I was checking out naij. Com until I came across this piece from the former aviation minister, am someone who feel Nigeria have some kind of hope ie. am very optimistic about it but I really got disturbed seeing something like this, though most people will label Kayode a talkative but seriously he couldn't just form all these by himself. If this is actually true then this country have some serious latent problem looming in the background because as a core igbo man who had never had sentiments for secession, it is really mind buggling because nobody is ever taking my possession because of religion or belief especially when I imagine my parents and siblings even my friends in such situation.
But still am still debating on how true it is and seriously pray it is a mere fabrication.
You can read it yourself from this link because am lazy in writing long essays.
https://www.naij.com/961527-core-northerner-thinks-femi-fani-kayode.html

hmm

OP you can ignore this ignorant write up by FFK knowing full well that this Adamu Mohammed is a fictitious character used to stir up a reaction. I would not be surprised to know FFK is behind the Adamu post on FB.

Ignore in peace and enjoy your Sunday. Like the average northerner who is not majority cattle owning Fulani cares. Or are the TIV,Birom and over 150 ethnic groups in northern Nigeria not northerners anymore.

Who listens to that donkey?

[s]

sweetgala:
OP you can ignore this ignorant write up by FFK knowing full well that this Adamu Mohammed is a fictitious character used to stir up a reaction. I would not be surprised to know FFK is behind the Adamu post on FB.

Ignore in peace and enjoy your Sunday. Like the average northerner who is not majority cattle owning Fulani cares. Or are the TIV,Birom and over 150 ethnic groups in northern Nigeria not northerners anymore.

[/s]


Liar the first son of Lai MuhaFairytale, I guess it was FFK that suggested that a plate no from Sokoto should carry 'Born to rule' .. Your hypocrisy and your hatred is buried deep in your hearts and it's becoming obvious by the day..

Continue deluding yourself..

yorubasmustprosper:
[s][/s]


Liar the first son of Lai MuhaFairytale, I guess it was FFK that suggested that a plate no from Sokoto should carry 'Born to rule' .. Your hypocrisy and your hatred is buried deep in your hearts and it's becoming obvious by the day..

Continue deluding yourself..

I am sure you also belived it when FFK once wrote that he raped bianca ojuku without using a condom

The south is full of idiots because if the likes of FFK is still preaching to you guys on the past and present artrocities of the muslim north and plan to expand their jihadists quest southwards then I foresee great tribulations in the nearest future.

All you have to do in this information age is to use google to validate all what FFK is preaching about the evil Muslim agenda and artrocities they have unleashed in northern Nigeria.

Read. This is your biggest weapon against these barbarian cowards . Once they know you are aware of their evil history and their present plans for jihadists conquest you render them powerless.

This is why they apboth hate and are afraid of FFK.

As you can see from the several slaves posting above who are desperately trying to dismiss the messenger but not his message , you ought to ask why they can't counter FFK with facts without resorting to insulting him?

Wake Up people. The Islamic jihad is on full swing and the only weapon you have to defeat their plans is to be aware of their plans.

Caseless:
Who listens to that donkey?

Definitely not you Muslims.

sweetgala:

Ignore in peace and enjoy your Sunday. Like the average northerner who is not majority cattle owning Fulani cares. Or are the TIV,Birom and over 150 ethnic groups in northern Nigeria not northerners anymore.

This is damn too weak.

The Beroms, Tivis, Egons, Idomas, Jukums and virtually every northern minority tribe that isnt Moslem have been at the forefront of the jihad.

Or do you think we don't know that Michika, Biu, Chibok and other ravaged communities in the NE are majoritly Christian?

Caseless:
Who listens to that donkey?

sweetgala:
OP you can ignore this ignorant write up by FFK knowing full well that this Adamu Mohammed is a fictitious character used to stir up a reaction. I would not be surprised to know FFK is behind the Adamu post on FB.
Ignore in peace and enjoy your Sunday. Like the average northerner who is not majority cattle owning Fulani cares. Or are the TIV,Birom and over 150 ethnic groups in northern Nigeria not northerners anymore.

Islam is currently protected from critique. This was not always so. Thomas Jefferson could declare that Muslims believe "that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Musselman who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise." John Quincy Adams could acknowledge that Muhammad "degraded" the female sex and "declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind." Winston Churchill could write of Islam, "No stronger retrograde force exists in the world." Pope Callixtus III could assess Islam as "diabolical."

