jpphilips:


Are you sure you have read the Nigerian constitution before??

jpphilips:



The posts were written in blue fonts to enhance visibility, where you respond with that contraption above, I will definitely overrule blindness but I will suspect comprehension issues, at this point, I will have to make it clear that I don't do well with those kinda people, most times I take it personal, I need no rubbish on my mention.

Nobody said that Netanyahu went to address congress to change Obama's veto, how you arrived there is where I need to wonder whether English is that difficult, you can stick with your fellow confucianists next time.
And to believe that someone who has comprehension problems can really offer "practical help" murders logic.

To be clear, the last paragraph of that post is just there to emphasize "how far congress went" to garner public support for their motive, because being an ally with a plethora of lobbyists in congress already knows that his message will be hinged on his recurrent paranoia; how deadly Iran is, and how much a threat she is to the stability of the middle east.

nduchucks:


I'd appreciate if you would educate me on the constitutional provision which empowers the President to veto constitutional amendments as opposed to Bills. I may have missed it. Thanks in advance.

jpphilips:


Sorry, no free classes today, Kindly go and pay school fees!!

nduchucks:


Most times your posts are spot on, but I'm afraid that this time around you are wrong.

The President can only veto Bills and NASS can override the said veto if they have enough votes. This veto power does not extend to amendments to the constitution which are not Bills which could become Laws upon the President's signature.

I challenge you to site the constitutional provision which contradicts my statement.

With respect,
Nduka Chukwunenye.