naijadeyhia:




Error of catastrophe was proposed by Leslie Orgel in 1963 and it was originally a very popular theory because it made a great deal of sense. Although the theory per se has by now been largely discarded due to a lack of experimental supporting evidence, elements of the theory are still being investigated as possible factors in aging

Youre are just been crude by arguing a Cat evolving to Dog.
That's biological nonsense, it doesnt work that way.
Meanwhile, i've got many material that could aid you in your quest for evolutionary proofs but i'm typing this from a Nokia 2700c.
I'm sure you know how it feels buh if you don't mind you can read the article bout misconceptions people like you have about evolution.
For your reading pleasure; http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/misconceptions_faq.php#a2

In another news, i'm in a live scene where some members of the dreaded Boko-haram were arrested at Agege market by men of NPF, isokoko police station, Agege.
If a bomb had gone off, maybe i'd be gone too.
I thank my stars.

Ofemmanu1:

Youre are just been crude by arguing a Cat evolving to Dog.
That's biological nonsense, it doesnt work that way.
Meanwhile, i've got many material that could aid you in your quest for evolutionary proofs but i'm typing this from a Nokia 2700c.
I'm sure you know how it feels buh if you don't mind you can read the article bout misconceptions people like you have about evolution.
For your reading pleasure; http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/misconceptions_faq.php#a2

Bro I respect you a lot. Dont show me someone elses assumptions and theories. Show me todays proof. Show me yours that you used to confirm anothers theory on evolution.

The burden of proof to support belief is upon the person who claims they believe.

Show me.

naijadeyhia:



And I said stop trying to shift our focus.

Your science with its roots in evolution said categorically that it is IMPOSSIBLE to merge a dogs DNA with a cats DNA even if they attempt the genetic modificarion themselves for eons.

If Science cannot do it throufh deliberate actions how can evolution do it to perfection through randomness?

Science tries to reproduce nature, to replicate it, not vice-versa

The Second Law of Thermodynamics establishes that everything in the world becomes more disordered over time, in the absence of intelligent intervention. TRUE OR FALSE?

CC cloudgoddess

SirWere:


Science tries to reproduce nature, to replicate it, not vice-versa

So nature is more powerful and way more intelligent than scientists are. True or false?

Biologists on Nairaland; I believe you have a job to do.


I believe it will be benefical to all if you open a thread of evolution in the Science and Tech section; where you give detailed insights, answer FAQ's and give examples.


Else, we'll keep seeing accidents threads like this.




Cc cloudgoddess, donffd, Ofennamu, krystalkris,......etal.

Op, I don't blame you, really I don't.

SirWere:
Biologists on Nairaland; I believe you have a job to do.


I believe it will be benefical to all if you open a thread of evolution in the Science and Tech section; where you give detailed insights, answer FAQ's and give examples.


Else, we'll keep seeing accidents threads like this.




Cc cloudgoddess, donffd, Ofennamu, krystalkris,......etal.

Op, I don't blame you, really I don't.

Why would you blame me? I asked for Proof and no single one of you in your large numbers could offer me any. No bro the blame and shame is on you.

You have nothing so can show nothing. If you do then no need opening another thread. All of you should converge here and show this proof for all to see afterall the readers all do not have my mind do they?

naijadeyhia:



Bro I respect you a lot. Dont show me someone elses assumptions and theories. Show me todays proof. Show me yours that you used to confirm anothers theory on evolution.

The burden of proof to support belief is upon the person who claims they believe.

Show me.

Those are the proofs!
We read em in books, schools etc.
We have to take it with faith just like the Brahmans take their scriptures by faith.
I have no proofs of my own;
"Learn to use the knowledge of the past, it is fools that learn by experience" ~Bismarck.
If you insist on a live proof, then i think it's the end of my contribution to this thread.

Ofemmanu1:

Those are the proofs!
We read em in books, schools etc.
We have to take it with faith just like the Brahmans take faith in their scriptures.
I have no proofs of my own;
"Learn to use the knowledge of the past, it is fools that learn by experience" ~Bismarck.

But I thought the whole evolutionary process is based on experience and not just knowledge. Science is based on proof and not just hearsay. Yes or no?

naijadeyhia:



But I thought the whole evolutionary process is based on experience and not just knowledge. Science is based on proof and not just hearsay. Yes or no?

You and me were not present when they decided 1+1 = 2.
So, if we could take that with faith, why not others?

Ofemmanu1:

You and me were not present when they decided 1+1 = 2.
So, if we could take that with faith, why not others?

When I was a kid they did not teach me with figures they taught me with tangible objects thats why till today they still do in kindergartens and nursery schools.

An apple and an apple means more apples. I can see it that its more and not just solitary. So when they say 1 + 1 is 2 I can connect that to previous information gotten.

.

naijadeyhia:


When I was a kid they did not teach me with figures they taught me with tangible objects thats why till today they still do in kindergartens and nursery schools.

An apple and an apple means more apples. I can see it that its more and not just solitary. So when they say 1 + 1 is 2 I can connect that to previous information gotten.

Do you know some people could prove; 1+1 =1 while others would prove; 1+1 =3?!
Such is life, it is a puzzle.

Ofemmanu1:

Do you know some people could prove; 1+1 =1 while others would prove; 1+1 =3?!
Such is life, it is a puzzle.

