The African Union has blamed Norway for the civil war which broke out in South Sudan at the end of 2013, arguing that the country had inadvertently created "a politically unchallenged armed power" when it brokered the 2005 peace deal with Sudan.

The accusation, made in an as yet unpublished African Union inquiry leaked to the Reuters newswire, calls for the oil-rich nation to be placed under the direct control of the AU in an effort to end the war.

According the report Norway, the US and the UK, the three countries who pushed for the deal had "ushered in an unaccountable political class" in the country, leading to the conditions which spilt the country's leadership apart eight years later.


The civil war in South Sudan, the world’s youngest nation, started in December 2013 when the governing party SPLM split into two factions headed respectively by President Salva Kiir and former Vice-President Riek Machar.

At least 10,000 people have been killed and 1.5 million people displaced. The UN accuses both sides of grave human rights violations, including widespread rape, executions, and ethnic-based massacres.



According to the AU report, Norway facilitated Kiir and Machar’s ascent to power when they helped broker the peace deal between SPLM/A rebels and the Sudanese government in 2005.

The settlement brought long-time guerrilla fighters to formal recognition, paving the way for them forming government when South Sudan became independent in in January 2011

Minister of Foreign Affairs Børge Brende has not yet commented on the accusations, but called for the report to be made public immediately.

“I think that the investigation that the African Union has started and the commission’s position, it needs to be made public. “ he told Urix, a foreign affairs programme aired by public broadcaster NRK

The African Union has shelved the report on the request of Salva Kiir and Reik Machar. There are fears that its release could disrupt on-going peace negotiations in the Ethiopian capital Addis-Abeba. Despite a truce signed by Kiir and Machar, fighting has continued while peace talks carry on.

http://www.thelocal.no/20150306/african-union-blames-norway-for-south-sudan-war

The news does not make sense.

Why can't the south sudan leaders rise above division and build a sensible country.

The nigerians cannot blame the britain for the mess this nigeria is now, the fault is mainly on very useless nigerians 'leaders'.

juman:
The news does not make sense.

Why can't the south sudan leaders rise above division and build a sensible country.

The nigerians cannot blame the britain for the mess this nigeria is now, the fault is mainly on very useless nigerians 'leaders'.

Also neocolpnoalism

Radio Univers: Neo-Colonialism as an Impediment (Part 2):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obFL2xpgZFQ

Does placing a Whole nation with that much resources under AU the answer ? why would AU allow Europeans to broker peace in Africa in the first place ? With Abacha and Ghaddaffi gone, AU is just a localized Neocolonialist tool against African nations that wants to fight off Imperialism.

thoth:
why would AU allow Europeans to broker peace in Africa in the first place ?

This weak little country is very active in the oil-rich East African countries. It is currently backing Kenya's attempt to annex a large portion of Somalia's maritime territory because of all the oil there. One only has to look at Norway's top exports to understand what exactly they are doing in South Sudan.