I have listened to so many pastors ANd christians proclain it a sin for ladies to put on Trousers.

I see this has pure mis-understanding of the Bible.

My take on it:

The bible only condemns a man puting on what belongs to a woman. That is... a cloth either trouser or skirt worn by anyone shouls not be worn again by the opposite sex.

A man buys a trouser ANd wears it, a woman should not pick up the same. A woman buys a trouser ANd wears it, a man should not take it up.

Very Simple

keep deceiving and confusing urself

@joshuadon.

Highly brainwashed. You should have presented a reasonable argument or say something edifying....

I need reasonable comments please.

newken:
@joshuadon.

Highly brainwashed. You should have presented a reasonable argument or say something edifying....

I need reasonable comments please.

what shd i say more, other than what the pastors and christains had said dont piss me off......................................................itching ears the end time prophecy

I still repeat the same.

You have been brainwashed by your so called pastors ANd christians. Have you considered all teachings yourself?

If you have, then you must have one way or 2 to convince me that I am wrong.

Infact, judging by the Bible, adam was given a skirt like covering. does that look like a trouser?

Gal 5 v 18,bt if ye be led of the spirit,ye
are not under The LAW....All the dozens
of laws
about the land, foods, dressing and rituals
of Israel don't pertain to us either.
Nor can the keeping of any set of laws give us eternal life.

newken:
I have listened to so many pastors ANd christians proclain it a sin for ladies to put on Trousers.

I see this has pure mis-understanding of the Bible.

My take on it:

The bible only condemns a man puting on what belongs to a woman. That is... a cloth either trouser or skirt worn by anyone shouls not be worn again by the opposite sex.

A man buys a trouser ANd wears it, a woman should not pick up the same. A woman buys a trouser ANd wears it, a man should not take it up.

Very Simple

Deuteronomy:22:5 says: "A woman shall not
wear anything that pertains to a man, nor shall a man put on a woman's garment, for all who do so are an abomination to the Lord your God."

Your interpretation is wrong in the absolute sense. The divinely instituted distinction between the sexes was to be sacredly observed, and, in order to this, the dress and ether things appropriate to the one were not to be used by the other.

This is an ethical regulation in the interests of morality. Whatever tends to obliterate the distinction between the sexes tends to licentiousness; and that the one sex should assume the dress of the other has always been regarded as unnatural and indecent.

Some people do argue that the law doesn't apply to modern day christianity, making reference to the fact that the law is only found in the new testament, disregarding what is obtainable in the book of Mathew.

Mathew 5:17 says: "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill
them".

@ the light01

You got it wrong. There is no kind of cloth that pertains to a man or wowan except what is purchased ANd owned.

If I purchase a pant with flowers designed for ladies, will I go to hell? Where in the bible did God forbid Trousers for women? Did isreali men put on trousers in those days?

That interpretation can't hold water when God didn't give adam a trouser ANd Eve a skirt.