₦airaland Forum

DissTroy:
You dimwitted offspring of a newt!

Anything which says rates means percentages. That's why I have consistently used rates and percentages, the reports of these crimes in summary use rates and percentages.

This is our fourth class today. Do take note as I'd score you at the end of the week.

US white population: 236.5 million

White on white murders in 2016: 2,874

Percentage white on white murders/ white population: 0.0000121 %. Meaning 12 in every 100,000 gets murdered by their own amongst whites.

----

US black population: 41.1 million

Black on black murders 2016: 2,570

Percentage/rate of black of black murders/black population: 0.0000625 %

Meaning about 63 in every 100,000 blacks get murdered by their own race - blacks.

See how percentages/rates are calculated now?

That's how Blacks on black crimes being the highest RATES/PERCENTAGES of intra-racial murders was arrived at, and it is much more than the other rsces' intra-racial murders combined!

Your name should really be WispyIntelligence - you have a very small amount of intelligence, and the eight wonder of the world is how you made it pass your toddling age without jumping off a jumping into a river because your intelligence mirrors that of a jellyfish.

Dumbolibtard!

are you done with your childish rants? Need a tissue? Need a hug from benalvino3? Have you marshalled your wits together? Good!

Now since you are smart enough to refer to rates and percentages, let's start with that, your stand alone statement in a paragraph of its own which from onset has been the claim I asked you to validate with data,

"black on black violent crime alone are higher than all violent crimes put together, is racism the reason black Americans keep murdering themselves?"

So you see, after all your hyperventilation I will still draw you back to this claim, what constitutes ALL violent crimes so we can take rate according to race and see how black on black violent crimes stacks up!
Oh! And nowhere did I see you mentioning violent crimes per capita as your partner in stupidity will like to frame it, see, I am not beguiled by your artful attempt to frame that claim in a different light as it is all after the fact, define all violent crimes so we can stack black on black violent crimes besides it, I already knew you'd devolve with your tantrums I just wasn't expecting it to be this fast

Logical argument my foot!

Oh and next time if you intend to change your narrative, change it at the first contest of your statement, don't bullshyte me with the claim at per capita permutation, that was never included or implied in your initial claim and we are far too committed for your lame revisions!
And come up with more interesting ad hominem next time as I reckon a jellyfish would do better

benalvino3:
if you stop lying you will not die? Disstroy has always said despite blacks being 14% or less of the population.

how will you highlight the part that supports your argument, go ahead and ignore the subsequent paragraph that I was referring to and in the same sentence call me a liar! It is this display of stupidity that you both portray and when people get tired of going back and forth on a single issue with you you announce yourself winners and by extension that you were right from the beginning, I saw that, I highlighted it with the next paragraph, addressed the claim in the next paragraph as bogus then went back to the preceding one stating that it is disputable and that a lack of understanding of CRT won't allow you understand that distribution and emphasises why you need to study CRT! so you are as barefaced a liar as DissTroy?

sonofcornpop:
digging in. ya donkey dig in

you're still alive?

benalvino3:
the bolded is true. if you know how statistics work

I know how statistics work, statistics work to prove of disprove statements as facts or not, what was the statement in dispute here or the null theory as statistics call it?

benalvino3:
he does not know what per capita is see embarassment. Disstroy already told you blacks are 14% and white are more than 50%

I know the population, I knew it before I engaged him dummy, the argument was never about criminal representation in violent crimes compared to population for each race, the argument was he claimed black on black violent crimes alone is More than all other violent crimes combined, I immediately called him out and told him to produce his stats, stick to topic, I know you like to deflect

benalvino3:
hopefully he does not say the europeans put this data in it to fault blacks

factually I did not say that and factually you'd be as idiotic as he is proving himself to be if you say you agree to his claim of "black on black violent crimes are more than all other violent crimes combined " or are you saying you agree with that comment so I can dutifully add you to his ridicule

DissTroy:
See? You jumped from lying that blacks don't have the highest violent crimes rates (including murder and robbery) after I provided official statists to prove blacks are top murders and robbers in America.


Now you've jumped to seeking evidence that black on black crimes are the highest. But being your tutor, I'd educate you. It brings me joy to shine a light into the denseness of your mind.

Class is in session! Get your jotter and take notes.

Official homicide statistics by race provided by the Criminal Justice Information Services Division of the FBI https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2016/crime-in-the-u.s.-2016/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-3.xls for 2016 alone.


I'm trimming it down to black on black murders:


Of the 6,676 homicides/murders in the US for the year 2016, 2,870 of those murdered were blacks who were murdered by 2,570 blacks.