Such critique is taboo today. A few days after 9-11, then-president George Bush declared that "Islam is peace." In February, 2015, after ISIS burned a Jordanian pilot alive in a cage, President Obama attempted to redirect outrage towards the Crusades. In 2016, Pope Francis said, "If I speak of Islamic violence, I should speak of Catholic violence … there is always a small group of fundamentalists … Terrorism grows when there are no other options, and when the center of the global economy is the god of money and not the person."

This no-go-zone surrounding Islam, where all critics are vaporized by ever-vigilant thought police, was erected and is maintained by a variety of forces. One of those forces is capital-A Atheism, that is Atheism as a proselytizing belief system.

Atheists have long promulgated their unique twist on cultural relativism. In 2005, an Atheist invented The Flying Spaghetti Monster. The larger point of his project: all religions are importantly identical; that is, they are all equally ridiculous. A deity invented out of spaghetti and meatballs has as much depth, truth value and relevance as any other.

After atrocities committed in the name of Islam, one encounters Atheists promoting this relativistic worldview. The flying-spaghetti-monster argument can be paraphrased thus, "It is racist to express outrage at Islamic atrocity in any way that indicates that it is different from other atrocities. In America we have Christian Taliban who are just as oppressive and violent as Muslims. They blow up abortion clinics. Christians murdered innocents during the Crusades. Singling out Islam vitiates the larger war against all religion."

In 2006, Richard Dawkins published The God Delusion. Critics pointed out that Dawkins revealed an abysmal ignorance of Christianity. The Dawkins camp replied that he didn't need to know such material; it was all flying-spaghetti-monster grade nonsense. Not so, Dawkins' critics replied. One may believe that there is no God, but there are certainly such things as scripture, history, and theology, and to misrepresent these actual facts is to obscure truths that have an impact on all lives. An excellent example of this public debate can be read in Terry Eagleton's piece "Lunging, Flailing, Mispunching" that appeared in the London Review of Books," on October 19, 2006.

In fact, even to Atheists, the differences between religions matter. They are reflected in the real world. Look at a map plotting high sex ratios. Women and girls have a much better chance of living a full human lifespan if they are born in cultures shaped by the Judeo-Christian tradition than they do if they are born into Muslim, Hindu, or Confucian countries. In those lands, females are more likely to die young, or simply to be aborted before birth.

Too, "Islam has bloody borders" as well as "bloody innards." Muslim populations are more likely to be in armed conflict with their neighbors than non-Muslim populations, according to Samuel P. Huntington.

American students who descend from ancestors from countries affected by Confucianism, or who were actually born in such countries, that is China, Japan, South Korea and Vietnam, often do better on standardized tests than other students. Jews, never more than one percent of the world's population, have a vastly disproportionate share of Nobel Prizes. The Catholic Church is said to be the largest single provider of social services in the world, and it played a key role in the development of the university, the hospital, and international law. It doesn't really matter if Richard Dawkins believes in Jesus or Confucius. Millions of people do, and those beliefs have an impact in the real world, including an impact on the lives of Atheists.

It behooves everyone, Atheist or believer, who wants to understand the daily news or the presidential race, to understand the difference between Christianity and Islam. Nabeel Qureshi's August, 2016 book No God But One: A Former Muslim Investigates the Evidence for Islam and Christianity, published by Zondervan, is a must-read, even for Atheists. In the simplest and most accessible terms possible, Qureshi outlines major theological differences between Islam and Christianity. Qureshi's stated goal, which he meets: "I hope to elucidate two overarching matters in particular: that the differences between Islam and Christianity have great implications, and that the evidence of history strongly supports the Christian claims." Qureshi's conclusion: Christianity can withstand historical examination and ethical interrogation. Islam cannot – in fact, neither Islam nor the Quran live up to their own stated criteria for themselves. Further, Muhammad, as depicted in canonical Muslim sources, is not the man Islamic propaganda makes him out to be.

Nabeel Qureshi is a Pakistani-American. He was born to a devout Muslim family. In college he met David Wood, who challenged his faith. Qureshi described his conversion to Christianity in his 2014 bestseller, Seeking Allah, Finding Jesus. Qureshi is a brilliant and ambitious man. He holds an MD, two MAs in religious studies, and is pursuing an Oxford PhD in New Testament studies. On August 30, 2016, Qureshi revealed on Facebook that he has recently been diagnosed with "advanced stomach cancer." One hopes, and some of us pray, for his rapid and thorough recovery.

