₦airaland Forum

Sweet business. Continue to pay ransom.

You know he will still come online to explain, yet you decided to make a fool of yourself.

Nairaland is compromised. Wait till few weeks to elections. The guy will collect money and start boosting Apc lapdogs with huge number of likes.

If courageous people like him step aside and refuse to act, don't complain when insecurity reaches your doorstep.

Nwaikpe:
He is a criminal.
He should have been in Sokoto prison, too.

A man is putting his life on the line to fight terrorists in our forests. Instead of encouraging him, most of you are sitting comfortably behind your phones talking him down. Una life don spoil.

Keep those prayers within your family members.

It says - admin.inecnigeria.org
How did he manage to enter admin's area?
It's finished. Apc will massively rig 2027 elections.

Right. A promise made, a promise to keep.

"He explained that those countries intentionally built strong industrial policies that supported pharmaceutical manufacturing for years, while Nigeria failed to do the same.

He pointed out that local pharmaceutical manufacturers are struggling under unbearable conditions including unstable electricity, poor infrastructure, high production costs, expensive loans and weak government support."

Nothing will ever work under Tinubu's watch.

So payment of salaries that workers are entitled to is now an achievement? This man does not deserve a second term.

Before criticizing others, what meaningful contribution have you done to help bring the kids back to their families aside from posting comments online?

femi4:
Festival wey dem suppose cancel

Nothing to celebrate with those kids out there

Sane Nigerians should regret these Apc criminals. Exactly like I expected it to happen.

Lie. "Government" have families. They've never messed with the wrong one. Hand go touch their families home and abroad.

Drsnives:
VDM take am easy oo.. nobody fight the government and succeed

First start with 10k airtime.

Get this into your skull, I don’t belong to any political party. The concern is how internal political processes shape national electoral credibility. Tinubu who once said grab it, snatch it, run away with it, cannot be viewed without serious concerns about electoral fairness. And having most governors on his side does not remove the possibility of manipulation. Party structures can still be used to engineer outcomes in his favour like inflating total number of votes during the primaries.

FSBoperator:
You can approach any court to compel INEC to release the APC register list for each state but must provide reason why you need the list and this must involve another court proceeding already initiated concerning the primaries which no court will give you five minutes of their time.

That's as far as you can go.

You will have to prove in court your assertion that the APC concluded primaries wil affect the elections negatively as you claim.

All said, when we told you guys the defections into the APC by state governors was setting the pace for mass grassroot mobilization for Tinubu's campaign, you guys dismissed it and said governors have only one vote.

Well you are seeing the kind of votes a sitting governor can pull and you are now crying.

Pele oh

This isn’t about party membership. The moment a process can influence how elections are perceived or conducted, it stops being purely internal issue. It becomes everyone’s business. Apc will conduct massive rigging next year.

FSBoperator:
You are free to go to court .

But on what grounds are you challenging the outcome of the primaries of a political party that you are not a card carrying member?

If other parties don’t investigate this 10 million+ claim properly now, they will repeat the same thing during the main election with military dss backup and nothing will change. Now they will tell you to go to court that Wike has compromised and bought over for Tinubu.

Pdp, Adc, and others should learn the game too. Announce huge numbers now so any future rigging can be defended and look normal. That way, when suspicious figures appear after the elections, Apc will be like ....we already pulled over 10 million votes during the primaries, so 20 million now shouldn’t be shocking. Tinubu is a strategist criminal.

Lol...no verifiable details, huge hidden fortune and mysterious enemies? Sounds like 2010 yahoo format. Somehow the entire thing depends on someone trusting you with 10 million dollars.

CaptainFM1:
It's something they will kill me for if I go through investors, partners. I just have to get the money and solely move on it.

And yes, there are several projects that don't come alive because the conceiver died with it. That's why they say the wealth of this world lies in the grave.

Nobody gives $10m to an idea that has produced no visible proof in 20 years. If your project truly has world-changing potential, there should already be partnerships, users, or investors interested. Otherwise, it's another packaged Nigerian sc!!!m. 

CaptainFM1:
I don't need #500k meagre pellet!. What I want to do is exactly $10m project that will revolutionize and re-engineered the world. It's a personal pet project that I've worked on developed for almost 20yrs.

Someone who cannot scale #500k into #5m is talking about becoming richer than a billionaire in 5 years if given $10m... Lol

CaptainFM1:
My name is Femi too. And I have this to say.
......If he gives my 10million dollars, I will be richer than him in 5years.

Anybody that has his contact should get this message to him.

A man needs a woman more in old age.

