From MSSNOAU to all Stalites, Freshers, friends and well-wishers within and outside OAU Campus

MADAM D.S.A AND HER “BROTHELS”,
A RESPONSE.

In a five page sheets of nausea issued from the Madam, Acting Dean of the DSA this afternoon (Dr. G.O Akinola), she claimed, after paragraphs of ambiguities and name-calling, that the well-known and well-visited Awo and Faj hall mosque is “running a brothel”, breeding prostitution.
Though we never expect nothing less from the DSA, but we never know it will stoop this low. We wonder if any sense of honour remains in the heart controlling the hand that penned that release. For it calls to mind baffling questions already begging for answers, not to talk of the shock and rage the association of “prostitution” with two hall mosques, a religious space, is certainly going to provoke.

HER VISIT TO THE HALL MOSQUES
What provoked this laughable accusations, we were told in her release, was her visit to the Hall mosques two days ago.
Clearly naive, she went into the mosque from the male side and started banging on the door from that side, in the name of knocking, in a bid to gain access to the female side. The ridiculousness of the situation was clearly manifest in the slowness of the sisters from their section of the mosque to open the door she was knocking, for they are not used to sudden knocks on their door from the brother's side at any other time except during the time for academic tutorials and arabic classes which have fixed times.
So they were slow to open the door, and when it was eventually opened and Madam DSA barged in, the only explanation she could give was that these sisters were slow to open the door because they are prostitutes, and the mosque where we all worship our lord, she claims, is where they ply their trade!
Her entry was just the beginning of an ugly story.
We have seen this, and before we see more, we are challenging her to employ all the might in her possession to bring out subtantive evidence that there are brothels in the mosques and that it is breeding prostitutes. The honour of multitudes she is dallying with will not leave unchecked!
But that aside, her whole bundle of papers need dissection, for it is rare to find such a concentration of falsehoods and inaccuracies that have been managed to be packed into five sheets:
1. On her claim that “students who wanted to impose themselves and their doctrines which are not consistent with the constitution of MSSN Members caused issues at the inauguration” at the central mosque.

Her first obvious collision with the truth was this – And it shows her complete ignorance of the details of this issues before delving into it or a deliberate and mischievous effort to turn the while story upside down.
Even the most passive Muslim student on this campus knows the true story of what led to the “inauguration” fracas, and we all know the elderly initiator and sole participant to initiate the disturbance that day. She would be kind to tell us if it is a sin to raise your hand to ask a question at an open gathering or if the elder flying at the questioner with the aim of trying to tear him into shreds justify the act of trying to impose executives on thousands of mature students who are capable of steering their own affairs.

The DSA hasn’t made its research enough despite the surplus sources of information as regards what really happened at the central mosque that day. We can only say she has only chosen to get her info from where she wishes clearly. An evidence that was witnessed by hundreds of students can never be written away by a few lines with her manufactured version. The while world knows who really caused the issue. Madam, you are not writing for imbeciles to read. Video records abound.

2. On her insistence on “a week to be given to permit the group interact with the Mainstream MSSN and settle their disagreement"

Our records of meetings with her rather shows her insistence of solving issues amicably with the Muslim Community rather than the so called ”Mainstream MSSN”(whatever that means, unless the MC is now the Mainstream MSSN) as she claims.

However, this also points to her ignorance of the issue on ground. A week or not, she seem not to realize, or have deliberately closed her eyes to the glaring fact before, during and after the “Inauguration” saga that the MC she is sending us to convince within a week to persuade to come back to its senses is not ready to shift grounds on its decision to forcefully impose a minute set of faceless mischievous students on the generality of OAU Muslim students as leaders at any cost.
We will ask her if it is that easy to convince an antagonist to a truce, when he is even ready for a dialogue, within a week, not to talk of one who is not ready for one in the foreseeable future, if ever. Anyway, posterity will record us a making an attempt in her one week of ordering us to take a camel through the eye of a needle and at our last meeting with her, that is on 31st August we reported to her that the camel won’t bulge to even move not to talk of passing it through the eye of a needle.

3. On her claim that the two hall mosques are being used for “ anti-mainstream MSSN rhetorics and doctrinal disagreement on campus, including recruitment of students for their separate teachings”
At this juncture, it becomes clear that the Acting Dean must be having a hidden personal stake in this brightening embers, for she has been seen fanning it.
Our advice to her is not take this issue personal, for when it grows beyond her purview, only God knows how many she will answer to.
In short, we call on her to produce evidence of recruitment going on at the two mosques! Her failure to do so guarantees her a place in the hall of liars, at the corner of those known with producing blatant lies.

