Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,159,281 members, 7,839,386 topics. Date: Friday, 24 May 2024 at 06:18 PM

Why Is It That In Nigeria, Public Office Holders Don't RESIGN When They FAIL? - Politics - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Why Is It That In Nigeria, Public Office Holders Don't RESIGN When They FAIL? (452 Views)

See Why Senator's don't Resign or Give Up. / APC Wants Obanikoro Banned From Public Office, Adesiyan Sacked As Minister / El-Rufai Wants Keshi, Emenike In APC To Run For Public Office (2) (3) (4)

(1) (Reply) (Go Down)

Why Is It That In Nigeria, Public Office Holders Don't RESIGN When They FAIL? by TRUTHTELA: 6:17am On Dec 20, 2012
These are some of the little things that matters in any given society. If you can, read the HIGHLIGHTED lines. Why is it that RESIGNATION is never an option for failed public office holders in Nigeria?


4 Are Out at State Dept. After Scathing Report on Benghazi Attack



Four State Department officials were removed from their posts on Wednesday after an independent panel criticized the “grossly inadequate” security at a diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, that was attacked on Sept. 11, leading to the deaths of Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans.



Panel Assails Role of State Department in Benghazi Attack (December 19, 2012)
Times Topic: Libya — the Benghazi Attacks
Eric J. Boswell, the assistant secretary of state for diplomatic security, resigned. Charlene R. Lamb, the deputy assistant secretary responsible for embassy security, and another official in the diplomatic security office whom officials would not identify were relieved of their duties. So was Raymond Maxwell, a deputy assistant secretary who had responsibility for North Africa. The four officials, a State Department spokeswoman said, “have been placed on administrative leave pending further action.”

The report criticized officials in the State Department’s Bureau for Diplomatic Security as having displayed a “lack of proactive leadership.” It also said that some officials in the Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs “showed a lack of ownership of Benghazi’s security issues.”

The report did not criticize more senior officials, including Patrick F. Kennedy, the under secretary for management, who has vigorously defended the State Department’s decision-making on Benghazi to Congress.

At a news conference at the State Department on Wednesday, Thomas R. Pickering, a former ambassador who led the independent review, said that most of the blame should fall on officials in the two bureaus.

“We fixed it at the assistant secretary level, which is, in our view, the appropriate place to look, where the decision-making in fact takes place, where, if you like, the rubber hits the road,” said Mr. Pickering, who did not identify the officials.

At the same time, the report that Mr. Pickering oversaw suggested that there was a culture of “husbanding resources” at senior levels of the State Department that contributed to the security deficiencies in Benghazi. Without identifying Mr. Kennedy or other senior officials, the report said that attitude “had the effect of conditioning a few State Department managers to favor restricting the use of resources as a general orientation.”

Two deputy secretaries of state, William J. Burns and Thomas R. Nides, are scheduled to testify to Congressional committees on Thursday. The question of whether senior officials at the State Department should be held accountable is likely to be raised by lawmakers at the hearing.

“The board severely critiques a handful of individuals, and they have been held accountable,” said Representative Ed Royce, Republican of California, who is the incoming chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee. “The degree that others bear responsibility warrants Congressional review, given the report’s rather sweeping indictment. And the Foreign Affairs Committee must hear from Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton concerning her role, which this report didn’t address.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/20/us/politics/3-state-dept-officials-resign-following-benghazi-report.html?hp&_r=0
Re: Why Is It That In Nigeria, Public Office Holders Don't RESIGN When They FAIL? by omenka(m): 6:37am On Dec 20, 2012
@topic: Gbagaun a la Carte.!.
Did you wrote this yourself or doesn't you?
Re: Why Is It That In Nigeria, Public Office Holders Don't RESIGN When They FAIL? by Gbawe: 7:22am On Dec 20, 2012
Resignations follows a deep sense of failure or extreme guilt at letting other down irredeemably. Most political leaders in Nigeria are not principled folks who hankered for office to serve others. They can therefore never feel they have let anyone down let alone resign
Re: Why Is It That In Nigeria, Public Office Holders Don't RESIGN When They FAIL? by vedaxcool(m): 7:36am On Dec 20, 2012
Because they want to try again.

(1) (Reply)

Beyond Oronto Douglas: Irresponsibility As Statecraft By Pius Adesanmi Via Theo / Lagos Deputy Governor’s Residence Catches Fire, Electrical Fault Blamed / President Goodluck Jonathan’s New Year Message To Nigerians

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 11
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.