DDeliverer:
weed n bible aint good combo.

OVI75:
U lack spiritual understanding,or may be worse!u lack simple grammatical understanding as well.first and foremost you are a confused muslim(Rilwon) so i don't realy blame you much.the bible was saying in hebrews thatJesus(son)though he was(perfect )learned obedience from what he suffered(the cross)you must know that Jesus was human in this world(thus having the tendency to be disobedient)yet submitted himself to what he could refused,by virtue of his power.so the prelude 'though he was'and learned does not mean he was imperfect and disobedient.

Rilwon:
Theists tend to believe that God is perfect and without flaw, and this is a belief that many Christians share. The New Testament expresses this belief, it mentions:

“Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.” – Matthew 5:48.

It should be noted that this verse specifies that only one person of the three persons of the Trinity is perfect. I found this to be odd. Why doesn’t the verse say, “as the Son, Holy Spirit and Father are perfect?” Why does the verse only declare the Father to be perfect? Does this mean that the Son, is imperfect? As it turns out, it does mean that. The Bible explicitly teaches that the Son, who is a God, is imperfect and had to be made perfect, God had to become perfect. That’s quite a strange idea. How can God be flawed? When we read Hebrews 5:8-9 , this is exactly what it teaches. The passages say:

Son though he was, he learned obedience from what he suffered and, once made perfect, he became the source of eternal salvation for all who obey him.

There are quite a few things we learn from this passage.
* God the Son, had to learn to be obedient and was thus disobedient at first.
* God the Son, was imperfect and had to become perfect.
* God the Son, could not grant salvation until He became perfect.

We should take note, that the passage begins with “Son though he was”, therefore qualifying that despite he is a God, these things happened. The author specifically uses this phrase to denote that the deity is being referred to, and that it is the deity of the Son which had to learn and become perfect. What is problematic is that according to the Trinitarian dogma,each person in the Godhead is co-equal. Therefore, if the Father is perfect, then the Son should be perfect too.

However, as we have just learned, this is not the case. The New Testament explicitly states that the Son was imperfect, had to be made perfect, had to suffer and only when he suffered, then he was able to grant salvation. The New Testament teaches that God could not grant salvation of His own will, because He was flawed and imperfect..

lexiconkabir:
God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the SON OF MAN, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?

Dekatron:
Baba rilwon,


please tell mohammed he is a piece of shiit.

I wonder how I can slaughter a fellow human cos of JIHAD & still not eat pork.



Mohammed fvcked us up sooooooo bad that I wish I could go back in time

After all, Christians are just plain foolish and gullible. They are not bloodthirsty like most Muslim



BTW, I am an atheist.

Rilwon:


lol

Some xtians would be hitting like on this troll's post forgetting that he called dem 'foolish and gullible'.

Dekatron:

yes, they are foolish and gullible for christ. And you are bloodthirsty for Allah