Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,151,843 members, 7,813,845 topics. Date: Tuesday, 30 April 2024 at 07:43 PM

Why Is David Cameron So Silent On The Recapture Of Palmyra From ISIS. - Foreign Affairs - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Foreign Affairs / Why Is David Cameron So Silent On The Recapture Of Palmyra From ISIS. (1170 Views)

David Cameron Resigns As Prime Minister After Britain Votes To Leave EU / Syrian Troops Drive IS Out Of Historic Palmyra / Triumph! Syrian Army Completely Liberates Palmyra From Daesh (2) (3) (4)

(1) (Reply) (Go Down)

Why Is David Cameron So Silent On The Recapture Of Palmyra From ISIS. by PhockPhockMan: 6:41pm On Mar 27, 2016

[size=15pt]
In the end, it was the Syrian army - and its Hizballah chums from Lebanon, and the Iranians, and the Russians - who drove the Isis murderers out of Palmyra. [/size]

The biggest military defeat that isis has suffered in more than two years. The recapture of Palmyra, the Roman city of the Empress Zenobia. And we are silent. Yes, folks, the bad guys won, didn't they? Otherwise, we would all be celebrating, wouldn't we?

Less than a week after the lost souls of the 'Islamic Caliphate' destroyed the lives of more than 30 innocent human beings in Brussels, we should - should we not? - have been clapping our hands at the most crushing military reverse in the history of Isis. But no. As the black masters of execution fled Palmyra this weekend, Messers Obama and Cameron were as silent as the grave to which Isis have dispatched so many of their victims. He who lowered our national flag in honour of the head-chopping king of Arabia (I'm talking about Dave, of course) said not a word.

As my long-dead colleague on the Sunday Express, John Gordon, used to say, makes you sit up a bit, doesn't it? Here are the Syrian army, backed, of course, by Vladimir Putin's Russkies, chucking the clowns of Isis out of town, and we daren't utter a single word to say well done.


When Palmyra fell last year, we predicted the fall of Bashar al-Assad. We ignored, were silent on, the Syrian army's big question: why, if the Americans hated Isis so much, didn't they bomb the suicide convoys that broke through the Syrian army's front lines? Why didn't they attack Isis?

“If the Americans wanted to destroy Isis, why didn't they bomb them when they saw them?” a Syrian army general asked me, after his soldiers' defeat His son had been killed defending Homs. His men had been captured and head-chopped in the Roman ruins. The Syrian official in charge of the Roman ruins (of which we cared so much, remember?) was himself beheaded. Isis even put his spectacles back on top of his decapitated head, for fun. And we were silent then.

Putin noticed this, and talked about it, and accurately predicted the retaking of Palmyra. His aircraft attacked Isis - as US planes did not - in advance of the Syrian army's conquest. I could not help but smile when I read that the US command claimed two air strikes against Isis around Palmyra in the days leading up to its recapture by the regime. That really did tell you all you needed to know about the American "war on terror". They wanted to destroy Isis, but not that much.
So in the end, it was the Syrian army and its Hizballah chums from Lebanon and the Iranians and the Russians who drove the Isis murderers out of Palmyra, and who may - heavens preserve us from such a success - even storm the Isis Syrian 'capital' of Raqqa. I have written many times that the Syrian army will decide the future of Syria. If they grab back Raqqa - and Deir el-Zour, where the Nusrah front destroyed the church of the Armenian genocide and threw the bones of the long-dead 1915 Christian victims into the streets - I promise you we will be silent again.

Aren't we supposed to be destroying Isis? Forget it. That's Putin's job. And Assad's. Pray for peace, folks. That's what it's about, isn't it? And Geneva. Where is that, exactly?


http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/why-is-david-cameron-so-silent-on-the-recapture-of-palmyra-from-the-clutches-of-isis-a6955406.html
Re: Why Is David Cameron So Silent On The Recapture Of Palmyra From ISIS. by praxisnetworks: 6:49pm On Mar 27, 2016
cheesy no wonder daretodiffer n skako have been low key for a while....