No God But One maintains an excruciatingly polite tone and a high-school sentence length and vocabulary level. Qureshi is thorough in his takedown of Islam, but he is never anything but kind. One is aware that this is a man who lived most of his life as a Muslim, and whose beloved family members are still Muslims. Those resorting to charges of "Islamophobia" to silence critique of Islam need to read Qureshi.

Chapters are a few pages long, limiting themselves to basic questions and answers, with bold headings guiding the reader. You could read – and understand – this book in the bathtub or in a crowded subway car. Chapters address topics like the differences between Muhammad and Jesus, between the Quran and the Bible, and jihad and the Crusades.

Anyone reading Qureshi's book will be introduced to facts that reduce the Atheist spaghetti-monster relativist dogma to shreds. Qureshi points out, and scholars of Christianity have long known, that the consensus among historians is that there was a real Jew named Jesus, he was crucified by Pontius Pilate, and his followers believed that they witnessed him alive after his death. One does not have to stray from historical documents or scholarship to accept these basic tenets of Christianity.

Muhammad, Qureshi claims, is another story. There are no records from the early days of the Arab Conquest, from either Arabs or those they conquered, mentioning a prophet named Muhammad, a scripture called the Quran, or the word "Muslim." The description of Mecca in the Quran does not mesh with historical or geographic realities, and early mosques faced Jerusalem or Petra, not Mecca. Robert Spencer's 2012 book, Did Muhammad Exist? covers this scholarship.

The earliest written documents about Jesus date, Qureshi convincingly argues, to within a decade or so of his death. Christians rapidly copied these documents and disseminated them throughout the Classical World. We have fragments dating back to the first half of the second century, and we have thousands of fragments and copies, more than for any other Ancient document. Gary Habermas wrote, "The New Testament has far more manuscript evidence from a far earlier period than other classical works. There are just under 6000 NT manuscripts, with copies of most of the NT dating from just 100 years or so after its writing." Any wholesale recall and centrally-dictated change to these documents would have been logistically impossible.



The earliest biography of Muhammad dates to 140 years after his death, and even that late book was lost. The extant biography of Muhammad, its author admits, was bowdlerized to eliminate potentially offensive material. Muslims insist that the Quran that exists today is exactly the same message that Allah conveyed to Muhammad. In fact, Qureshi points out, Islam's own history proves this false. As attested in Muslim sources, the Quran has undergone alterations right up to the twentieth century.

As a Muslim child, Qureshi learned that Muhammad was "Al-Insān al-Kāmil," the perfect human, worthy of emulation. Muhammad was humble, peaceful, and kind. Through research of Muslim canonical sources, Qureshi learned that in fact Muhammad loved and praised war as the highest act (eg Bukhari 4:52:50, 4:52:44, 4:52:72). He also ordered assassinations, torture, mass murder, and rape of female captives.

Islam, Qureshi argues, is based on blind obedience to a deity, Allah, who is not interested in or capable of either intimacy or love. Christianity, on the other hand, promises an intimate relationship with a loving Father God. This difference in valuation of love and power inevitably is reflected in the societies where Christianity and Islam predominate. "Obedience under the shadow of threat is hardly obedience at all, but compulsion," he writes. "Christian obedience," he argues, is "rooted in love."

Muslims frequently believe that their Allah is loving, but there is no support for this in the Quran. In an attempt to depict Allah as loving, Qureshi says, Muslims cite that Allah is closer to a man than his own jugular vein (Quran 50:16). This is not an expression of intimacy, subsequent verses show, but rather a warning: Allah knows what bad things man has done, and will punish him when the time comes. The jugular vein is found in the neck, and the Quran tells believers to strike at the neck. Allah aims for the same target.

The Trinity is a very tough topic. Qureshi handles it well. I will not attempt to recapitulate his argument here. I will say that he does cite quantum physics to help the reader understand how the Biblical God could conceivably be one entity made up of three persons: father, son, and holy spirit. Qureshi also uses linguistic support to argue that the concept of the Trinity is hinted at in the Old Testament. In historical fact, some Jews did believe in a God of more than one person; after the rise of Christianity, that understanding was condemned as heretical in Judaism.

