A discourse on the True Assasin: Desmond (AC3) vs Sam Fisher (Splinter Cell) vs 47 (Hitman Absolution)

So I watched as my bro ran a marathon of playing Hitman Absolution and Assassin's Creed 3, and it got me thinking: who would win in combat? After the usual fanboy argument boiled off we realized it wasn't so simple. especially when we suddenly remembered the argument wouldn't be complete with Sam Fisher. All three are assassins and have excelled in the art of the kill enough to spawn so many sequel. But if all three fought among themselves, who would win?

We could say A would win against B in combat and leave it at that, but if their respective games are anything to go by it's not so straightforward or fun. So I came up 2 different scenarios for testing which of the three would be the True Assassin.

Assume that all three participants have access to all their tools and have prepared in advance for each scenario. You can pick one scenario and state your case or pick all three and conclude on your own.

Scenario 1: Killing a target in a populated area (market place, heavy traffic)
Scenario 2: All three stranded on an island. last man standing wins

We all know who would win, Sam Fisher is useless without his three-eyes, nd Ezio & Altair both use a hefty bag of tricks, give 47 a fibrewire nd the case i closed, he's the only one that actually adapts to the environment, blends in properly, sets up "accidental deaths" nd walks away, no hood, no shadows...in plain sight