1 Like

Re: Why Is David Cameron So Silent On The Recapture Of Palmyra From ISIS. by sirthisthickkal: 7:54pm On Mar 27, 2016
[b] i ve said it and i wud to continue to say it, "syria was better off before the west orchestrated a micro war using the opposition goverment as their tools and camouflage". Now it seems their dialobolical plan has boomerang they had more than they had bargain for, millions of syrian refugees who had been displaced due to the casualties of the war are now seeking for asylum desperately from europe and the west, their tools for destruction have gone rogue which have resulted to the emergence of Isis and Isis are bent on destroying the west. We ve seen what happened in france, turkey and brussels...The hunter becomes the hunted. And here comes super russian cleaning their mess. With the migrant issue hitting the EU hard, they are looking for who dump their mess on and turkey had volunteered to be the scape goat by striking a deal with EU. Now things are easing up a bit in syria, assad is now fortified with millatary assistance from russia and more territory have fallen back to the syrian forces. Here comes the west again with super power mentality, pushing to remove assad at all cost and to conduct an election without assad involve while russia is saying" no no no no no we cleaned we what u started and we must also finish it to the end. Assad must stay and he must also participate in the election."


wow i am loving this . [/b] grin

2 Likes 1 Share

Re: Why Is David Cameron So Silent On The Recapture Of Palmyra From ISIS. by PhockPhockMan: 9:17pm On Mar 27, 2016
sirthisthickkal:
[b] i ve said it and i wud to continue to say it, "syria was better off before the west orchestrated a micro war using the opposition goverment as their tools and camouflage". Now it seems their dialobolical plan has boomerang they had more than they had bargain for, millions of syrian refugees who had been displaced due to the casualties of the war are now seeking for asylum desperately from europe and the west, their tools for destruction have gone rogue which have resulted to the emergence of Isis and Isis are bent on destroying the west. We ve seen what happened in france, turkey and brussels...The hunter becomes the hunted. And here comes super russian cleaning their mess. With the migrant issue hitting the EU hard, they are looking for who dump their mess on and turkey had volunteered to be the scape goat by striking a deal with EU. Now things are easing up a bit in syria, assad is now fortified with millatary assistance from russia and more territory have fallen back to the syrian forces. Here comes the west again with super power mentality, pushing to remove assad at all cost and to conduct an election without assad involve while russia is saying" no no no no no we cleaned we what u started and we must also finish it to the end. Assad must stay and he must also participate in the election."


wow i am loving this . [/b] grin


You're correct.

1 Like

Re: Why Is David Cameron So Silent On The Recapture Of Palmyra From ISIS. by Appleyard(m): 3:07pm On Mar 28, 2016
sirthisthickkal:
[b] i ve said it and i wud to continue to say it, "syria was better off before the west orchestrated a micro war using the opposition goverment as their tools and camouflage". Now it seems their dialobolical plan has boomerang they had more than they had bargain for, millions of syrian refugees who had been displaced due to the casualties of the war are now seeking for asylum desperately from europe and the west, their tools for destruction have gone rogue which have resulted to the emergence of Isis and Isis are bent on destroying the west. We ve seen what happened in france, turkey and brussels...The hunter becomes the hunted. And here comes super russian cleaning their mess. With the migrant issue hitting the EU hard, they are looking for who dump their mess on and turkey had volunteered to be the scape goat by striking a deal with EU. Now things are easing up a bit in syria, assad is now fortified with millatary assistance from russia and more territory have fallen back to the syrian forces. Here comes the west again with super power mentality, pushing to remove assad at all cost and to conduct an election without assad involve while russia is saying" no no no no no we cleaned we what u started and we must also finish it to the end. Assad must stay and he must also participate in the election."


wow i am loving this . [/b] grin
You absolutely killed this. It is only zombies and russophobic midgets that will discredit Russia for the successes the Syrian army is recording currently. Ride on, man. The truth is always treason in the empire of lies.

