn't have to....the 'due process' in this scenario was signed into law during the Biden presidency

But no wahala....she should seek justice the appropriate way

maasoap:
You just described Trump's childish behaviour here. President firing civil and career officials at will, which law gave him that power? That's abuse of power. I'm sure that the reason you didn't recognise what he did was that it was done by American president. If it was done by Tinubu, you would instantly know that it was an abuse of power.

Stop bringing tinubu into this discussion

Some of una ehn, wetin concern tinubu here?

There's terrible inflation in Nigeria and tinubu should be held responsible....if you disagree with that then there's something fundamentally wrong with you

Wallade:
She can't be removed by the president with executive fiat in the manner Trump did.

Trumo can remove her, and she did not say he couldn't, but by following a process which is backed by law.

The process, most importantly, includes that the President of USA (Donald Trump, in this case) should inform the Congress of the USA with reasons his justification to sack or remove an Inspector General before the IG is removed.

That is the law in the USA.

Trump ignored that part of the law and used a unilateral executive order (fiat). Do you know why Trump removed her, Trump never told the press or the Congress why he removed her till now.

That position of the Inspector General can investigate any head of agency and even the president of the USA himself, so you should understand why the law seeks to protect the Inspector General from a power drunk, bullish and overreaching president like Trump or in future.

Bottom line is she can be removed by the president. Only that he has to tell Congress why.

In this case her fate is sealed wether through Congress or executive order.... Republicans control both houses and even the supreme Court. So all that is formality.

And if she feels Trump has violated the law then she can seek justice the appropriate way.

P.S. Trump is not the first president doing this type of thing. Republican and democratic presidents in the past have removed numerous IG's during their time. It's only getting major publicity now because of who is in power.

Normal level....I go soon win nobel peace prize for my efforts in educating netizens on nairaland

Wallade:
Oga, stop talking rubbish.

It is not a formality to inform the Congress. That position is a very sensitive position because an inspector general can investigate heads of agency and even Mr President himself. That is why the President of USA can't unilaterally fire Inspector Generals. That is why the president must justify with reasons the desire to fire an Inspector General to the Congress of the USA.

Again I will show you why you are talking rubbish like you said again with your statement that I made bold.

"Phyllis Fong, a 22-year veteran of the department, had earlier told colleagues that she intended to stay after the White House terminated her Friday, saying that she didn’t believe the administration had followed proper protocols, the sources said"

I copied it from the original post. now I ask:

How did you miss that information on the original post? Do you still have your eyes or you just don't want to see?

Sorry I might have missed that part

But your argument has been centered on the point that she cannot be removed by the president. Not that due process must be followed

You've been arguing that she cannot be removed by the president hence my response to you

And yes the Congress being informed is mainly a formality... they don't usually turn down the president's request in this scenario.


If by chance they ever do, the supreme Court will ultimately have the final say

spiSeyi:
Illiteracy she wasn't hire and paid by Trump she was hired by the US and paid with the Americans tax payers money. If the sack is illegal she can be reinstated and paid damages .. She is even lucky bcs US nor be Nigeria

Actually she was appointed by the presidency

Ojuntana:
Don't mind the guy
Hatred for Trump has blocked their reasoning
He's reading something clear and simple and still arguing against it

I just taya for some people

It's clearly impossible to have logical and rational conversations with them

Wallade:
Oga, stop talking rubbish.

It is not a formality to inform the Congress. That position is a very sensitive position because an inspector general can investigate heads of agency and even Mr President himself. That is why the President of USA can't unilaterally fire Inspector Generals. That is why the president must justify with reasons the desire to fire an Inspector General to the Congress of the USA.

Again I will show you why are talking rubbish like you said again with your statement that I made bold.

Ok...you don win

Wallade:
Did Trump notify the Congress before removing the Inspector Generals?

Trump has to notify the Congress with reasons or justification before he can remove her.

It is quite obvious that Trump is seeking and gearing to have absolute power, that is something no USA president had because of checks and balances.

Trump criticized African leadership recently but he covets the absolute power that fuelled corruption, bad leadership and bad governance in Africa.

I am afraid of what failure, terror and pevert USA will become with Trump as the president.

You're still not getting it...yes Trump should have notified Congress...even that in itself is a formality

The issue here is her claiming 'the president cannot remove her'...He actually can. It's in the Constitution

There's a difference between saying 'i don't believe due process was followed in my removal and saying 'i cannot be removed by the president'

I nor dey explain again

Winnin009:
Kindly share a link i can read. Would love to read just like I read the other guy's

Already did

Wallade:
Did you read my post? Maybe you should read again and try to comprehend

You're the one not comprehending....

Can she be removed by the president?,yes...it's written in the Constitution

Only that Congress has to be notified...

She didn't say due process was not followed. She expressly said the president does not have the right to remove her.

Either she's ignorant or a terrible liar who feels uncountable to the presidency. Either of these two scenarios make her unfit to hold key govt position.

Winnin009:
What exactly was said the the person doesn't know?

Before you respond ehn.... read the link below.

https://www.npr.org/2025/01/27/nx-s1-5275424/president-trump-fired-more-that-a-dozen-inspectors-general-heres-why-that-matters

Here's one for you....https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/trump-fired-17-inspectors-general-was-it-legal


These issues are complex

The supreme Court ultimately has the final say

The presidency still has the right to remove her. Only that it must give Congress reasons for doing it.

Her saying the presidency does not have the right to remove is another thing. It's blatant ignorance and disrespect for the number one office in the country

Winnin009:
What exactly was said the the person doesn't know?

Before you respond ehn.... read the link below.

https://www.npr.org/2025/01/27/nx-s1-5275424/president-trump-fired-more-that-a-dozen-inspectors-general-heres-why-that-matters

It's you and the guy that should read broadly before typing




It now states that the presidency must have substantial reasons for the firing .

Stop following leftist propaganda sites

I nor trust una

Drop another one(s) here

Money we nor reach anything nqim dey still nor wan gree pay

Naija politicians ehn...later they'll be waiting for Western govts to help them perform their duties through aid

DrAda:
How long do you think it will take before Americans launches a massive protest against Trump?

They did that all through his first term. Even organizing overseas rallies.

But here he is serving a second term. The protests will come,but it won't change much.