The Quran promotes a garbled version of the Trinity, insisting that Christians worship God the father, Jesus, and Mary. Jews, the Quran claims, worship Ezra, an Old Testament scribe, as God. In fact Jews do not worship Ezra, and Mary has never been part of the Trinity.

Early Muslims debated whether or not the Quran was created or eternal. Beginning in 833 AD, during a process called the Mihna, Muslims who believed that the Quran was eternal were persecuted, imprisoned, and killed. Today most Muslims insist that the Quran is eternal and uncreated, granting it a status reserved for gods. This belief contradicts the doctrine that only Allah is god; Muslims don't seem to care. This reverence for the Quran is not reflected in Muslims' relationship to it. Most Muslims don't read, refer to, or attempt to understand the Quran. Its language is opaque to them, and Muslims fear that they may be clinging to a verse that has been abrogated, or canceled out, a Quranic doctrine whereby some verses become obsolete, but are retained in the text.

Qureshi is rather gentle in his critique of the Quran. He writes off its incoherence as a result of it having been first oral rather than written. That won't wash. The Iliad and the Odyssey were originally oral, and they are magnificent. Qureshi should read Eric Havelock's Preface to Plato, an examination of oral societies. The oral mind was a different mind, but not inferior. The Quran's incoherence can't be blamed on orality.

Those seeking a tougher critique of the Quran will want to read Don Richardson's Secrets of the Koran. Richardson points out that the Quran is so repetitious that if all its repeated material were removed, it would be 40% shorter. The Quran is so violent that it contains at least 109 jihad verses; one of every 55 verses is a jihad verse. One of every eight verses is a threat of damnation or a graphic description of sadistic tortures in hell for infidels. By contrast, the Old Testament mentions Hell once in every 774 verses, and Hell is never described with as much lip-smacking sadism as it is in the Quran.

The Quran is written in one language; the Bible was written in three languages. The Quran is the product of a much shorter period of composition than the Bible. The Quran is approximately 77,000 words long; the Bible is approximately 800,000 words long. The Quran offers much less elbow room for alternate interpretations than the Bible. The Quran itself offers no escape from its own demands for violence.

There is no analog to jihad in the Bible. The advancing Israelites do claim Canaan through military conquest. That conquest is limited by geography and time. But the Bible also includes repeated calls for mercy (Hosea 6:6, Micah 6: and respect for the stranger (Exodus 22:21). The Moabite Ruth, and Rahab the Harlot, both originally non-Jewish outsiders, become heroines. Rabbi Jeffrey Salkin argues that "righteous Gentiles" are essential to the Old Testament. In the New Testament, Jesus depicts the ultimate outsider, the Good Samaritan, as an exemplar of conduct.

The Quran, in contrast, adjures Muslims to be harsh with non-Muslims and not take them as friends (66:9, 48:29, 3:28, 5:51, 9:28, etc). The Atheist flying-spaghetti-monster myth just doesn't work here. The Bible and the Quran are very different books. They cannot be relativized into sameness.

The Quran offers garbled versions of the life of Jesus. The Quran appeared at least six hundred years after Jesus died, over six hundred miles away from his life and death, and in a language foreign to what Jesus and his apostles spoke. Its fables about Jesus' life are cribbed from non-Biblical, pop versions – Qureshi calls them "fan fiction" – that were circulating in the seventh century. Further, the frequently stated Muslim belief that the Quran contains secret, advanced, scientific knowledge or mysterious number codes is easily debunked.

Ironically, the one miracle Muhammad attributed to himself was the Quran. No one could ever write a book comparable to the Quran, the Quran says. Christians produced al-Furqan al-Haqq, a book that presents Biblical teaching in Quranic style. Muslims mistook it for the Quran. It is convincing enough that it is banned in some countries, and many websites warn Muslims not to read it. The ease with which a book that is like the Quran was created disproves the Quran's statement about itself, that no one could create anything like it.

