[size=13pt]I find it kind of suspicioius that suddenly, shekau the Boko Haram leader should call for an abandonment of arms by his followers.

Even when they were rattled under Jonathan, they called for negotiation.

It makes me feel there is a possibility their masters (the folks behind them) have told them to pipe down because it is time for that to happen.

Actually, if Buhari and any elements of the APC were behind Boko Haram, it would be apparent who has been behind them if immediately after the 2015 polls, Boko Haram decided to disband themselves.

The natural thing would have been to wait till a much later date to have them disbanded.

Now curiously, in the first Security Council meeting, shortly after Buhari was sworn in, Osibanjo his deputy was prevented from participating in that meeting on Buhari's orders.

What did he not want the elected vice president to know that would lead him to illegally order and enforce the barring of the vice president from the security council meeting?

Does the presidency have any acceptable explanation for his actions there?

So long as that action was carried out and we still have no valid explanation, Nigerians must suspect the president and elements in his party with regards to the insecurity that has plagued the country through Boko haram[/size]

Thank you very much OP.
U just said my mind. Afterall they promised to make jona's government Ungovernable. That might just be their medium.

coolscott:
[size=13pt]I find it kind of suspicioius that suddenly, shekau the Boko Haram leader should call for an abandonment of arms by his followers.

Even when they were rattled under Jonathan, they called for negotiation.

It makes me feel there is a possibility their masters (the folks behind them) have told them to pipe down because it is time for that to happen.

Actually, if Buhari and any elements of the APC were behind Boko Haram, it would be apparent who has been behind them if immediately after the 2015 polls, Boko Haram decided to disband themselves.

The natural thing would have been to wait till a much later date to have them disbanded.

Now curiously, in the first Security Council meeting, shortly after Buhari was sworn in, Osibanjo his deputy was prevented from participating in that meeting on Buhari's orders.

What did he not want the elected vice president to know that would lead him to illegally order and enforce the barring of the vice president from the security council meeting?

Does the presidency have any acceptable explanation for his actions there?

So long as that action was carried out and Nigerians must suspect the president and elements in his party with regards to the insecurity that has plagued the country through Boko haram[/size]

BH has served its purpose.

Hmmm....
I had to pause for several minutes, trying not to be rude.
Una try, kontinu