In other words, about 90 percent of blacks murdered in 2016 alone were murdered by their own race - blacks. That's the highest murder rate within any intra-racial group.
The highest rate for any racial group on itself.

But CRT wants you to believe whites are responsible for black people dying and getting shot. They want you to believe cops are gunning down black men daily in hundreds.

Let's not even go into the percentage of blacks who murder whites versus whites who murder blacks. The number of blacks who murder whites is exactly 2.2 times the number of whites who murder blacks.

Yet blacks are just 14 percent of the population.


You still don't realize everything I type is targeted. Never random. I am baiting you to back yourself into a corner soi can bloody your nose for the fun of it.

What's a Centaur to this Zeus? Class is in session!

oh just shut up and hide your face! See yourself playing semantics and word salad instead of addressing your specific claim! In your own source from 2016, white on white crime is 2,874 and black on black was 2,570! In what hillbilly Kentucky backwater is 2,570 greater than 2,874 that is even without adding all the other categories of crime of other racial and multiracial involvement by perpetrator and victims into the mix! And see benalvino3 acting as your validation dummy or does he also claim that 2,570>2,874? you claimed that black on black violent crime is more than all other categories of violent crimes combined! Those were your exact words! Stop dribbling yourself to an own goal! You specified black on black violent crimes and you specified all other violent crimes in comparison and I specifically called you out on that now you tried to paint it as percentage of black offenders as compared with population percentage and I called you out on that now you're trying to paint it as black on black violent crimes as a percentage of violent crimes against blacks in total! You're a joker!
And look at him zeussing himself already, more like Seuss, even he is smarter than you have proven to be!

Come back with data that can prove your actual claim and stop wasting everyone's time!
Einsteinian IQ my foot!

benalvino3:
[s]
I canceled it because it has no reference. do you know who delgado is?
stop trying to be smart with you are not. There is a reason why i said from your definition and mine which part of it is talking about Black history. I am not really disagreeing with your definition, just presenting the more accurate one.

actually history is not which is why i ask you to list the tenents of CRT. oya lets go.

try to use citations or reference because i know you have posted conspiracy dirts and refused to provide source for them before.[/s]

I never promised to give you a reference as you never asked for one, your question was "what do I understand to be CRT" if I remember correctly so I used my own words from my understanding of the little I have read about it so when and how the blazes did my lack of references become the main issue rather than my definition? It is interesting that you're not outrightly saying I'm wrong because you know I'm not, rather you cancel it to give the impression that I either don't know what I'm saying or what I'm saying is rubbish, then if I decide to get carried away by your trick we then switch to who or what Delgado is and why CRT should be restricted to tenets!

You're not half as smart as you think

DissTroy your modus operandi is so simple I'm tempted to let you go
1. Claim to be infallible and a great repository of knowledge.
2. Start or enter an already started debate, chose the neoconservative view, bend logic and outright lie to prop that view.

3. Get caught lying, huff and puff, provide watery, weak defences and hope not to get caught a second time in act of lying to prop up a lie

4. Fail to impress, huff and puff about your self acclaimed awesomeness, your longevity, your number of kills (like that should impress me ) threaten to release the kraken


5. Still fail to impress, go to research opponents past, dredge for something to use as a weapon against said opponent, find the flimsiest, attempt to blow it up and fail, go ad hominem with it, hope it works and diverts from the fact that you lied and were caught

6. Resort to one liners thinking this is a dissing competition, starts displaying childishness

Is there anything I missed yet?

Impress sonofcornpooop! He's waiting on his idol to come blast me to silence like he promised, don't fail him

benalvino3:
Delgado - CRT tries to understand and change the social situation by exploring the organization of the society along racial lines and hierarchies and transforming it for the better. CRT emerged in the legal framework, with the progressive scholars looking past the overt racism to try and understand the systems that enable the existence of racism, especially in the legal system, and look for ways to employ the same justice system to protect civil rights.

Janel George (2021) - critical race theorists understood that while the law could be a tool used to deepen racial inequality, it also had the potential to be used as a tool for emancipation and the achievement of racial equality.

