dplomaticVal:


fish brain

can't you just counter my position without spilling thrash? So annoyingly childish. By the way,how old are you?

It wasnt charles
It was Darius

it wasn't reachycul
it was #Dairus#

abumeinben Let's get this started[b][/b]
The statements are not up to 8 but they said that 4 of the 8 statements are correct. Therefore d 4 statement there are exactly correct

Toyolad:
Since Darius claims that it wasn't Alfred and It wasn't Charles, then only Darius and Brenda are left to be suspected... then foolish Brenda shot herself in the leg by claiming that it wasn't Darius, which leaves me with no other option but to conclude that it was Brenda!!...

This doesn't make any sense

santos876:
babe u no go understand......da gal record plenty......am not surprised at all...bcoz she is d only thief in dere midst.........since u care for her try and talk sense into her

Ve talked to her, she promised not to steal again

gabylzy:
this shuldnt be in d education section..ts shuld be in confusion section...

THATS THE BEAUTY OF LOGIC BRUH

sleeveless:
abumeinben Let's get this started[b][/b]
The statements are not up to 8 but they said that 4 of the 8 statements are correct. Therefore d 4 statement there are exactly correct

In logic, a statement is like a simple sentence.

"It wasnt Darius" is one statement.
"It was Darius" is another.

Each accuser used two statements per line.

Garrit?

beautycrush24:
Oga OP it was cake they stole ooo not coke

U r a suspect o

Vivipop:

Let (1) A negative outcome be Guity, a positive outcome Innocent and zero Can't say.
(2) It wasn't = Positive comment. It was = Negative comment. Then,

ALFRED
Deductions: One Positive, One Negative.
Conclusion: Can't Say(+1-1=0)

BRENDA
Deductions: One Positive, Zero Negative.
Conclusion: Innocent(+1)

CHARLES
Deductions: Two Positives, Zero Negative.
Conclusion: Innocent(+2)

DARIUS
Deductions: One Positive, Two Negatives
Conclusion: Guilty(+1-2=-1)
Darius is the thief.

Just as I did it.
In fact, Darius had 3 -ve

Like u had an engineering/science background?

End time brenda

I did not read through carefully before saying Darius. The right answer is Brenda.
It is the only name that will make exactly half of the statements to be true.

tempest01:
@abumeinben I have tried working this....no body matches the conditions there. Statement 8, is the "wasn't" not meant to be was?



Modified: it was Brenda!! Statement 5 is wrong. Making my proof correct.

4 correct statements, 4 wrong statements

Vivipop

Let (1) A negative outcome be Guity, a positive outcome Innocent and zero Can't say.
(2) It wasn't = Positive comment. It was = Negative comment. Then,

ALFRED
Deductions: One Positive, One Negative.
Conclusion: Can't Say(+1-1=0)

BRENDA
Deductions: One Positive, Zero Negative.
Conclusion: Innocent(+1)

CHARLES
Deductions: Two Positives, Zero Negative.
Conclusion: Innocent(+2)

DARIUS
Deductions: One Positive, Two Negatives
Conclusion: Guilty(+1-2=-1)
Darius is the thief

brenda na theif....walahi

EverestdeBliu:
can't you just counter my position without spilling thrash? So annoyingly childish. By the way,how old are you?

sorry guy. just that u answered the question like someone bereft of rational reasoning. pls think deep next time bfor talking so you wont be thought a fool. my apologies

abumeinben:



Just as I did it.
In fact, Darius had 3 -ve

Like u had an engineering/science background?

If Darius is the thief, then six of the eight statements will be true. But the condition given is that exactly four of the statements are false, so Darius cannot be the thief.

dorox:

If Darius is the thief, then six of the eight statements will be true.

How?

Kindly explain

dplomaticVal:


sorry guy. just that u answered the question like someone bereft of rational reasoning. pls think deep next time bfor talking so you wont be thought a fool. my apologies

Oga what is the answer?

abumeinben:


How?

Kindly explain

There are five statement to the contrary proposition which says the person did not steal the coke. One each for Darius, Alfred and Brenda, and two for Charles. While the are three statements to the affirmative which says that the person stole the coke, of which Alfred has one and darius has two.
So if Darius is the thief, then it would be true that he stole the coke twice and it will also be true that it was not not Alfred , Brenda and Charles twice which adds up to six true.

abumeinben:
Let's get this started!

break into two - statements that can and cannot be true

false true
----------- --------
was alfred wasn't alfred
was darius wasn't darius
was darius wasnt charles
wasnt brenda wasnt charles

Brenda stole the coke

EverestdeBliu:
Oga what is the answer?

Brenda

abumeinben:



U r a suspect o

Lol

Brenda is the thief. You can only get exactly 4 of the statements to be correct if Brenda was the culprit.

olafirstt:
It was Darius

Pesin wey get sense go knw say na BRENDA!

Its darius bcus two pipo said it was him

It was Alfred. I don't have the strength to explain abeg.

Just believe it by faith, that Alfred was the thief.

#itwasalfred

dplomaticVal:


Brenda

Now this is what u would have long typed and not trying to attack any personality. You're entitled to your own opinion. Next time try to present ur case/judgement/answer/solution/idea in a more civil way.

Joblessb!!! let them go Fr lab test

VAGINAAAAA stole d fuckin COKE; ; ; ;

abumeinben:
Let's get this started!

Answer, Brenda.......
Logic:
It is Alfred, 5 statements are true.
It is Brenda, 4 statements are true.
It is Charles, 3 statements are true.
It is Darius, 6 statements are true.

should I tell you that it was Brenda that stole the coke.....if you look closely...her name is in the middle with the colour RED... RED as a colour is to be known to attract an individual when focused in the middle her name appeared only once while others twice

It was Darius that stole the coke reason is that; the bible said that in the mouth of two or three a matter is established. Even in the law court Darius has two witness that testified against him of wic make him guilty.