Following some of the decisions taken at the 2016 JAMB Combined Policy meeting which include the official announcement of the 2016 cut-off mark as 180 for Universities, Polytechnic and Colleges of education and the scrapping of Post-UTME, many candidates are asking a lot of questions with regard to how the admission process for this year is going to run.

Having examined the situation, we would like to point out some factors that may likely come in to play in 2016 admission process.

First, one thing that will likely be a fall-out of this new development is the fact that the cut off-mark of top institutions like UNIBEN, UNILORIN, OAU, UI, UNILAG may shoot up to 220, 240 or even 250. However, no institution will go below 180.

The responsibility of placing candidates in schools will now reside with JAMB. However, JAMB has to first confirm the requirements of institutions before placing candidates in such institution. For instance, if UNIBEN decides that their cut-off mark for this year is 250, it is only candidates who applied to study in that school and score up to 250 will secure admission in UNIBEN.

Similarly, since the bench cut-off mark is 180, JAMB may decide to re-distribute candidates who scored up to 180 to other institutions (who knows, it could be a university, polytechnic or College of education since they all have the same cut-off mark) if the institution they originally chose have reached its admission quota or if such candidates UTME score falls below the set cut-off mark of their specific institutions.

The scrapping of Post-UTME does not necessarily mean that institutions cannot conduct other forms of screening, it only means they cannot conduct another form of examination similar to UTME. So schools may decide to use oral interview or verification of documents to screen candidates.

The scrapping of post-UTME will equally save candidates the cost of purchasing their school's post-UTME form and going through the usual hassles associated with it.

However, all these factors will be expected to play out when ASUU, ASUP and NCEE accept the outcome of the 2016 JAMB Combines Policy meeting.

Since these bodies are yet to express their stance on this, we will only wait to see how it plays out at the end of it all.

Now, lets know your opinion on this or what you think the admission process will be like.

http://www.edificationinfo.com/2016/06/possible-effects-of-scrapping-post-utme.html

cc lalasticlala

i lik it

Please don't forget the idea behind the introduction of postutme by our schools, other posted have already highlighted some facts and let me tell you, the need for postutme cannot be down-played, it has almost if not totally, eradicated the manace of admission sharp practices that were experienced in the 90's and early 2000. it has sent most of the so called admission agents into packing, with post utme i.e. taking OAU for example, once a candidate can obtain 200+ in utme, he needs to obtain another 200 or + in the post jamb after which the school admission board will now sit down and determine the no of students to be admitted and hence, peg a mark based on the back already scored by the applicants seeking admission into a particular course. This has helped many to gain admission without knowing anybody or connection but tru self effort.

what i think we need is to ask the institution why they are charging exhobitant fee from candidate. i think a token of 1k should be enough.

and lastly, if this decision comes to effect, I pity a lot of those candidate without money and connection.