God forbid though, but if you have to choose any of these obstacles to survive from, which will it be? An armed robbery attack with the shock. potential rape but they will be taking only what they see on you at the moment. If you don't get shot. Or a kidnap expirience where you'll be forced to empty your account or sell properties to save a child or grandmother from abductors. Which is fairer?

Bros, na KP sure pass if u do ur homework very well but remember that Hot-Lead-hole is always d end of both profession.

From the point of view of a criminal, Kidnapping is preferred because it is considered less risky than armed robbery. It is also just as profitable if not even more profitable than armed robbery.

From a victim point of view, armed robbery would be a slighly better ordeal to pass through than kidnapping. Armed robberies typically do not last more than a few minutes to hours compared to kidnapping/abduction that could go on for days. The risk of sexu@l molestation is not as high with armed robbery as it is with kidnapping since it is time-bound. Perpetrators just want to make away with your valuables in the quickest time possible.
Secondly the scale of your losses is likely to be far greater if you're a victim of kidnapping as against armed robbery.