1 Like

Re: Why Is David Cameron So Silent On The Recapture Of Palmyra From ISIS. by Appleyard(m): 3:59pm On Mar 28, 2016
Why are they silent? Well, what else do you expect? Russia is cleaning up their mess at the moment, and what the west couldn't do for years, the Syrian army has achieve in a limited time, and of course, its by the air power of Vladimir Putin, God's Elijah to Syria, bringing fire from heaven against the western diabolic designs for Syria. Now you can understand why the silence is deafening. This was the same Cameron's Britain whose planes were caught and shot down by Iraqi forces, as they air-dropped weapons for IS. Of course, the silence is all they can do now. With the Russian success and Assad's position consolidated, the id1otic US puppet-west is looking like a confuse man who neither can go to the right nor left in a given scenario. Admitting and lauding the Syrian army success over IS in Pymira, would conote a tacit failure in their SATANIC policy towards Syria, while at the same time admiting the legitimacy of the Assad government to manage its own affairs, as well as tacitly crediting the Russian engagement in like manner.
On the other hand, downgrading the SAA achievement would have laid bare the real motive of the west engaging in the Syrian Brouhaha, and with the refugees in mind, many of these clowns cum Western governments would be praying for a speedy Syrian success against ISIS, so they can breath in some fresh air, when Syria eventualy become stable and the refugees returns home. But being the puppet they are, they just can't openly allude to these facts! Now you can understand even better, the graveyard silence. The zombies like Cameron are caught in the middle. Especially when you take into consideration the fact that the RAF, and the French air force all went in there, but how many sorties had they flown? Virtually nothing! So you can imagine how shameful they must be feeling now, witnessing the rapid entrance and exit of the Bear's air force, a mission that has proved to be the turning point in the Syria troubled water - Russia, with clear-cut objectives, flying sorties that superceded the entire ones it flown in WW2, as against Britain's intervention, having no clearly defined objectives
in Syria, and with nothing to show for their involvement.

How pathetic and deafening the silence must have been accross Downing Street!

Pathetic puppets.

6 Likes 2 Shares

Re: Why Is David Cameron So Silent On The Recapture Of Palmyra From ISIS. by sirthisthickkal: 6:11pm On Mar 28, 2016
Appleyard:
You absolutely killed this. It is only zombies and russophobic midgets that will discredit Russia for the successes the Syrian army is recording currently. Ride on, man. The truth is always treason in the empire of lies.
Thanks bro
Re: Why Is David Cameron So Silent On The Recapture Of Palmyra From ISIS. by ATERI(m): 5:07am On Mar 29, 2016
Haha! This is not going to fit the narrative of Anglo-American politicians and their lazy BBC and CNN.

1 Like

Re: Why Is David Cameron So Silent On The Recapture Of Palmyra From ISIS. by ATERI(m): 5:10am On Mar 29, 2016
Appleyard:
Why are they silent? Well, what else do you expect? Russia is cleaning up their mess at the moment, and what the west couldn't do for years, the Syrian army has achieve in a limited time, and of course, its by the air power of Vladimir Putin, God's Elijah to Syria, bringing fire from heaven against the western diabolic designs for Syria. Now you can understand why the silence is deafening. This was the same Cameron's Britain whose planes were caught and shot down by Iraqi forces, as they air-dropped weapons for IS. Of course, the silence is all they can do now. With the Russian success and Assad's position consolidated, the id1otic US puppet-west is looking like a confuse man who neither can go to the right nor left in a given scenario. Admitting and lauding the Syrian army success over IS in Pymira, would conote a tacit failure in their SATANIC policy towards Syria, while at the same time admiting the legitimacy of the Assad government to manage its own affairs, as well as tacitly crediting the Russian engagement in like manner.
On the other hand, downgrading the SAA achievement would have laid bare the real motive of the west engaging in the Syrian Brouhaha, and with the refugees in mind, many of these clowns cum Western governments would be praying for a speedy Syrian success against ISIS, so they can breath in some fresh air, when Syria eventualy become stable and the refugees returns home. But being the puppet they are, they just can't openly allude to these facts! Now you can understand even better, the graveyard silence. The zombies like Cameron are caught in the middle. Especially when you take into consideration the fact that the RAF, and the French air force all went in there, but how many sorties had they flown? Virtually nothing! So you can imagine how shameful they must be feeling now, witnessing the rapid entrance and exit of the Bear's air force, a mission that has proved to be the turning point in the Syria troubled water - Russia, with clear-cut objectives, flying sorties that superceded the entire ones it flown in WW2, as against Britain's intervention, having no clearly defined objectives
in Syria, and with nothing to show for their involvement.

How pathetic and deafening the silence must have been accross Downing Street!

Pathetic puppets.

