Guys don't waste your time answering, the OP is an unabashed illiterate. Seeking attention, what concerns evolution with regeneration of limbs? Ignorance is bad

Officialkenshin:
Since u nor knw book enough to know what regeneration is n wat evolution is.

Here u go.

All organisms, including humans, have the ability to regenerate something in the body. But the process is much more developed in lower organisms such as plants, protists -- unicellular organisms such as bacteria, algae, and fungi — and many invertebrate animals such as earthworms and starfish. These organisms can grow new heads, tails, and other body parts when injured.
Scientists don't know why mammals don't have the same ability to grow new limbs. But they think it is because mammals have more complex biological structures; limb regeneration would require sophisticated controls to ensure that limbs and organs don't grow out of control. Humans, for example, are already equipped with safety mechanisms to ensure that individual cells don't grow uncontrollably. But these mechanisms wear down as a person ages and cancer is often the result.
Nevertheless, mammals do regenerate skin, muscle, and blood. Scientists are just beginning to learn about other types of cells, such as those in the brain and blood, that also regenerate. Further study of the phenomenon might lead to a way of growing replacement organs and limbs outside the body.
Not all organisms regenerate in the same way. In plants and organisms like hydra and jellyfish, missing parts are replaced by reorganizing neighboring tissues into whatever parts have been cut off. Animals with more complex bodies usually regenerate parts by producing a specialized bud, or blastema, at the site of amputation. The blastema supplies the tissue necessary for the regenerated part.
The regenerated body part is not always the same as what was lost. Many insects regenerate abnormally small legs from which some segments may be missing.
Tadpole tails, for example, typically grow back to about only half their original length. And regenerated parts often differ in details. A regenerated lizard tail, for example, contains a cartilaginous tube instead
of the vertebrae in the original.


Evolution

ev·o·lu·tion
ˌevəˈlo͞oSH(ə)n/
noun
1.
the process by which different kinds of living organisms are thought to have developed and diversified from earlier forms during the history of the earth.



Now dumb head hope u understand.

Evolution & Regeneration involve changes, growths and developments.

In regeneration there is evolution, true or false?

Regeneration = to create or form again.

Organisms, with all their parts, are thought to have been formed through evolution.

Based on this thought, op wants to know why limbs formed through evolution can't grow or be formed again by same process - evolution.

Lennycool:
Guys don't waste your time answering, the OP is an unabashed illiterate. Seeking attention, what concerns evolution with regeneration of limbs? Ignorance is bad

In regeneration there is evolution, true or false?

Freksy:


When the sex organs (plug & socket), sex cells, sex drive & everything else associated with reproduction/procreation/propagation were introduced by the almighty and wise EVOLUTION.

You think EVOLUTION gave us those things mistakenly or just for fun

If you expect to see a fish that's about to become a bird, or a monkey that will soon change to a human, then you'll wait in vain & forever be disappointed.

Because u all know evolution will never happen again dats y u all now accept dat we as humans are d peak of evolution.


Evolution is a sham. If a bacteria cell can be d genesis of all life forms and you can bliv it, den nothing stops evolution from continuing because lots of species are nt in a favorable condition and yet dey don't evolve.

You all know evolution is false dats y u make we humans d peak of evolution because u know we can never evolve into something else.

adjoviomole:



Because u all know evolution will never happen again dats y u all now accept dat we as humans are d peak of evolution.


Evolution is a sham. If a bacteria cell can be d genesis of all life forms and you can bliv it, den nothing stops evolution from continuing because lots of species are nt in a favorable condition and yet dey don't evolve.

You all know evolution is false dats y u make we humans d peak of evolution because u know we can never evolve into something else.

How simple minded are you? Evolution takes thousands and millions of years, all organisms are constantly evolving. If you're waiting to see it happen fully, you'll have to hang around for the next two million years, and then check.

adjoviomole:
If evolution was true den, humans should be able to grow back amputated limbs. Since it is blivd dat we evolved frm something dat had no arm or legs nor head, den it should not be impossible for evolution to regrow limbs in human.



Over to the wise men!

wow you just dismantled evolution!!!!
Go get yourself a nobel prize...
For someone who can believe a rectangle is a 3-dimensional shape(object),i shouldnt be fazed...
Keep on disgracing yourself on a public forum...

Forgive my ad hominem...but its the truth

Freksy:


In regeneration there is evolution, true or false?

Regeneration is a product of evolution, it aids the organism survive in its environment, but it is different from evolution. For example some species of wall gecko store fat content's in their tales, this helps them survive when there is a lack of food, as they can depend on this fat storage. Hence aiding there survival, that is evolution.

adjoviomole:



Because u all know evolution will never happen again dats y u all now accept dat we as humans are d peak of evolution.


