Victor James Zammit, LL.B, Ph.D., is a retired attorney of the Supreme Court of the New South Wales and the High Court of Australia. He has served as an attorney in the Local, District, and Supreme Courts in Sydney, has worked as a company-law consultant ,and lectured in Corporations Law. Also, he has worked part-time for police prosecution. In 1979, Zammit was a member of the United Nations Association of New South Wales - Human Rights Committee. In his work as a lawyer, Zammit became a 'professional skeptic' since he was never in a position to believe anyone unless the client had objective evidence to support the client's claims. Although initially suspicious of the New Age Movement for what appeared to be its blatant commercial exploitation of people's basic instinctual tendency for spiritual development, after many years as an open-minded skeptic, Zammit had a number of repeated psychic/mediumistic experiences which set him questioning, reading, and researching. Adopting a scientific criterion, he was able to select that information which could withstand and pass the many rigid tests of repeatability and objectivity. Currently, he does afterlife investigations virtually seven days a week. Zammit wrote A Lawyer Presents the Case For The Afterlife (ISBN: 0-9580115-0-, which has been translated into Italian, Portuguese, Spanish, Dutch and now is in the process of being translated into German and French. The same book has been translated into Russian and is now being sold in Russian bookshops. Since 2001, Victor Zammit has sponsored a one-million-dollar challenge to anyone in the world who can rebut the existing evidence for the afterlife. Up 'til now, no scientist, no physicist, no biologist, no psychologist, no empiricist, no skeptical debunker - no one has been able to show where, when, how, or why the evidence is invalid.

Professor Stephen Hawking EXPOSED!-By Zammit

To-day’s brief talk is to show you why this closed-minded Professor of Cosmology Prof. Stephen Hawking is deluding himself when he says there is no afterlife. He further stated in the television documentary ‘Curiosity … Who Created the Universe’ that there is no God. This professor made serious blunders and failures which I believe have completely destroyed the credibility of his anti-afterlife argument.

1. His first big BLUNDER: he FAILED to use Scientific Methodology to show why the existing evidence for the afterlife is not valid. He had to deal with EVP, ITC, NDE, OBE and MENTAL MEDIUMSHIP including the research done by the Windbridge Institute where they use PURE SCIENCE to investigate mediumship. This paranormally uninformed professor FAILED to deal with the most sensational afterlife evidence of the Cross-Correspondences, and the objective and repeatable scientific evidence of materialization – and some ten other areas of afterlife evidence this professor shows he’s totally ignorant about.

2. His second BIGGER BLUNDER: this professor FAILED to apply scientific methodology to his claim about the afterlife when he negligently came to conclusions about the evidence BEFORE he investigated! The principle involved is not dissimilar to this professor saying there are no blond haired people in the United States before he investigated. This professor allowed his closed mindedness and negative prejudices to over-ride scientific reasoning. That is a huge blunder– and something which I believe destroyed his credibility in relation to the afterlife.

3. His third BIGGEST BLUNDER is that he is presenting speculations and interpretations from speculations as science. THAT IS WRONG! THAT IS INADMISSIBLE AND UNACCAPTABLE. Lawyers and scientists will tell you that you cannot present speculations UNLESS you can independently substantiate your argument. When afterlife investigators deal with some afterlife evidence, it has to be repeated over time and space, keeping variables constant. And it has to yield the same positive results. We CAN independently substantiate the evidence we present for the afterlife.
In relation to God this professor said that because there was no ‘time’ before the big-bang – there was no God. He also said that since protons appear and disappear this shows that the universe created itself without the need for a creator.
But I say all these are just mere speculations and interpretations from speculations. In the next two to three decades other cosmologists will make other discoveries to completely invalidate Stephen Hawking’s argument against the afterlife and against the existence of God.
He is using his status as a ‘scientist’ to completely ignore the strict laws of science. That can never be accepted. So what this afterlife UNINFORMED professor stated was NOT science.
He expressed his closed minded prejudices and negativity as an atheistic layperson. Heshows he knows absolutely nothing about the afterlife - DON’T LET HIM MAKE A FOOL OF YOU!