rationalmind: Mental gymnastic at its best. The run was good, the pass was bad. If the pass had been to the space infront of Werner, you would have been here telling us how great his run was.
The pass was so bad that if Werner had left it, Kante would 100% have got a better shot at goal than what Werner played there
thorrvik55: U skipped the Werner chance created by Mount which hit the sidenetting in the firsthalf but okay..
Mount, worst player on the pitch created two clear chances that any Attacker with finishing ought to have buried despite getting hooked off around 60+minutes..
Havertz the Lord of creativity also created two chances despite playing 90mins..
Werner, how many chances did he create?
Mount was the worst player on the pitch so how come from what u said urself, none of the other attackers bettered him?
We've agreed Mason Mount was the worst player on the pitch, he showed 0 creativity in the 60+minutes he played. Drop gifs of the chances that the other attackers with "creativity" created (some of them even played the full 90minutes)
rationalmind: Sure. It was a very poor strike and he deserves all the blame he got but that pass from Mount made it more difficult than it should have been.
His run was very bad.. Like very very bad, he ought to have held his run a bit rather than dashing to the Mancity post like it's Temple run..
If he had left the ball sef, Kante might have had a better effort at goal than the nonsense he played
Havertz10: havertz created 2, pulisic chance and the Werner chance above, cause nothing about anything he did was creative, all he did was pass the ball, no intelligence used, pass to havertz was aided by havertz, werner pass was simple
U skipped the Werner chance created by Mount which hit the sidenetting in the firsthalf but okay..
Mount, worst player on the pitch created two clear chances that any Attacker with finishing ought to have buried despite getting hooked off around 60+minutes..
Havertz the Lord of creativity also created two chances despite playing 90mins..
Werner, how many chances did he create?
Mount was the worst player on the pitch so how come from what u said urself, none of the other attackers bettered him?
So Mount created two clear cut chances that any professional football ought to score??
Ok, Mount was the worst player on the pitch, he created just two clear chances, oya bring gifs of the clear cut chances created by the other attackers (Werner and Havertz)
Havertz10: I should lie that we dominated the champions league because being deluded is something only true Chelsea fans exhibit, una no just like the truth
We aren't there yet, we still need a few players before we can start boasting that we can beat anybody
Isn't it funny how u rubbished Chelsea as a Club as not being a "Big" team..
Havertz10: Did you know that kross alone has more followers on Instagram than Chelsea as a club
He has won more trophies than our club, if mount had talent they would have compared him to kross but because the dunce is useless they are finishing our club Kross has won more trophies than our club
"Small Club" Chelsea with less Instagram followers and trophies than Toni Kroos, Champions of Europe
BlueAngel444: Mason Mount created more chances than any other English player in the Premier League this season (87). He created twice as many as any other Chelsea player.
How does one hate a player that keeps getting better every season
They would tell u the chances he created were not from open play.. He created those chances from corners and freekicks
Create your own legacy abeg, there is no 2012 pose he didn't copy yesterday and he picked only the big names to copy cause he knows that Chelsea fans will remember
Mason Mount is a nostalgia vulture for recreating Drogba's celebration?
donstan18: [s] Origi scored the winning goal that eliminated Barcelona in the season Liverpool won the Ucl.
The same Origi scored the goal that sealed their win in the finals against Spurs.
What happened after all he did? Did the goals guarantee him a place in Liverpool starting lineup the rest seasons? No!
If you are good, managers and fans will fancy you, you’ll make the starting lineup steady, but if you aren’t, you’ll either be loaned or used as sub, it doesn’t matter if you scored in Ucl finals or World Cup finals. You can ask Gotze hwfr.
Harvertz cost us 75m+ and yet to keep up to expectations. Once he starts delivering, I’ll personally back him up, nobody hates a committed, hardworking and developing player except abnormal people, I mean people that hates Mount. [/s]
Nonsense.. Kai Havertz is no Origi. He is a young guy in a new country/League and has already cemented his name in Chelsea history books by scoring the goal that secured our 2nd UCL trophy..
Clueless mount wouldn't have played it, if havertz didn't make the run or call the pass
Are u stupid? Are u mad?
This is no time for Agenda.. If we end up winning then u start ur Mount agenda. For now, all that matters is Chelsea winning the game. Rest with ur Mount agenda for now please
Havertz10: ndidi na rubbish player, I have said that many times
Everybody knows ur ball knowledge is less than zero so I'm not surprised
If I tell u to name players better than Ndidi in the EPL now, u will find a way to drag Mason Mount into the discussion.. Stick to hating Mason Mount my guy cos that's the only tin u are good at
popizaino: Where is the sentiment or hate in my comment? Nobody here is hating on Ndidi,all I am saying is that he is not what man urinated fans make of him. Simple!
How many midfielders in the Premier League are better than Wilfred Ndidi?
Ndidi is good at what he does, leave it at that. No one is calling him the next "Xavi" or "Pirlo"