Sanpipita says its a black history class. so from your own definition and this one, Which part of the definition has to do with black history?

also what are the tenents of CRT?

seriously are you dumb? This is a serious question because reading through what you provided and going back to what I wrote the question begs asking, how does what I wrote differ from what you provided? Or do you have comprehension issues? And also, history is the most critical part of CRT, "actual history" not the whitewashed version, so how are you proposing to divorce the teaching of history from CRT?

sonofcornpop:
he isa conspiracy nutcase. WispyEthereal isa racist anti white donkey.

i would recommend you buy popcorn, sit down and enjoy the show but you unfortunately lack the braincells to comprehend what's afoot, so go swim with the rubber ducks in the pool till we call for you

DissTroy:
Dude, I registered on Nairaland in 2014 and have been active and my accounts known sinne then. Never before have I been bested in debates or e-brawls. One of the reasons for that is simple: I never debate or comment on issues I don't have a firm grasp of.

If you start a debate about crypto-trading, I'd take a backseat. I know the terms but I'm not invested in the topic. Unlike you, I'd never jump in to show off.

Aren't you the same guy who was claiming England was ruled by blacks and was confused about the age of the first homo sapiens yet I kept correcting you with evidence and links, only for you to return 4 days later?

You have the inverse proportion of Einstein's IQ!

you can go ad hominem on me later for all I care, yes I am the guy who was claiming England was peopled by blacks and whites or whiteness evolved around the last ice age and either violence, favourable adaptation or both resulted in them being the race that dominated Europe going forward and I cited the 10,000 year old cheddar man on whom DNA testing was done as my evidence as against your wishy washy archeological permutations but that is an argument for another day, for today we are currently on your claims on CRT and that black on black violeng crime is more than all other violent crime combined together by official government statistics.
Bring your A game on, don't dissapoint your groupie sonofcornpop

And on me having the inverse proportion of Einstein's IQ, prove it!
This is how you bamboozle your way talking big while saying nothing, face the topic, prove your lie!

DissTroy:
Exactly! You are proving my point! This is the reason many people of other races shy away from talking about CRT. Regardless of the facts presented, you would label them racist as the cheap escape route from intellectual, factual debates.

Lie! People of other races don't shy away from talking about CRT, there is absolutely nothing controversial about it
Truth, republicans of all races shy away from talking about CRT and the reason is purely political, not teaching the actual American history and not the whitewashed version being taught that CRT requires resonates with their voting demographics of old white people who know real history will paint them in a bad light to their grandkids so they would rather suppress teaching it by acts of law.
Matter of fact CRT was developed by a faculty comprising multiple races

STOP LYING!

But it baffles you when people of your own race questions these things. The racist slam holds no wait.

You and WipsyEthereal are dumbfounded and can't even counter the stats. Are you going to argue against obvious US government stats like you did claiming the law legalising conditional cannibalism doesn't hold even though it's a written law?

LIE! what stats have you provided that I couldn't counter?

I just should you official evidence of Black Americans having committing the highest number of murders and robberies despite being just 14 percent of the population and on about whataboutism

Stop dribbling yourself, you showed statistics that are consistent with other statistics, the statistics show that blacks are more represented in the commiting of violent crimes as compared to population size than other races, the stats do not show that black on black violent crimes alone is more than all other violent crimes added together like you claimed so stop lying and retrace your steps! And the numbers average around 33% in total unless in your version of conservative mathematics 33% is greater than 67%

You need to be schooled in the art and science of logical debates. Everything I have stated since morning when I joined in this has been focused on one thing:

How flawed the premise of CRT is and how victimhood would always draw blacks back. Every sngle thing. Not deviated once. Al the needless epistles about issues which doesn't relate to black sociopolitical reach are only as relevant as Budaatum's need to display pseudo-sanctimony.

Lols, you claim to espouse to logical debating as an art form? year, whales can also fly I guess

I was not here since morning so please for the benefit of those of us at the back of the class, recap the flawed premise of CRT let me have your logical argument and if you may, the steps you took to arrive at it in fulfillment of your devotion to logic.
And sorry, as long as history is involved, black sociopolitical experience is logically infered

You're as smart as rusty doornail hammered to a wooden pole. Sanpipita: even your username seems like a dyslexia subtype.

yes, yes, we can tell how smart you're not! Don't blow your trumpet, let others do it for you, me most of all, convince about your smarts, let's start with this topic

DissTroy:
I swear by everything, these guys on Nairaland, on live interviews, or on other social media platforms always duck the CRT debate. If it's a White person questioning them, they gaslight with the racist tag. When it's black like us they run.

The last time we had a full debate about CRT, only Budaatum could start to argue on the Leftist side of the fence. And even him disagreed with some of the postulations of the CRT proponents.

The other guys began a cussfest days after.