Qureshi's treatment of the Crusades irked me. Like many Protestants, he mentions Catholics only in a negative sense: Catholics, he reports, unlike Protestants, are similar to Muslims in their view of scripture (298). Qureshi does not cite a single Catholic source to back up this unfriendly generalization. Qureshi depicts Pope Urban II as a genocidal maniac. He relativizes Crusaders and jihadis and repeats, three times in as many pages, the plainly hyperbolic statement that Crusaders traveled through Muslim blood up to their ankles, knees, or the knees of their horses. He tosses off a reference to the Spanish Inquisition; apparently he is unaware that that misrepresented period, often used to malign Catholics, has been completely redefined by modern scholarship. Good sources on the topic of the Muslim presence in Spain include Dario Fernandez-Morera's 2016 book The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise and Henry Kamen's The Spanish Inquisition: A Historical Revision. Both Crusaders and Muslims "committed inexcusable atrocities," Qureshi relativizes. Incorrect, as Dr. Bill Warner's Jihad v Crusades video demonstrates.

FFKfuckedBIANCA:
I am sure you also belived it when FFK once wrote that he raped bianca ojuku without using a condom

Why should l doubt or believe him.. Just like I don't doubt or believe this right now..

But I certainly believe the unreserved hunger for power and hatred and religious bigotry and murderous behaviors of the majority of Northern Muslims..

I don't need FFK to direct my thoughts, I observe things and make my own conclusions...

Northern Muslims has high hate and murder tendencies..

sweetgala:
OP you can ignore this ignorant write up by FFK knowing full well that this Adamu Mohammed is a fictitious character used to stir up a reaction. I would not be surprised to know FFK is behind the Adamu post on FB.

Ignore in peace and enjoy your Sunday. Like the average northerner who is not majority cattle owning Fulani cares. Or are the TIV,Birom and over 150 ethnic groups in northern Nigeria not northerners anymore.

The ideology of jihad champion by Fulani herdsmen haven't prove him wrong either.

NaYouGoTire:

The ideology of jihad champion by Fulani herdsmen haven't prove him wrong either.

Jihad by the Fulani ! You people give the Fulani more credit than it's worth or they care.

The Fulani don't want new Muslim converts and they can't be worried if the whole of Nigeria become Muslim or not. Their main battle starts and ends in the capture of the Hausa territory down to Kwara and northern Edo keeping the royal line Fulani and controlling the caliphate is their main ambition.

The large Fulani population distributed from Cameroon along the western coast towards Mali and northern Saharan Africa are pastural nomads who have traditions not far from bushmen. Some have settled for centuries but the majority prefer to roam.

The Fulani clashes in the middle belt can not be described as a terrorist plot or group because they are chance encounters rather than a well tought out act,the lapses of the security aparatus and the inadequacies of the police formation is the reason farmers and villages in the middle belt are pillaged by angry vengeful Fulani herders who know the villages don't have guns to diffend their farmlands.

Nigerians are the worst type of conspiracy theorist who give little time to even try and investigate matters or do a decent jobs of convincing beyond emotional pleadings .

sweetgala:


Jihad by the Fulani ! You people give the Fulani more credit than it's worth or they care.

The Fulani don't want new Muslim converts and they can't be worried if the whole of Nigeria become Muslim or not. Their main battle starts and ends in the capture of the Hausa territory down to Kwara and northern Edo keeping the royal line Fulani and controlling the caliphate is their main ambition.

The large Fulani population distributed from Cameroon along the western coast towards Mali and northern Saharan Africa are pastural nomads who have traditions not far from bushmen. Some have settled for centuries but the majority prefer to roam.

The Fulani clashes in the middle belt can not be described as a terrorist plot or group because they are chance encounters rather than a well tought out act,the lapses of the security aparatus and the inadequacies of the police formation is the reason farmers and villages in the middle belt are pillaged by angry vengeful Fulani herders who know the villages don't have guns to diffend their farmlands.

Nigerians are the worst type of conspiracy therotists who give little time to even try and investigate matters or do a decent jobs of convincing beyond emotional pleadings .

This is a useful idiot post.

You call the Fulani jihadist quest a conspiracy theory?

Wasn't it the same Fulani that you are vainly trying to exonerate that brought jihad into present day Nigeria?

Did they confide in you that they are content with their current northern enclave?

Do you by any chance know that everyday in this world of ours people gather to conspire together for the quest of power?

Or did Uthman's jihad spring out from mid air?

When Uthman overthrew the Hausa Kingdoms did he act on the moment or did he not sit down an orchestrate a grand plan of conquest by first studying the weakness of his hosts? Identifying with useful idiots like yourself within the Hausa kingdoms to overthrow and sieze power for himself and his clan?

sweetgala:


Jihad by the Fulani ! You people give the Fulani more credit than it's worth or they care.