Nice one!
Re: Why Is David Cameron So Silent On The Recapture Of Palmyra From ISIS. by NairaMinted: 10:05am On Mar 29, 2016
They say the rabidly anti-Putin troupe are upset, embarrassed, & shocked hence the silence from Cameron - and of course those here on Nairaland.

grin grin grin

3 Likes 2 Shares

Re: Why Is David Cameron So Silent On The Recapture Of Palmyra From ISIS. by fineguy11(m): 10:21am On Mar 29, 2016
And the bastards @ the pentagon and NATO headquarters claims Russians and Assad are the bad guys!!...Sup all western trolls,SPETSNAZ is kicking ISIS butt,what are u gonna do abt it! grin grin grin grin grin grin

3 Likes 2 Shares

Re: Why Is David Cameron So Silent On The Recapture Of Palmyra From ISIS. by NairaMinted: 10:29am On Mar 29, 2016
Who needs Cameron's comments. The unzombified citizens of the West have spoken


[size=18pt]Palmyra's Liberation Greeted With Praise Despite Silence of Officials[/size]



While Western authorities remain “decidedly muted” over the liberation of the ancient city of Palmyra from Daesh terrorists, many Western readers have lavished their admiration on the UNESCO site's liberators when commenting on dry factual articles. Sputnik has compiled a small number of these readers' responses.

While Western journalists wonder why their Western leaders “appear unenthusiastic” over the biggest military defeat of Daesh militants in Syria so far, their readers aren't concealing their admiration of those who fought to liberate the ancient city of Palmyra.


Comments in the US media:

Los Angeles Times


"Dilemma indeed. How to explain to the American public that the US really didn't oppose IS because the US thought IS would deliver the coup de grace to the Syrian government? Instead, IS will soon be driven from Syria by the Syrian Arab Army backed by Russian air power Meanwhile, the CIA backed mercenaries and the Pentagon backed mercenaries are fighting each other in the small corner of northwest Syria not yet controlled by the Syrian government.


​No doubt telling the truth will not be an option. Instead we will get more phony 'narratives' duly conveyed by the LAT and other mainstream outlets."

"It took a real man like Putin, in a country that still knows right from wrong, Russia, to solve the Syrian war."

Wall Street Journal

"I wonder if this means the Syrian civil war is once again at risk of ending? If so, what measures can we take to ensure it continues?…the irony here is that it's not clear that I'm being sarcastic. Many here would post the above or close to it in all seriousness."


​"Since Putin got involved the situation gets worse for IS! LOL, and Obama said that Putin will leave defeated! O tries to claim to be part of Putin's success now!"

"The USG won't give up its bad habit of overthrowing elected governments it doesn't like. Regime change is one of those euphemisms to muddy the waters, as if calling an elected government a 'regime' legitimizes illegal US aggression against them. Russia has waged a serious war against ISIS in Syria, and against the US-armed, trained and supported groups, many of them affiliated in one way or another with the terrorists and all acting as a proxy US army to bring down Assad. The US goal has never been to stop ISIS, only to show it can still pick and choose other people's governments."


​"The advance by Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s forces showed how reliant the regime remains on help from Russia, which said Sunday that its warplanes had hit more than 100 targets over 24 hours in the vicinity of Palmyra.

Putin is killing Islamic State terrorists. That's a good thing. This is how it's done Obama, 100 bombs in one day."

Comments in the UK media:

Daily Express

"The West owes Putin a debt of gratitude."

"This is the difference. Obama supports, arms and then apologises for terrorists. Putin destroys them."

"Had the west supported Syria and Assad, Palmyra would still be intact, there would be no drownings, EU would be safer and refugees would still be living at home. Our foreign policy is a foreign disaster."

"Well done Putin. He has the 'balls' that Cameron and the EU politburo lack."

"Who would you most trust to fight and protect the interests of your country — Cameron, Obama, or Putin? Bit of a no brainer really isn't it."


Daily Mail

"America could take some Tips from the Russians.. They get the job done."

"Putin has invited Western countries to assist in the de-mining and cleanup of Palmyra; whether the West does or does not assist it's another public relations coup for the Russian President. Come on Obama, Kerry, Cameron and Hammond, it`s time to call it a day and tell your Wall St bosses that the game is over, and you've LOST."

The Independent

"I could not help but smile when I read that the US command claimed two air strikes against Isis around Palmyra in the days leading up to its recapture by the regime. That really did tell you all you needed to know about the American 'war on terror'. They wanted to destroy Isis, but not that much."