I don't even mind, no insults but any of them who is intelligent enough to debate the CRT should step up. They better bring their A-game and come with facts from credible (neutral) or official sources we can all verify, not some nonsense emotional blackmail attempts.

They always run.

I promise I won't, what is it? Yeah, I won't run, bring it on! Maybe I will be the one to succeed in showing you that your pretence to ignorance isn't fooling anyone

chopnaira:

I Isa down fa dat

it is reading it is sorely tempted but doesn't want to lose face, it should know we liberals are for the masses even the irritants amongst the masses like it

chopnaira:
I Isa support. D bwoy Isa suffa too mach

only condition is it must first post an official picture of itself begging bowl in hand and placard on neck reading it's legend "I adedayo adedapo whatever whatever a.k.a bambialla humbly request aid from the magnanimousity of my liberal benefactors and forthwith declare myself born again with no intention of ever sinning again"

sonofcornpop:
he is by far smarter than you are. you isa conspiracy theorist who isa lie left and right

lol I figured he is your champion and by extension you declared yourself comparatively brainless (not than we didn't know before )
So let him come and defend his smarts, I'm game, now gettout!

chopnaira:
Yesi. Dati isi da chief donkey bwoy imself

let's create a gofundit for it it looks hungry

DissTroy:
Official statistics of crimes by the Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice
https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/crime/ucr.asp?table_in=2


Bear in mind that blacks are just less than 14 percent of the population.

Black Americans commit the highest crimes in these areas:

- Murder and manslaughter

- Robbery

The most violent of crimes. Yet just 14 percent of the population. Less than one-seventh of the whole population committing the highest murders and robbery. But CRT wants us to believe racism is the cause.

See how I provided evidence from official US government websites? I baited you. Take a thousand seats! You're a toddler in the game of wits. I never make claims I don't have evidence for.

so this is how you argue then go about shouting you're right blah bla bla and eventually bore people of! This is the weak, watery, lame defence you could muster?
Firstly who and what do you take me for? Do you take me for a kid? I can read, I can understand, what was your claim, oh =======> "black on black violent crime is more(I'm guessing by numbers) than all other violent crimes put together" so tell me, this was what I pointed out and this was what I set to disprove and by extension I'm saying if I set to disprove the rest of your claim I bolded, the ones on prison incarceration, drug convictions, abortion e.t.c I will do same, so by what form of mathematics does the table you provided support YOUR LIE seeing as this is what your failure to prove your claim automatically becomes! Your lie!
The argument wasn't the highest percentage representation by population on the violent crimes chart, your statement was blanket, blacks commit more violent crimes against blacks than every other violent crime added together! That was your claim except you will like to interpret your comment for our collective benefit and understanding.
Also in case you've forgotten how to read and interpret data, the table you provided was for 2019, I provided DOJ statistics by percentage points for 2018 and 2021 and your table when boiled down to percentages still correlates with the other years for the first four crimes by row which aggregate the violent crimes, even rape isn't even accounted for and all in all blacks still account for over 30% whites close to 50% and Hispanics around 14% Asians around 4% so how did blacks commit 50.00001% of the violent crimes according to your claim?


You also claim you provided data from sic official government sites, so are you claiming the data i provided was unofficial or what? Clarify this your point before I accuse you rightly or wrongly of dancing naked in the streets to a tune in your head

And lastly, you claim to be a master and me a toddler (lol, you don't know me neither do i know you yet you think you know enough to declare yourself smarter than me by your standards, in another era i will call you arrogant and act accordingly and drop you down your ladder a few rungs at a time but i will just ignore this beyond this point) and this a game (not a debate) of wits (not on truths) childish much?

chopnaira:
Yesi. Fram aba

Ya dirty pig kokobilo87

is that the offensive character?
sonofcornpop drop your account lemme epp you small as you look in need

DissTroy:
I swear by everything, these guys on Nairaland, on live interviews, or on other social media platforms always duck the CRT debate. If it's a White person questioning them, they gaslight with the racist tag. When it's black like us they run.

The last time we had a full debate about CRT, only Budaatum could start to argue on the Leftist side of the fence. And even him disagreed with some of the postulations of the CRT proponents.

The other guys began a cussfest days after.

I don't even mind, no insults but any of them who is intelligent enough to debate the CRT should step up. They better bring their A-game and come with facts from credible (neutral) or official sources we can all verify, not some nonsense emotional blackmail attempts.

