Both of the alleged Woolwich attackers, Micheal Adebolajo and Micheal Adebowale, were of Nigerian descent, both were born and raised in England, and both were raised as Christians.

Former Det Ch Insp Peter Kirkham, in response to the Lee Rigby killing, is quoted as saying "For two suspects to carry out a brutal attack like this then stand around in plain sight waiting for the police is crazy”(1), but there is a lot more to this alleged attack that is "crazy" than just the fact that they stood around waiting for twenty minutes after the attack (See link below for evidence of all claims regarding this faked killing).

It is "crazy" that women on the scene chatted to the killers, it is also "crazy" that other women casually passed right next to one of the alleged killers as he was ranting to the cameras and holding a bloodied meat cleaver.



It is "crazy" that the car which supposed hit a relatively small signpost is severely damaged, yet the sign is completely undamaged. This is a strong indicator of a staged accident.

It is "crazy" that the armed police are photographed tending to one of the alleged killers wounds while the alleged killers arms are free. We are led to believe that the sole purpose of this mans life at this point is to kill police, yet his arms are clearly free while the officer is in easy reach. How did police know he did not pose any threat at this time? How did they know he did not have another concealed knife?

http://anywho.simplesite.com/201858949

The reason given for attacking the British soldier is also nonsensical, wanting Sharia law in Muslim countries is one reason we are given by Micheal Adebolajo, yet the British military supported the Islamists in Libya against the secular government, and in Syria the British government is an avid supporter of the largely Islamist opposition against the secular government of Dr Bashar Al Assad.

Islamists who want Sharia law in Muslim countries have no more powerful an ally than David Cameron, both seemingly want progressive Muslim countries destroyed and returned to the dark ages. How fitting that pretend enemies should have a pretend killing.

The Woolwich killing is not the only "crazy" terrorist attack supposedly carried out by a Nigerian Islamist against Western targets, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, also known as the "underwear bomber", is alleged to have tried to blow up flight 253 with 80 grams of a high explosive hidden in his underwear(2).

Attorney Kurt Haskell testifies that Umar was assisted onto the plane by a "sharp dressed man" who appeared to be trying to board Umar without a passport(3).

Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab is the son of a billionaire banker, he went to to the exclusive "British School of Lome" in Togo(4) before continuing on to London where he earned a degree in mechanical engineering from University College London(5). This is a very wealthy, well educated, and well traveled young man, yet the attempted bombing was a bumbling nonsensical farce (were it to be believed)

Why would such a wealthy and well educated person take part in a suicide bombing? His worth to an organisation would be far greater alive than dead.

Why would he board an international flight without checking any luggage(6)? Umar is a well educated and well traveled individual, he would certainly know that checking no luggage on an international flight is a good way to stand out rather than blend in.

Why was, according to the above eyewitness testimony, a sharp dressed man trying to board Umar without a passport? Umar is reported to have had a passport on his person, perhaps if it was a poor counterfeit passport and the individual is not the real Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab but instead just a patsy, then it may be necessary to bypass normal check-in procedures.



Above is the passport the bomber was carrying, as can be seen the signature is just a very poorly printed first name, this signature is irreconcilable with a very wealthy, well traveled, and very well educated young man (educated in top British schools including university). That is the signature of someone who is at best semi-literate in the English written language, that is the signature of a patsy.

The alleged bombing plot is "crazy" from inception through to implementation, why would a suicide bomber smuggle a mere 80 grams of explosives onto a plane in his underwear when he could put 100 or 200 times that amount (8 or 16 kgs) into a suitcase and check it on to the plane? Checked luggage, whilst there are some random checks, comes under a fracton of the scrutiny that persons boarding the plane come under due to the threat of hijackings.

The attempted detonation of the 80 grams of PETN in Umar's underwear is as fishy as the rest of the story, usually, a shock wave from a blasting cap or an exploding wire detonator is needed to set off PETN(7), yet Umar tried using the somewhat dubious and ultimately unsuccessful method of trying to use a syringe to attempt detonation by a chemical reaction. This created smoke but no explosion.

This "underwear Bomber" ushered full body scanners into airports around the world, these intrusive machines would be nigh on a wet dream for perverts and peadophiles, the machines essentially strip passengers naked for the operator to view.

This complete exposure, even ignoring the possible health implications from radiation, are an affront to common decency. Many people would simply not like themselves or their children to be viewed naked, not to mention the many people wear incontinence or other sanitary products, all of whom have a right to complete privacy.

As noted earlier, these disgusting machines do nothing to make us safer from a genuine potential suicide bomber (should this threat actually exist), because they do nothing to stop a suicide bomber from checking a suitcase full of explosives onto a plane, and that is where any real attempt at blowing up a plane would be made.

What a boon this nonsensical, pathetic, attempt at a bombing was for security companies, they developed these machines and were just waiting for a catalyst to make their implementation acceptable when along came Umar the underwear bomber. A cynic might have thought the whole escapade a sham to keep the fake war on terror alive, and provide a catalyst for useless, yet very expensive, and very intrusive machines to be thrust upon airports worldwide.

"Crazy" is indeed a good choice of words.


(1) http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/woolwich-attack-video-watch-full-1908975

(2) http://www.examiner.com/article/exclusive-pictures-underwear-bomb-of-flight-253-christmas-terrorist

(3) http://www.mlive.com/news/detroit/index.ssf/2009/12/flight_253_passenger_says_at_l.html

(4) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/6896128/Detroit-terror-attack-profile-of-Umar-Farouk-Abdul-Mutallab.html

(5) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/6891348/Detroit-attack-Umar-Farouk-Abdulmutallab-from-London-student-to-jihadist.html

(6) http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1950280,00.html

(7) http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/28/us/28explosives.html

Do you all believe the "war on terror" rubbish?

It's all lies, and they are using peoples prejudices against black people to sell those lies.

Food for thought.