The Obama
administration is preparing a
military attack against Syria
which has the potential of
starting World War 3. In fact, it
is being reported that cruise
missile strikes could begin “as
early as Thursday“. The Obama
administration is pledging that
the strikes will be “limited”,
but what happens when the
Syrians fight back?
What happens if they sink a US
naval vessel or they have
agents start hitting targets
inside the United States? Then
we would have a full-blown
war on our hands. And what
happens if the Syrians decide
to retaliate by hitting Israel? If
Syrian missiles start raining
down on Tel Aviv, Israel will be
extremely tempted to
absolutely flatten Damascus,
and they are more than
capable of doing precisely that.
And of course Hezbollah and
Iran are not likely to just sit
idly by as their close ally Syria
is battered into oblivion.
We are looking at a scenario
where the entire Middle East
could be set aflame, and that
might only be just the
beginning. Russia and China
are sternly warning the U.S.
government not to get
involved in Syria, and by
starting a war with Syria we
will do an extraordinary
amount of damage to our
relationships with those two
global superpowers. Could this
be the beginning of a chain of
events that could eventually
lead to a massive global
conflict with Russia and China
on one side and the United
States on the other? Of course
it will not happen immediately,
but I fear that what is
happening now is setting the
stage for some really bad
things. The following are 22
reasons why starting World
War 3 in the Middle East is a
really bad idea…
#1 The American people are
overwhelmingly against going
to war with Syria…
Americans strongly oppose US
intervention in Syria’s civil war
and believe Washington should
stay out of the conflict even if
reports that Syria’s
government used deadly
chemicals to attack civilians are
confirmed, a Reuters/Ipsos
poll says.
About 60 percent of Americans
surveyed said the United
States should not intervene in
Syria’s civil war, while just 9
percent thought President
Barack Obama should act.
#2 At this point, a war in Syria
is even more unpopular with
the American people than
Congress is.
#3 The Obama administration
has not gotten approval to go
to war with Syria from
Congress as the US
Constitution requires.
#4 The United States does not
have the approval of the
United Nations to attack Syria
and it is not going to be
getting it.
#5 Syria has said that it will
use ”all means available” to
defend itself if the United
States attacks. Would that
include terror attacks in the
United States itself?
#6 Syrian Foreign Minister
Walid Muallem made the
following statement on
Tuesday…
“We have two options: either
to surrender, or to defend
ourselves with the means at
our disposal. The second
choice is the best: we will
defend ourselves”
#7 Russia has just sent their
most advanced anti-ship
missiles to Syria. What do you
think would happen if images
of sinking US naval vessels
were to come flashing across
our television screens?
#8 When the United States
attacks Syria, there is a very
good chance that Syria will
attack Israel. Just check out
what one Syrian official said
recently…
A member of the Syrian Ba’ath
national council Halef al-
Muftah, until recently the
Syrian propaganda minister’s
aide, said on Monday that
Damascus views Israel as
“behind the aggression and
therefore it will come under
fire” should Syria be attacked
by the United States.
In an interview for the
American radio station Sawa in
Arabic, President Bashar
Assad’s fellow party member
said: “We have strategic
weapons and we can retaliate.
Essentially, the strategic
weapons are aimed at Israel.”
Al-Muftah stressed that the
US’s threats will not influence
the Syrain regime and added
that “If the US or Israel err
through aggression and exploit
the chemical issue, the region
will go up in endless flames,
affecting not only the area’s
security, but the world’s.”
#9 If Syria attacks Israel, the
consequences could be
absolutely catastrophic. Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu is promising that
any attack will be responded to
“forcefully“…
“We are not a party to this civil
war in Syria but if we identify
any attempt to attack us we
will respond and we will
respond forcefully”
#10 Hezbollah will likely do
whatever it can to fight for the
survival of the Assad regime.
That could include striking
targets inside both the United
States and Israel.
#11 Iran’s closest ally is Syria.
Will Iran sit idly by as their
closest ally is removed from
the chessboard?
#12 Starting a war with Syria
will cause significant damage to
our relationship with Russia.
On Tuesday, Deputy Prime
Minister Dmitry Rogozin said
that the West is acting like a
“monkey with a hand
grenade.”
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130903021308AA4xsdT
http://
www.presstv.ir/
detail/2013/08/28/320969/22
-reasons-wwiii-in-mideast-is-b

There would be no world war 3 period! Endtimetins sha

Poster, go and look at history. B4 america starts a war of this scale, they always have NOC's on ground not just for intelligence but also to make people disappear if need be. That world war 3 u are hoping for will not happen.