They always run.

what debate? What is there to debate about CRT? And while you're on it, bring your official government data showing black on black violent crime being more than all other violent crime put together. The source I provided didn't specifically state "black on black" but it collated all the violent crimes blacks were reported and arrested for so your "black on black" crimes are covered with a little fisi and jara added to prop up the numbers to support your argument but it still falls far short of your required 51% of this category of crimes, I am still refraining from calling you a liar so kindly go and bring your much touted sources

sonofcornpop:
ya conspiracy nutjob

and while there take a dip in the yummy chocolate pool! Dive in! Dive deep! Splendid right? Now drown in it tata

budaatum:
I often convince myself he isn't that ignorant, but I find I'm always disappointed.

I sincerely hope you're wrong

benalvino3:
tell us what you understand about CRT. the last time Disstroy and I discuss this with these simpletons, none of them could show any real understanding of it. so tell what you know lets discuss it.

OK since you asked nicely I will answer
CRT is a post graduate course that postulates that the delivery of justice via the justice system is racially biased and that it is caused by a culture that is a cascade of government policies and laws of racist origins dating back to the post slavery Jim crow era and before that the era of slavery itself, it further argues that even when some of these laws and policies have been repealed or removed, the culture it sprouted is still alive and active till date and its effect is observed in conviction and incarceration rates of blacks as compared to whites for similar crimes, the inherent bias in the unconscious presumption of guilt or innocence by juries in respect to race, the racial distribution of juries and many other factors, these few I can pluck of the top of my hat. But critically its studies requires the study of actual American history not the whitewashed version being taught in schools

sonofcornpop:
or is it that you are clueless? lets see ya donkey

look over there=====> go that way and ride your toffee dragon to candyland! Now of you go kiddo

budaatum:
I don't think he understands that carrying a confederate flag is the same as proudly wearing a swastika.

Try it where I live and you'd end up in jail!

he does, but he is playing to the conservative gallery here of which he is apparently the star. I refuse to believe he could be that ignorant

benalvino3:
what are the tenents of CRT?

use google, list them out then tell me what you understand. Else STFU

why the hillbilly fvck should I play by your book and define CRT by tennet?

budaatum:
You are very very dumb!

The Jews don't need to yell Jews lives matter because no one on this earth, except in the Arab world perhaps, would dare say Jews lives don't matter!

If black lives were as valued as Jew lives, blacks wouldn't be reminding you their lives matter neither. Just as Palestinians wouldn't either if their lives were valued too!

I couldn't have said it better

obixcel:
Well said but unfortunately no amount of eye-opening & constructive analysis will open his eyes. This people just want to keep wallowing in the mud of victimhood.

a well presented falsehood is still falsehood

DissTroy:
You are dumb or play dumb to further the chatter by the voices in your head.

Thankfully, knowing how manipulative you Leftists are, I took time to address all areas in my previous post.

You don't see Jews yelling Jew Lives Matter. They know their history. Holocaust jokes are still sensitive to Jews but they aren't asking for hand-me-downs and the standards lowered for them like Black Americans are doing.

They are not asking for affirmative actions.

They are not consoling themselves when they fail that America is antisemitic (we both know the Left has many antisemitic campaigners, including Ilhan Omar).

They are avoiding crimes as much as they can instead of doing crimes and blaming the American system for victimising black men.

Unlike blacks, they aren't canonising violent male criminals amongst them who rapéd and abuse women because it's political weapon.

They are not asking for donations to Jew Lives Matter and the monies being siphoned to ActBlue which funds Democrat party and social activities.



You shameless liar! Anyone who read my replies to you all through would see I pointed out history (old and recent) should be taught but victimhood should never glamorised.

I see how you deviously avoided all the points which I stated Black Americans do to themselves like highest murder rates, abortions, substance convictions, prison demography, dysfunctional families, and violent crimes even though they are less than 14 percent of the population.

Black-on-black violent crimes alone are higher than all violent crimes put together? Is racism the reason Blacks Americans keep murdering themselves?

Oga this is bullshyte, miss me with it!
Black on black crimes higher than all violent crimes put together, oga bring data make we see
Whites kill whites equally at the same rate but white on white crime doesn't fit a conservative political narrative so it was never made a thing
You mentioned substance convictions, that is one of the things the CRT you condemn for political reasons would have educated you on, blacks and whites abuse substance at equal rates, but blacks are three times more likely to be arrested and when arrested, convicted than whites and given longer sentences too and that is a product of systemic racism in the justice system
When the CIA contra ops of the 70's and 80's flooded American poor neighbourhoods with drugs and guns deliberately, a war on drugs was declared and the police given their marching orders into black neighbourhoods to feed the prison system, on the flip side when rural Republican loving white America got hooked on opiods a health crisis and not a war was declared instead, see the difference in narrative? An educated black man with critical thinking would have seen this disparity for what it is but you're race blind right? Racism could never have anything to do with this could it? Imagine a war on opiods were declared today, how many white bodies would be in the prison system by years end?

