I think the ombudsman should caution and in fact sanction media organisations that describe public offices as juicy or not juicy. How does responsible media describe public trust as juicy?Aren't they ashamed that they embolden corruption?

We as a people complain about corruption and turn round to applaud 'juicy' appointments!

Juicy ministry
Juicy committee
Juicy office
Juicy posting
Juicy.....

We should make up our minds what we want and stop the ridicule.

A more responsible media would promote words like: influential, important, powerful, and in fact use comparatives like 'more influencial' to describe appointments since all offices that affect the people are, at the end of the day, important.

Some misguided people were here the other day arguing about what juice went to what region. As if the 'juice' would ever get to them.