Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,151,355 members, 7,812,012 topics. Date: Monday, 29 April 2024 at 06:11 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / Is This Catholic Defence Biblically Justifiable To Christians? (531 Views)
Is It Biblically Right To Wear A Necklace With The Image Of A Pastor? / Is Paying Tithe From MMM And Nairabet Money Biblically Right? / This Catholic Priest Is Missing (photo) (2) (3) (4)
Is This Catholic Defence Biblically Justifiable To Christians? by ccollins(m): 1:39pm On Nov 17, 2015 |
I did not grow up Catholic but I've interviewed dozens of older Catholics, and ex Catholics, including those who now go to Evangelical Churches, to try to gain an understanding of the charge that Catholics weren't allowed to read their Bibles in the 1930's - 1970's. It is true that earlier in this century, in some Catholic circles, people were not encouraged to read their Bibles. This discouragement was a mistake. The Church does not claim that these types of mistakes have not been made. Catholics believe that although the teaching of the Church is "infallible" on matters of doctrine, the Church is not "indefectible." Sometimes God chooses people who fall. He has done that since the beginning of the Church. (i.e., Judas). It was never forbidden to read the Bible. But some priests were worried that congregations would come up with dozens of conflicting interpretations of Scripture. These priests knew of over 300 Protestant denominations who had distinct beliefs about the interpretation of Scripture. Many of these interpretations conflicted with each other yet every one of them claimed divine inspiration. As a whole, neither Catholics or Evangelicals are into relativism (which says there are many truths). So we have to conclude that the vast majority of conflicting Evangelical biblical interpretations are incorrect since only one can be true. (Perhaps this is a powerful argument against Sola Scriptura - Bible alone.) Some priests saw this divisional process in Protestant circles and felt it was a danger. |
Re: Is This Catholic Defence Biblically Justifiable To Christians? by ccollins(m): 1:40pm On Nov 17, 2015 |
We must be careful not to project
modern, American sensibilities (in
regard to freedom and justice) into the
context of medieval history. In the
Middle Ages and before 1776, there was
simply no such thing as separation of
Church and State ---not in Catholic
countries OR in Protestant countries. If
we "burned people for reading the
Bible," then the Protestants burned
people for praying in Latin or hearing
the Catholic Mass (something they
unquestionably did in England, Geneva,
and Scandinavia, etc.). At this time in
history, heresy was also a secular crime;
and the powers of a particular country
treated it as such ... Despite the "spin"
that some Evangelicals put on the
Catholic position, the Catholic Church
was never opposed people reading the
Bible. What it opposed was people
reading interpretations the Bible apart
from the teaching authority of the
Church, which would lead to the kinds
of problems we have today with 30,000
denominations interpreting Scripture
differently. The Bible itself warns
against this. (2 Peter 1:20). With the
invention of printing, there was a
communications explosion, and one
suddenly saw lots of people making
very poor and heretical translations of
the Bible and popularizing them
throughout Christendom...The Church
tried to stop this. |
Re: Is This Catholic Defence Biblically Justifiable To Christians? by ccollins(m): 2:53am On Nov 18, 2015 |
up |
Re: Is This Catholic Defence Biblically Justifiable To Christians? by italo: 11:36am On Nov 18, 2015 |
I am not aware of a time when Catholics were discouraged from reading the bible. Can you provide evidence of that claim? I know that the Catholic Church encourages Catholics to read the Bible with the guidance/mind of the Church. Secondly, it's obvious that the Protestant doctrine of Sola Scriptura is a huge error. That's why their "Churches" are teaching their congregation to eat snakes, drink petrol and perform mouth-action on their "pastors" to such "anointed milk." ...and these protestants are deriving these doctrines from their "Holy Spirit" inspired interpretations. |
(1) (Reply)
The Easiest Way To Be Useless Is To Sleep With More Than One Person. / Tk103 Vehicle Tracker @ N14,000 / What Exactly Does The Bible Mean Here?
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 14 |