Kingray10:
Na f**k just full your head. They are talking about not spending old age alone you are talking about s*x

Next year, vote wisely.

2 more characters needed.

I'm not arguing with you. You’re fond of making broad generalizations. Now, not all women chase the same type of man, just like not all men place virginity at the top of their list. Different people have different standards and priorities. Me saying some men value virginity less is not attacking your preference. It’s simply acknowledging that your standard is not a universal thing. To each his own.

marcusverum:
Finally something we agree on.

To every man his own standard.
That is exactly the point of the post.

But notice what just happened.

You spent this entire thread arguing against a standard you now agree every man has a right to hold.

Women demand the best man available.
Tall. Successful. Ambitious. Stable.
No one calls that unrealistic.
No one writes paragraphs telling women
to lower their standards.

A man asks for a virgin and suddenly it requires a full debate.

That alone tells you everything about who this conversation was ever uncomfortable for.

- MV

You're talking carelessly. I guess you've never done a building project in your life.

lordm:
Oga, I'm telling you they are building.

To every man, his own preferences and standards. To you, virginity is a must. To other men, it is not a priority as long as a woman possesses the qualities they value.

marcusverum:
You just agreed with the post and called it a debate.

You said men are free to go for virgins if that is what they want.
That is exactly what the post said.

You said any comparisons a woman makes
depend on her emotional maturity.
Correct.
And a man cannot measure emotional maturity from the outside.
Which is why virginity remains the clearest
visible standard available.

You said being a non virgin does not mean
she slept with multiple men.
Also correct.
The post acknowledged that too.
Some women lost their virginity in relationships that did not survive.

But here is what you keep avoiding.

A man has no way of knowing which category she falls into.
The woman with one past partner and the woman with twenty will tell him the same story.

This is not about assuming the worst.
This is about a man protecting himself in the absence of certainty.

You have not disagreed with the post.
You have disagreed with generalizations
that are not in the post.

Read it again.

- MV

You said does a woman with multiple sexual partners carry zero emotional history from those encounters? You are already deviating from the main conversation. Being a non-virgin doesn’t mean she has slept with multiple men. Like I said earlier, she might have given her virginity to the man she thought was genuinely interested in her. Stuff like soul ties are spiritual beliefs. Psychology does not say non-virgins are damaged or virgins are emotionally healthy. Any comparisons she makes in marriage depend on the individual’s emotional maturity. Definitely not a universal rule like you’re presenting it. Nobody is saying men can’t have standards. Men are free to go for virgins if that’s what they want. The issue with you and others with your type of mentality is you keep generalizing and assuming the worst-case scenario applies to everyone who goes for non-virgins.

marcusverum:
Read the post again before you comment.

If you read it as an attack on women you missed the entire argument.

Nobody said every non virgin gave herself to the street. The post clearly stated that some women lost their virginity in relationships that did not survive and that there are non virgins who are not wayward.

That is in the post you are responding to. Which means you did not read it.

On baggage.
You said baggage comes from trauma and unresolved emotional issues.
Correct.

Now tell me.
Does a woman with multiple sexual partners
carry zero emotional history from those
encounters?
Does she have no soul ties?
No comparisons she makes in marriage?
No ex she cannot fully let go of?

The physical act has emotional consequences.
That is not an opinion.
That is biology and psychology combined.

A woman's worth is not reduced by her past.
But a man's right to set standards is not reduced by your feelings either.

Nobody is forcing any man to marry a virgin.
The post is awareness. Not a law.

- MV

Last time I checked, people get baggage from trauma and unresolved emotional issues not from physical act of intercourse. Calling non-virgin ladies "the gutter" or saying they "gave themselves freely to the street" does not make any sense. Many of them lose their virginity in committed relationships with people they genuinely loved and intended to build with. Being a non-virgin now does not reduce their worth unless in your own head.

marcusverum:
Nobody said virginity makes a woman a perfect human being.

The argument is simple. A virgin comes with less baggage than a non virgin. That is not an opinion. That is logic.

You just described two types of virgins and used them to argue against virginity. You actually proved the point.

Whether she kept it for love or for God the result is the same. She kept it.

That is the standard. Not perfection. Just a woman who did not give herself freely to the street.

The bar is not heaven. The bar is simply not the gutter.

- MV

‎To each his own. Some women choose to give their virginity to a man they sincerely believe loves them even after turning down other guys. Likewise, other women remain virgins not because they have better character or more disciplined, but because they view virginity as sacred/spiritual. Their discipline is rooted in that belief, not because they are morally better than others. Just as being religious does not automatically make someone a good person, virginity alone is not a complete measure of morality or character.