Somebody help me to understand this:

Is anything wrong in granting Bokoharam their wish, which is to ISLAMIZE NORTHERN NIGERIA?

Presently, many states in the north are under "SHARIA LAW", so what's the DIFFERENCE?

It's a known fact that northern muslims sympathize with the BH folks, I'm sure they'll be fine with their own islamic republic.

Is it not better to grant them their ISLAMIC NATION, rather than "amnesty" (giving them money to share)?

Boko haram doesnt need money,i knew right frm time that the issue of amnesty for BH wasnt going to work.
I was born n bred in the north n i knw their mentality,they ar jst blood thirsty vampires.haters of other tribes.
Islamizing the entire country is nt even the solution

liloelawwal: Boko haram doesnt need money,i knew right frm time that the issue of amnesty for BH wasnt going to work.
I was born n bred in the north n i knw their mentality,they ar jst blood thirsty vampires.haters of other tribes.
Islamizing the entire country is nt even the solution

Then what do you think is the solution? They want to Islamize their own region. Is it too much to ask?

If northern nigeria is islamized, what happens to the christians in the north? Force them to accept a religion of violence too?