The Fulani don't want new Muslim converts and they can't be worried if the whole of Nigeria become Muslim or not. Their main battle starts and ends in the capture of the Hausa territory down to Kwara and northern Edo keeping the royal line Fulani and controlling the caliphate is their main ambition.

The large Fulani population distributed from Cameroon along the western coast towards Mali and northern Saharan Africa are pastural nomads who have traditions not far from bushmen. Some have settled for centuries but the majority prefer to roam.

The Fulani clashes in the middle belt can not be described as a terrorist plot or group because they are chance encounters rather than a well tought out act,the lapses of the security aparatus and the inadequacies of the police formation is the reason farmers and villages in the middle belt are pillaged by angry vengeful Fulani herders who know the villages don't have guns to diffend their farmlands.

Nigerians are the worst type of conspiracy theorist who give little time to even try and investigate matters or do a decent jobs of convincing beyond emotional pleadings .

Afonjaism.

yorubasmustprosper:
[s][/s]


Liar the first son of Lai MuhaFairytale, I guess it was FFK that suggested that a plate no from Sokoto should carry 'Born to rule' .. Your hypocrisy and your hatred is buried deep in your hearts and it's becoming obvious by the day..

Continue deluding yourself..

Lol. You are a special kind of clown

So since the man with exceptional more humour than yourself decided he wanted to get a plate that read “born to rule” it must mean him and several million people are in come cohutts to do some devious things !

Please engage your brain from time to time you'll find it most thrilling.

“raped” Where did that come from ; he said they were engaged in a relationship which was sexual and their is proof to this effect even thou many of our eastern brethren want to wish this history away like, they want to live in the fools paradise that the one bethroathed to their messiah was without blemish a Yoruba blemish at that.

FFK and Kemi Olunloyo may be mythomaniacs whom I despise but the proof is there that FFK dated and may have gotten your darling Bianca pregnant. Its nothing out of this world and nothing of grave importance in the grand scheme of things

12Monkeys:


This is damn too weak.

The Beroms, Tivis, Egons, Idomas, Jukums and virtually every northern minority tribe that isnt Moslem have been at the forefront of the jihad.

Or do you think we don't know that Michika, Biu, Chibok and other ravaged communities in the NE are majoritly Christian?

I guess the several thousand Muslims and villages occupied by Muslims which have been destroyed by BH are also at the fore front of the jihad..

Clown if you truly know what jihad meant you wouldn't use the word so foolishly and freely.

Communal clashes , ethnic insensitivity and desperate security lapses is not equal to a jihad , if you want to see a tenth of a full scale jihad please travel to Iraq and Syria or maybe I can open a time warp and send you to bezanthine middle East or the ottoman onslaught or maybe Napoleon quest to rule Europe that is what jihad is.

Boko harem are pretenders to the throne an annoying and persistent ones at best but even they are not a jihadist movement

12Monkeys:


Afonjaism.

Thanks. I'd rather be a wise Afonja than a stupid scared flattie whiping up sentiments and making false absurd ludicrous claims.

sweetgala:


Jihad by the Fulani ! You people give the Fulani more credit than it's worth or they care.

The Fulani don't want new Muslim converts and they can't be worried if the whole of Nigeria become Muslim or not. Their main battle starts and ends in the capture of the Hausa territory down to Kwara and northern Edo keeping the royal line Fulani and controlling the caliphate is their main ambition.

The large Fulani population distributed from Cameroon along the western coast towards Mali and northern Saharan Africa are pastural nomads who have traditions not far from bushmen. Some have settled for centuries but the majority prefer to roam.

The Fulani clashes in the middle belt can not be described as a terrorist plot or group because they are chance encounters rather than a well tought out act,the lapses of the security aparatus and the inadequacies of the police formation is the reason farmers and villages in the middle belt are pillaged by angry vengeful Fulani herders who know the villages don't have guns to diffend their farmlands.

Nigerians are the worst type of conspiracy theorist who give little time to even try and investigate matters or do a decent jobs of convincing beyond emotional pleadings .