You are as devious as Budaatum. When you lose, you run off then return 24 hours later claiming you were busy and couldn't continue with the arguments.

You couldn't even go on with the Igbo/Biafra example you tried to juxtapose after I attacked and countered it. Stop addressing issues you can't defend with verified facts.

For every fact I have stated, I can provide links to official US Government sources collaborating these facts. Yet you can't prove even one way there's a glass ceiling on black achievements.

Same way both of you kept denying there's no law legalising conditional cannibalism in the US. I brought evidence and you began whataboutism to muddy the waters then ran off into the shadows.

Facts only here! Your emotions and assumptions matter little when the truth light is beamed.

I look forward to your official government statistics showing black on black violent crimes are higher than all violent crimes put together
https://www.prisonlegalnews.org/news/2021/jun/1/us-doj-statistics-race-and-ethnicity-violent-crime-perpetrators/
The above is sourced from the DOJ since we're doing official sources and is for 2021
There is similar for 2018 but I'm getting firewalled accessing it

Updated
https://www.crimeinamerica.net/department-of-justice-data-on-violent-crime-and-race/

This contains data from 2018 too that disproves your claim that black people commit more violent crimes than all others put together but I won't call you a liar, I will wait till you present your facts so we can compare

sanpipita:
Jews at sight of Nazi flags will get offended and justified but a black American getting offended by confederate flags becomes victimhood, this life.

I just taya
The bullshyte some grown ass men will contrive to support a conservative narrative against every logic is not funny at all

DissTroy:
It does.

Here's the difference between Jews who suffered the Holocaust and Blacks today whose grandfathers didn't even experience slavery:

The Jews acknowledge their history and the horrors they suffered but it has spurred them to achieve more. They shun victimhood and have instead taken proactive measures to dominate every sphere of society, from politics to trade to tech and real estate.
The most influential lobby groups in the US today are Jewish/Jews.

In fact, it's almost like their fear of the Holocaust ever happening again is why Jews (in Israel) too are combat-ready and have pushed themselves to ascend to the very zenith of any profession.

Instead of blacks who teach revelling in victimhood to their kids, Jews/Jewish people indoctrinate and push their young ones never to settle for less. Research this part.



Nobody is saying don't talk about history but don't revel in victimhood. It's the main problem I have with the Igbos - they can be anything really sociopolitically in this country (I believe this) but they keep revelling in victimhood of the Civil War when they weren't the only victims. Ibibios, Ukwuanis and others were victims of that war too but we've managed to move on.
Do you want me to break it down to you how the other tribes in league with the Igbos suffered the fall out of the Civil War? Do you want to break it down to you how the Igbos turned on their other tribal neighbouring allies during the war? Don't get me started on that part. We got over the bitterness of the fallout but we didn't forget. It's the main reason Rivers and Akwa Ibom States do not allow any form of Biafra rally over the years. It has nothing to do with Wike and Udom Emmanuel's choices.

The Igbos' case is even understandable given it happened in recent history but Black Americans?

Tell your history. Let it galvanize you to be more, not cage you. The difference between the Jews and Black Americans.

pray tell, in all these you're preaching was there any arm of government actively passing legislation against Jews post holocaust? Were any people discriminating against Jews as a matter of policy? Were their sufferings "officially" acknowledged and reparations paid? Have we ever been allowed to forget about the holocaust to the point that Nazi paraphernalia and memorabilia are tolerated outside dedicated meseums? Were statues of famous Nazis made celebrating the nationalism of Germany and the Aryan race?
Are there modern day police cultures derived from the officially sanctioned policy of Jew hunting and oppression that are found acceptable?
Was there a holocaust 2.0 which was a holocaust in all but name legalised by thinly veiled laws discriminating against Jews on the vaguest of pretences?
Is there a Jewish version of Jim crow?
Were Jews ever denied the franchise? Did they have to have their version of the civil right movement for obvious reasons?

How the hell on earth can you sit in the comfort of your African immunity from racist discrimination and say black Americans espouse to victimhood and that that is what CRT teaches?
Men, I just can't........ I can't! You have a remarkable ability to switch of empathy to arrive at a narrative otherwise you should have been able to put yourself in the shoes of the affected and see things from their perspective.