​"It is not only Dave that has been quiet, the whole western media have been quiet about it as well. Now if the Americans had liberated Palmyra,it would be front page news, story after story but because it is the Syrians, Hizbollah, Iran and the Russians, it is hardly mentioned. Just goes to show who runs the media in the west."

"ISIS is a 100% western creation, to give the West reason for continuous military presence in the region, for decades to come. That *was* their plan. Now let them mess with Russia if they have the nerve: Turkish F-16 haven't even taken off, since the day the S400's became operational in Northern Syria…"

"Shame that the West Media does not allow its readers access to the true story…"


​"The silence of Western leaders over the recapturing of Palmyra is for the same reason the allies during WW2 never once bombed the tracks that took millions of people to the Nazi death camps. Vested class interests. From Standard Oil, Ford, ITT, Coca Cola to IBM, to name a few, that kept the war going.

ISIS is a creation of Western imperialism; oil, political power and profits are the basis of the present silence. The same reason why Turkey keeps the border open with Syria – oil deals with ISIS. For them it's business as usual. The point is us and our response in how we protect our own class interests."

2 Likes 1 Share

Re: Why Is David Cameron So Silent On The Recapture Of Palmyra From ISIS. by PhockPhockMan: 2:51pm On Mar 29, 2016
NairaMinted:
Who needs Cameron's comments. The unzombified citizens of the West have spoken


[size=18pt]Palmyra's Liberation Greeted With Praise Despite Silence of Officials[/size]



While Western authorities remain “decidedly muted” over the liberation of the ancient city of Palmyra from Daesh terrorists, many Western readers have lavished their admiration on the UNESCO site's liberators when commenting on dry factual articles. Sputnik has compiled a small number of these readers' responses.

While Western journalists wonder why their Western leaders “appear unenthusiastic” over the biggest military defeat of Daesh militants in Syria so far, their readers aren't concealing their admiration of those who fought to liberate the ancient city of Palmyra.


Comments in the US media:

Los Angeles Times


"Dilemma indeed. How to explain to the American public that the US really didn't oppose IS because the US thought IS would deliver the coup de grace to the Syrian government? Instead, IS will soon be driven from Syria by the Syrian Arab Army backed by Russian air power Meanwhile, the CIA backed mercenaries and the Pentagon backed mercenaries are fighting each other in the small corner of northwest Syria not yet controlled by the Syrian government.


​No doubt telling the truth will not be an option. Instead we will get more phony 'narratives' duly conveyed by the LAT and other mainstream outlets."

"It took a real man like Putin, in a country that still knows right from wrong, Russia, to solve the Syrian war."

Wall Street Journal

"I wonder if this means the Syrian civil war is once again at risk of ending? If so, what measures can we take to ensure it continues?…the irony here is that it's not clear that I'm being sarcastic. Many here would post the above or close to it in all seriousness."


​"Since Putin got involved the situation gets worse for IS! LOL, and Obama said that Putin will leave defeated! O tries to claim to be part of Putin's success now!"

"The USG won't give up its bad habit of overthrowing elected governments it doesn't like. Regime change is one of those euphemisms to muddy the waters, as if calling an elected government a 'regime' legitimizes illegal US aggression against them. Russia has waged a serious war against ISIS in Syria, and against the US-armed, trained and supported groups, many of them affiliated in one way or another with the terrorists and all acting as a proxy US army to bring down Assad. The US goal has never been to stop ISIS, only to show it can still pick and choose other people's governments."


​"The advance by Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s forces showed how reliant the regime remains on help from Russia, which said Sunday that its warplanes had hit more than 100 targets over 24 hours in the vicinity of Palmyra.

Putin is killing Islamic State terrorists. That's a good thing. This is how it's done Obama, 100 bombs in one day."

Comments in the UK media:

Daily Express

"The West owes Putin a debt of gratitude."

"This is the difference. Obama supports, arms and then apologises for terrorists. Putin destroys them."

"Had the west supported Syria and Assad, Palmyra would still be intact, there would be no drownings, EU would be safer and refugees would still be living at home. Our foreign policy is a foreign disaster."

"Well done Putin. He has the 'balls' that Cameron and the EU politburo lack."

"Who would you most trust to fight and protect the interests of your country — Cameron, Obama, or Putin? Bit of a no brainer really isn't it."


Daily Mail

"America could take some Tips from the Russians.. They get the job done."