Trash! Who is Usman Dan fodio? What was his legacy? Who are those champion the legacy? What of the statement of diping Koran into the Atlantic Ocean? Better go look for riffraff and talk to not me and other well learned Biafrans.

sweetgala:


Thanks. I'd rather be a wise Afonja than a stupid scared flattie

Wise Afonja?

That is an oxymoron similar to the phrase living Dead.

12Monkeys:
The south is full of idiots because if the likes of FFK is still preaching to you guys on the past and present artrocities of the muslim north and plan to expand their jihadists quest southwards then I foresee great tribulations in the nearest future.

All you have to do in this information age is to use google to validate all what FFK is preaching about the evil Muslim agenda and artrocities they have unleashed in northern Nigeria.

Read. This is your biggest weapon against these barbarian cowards . Once they know you are aware of their evil history and their present plans for jihadists conquest you render them powerless.

This is why they apboth hate and are afraid of FFK.

As you can see from the several slaves posting above who are desperately trying to dismiss the messenger but not his message , you ought to ask why they can't counter FFK with facts without resorting to insulting him?

Wake Up people. The Islamic jihad is on full swing and the only weapon you have to defeat their plans is to be aware of their plans.

Blame Yorubba not the entire South. Yorubba are the ones causing all the trouble, confusion and backwardness in the South. Especially Yorubba muslims who their first allegiance is to their fellow Northern muslims than to yorubba or the South.

sweetgala:


I guess the several thousand Muslims and villages occupied by Muslims which have been destroyed by BH are also at the fore front of the jihad..

Clown if you truly know what jihad meant you wouldn't use the word so foolishly and freely.

Communal clashes , ethnic insensitivity and desperate security lapses is not equal to a jihad , if you want to see a tenth of a full scale jihad please travel to Iraq and Syria or maybe I can open a time warp and send you to bezanthine middle East or the ottoman onslaught or maybe Napoleon quest to rule Europe that is what jihad is.

Boko harem are pretenders to the throne an annoying and persistent ones at best but even they are not a jihadist movement

Keep telling yourself that rubbish.

Boko Haram, ISIS are the real deal as they follow strictly the commands of the koran.

The same koran that makes hypocrites out of unwilling or unreluctant jihadists

The same koran that has no problem killing apostates of islam who become less than human for living islam

The same sunni brand of islam that you belong to that justified the killing of your own fellow Shiite Moslems in cold blood.

Pls nigga, your islam is evil for all to see like the sun at noon.

Hmm

12Monkeys:


This is a useful idiot post.

You call the Fulani jihadist quest a conspiracy theory?

Wasn't it the same Fulani that you are vainly trying to exonerate that brought jihad into present day Nigeria?

Did they confide in you that they are content with their current northern enclave?

Do you by any chance know that everyday in this world of ours people gather to conspire together for the quest of power?

Or did Uthman's jihad spring out from mid air?

When Uthman overthrew the Hausa Kingdoms did he act on the moment or did he not sit down an orchestrate a grand plan of conquest by first studying the weakness of his hosts? Identifying with useful idiots like yourself within the Hausa kingdoms to overthrow and sieze power for himself and his clan?

You are a special Dullard.. My friend leave the confines of your miniscule mental space and explore the world before you.. News flash we are in the 21st century

And while people shout on about Dan Fodio expansion and capture of Hausa domains and establishment of a caliphate it was not a secluded unique action , in that world of man at the time that was the modus operandi of the growth of the empire

At the same point in time the British were completing their own “jihad” expanding to North America , Africa , the kingdoms of Eithopia was not done expanding to present day Eritrea , sudan and the Spanish were only getting started with South America ooh the Japanese also had a tight grip on China at this point in time. Did you notice none of the empires mentioned were Muslim

For the purpose of clarity I'll also mention a few more expansionist nations at this point in time India still had the areas that make up present day Pakistan and Bangladesh , Hitler was yet to actualize his plans of world dominance but the Prussian/Austrian/Hungarian strife was well underway(I'm guessing you have no clue of the causes of the world wars) and Russian Tsars were still dominating the people of Mongolia and the eastern Europeans from Moscow.

So you get the gist of how the world was and now is.

saint7000:


Blame Yorubba not the entire South. Yorubba are the ones causing all the trouble, confusion and backwardness in the South. Especially Yorubba muslims who their first allegiance is to their fellow Northern muslims than to yorubba or the South.

Sweetgala has no shame. I bet he is from kwara just like most of the afonja slaves here.