4. On her mention of suggesting closure of the mosques while we go and reach agreement on “doctrinal or worship issues”.
What does she know about the doctrines and mode of worship in Islam?
Our many meeting with her usually put us at a disadvantage on some issues regarding Islam simply because of her inability to grasp the meaning of some simple Islamic concepts, even despite her claim agelong purported Muslim affiliations.

5. On the “report” she claimed came to her that a “religious programme” is being planned to be held in Awolowo Hall Cafeteria the following Day (i.e 28th August, 2016).
We wonder the idle individual or individuals who gave her the highly unnecessary “report” that a programme that has been holding every Sunday at that venue decades before her appointment as the Acting Dean will also holds on the 28th. If not being having a mischievous agenda, sponsored or wholly her own, she’d not suddenly develop a ridiculous suspicion towards an open and peaceful programme already well known to both Muslims and Christians on this campus.

6. On her claim that we sent a text message to the DSA that we’d all be having a “continuous assessment tests from 10am to 5pm on the 31st August” to avoid meeting with her.
This is either a calculated twisting of the facts on this or an innocent misreading of our text message, which since her motives is now getting clearer, we will only be too glad to explain to her again.
No test of any nature will hold from 10am to 5pm on this campus and she very well knows that. How she concluded that the that the text message mentioning that “our” tests which (collectively) is referring to various brothers that will be participating at the meeting having their various tests in their various department at different times between 10am and 5pm of the 31st of August can be misread beats the imagination.
The wordings of the text message sent to her (through the Vice-Dean):
“Good evening sir, we request the meeting should be shifted as some of us will be having tests at that time and will be finishing around 5pm, we want to know when it will be convenient for you. Thanks…

7. On her bizarre claim of girls being “locked” “in a room” in the mosque “by their leaders.”
The locked room being referred to by this forever baffling Acting Dean is the entrance to the female section of the mosque. On this, we don’t find it surprising that she is even unaware of the plain and common fact that Muslims have separate places of worship sectioned separately for males and females in all mosques, since we have witnessed her other blunders regarding her familiarity with Islam.

8. On her claim that the said girls she met in their side of the mosque are “locked” there by their leaders, we have nothing to say except
“…supplicate earnestly and invoke the curse of Allah upon the liars” Qur’an 3 vs 61.

9. On her strange admission of finding girls at the mosque “during lecture hours”.
We wonder if everybody on campus have the same lecture hours that dictates everybody be at lectures at the exactly the same time? So it really gives one mental agony seeing how she’s making an issue of finding them at the mosque when they should be in her own defined “lecture hours”. Does their lack of a lecture at that time and their presence in the mosque at that time justify calling them prostitutes!!! Acting dean!!!

10. She said there is a practice of “harboring girls in rooms within the mosques”.
We’ll be glad to see her point again to the female side of the mosque where the females perform their daily acts of worship as the room where “harboring girls in the mosques” is going on. The world will be glad for the laugh.

11. Even as ID cards were obligingly giving to her, this jesting Madam pulled up her dishonorable conclusions out of thin air.
Our hasty acting dean shoots herself in the leg after implying our sisters are in their side of the mosque performing immoral action by admitting she obtained ID cards, obligingly, from all of them except one who wasn’t with hers and was vouched for by a brother.
We want to ask if girls that she says don’t “go to lectures” at “lecture hours”, girls that have been “locked” in by her manufactured “their leaders” and are plying the trade of prostitution in the Mosques use for worship of the lord will obligingly hand over their active ID cards to her if they have something to hide?
Madam D.S.A came to the Mosque on an agenda, no doubt, and the scapegoat she thought will be slaughtered after a chase turned out to be human afterall, and they, to her chagrin, came to her slaughter slab without a fight. The knife falls.
We are waiting for her proofs (hard one) that they are conducting prostitution in the Mosque where we all pray, and how career prostitutes who are locked up managed to obtain the school ID card under her nose.

HER VISIT TO THE HALL MOSQUES
What provoked this laughable accusations, we were told in her release, was her visit to the Hall mosques two days ago.
Clearly naive, she went into the mosque from the male side and started banging on the door from that side, in the name of knocking, in a bid to gain access to the female side. The ridiculousness of the situation was clearly manifest in the slowness of the sisters from their section of the mosque to open the door she was knocking,

imagine!

Female section in a male hostel!
Pure nonsense!

Poor write-up. The Op is telling the stories from his own side. let's wait and hear from the other side. A whole DSA of OAU cannot be that naive

Cc: Lalasticlala Mynd44 Seun

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yGdOvfhWXs
This is where d mosque is