religious ethics revisited

my sitiation now is because of my quest for better understanding for humanity my tiolet/bathroom collapsed,
phone swicth off with the exception of broadband internet that i am still using now. 
my land line cut off  and my mobile  phone is now five pounds a call , my bill say i only owe fifty five pounds.
Flat about to be reposessed because of high blood pressure that restrict me from my normal duties
for a while on doctors orders.
There is a wedding i don't have money to attend plus caution from the order and evil all around from this collapse toilet with debries that look like it can be transform into a snake with the right photosynthesis,    i wonder where i go wrong and insurance non functional
God help me out  you are the only one i know  and have or can have.
if this is all the religious adherance i wonder where the end of the line is ,where no one can be disturb.

the clear line is my bro you either aspire to be a good or bad person and eventually you fall into
a category either in psycology or phylosophy of being a good or bad person this does'nt have
to be a social label but anything social is still the work of god.For any human to be a good human with good attitude even though we aspire to  be good most of the time requires some further aspiration into older humans
that can end being a disapointment if you don't use you own accord/spirit to judge others.
the general ethical foundation is all about good tidings and morals in any form of relationship and application.

how about the foundation of our moral values?

to sleep with a dead brother wife in its modern context is not ethical by that you are getting involve
in a relationship that is not progressive and will affect your clearity of spiritual purpose and awareness.
religion in sync with what i know or in its modernist context is not to control or posses but to
undestand worship and get close to god in its wholeness or to put in a simplictic term the moon
and earth or neptune and venus can't sleep with one another and give earth its norishment from the information we all know about the universe but they still have a unique relationship with one another
even in their deep thougths.gallelio from greece that formulated a lot of planetarian names in its purest
forms did not mention any kind of similarity in composition except some stars.
so bro i wouldnt know how to breakdown what goes on among the pigmies kingdom in the polar regions of the world or what goes on nearest to the sun with movement that have been develop or
modify to sustain us and other creatures.
the pre historic theses of the bible has already testify to an earlier order of existence so its just the power of
knowing and understanding and clearity that will deliver all creatures, the hypotheses that the moon and the earth may have broken off from one another is still not plausible in light on all the mordern
contemporary form like four eclips since 1999 till present all this apocalipse are in the bible french
mythologies greek myths and a whole lot of holy expressionism of movements.

i see,

You do realise that regardless of the contents in the bible nothing has come true? People who use the bible use it as a crutch because they think that poring over the revised and re-edited pages of it they will find god.

The stars as you said have a relationship with each other only in so far that if one planet is destroyed or some how shifted from its path around the sun - like a house of cards they all fall down- a scenario i wouldn't wish to experience.

Apocalypse: contrived- especially in this day and age. Sine the dawn of time when humanity learned to articulate and express thought: religion has always had some kind of doomsday scenario because the ancients knew that one day our planet would die.

Picture taken from London?

the planet will not die fear hear is only for the dying the whole world can die the planet will not die
bro think of the composition.

you have a point bro but this ethical analogy is for managing  an order that cannot function
without it constant downturns in its historical entirerety.

you have a point bro but this ethical analogy is for managing  an order that cannot function
without it constant downturns in its historical entirerety.

i dont really understand what he is on about?

@Zappking
You are wierd! what are u talking about in simple english?

@MIZIEYA what?

i don't think xtianity want us to LOT any religiuos characters or religiuos patriach's, than to be self righteous, the old races of cultures made some mistakes and GOD made them scapegoats before
they die,[/color] virtue is a modern language.[color=#550000][color=#550000][/color]

our clear as far as our quest for ethical exellence is concern is to be simple in application
simple in purpose and understanding of the human race.Basically our theology requires a simplistic
approach to our concensus.the more superior you are the more probably complicated your
dogma is.feminist bible is a good example.
don't miss time essence bros.