Imagine him saying that the clashes in the middle belt are devoid of religious motives but purely an ethnic clash.

sweetgala:



You are a special Dullard.. My friend leave the confines of your miniscule mental space and explore the world before you.. News flash we are in the 21st century

And while people shout on about Dan Fodio expansion and capture of Hausa domains and establishment of a caliphate it was not a secluded unique action , in that world of man at the time that was the modus operandi of the growth of the empire

At the same point in time the British were completing their own “jihad” expanding to North America , Africa , the kingdoms of Eithopia was not done expanding to present day Eritrea , sudan and the Spanish were only getting started with South America ooh the Japanese also had a tight grip on China at this point in time. Did you notice none of the empires mentioned were Muslim

For the purpose of clarity I'll also mention a few more expansionist nations at this point in time India still had the areas that make up present day Pakistan and Bangladesh , Hitler was yet to actualize his plans of world dominance but the Prussian/Austrian/Hungarian strife was well underway(I'm guessing you have no clue of the causes of the world wars) and Russian Tsars were still dominating the people of Mongolia and the eastern Europeans from Moscow.

So you get the gist of how the world was and now is.

How does this excuse the existence of boko haram, Al nusra, Al Shababb, the Taliban, Muslim brotherhood, ISIS in the 21st century?

If truly we are in the 21st century with you medieval plebs how come there is sharia aggitating by Muslims in Europe and Nigeria?

You have said nothing but rant out the weakest level of taqiyya.

12Monkeys:

Did you read the fullness of this article before you posted it. I doubt you did because of you did you would not have used it as rebuttal.

It is greatly flawed and it's opening paragraph concluded the argument , it's case was not that there exist a conspiracy but what is agreeable to any same human that freedom of speech and what is considered insensitive is today's society is different to before.

It lists a number of famous leaders of their times who expressed their opinion on Islam as they undestood it freely without moral consequences or public castigation.

I dare Theresa May to say same today she may not have her job for 24 hours

sweetgala:


Did you read the fullness of this article before you posted it. I doubt you did because of you did you would not have used it as rebuttal.

It is greatly flawed and it's opening paragraph concluded the argument , it's case was not that there exist a conspiracy but what is agreeable to any same human that freedom of speech and what is considered insensitive is today's society is different to before.

It lists a number of famous leaders of their times who expressed their opinion on Islam as they undestood it freely without moral consequences or public castigation.

I dare Theresa May to say same today she may not have her job for 24 hours

You have serious comprehension deficit.

The article looked at how PC in the 21st century as championed by liberal idiots like Obama have come to serve as apologists to Islamic nonsense thereby given the Islamic criminals a sense of right and a victim status above their victims.

Read it again. And this time slowly.

sweetgala:


Jihad by the Fulani ! You people give the Fulani more credit than it's worth or they care.

The Fulani don't want new Muslim converts and they can't be worried if the whole of Nigeria become Muslim or not. Their main battle starts and ends in the capture of the Hausa territory down to Kwara and northern Edo keeping the royal line Fulani and controlling the caliphate is their main ambition.

The large Fulani population distributed from Cameroon along the western coast towards Mali and northern Saharan Africa are pastural nomads who have traditions not far from bushmen. Some have settled for centuries but the majority prefer to roam.

The Fulani clashes in the middle belt can not be described as a terrorist plot or group because they are chance encounters rather than a well tought out act,the lapses of the security aparatus and the inadequacies of the police formation is the reason farmers and villages in the middle belt are pillaged by angry vengeful Fulani herders who know the villages don't have guns to diffend their farmlands.

Nigerians are the worst type of conspiracy theorist who give little time to even try and investigate matters or do a decent jobs of convincing beyond emotional pleadings .

I take an exception to kwara been captured.
kiss the truth!

timeman:
I take an exception to kwara been captured.
kiss the truth!

Lolz.

See this by force ab0ki muslim

12Monkeys:


Lolz.

See this by force ab0ki muslim

Afonja towncrier!! Afonjas w'd continually make the call on you. You're dead beat bruised, you depend on Afonjas to lead on your fight. where was your grunting disorder when a report on attacks on northern minorities emerged in 2006? up untill 2015 you were self muted, until very recently that you found your voice(s) gag off. we can see through your thinly eroded sentiments. go swallow a stone!
kiss the truth!