Its no puzzle. If I have 6 apples and I take away 4 how many do I have left?

naijadeyhia:



Its no puzzle. If I have 6 apples and I take away 4 how many do I have left?

2 apples of course but sombody invented the number "2"!

Ofemmanu1:

2 apples of course but sombody invented the number "2"!

Sorry the common sense and true answer is 4. Life isnt a puzzle

naijadeyhia:


Sorry the common sense and true answer is 4. Life isnt a puzzle

hahahahaha! That was fast! I think you should take a leaf outta Rob Green's Power book. It will surely help you. Law 38; " Think as you like but behave like others"

At this Juncture I need to taks a break and will be back in maybe another hour or so.

I want to believe that by the time I return some evolutionist would have taken time to provide tangible relatable evolutionary proof for me so I can learn.

I will not respond to those who just want to make a nuisance of themselves via memes and jabs. I am here to learn so focus all your energy on educating me.

See you all in an hour.

naijadeyhia:
At this Juncture I need to taks a break and will be back in maybe another hour or so.

I want to believe that by the time I return some evolutionist would have taken time to provide tangible relatable evolutionary proof for me so I can learn.

I will not respond to those who just want to make a nuisance of themselves via memes and jabs. I am here to learn so focus all your energy on educating me.

See you all in an hour.

Bro, of what benefit is it to prove the great "evolution theory" was a myth, or a hoax?!
I suggest you learn more from the present human situations and come up with plans to better LIFE.
Once again, i see life as a puzzle without all the pieces in the box.
Socrates once said "The world is a puzzle, no need to make sense out of it"
Thanks for your time, have a good break.

tempem:

But, they both have central conclusion.

Evolutionist never believed we were created.
Atheist never believed there is a God.

Isn't that the fact?!

we have theists who believe evolution was guided by a god. its not only atheists who believe in evolution.

Ok I am back!

I can see no evolutionist dared try to post any proof. Isnt that strange? Well here we go again. I am still waiting for that numerous yet elusive proof o my people.

Ranchhoddas:
Evolution has absolutely nothing to do with atheism. There were atheists centuries before Darwin. Stop mixing the two.

Darwin was a theist.

wirinet:

Darwin was a theist.

Pls can we focus on the purpose of this thread. I am not here for theists or atheists I am here for evolutionists be they theists or atheists.

Cloudgoddess I am still waiting for at least an attempt to answer my questions asked you directly. Wanna give it a try?

wirinet:

Darwin was a theist.

I think he meant 'before Darwin proposed the theory of evolution.

naijadeyhia:



I helped u with some highlights in your post.

So evolution isnt random so what is it? Intelligent?

This was all you could pick out from this sentence?

Evolution isn't a random mashing together of different species.

Look at both sentences again (and again if necessary) and see how you've cherry picked and misled yourself.

stainlex:

I think he meant 'before Darwin proposed the theory of evolution.




This was all you could pick out from this sentence?



Look at both sentences again (and again if necessary) and see how you've cherry picked and misled yourself.

I saw it clearly. So let me help rephrase. If evolution isnt the random mashing together of different species is it then the random mashing together of same species or the intelligent mashing together of same species?

If you randomly mash together same species would you get a different specie?

Yes or no?

I have gotten 4 pages of all talk and assumptions and yet no tangible proof of evolution from my super evolutionists.

Is this proof tucked away somewhere in the uttermost parts of the earth?

Lets assume I do not know what evolution is and want to cut to the chase by demanding for relatable proof how can it be so so hard to provide?

@op If U Need Tangible Evidence YouTube.com Is Always There For U!!

stainlex:

I think he meant 'before Darwin proposed the theory of evolution.




This was all you could pick out from this sentence?



Look at both sentences again (and again if necessary) and see how you've cherry picked and misled yourself.

If you could pick that singular highlighted statement I made and leave out the rest what does that say?

If you have an answer say it and stop trying to explain me. Explain evolution with proof. I didnt ask for proof of me or my words but proof of evolution.

naijadeyhia:
I have gotten 4 pages of all talk and assumptions and yet no tangible proof of evolution from my super evolutionists.

Is this proof tucked away somewhere in the uttermost parts of the earth?

Lets assume I do not know what evolution is and want to cut to the chase by demanding for relatable proof how can it be so so hard to provide?

I wonder.
The man wey start the theory sef, based it on assumption and he himself believed in God.
The next generation of scientists, became extremists on top the matter, since then life has never been the same for us.

Lilbrown007:
@op If U Need Tangible Evidence YouTube.com Is Always There For U!!

Who posted the purported proof on youtube? Same people who got it via assumptions.

We share 98% of our genes with apes yet somehow they lost the most important 2% and we got it. And with that 2% we are able to have over 120 languages and can reason and can plan and execute trips to mars and back.

How come we also share 80% of our genes with horses and same with mice as well as other creatures?

If the evolutionary process began millions of years ago then surely we are the future of those millions of years so where are todays evolutionary processes yet ongoing?

Just show this judge and court one little, itsy, bitsy proof of creatures evolving from one species into another species. Deliver the facts or publically admit your defeat and proclaim to the world you have lied to the world. Evolution does not exist. Prove me wrong. You can't, can you? So far, I see no intelligent answers from avowed atheists and or believers of evolution. Subject failed to deliver intellectual, scientific or reasonable evidence to support the subject of evolution.

I wonder why.