With the premiere of the first "Avengers" Three years have passed. During the reporting period the solo outputs implemented Tony Stark ("Iron Man 3", Thor ("Thor 2: The Kingdom of Darkness" and Captain America ("Captain America: The Winter Soldier". At the other end of the universe had to make some noise and the "Guardians of the Galaxy." The grand project of producer Feyge continues to expand in all possible directions, giving a devoted army of fans exactly what from the Marvel and wait. Drimtim-project "Avengers" in the already self-sufficient and totally offline world from the very beginning was prepared a special role, and glue the pieces of a single puzzle, gathering under the banners of the best among equals. In 2012, Joss Whedon solved this problem very elegantly, with the inherent humor myself and apparent ease. By and large, it was a success (crushing and unequivocal) "The Avengers" has made it clear that the idea of ​​transfer of comic stories to the big screen in the assembly line and made sense, at least, justified. On the other hand, put on stream production sooner or later will inevitably begin to cannibalize itself. Not in terms of cash, but from the point of view of at least some meaning. We can assume that the first victim was the "Age of Ultron."
To hide the pregnancy Scarlett Johansson participated in the shooting of three understudy. It caused a lot of confusion - other actors began to flounder in the Black widows are very similar to each other. So, Chris Evans admitted that sometimes in the course of the conversation with "Scarlett" realized that in fact before him her understudy.

* James Spader had to wear a design reminiscent of an antenna with two red balls on top. According to the comics and script, Ultron growth is almost three meters, and "false eyes" were needed Spader to the actors who starred with him in one scene, you know, where the "face" of the interlocutor
The main and fundamental problem of the second "Avengers" is a definitive lack of time for a single character. The protagonists are abundant enough for a full show, but at the disposal of Whedon "only" 142 minute timekeeping. This is sufficient for conventional masks (Stark Hochma Banner is trying not to be angry, and so on), but character development. "The Avengers" 2012 turned out to be nicest, Convivial skit where it was not for real, that is captivating. The "Age of Ultron" everything tragic and gloomy. Weedon little knocks sight toward a no drama, not forgetting the film scatter a dozen jokes, and popliteus. Trying to simultaneous holding of two chairs creates a strange effect: do not want to be sad about the same as laughing. It remains to action, right cut, but redundant.

The "Age of Ultron" just too much that is known, in most cases, more minuses than pluses. Yes, do not forget, it's "only" a film adaptation of a comic book. Comics, however, are different, and their movies. Three years ago, Whedon felt inspired, and now - the desire to do their job honestly and safely withdraw from the territory of Marvel. And only.

I dont understand a sentence of the whole story.

dajoaneke:
I dont understand a sentence of the whole story.

Lol. I'm vry sure d op won't mind an edit button