"Putin has invited Western countries to assist in the de-mining and cleanup of Palmyra; whether the West does or does not assist it's another public relations coup for the Russian President. Come on Obama, Kerry, Cameron and Hammond, it`s time to call it a day and tell your Wall St bosses that the game is over, and you've LOST."

The Independent

"I could not help but smile when I read that the US command claimed two air strikes against Isis around Palmyra in the days leading up to its recapture by the regime. That really did tell you all you needed to know about the American 'war on terror'. They wanted to destroy Isis, but not that much."


​"It is not only Dave that has been quiet, the whole western media have been quiet about it as well. Now if the Americans had liberated Palmyra,it would be front page news, story after story but because it is the Syrians, Hizbollah, Iran and the Russians, it is hardly mentioned. Just goes to show who runs the media in the west."

"ISIS is a 100% western creation, to give the West reason for continuous military presence in the region, for decades to come. That *was* their plan. Now let them mess with Russia if they have the nerve: Turkish F-16 haven't even taken off, since the day the S400's became operational in Northern Syria…"

"Shame that the West Media does not allow its readers access to the true story…"


​"The silence of Western leaders over the recapturing of Palmyra is for the same reason the allies during WW2 never once bombed the tracks that took millions of people to the Nazi death camps. Vested class interests. From Standard Oil, Ford, ITT, Coca Cola to IBM, to name a few, that kept the war going.

ISIS is a creation of Western imperialism; oil, political power and profits are the basis of the present silence. The same reason why Turkey keeps the border open with Syria – oil deals with ISIS. For them it's business as usual. The point is us and our response in how we protect our own class interests."


An eye opener. Thanks.

2 Likes 1 Share

Re: Why Is David Cameron So Silent On The Recapture Of Palmyra From ISIS. by Nobody: 8:32pm On Mar 29, 2016
It is no surprise that western analysts and political pundits will be silent, after all it is the big daddy from Russia that did the magic.

Can't you see how their fellow trolls here have gone into hibernation. You will never see the likes Shitty89 (missy89), the old haggard fool luscabalo, with some of their fellow gay partners like valeriansteel and vedASScool, in this beautiful thread.

You will only see the children of light and of God rejoicing over the liberation from darkness.

Shout out to all the Putin super fans in the house most especially Lord winner Appleyard (the most prolific political analyst of our time), not forgetting his fellow super analysts, Nairaminted, Scully95, Zohariel, Fineguy11 and a host of other pundits.

5 Likes 2 Shares

Re: Why Is David Cameron So Silent On The Recapture Of Palmyra From ISIS. by scully95: 2:29am On Mar 30, 2016
I am happy that Palmyra has finally been liberated. It really showed to the world who's actually fighting ISIS/DEASH.. Not only did it show to the world but it's open to many/unzombified masses that ISIS/DAESH is tier 2 terrorrist group backing their tier 1 free syrian army/moderate army or whaterver army Pentagon and Washington were backing with arms and the rest in the empire.

While ISIS is the big picture tier 2 terrorist army put in place. Watch them changing ISIS now to DAESH. Terrorist Name rebranding.

As for SAA.. I will say carry on, still a long way to go as ISIS/DEASh still spread like cancer in Syria and Iraq. Once Raqqa is taken back, then all things being equal.

Plus posts like this should be hitting the FP.. Mods... Mynd44, lalasticlala, Seun .. Pls do the needful .

3 Likes 1 Share

Re: Why Is David Cameron So Silent On The Recapture Of Palmyra From ISIS. by romme2u: 4:53am On Mar 30, 2016
before it gets to hqtrs, let me answer present because i know phockphock threads always goes places

though i don't have anything to add than what psquare said the game is over
Re: Why Is David Cameron So Silent On The Recapture Of Palmyra From ISIS. by dadicvila(m): 11:35pm On Mar 30, 2016
Biko this thread should the front page........ Chief Vladimir Putin should choose any region of his choice in Ijaw Land, I will ensure he gets 300 acres of land in that region to do as he pleases........God bless Putin, God bless mother Russia, shame on all terror sponsors

3 Likes 1 Share

(1) (Reply)

Israeli Soldiers Report Divine Intervention Battle ISIS [VIDEO] / Gaddafi’s Son Saif Al Islam Freed From Prison In Zintan / Senile Saudi King To Relinquish Power To His Evil Son In 48hrs

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 81
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.