Baby mama: Jesus!
God forbid bad thing!
even if maggots were crawling out from the place,you cannot remove a man's most prized possession without his express written consent
Abomination
See how they turned Ifeanyi to Ifeyinwa with a stroke of the knife Babatunde has become Yetunde overnight without brea.sts o
The doctor should kukuma cut off his head with the same butcher knife since he has already killed the man

KINGwax: Okay, no be wetin una all dey think i dey think, my own be say, 'how the man go dey weewee'?i guess he'll be spitting it out like saliva! Abi?

only in nigeria! What a barbaric set of people

webaplanet: Circumcision Turned Amputation: Doctor Sued For Removing Man’s Penis Without Consent

Frankfort, KY — A Kentucky man that went under the knife for a circumcision only to wake up with an amputation of his penis has asked the Kentucky Court of Appeals to overturn a previous verdict siding with the doctor who performed the operation.

Phillip Seaton was supposed to undergo a standard circumcision as a treatment for an inflammation in October of 2007, but instead woke up to find his manhood missing.

The unscheduled amputation was necessary according to Dr. John Patterson, who discovered during the operation that Seaton had cancer in his penis.

Seaton contends, however, that the amputation of his penis was not necessary, because other options could have been available to him, reports The Huffington Post.

The lawsuit contended that Dr. Patterson should have received consent from Seaton before performing the amputation. Seaton’s lawyer, Kevin George, stated:

“The point is … a patient has a right. The doctor does not have the right to do whatever he wants, even if it turns out to be reasonable.”


Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/329674/circumcision-turned-amputation-doctor-sued-for-removing-mans-penis-without-consent

For more odd and weird news visit the blog http://

webaplanet: Circumcision Turned Amputation: Doctor Sued For Removing Man’s Penis Without Consent

Frankfort, KY — A Kentucky man that went under the knife for a circumcision only to wake up with an amputation of his penis has asked the Kentucky Court of Appeals to overturn a previous verdict siding with the doctor who performed the operation.

Phillip Seaton was supposed to undergo a standard circumcision as a treatment for an inflammation in October of 2007, but instead woke up to find his manhood missing.

The unscheduled amputation was necessary according to Dr. John Patterson, who discovered during the operation that Seaton had cancer in his penis.

Seaton contends, however, that the amputation of his penis was not necessary, because other options could have been available to him, reports The Huffington Post.

The lawsuit contended that Dr. Patterson should have received consent from Seaton before performing the amputation. Seaton’s lawyer, Kevin George, stated:

“The point is … a patient has a right. The doctor does not have the right to do whatever he wants, even if it turns out to be reasonable.”


Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/329674/circumcision-turned-amputation-doctor-sued-for-removing-mans-penis-without-consent

For more odd and weird news visit the blog http://

mayor-cowboy:
things like that don't happen ordinary,may be guy don trespass and the dock use verse nation chop off his uncultured animal for revenge.
i suggest make d guy enter market go buy monkey or donkey or horse priq, because at all at all na him bad.

Lakayana: See how men body dey hot because they remove that notorious trouble maker if i sabi remove that thing plenty men no go get am for dem no deserve to get that trouble shooter.

Ammanda :
waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat! he's finished, nothing for him again

BTW, he can get a replacement nah,cut from somewhere and stitch to his body simple