Writetopoker601's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Writetopoker601's Profile › Writetopoker601's Posts
chinchum:The actions taken by the federal government in Plateau (2004) and Ekiti (2006) were controversial in terms of their legality under the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria. Here’s why: 1. What the Constitution Says About a State of Emergency Under Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution, the President can declare a state of emergency in a state, but only under specific conditions, such as: - War, insurrection, or civil unrest that endangers public safety. - The breakdown of law and order beyond the control of local authorities. - A natural disaster or other emergencies that require federal intervention. However, after declaring a state of emergency, the Constitution does not explicitly give the President the power to remove an elected governor. Instead, the governor remains in office, though his powers may be suspended. 2. Controversy Over the Removal of Governors - In both Plateau and Ekiti, the federal government not only declared a state of emergency but also suspended the governors (Joshua Dariye and Ayo Fayose). - Legality Issue: There is no clear constitutional provision that allows the President to remove a governor via a state of emergency. The only constitutional ways to remove a governor are: 1. Impeachment by the State House of Assembly (Section 188). 2. Resignation or death of the governor. 3. A court ruling nullifying an election. - The federal government’s decision to suspend these governors and appoint sole administrators was therefore seen as extra-constitutional (outside the clear provisions of the law). 3. Was It Officially Justified? - The federal government justified its actions by arguing that the crisis in those states made governance impossible and that decisive intervention was needed. - However, many legal experts and politicians criticized these moves as political overreach and an abuse of executive power. - The fact that this practice has not been repeated in later states of emergency (e.g., Borno, Yobe, and Adamawa during the Boko Haram crisis in 2013) suggests that it was not a legally sustainable precedent. Conclusion While the federal government carried out these actions and made them "official," they were not clearly legal under the 1999 Constitution. The removal of elected governors through a state of emergency remains a grey area and is widely viewed as unconstitutional. Mumu idiat, that can't do a common research no be your fault, naa Glo and AI fault Idiat |
Dicoomoba:The actions taken by the federal government in Plateau (2004) and Ekiti (2006) were controversial in terms of their legality under the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria. Here’s why: 1. What the Constitution Says About a State of Emergency Under Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution, the President can declare a state of emergency in a state, but only under specific conditions, such as: - War, insurrection, or civil unrest that endangers public safety. - The breakdown of law and order beyond the control of local authorities. - A natural disaster or other emergencies that require federal intervention. However, after declaring a state of emergency, the Constitution does not explicitly give the President the power to remove an elected governor. Instead, the governor remains in office, though his powers may be suspended. 2. Controversy Over the Removal of Governors - In both Plateau and Ekiti, the federal government not only declared a state of emergency but also suspended the governors (Joshua Dariye and Ayo Fayose). - Legality Issue: There is no clear constitutional provision that allows the President to remove a governor via a state of emergency. The only constitutional ways to remove a governor are: 1. Impeachment by the State House of Assembly (Section 188). 2. Resignation or death of the governor. 3. A court ruling nullifying an election. - The federal government’s decision to suspend these governors and appoint sole administrators was therefore seen as extra-constitutional (outside the clear provisions of the law). 3. Was It Officially Justified? - The federal government justified its actions by arguing that the crisis in those states made governance impossible and that decisive intervention was needed. - However, many legal experts and politicians criticized these moves as political overreach and an abuse of executive power. - The fact that this practice has not been repeated in later states of emergency (e.g., Borno, Yobe, and Adamawa during the Boko Haram crisis in 2013) suggests that it was not a legally sustainable precedent. Conclusion While the federal government carried out these actions and made them "official," they were not clearly legal under the 1999 Constitution. The removal of elected governors through a state of emergency remains a grey area and is widely viewed as unconstitutional. Mumu idiat, that can't do a common research no be your fault, naa Glo and AI fault Idiat |
Omozeez1:Do not mind some idiats, they only depend on AI and the next thing is abuse. Don't just mind them, most of them can't level up to up, it's just free data from glo that caused these rubbish |
chinchum:Following politics in 2015 means completely nothing, because this account might be my 10th account due to ban, if u know u know. Secondly, who told u am not aware of the 2 states initial taken over by military under Obasanjo regime? The question is, the take over by the military is it legit in our Constitution? That Obasanjo did it as a military man, and remember we just had a change of military to civilian recently then. Anyway, I only responded to you because your write-up is devoid of any insults. So military takeover is alien to our constitution and currently can not happen |
Dicoomoba:I know you were born by a prostitute and a drunkard gamblers who raped your stupid mother. I even wonder why am responding to you. It's not your fault, but Glo that dashed you free data Mugu |
stonemasonn:You dey mind the mugu? |
All these started after Tinubu increased the hardship. |
EXOUSIAng:Your family is a complete shame, because u are a waste of human resources |
Xisnin:Am young enough to be older than your papa |
CaptainGo:U don't know your father, because u are a bastard |
EXOUSIAng:Na thunder without destination go destroy your generation. Look at this idiatic hooligan calling himself kid because of your free data from glo . na trailer go jam u Mugu |
CaptainGo:Nikita riforogi nsi Mugus |
helinues:Una just they talk the impossible |
fuckJones:Brigadier general from your village abi? Where has that happened before |
If na me be fubara, I go declare war for Rivers, and make sure that the war go last for like 6 months until the Rivers Highcourt go declare there judgement on the detection matter |
State of excellence, ndi ala |
Two options left 1. Kill her (click share) 2. Naked her completely (click like) |
That stew is worth above N15k plus |
Because of this single inaction, to sign that confab, I personally stopped admiring Jonathan. Jonathan tried in government, but to me he's a very big coward |
Relocate with your wife |
CSTRR:You mustn't be stupid because you want to make a point. If you have a something say, say it respectfully, if at all you have parental upbringing. For you information, I strongly stand with the female senator Natasha |
Osazeidehen:She might be sued because there is no evidence to all these allegations |
writetopoker601:State of excellence my foot 🦶 |
Seasonal film: Season 1 - Episode 3 |
GloriousGbola:U are very daft even in your half wisdom |
Memphis357:My brother don't mind anyone, most of the nigerians of today are even worst than Nigerians of our forefathers who are still ruling. This current Nigerians are irredeemable |
Until Nigerians stand up to there rights, Nigeria will never be okay again. Nigeria is so divided into ethnic and religion divide that, we have lossed every atom of common sensibility required for national development |
I think it is realscamed |