Evolution is a sham. If a bacteria cell can be d genesis of all life forms and you can bliv it, den nothing stops evolution from continuing because lots of species are nt in a favorable condition and yet dey don't evolve.

You all know evolution is false dats y u make we humans d peak of evolution because u know we can never evolve into something else.

You failed to see the sarcasm in the post you responded to.

It requires a faith bigger than the universe to believe those fits were achieved by a blind chance & purposeless process called EVOLUTION.

The question is: did evolution foreknow the process will discontinue in our time, so it wisely gave organisms reproduction mechanisms for procreation?

Freksy:


You failed to see the sarcasm in the post you responded to.

It requires a faith bigger than the universe to believe those fits were achieved by a blind chance & purposeless process called EVOLUTION.

The question is: did evolution foreknow the process will discontinue in our time, so it wisely gave organisms reproduction mechanisms for procreation?

Good question for the wise men to answer.

Freksy:


You failed to see the sarcasm in the post you responded to.

It requires a faith bigger than the universe to believe those fits were achieved by a blind chance & purposeless process called EVOLUTION.

The question is: did evolution foreknow the process will discontinue in our time, so it wisely gave organisms reproduction mechanisms for procreation?

do you really want to learn about evolution?

raphieMontella:

wow you just dismantled evolution!!!!
Go get yourself a nobel prize...
For someone who can believe a rectangle is a 3-dimensional shape(object),i shouldnt be fazed...
Keep on disgracing yourself on a public forum...

Forgive my ad hominem...but its the truth

Who cares what u say the fact is staring u all in d face, but u all av no answer. How evolution started see below


How did life originate?
Living things (even ancient organisms like bacteria) are
enormously complex. However, all this complexity did not leap
fully-formed from the primordial soup. Instead life almost
certainly originated in a series of small steps, each building upon
the complexity that evolved previously:
1. Simple organic molecules were formed.
Simple organic molecules, similar to the nucleotide shown
below, are the building blocks of life and must have been
involved in its origin. Experiments suggest that organic
molecules could have been synthesized in the atmosphere of
early Earth and rained down into the oceans. RNA and DNA
molecules — the genetic material for all life — are just long
chains of simple nucleotides.



Can u notice d words like must have been, could have been all ur so called scientist have no idea how it apnd, but dey just imagined and tot up something wich cld b true and could be false, so basically it is not a certainty. So u see how stupid u are . If ordinary bacteria can b blived to b d genesis of all life forms, den regrowing lost limbs shld nt be a problem for evolution to do in humans. now if u av nothn to say go back to bed pls

Lennycool:

How simple minded are you? Evolution takes thousands and millions of years, all organisms are constantly evolving. If you're waiting to see it happen fully, you'll have to hang around for the next two million years, and then check.

So how long did those species dat evolved from water creatures to land animals live for? How long did dey live as in der life span?

Lennycool:

How simple minded are you? Evolution takes thousands and millions of years, all organisms are constantly evolving. If you're waiting to see it happen fully, you'll have to hang around for the next two million years, and then check.

Whenever fruit bearing plants blossom, what do you see on their canopies?

You see flowers and fruits at different stages of development - one thing that will soon become another.

If macro evolution were true, the earth would be littered with all sorts and different stages of intermediary organisms - ALL AROUND US.

It's either it never happened or the tree was chopped off & the chain broken. Who/what hibernated the process?

As insects & bacteria are numerous, so numerous would various intermediaries have been AROUND US.

Lennycool:
Guys don't waste your time answering, the OP is an unabashed illiterate. Seeking attention, what concerns evolution with regeneration of limbs? Ignorance is bad

By this comment you have disassociated evolution from regeneration in a bit to dodging OP's question.

Lennycool:

Regeneration is a product of evolution, it aids the organism survive in its environment, but it is different from evolution. For example some species of wall gecko store fat content's in their tales, this helps them survive when there is a lack of food, as they can depend on this fat storage. Hence aiding there survival, that is evolution.

Here, you have unknowingly contradicted what you said earlier by implying evolution is responsible for regeneration. If regeneration is a product of evolution, as you claim, OP wants to know what prevents EVOLUTION from regenerating amputated limbs; after all, it generated them when there was none.

Lennycool:

Regeneration is a product of evolution, it aids the organism survive in its environment, but it is different from evolution.

I thought regeneration had nothing to do with evolution.

For example some species of wall gecko store fat content's in their tales, this helps them survive when there is a lack of food, as they can depend on this fat storage.Hence aiding there survival, that is evolution.

Thank you the learned! Here & now I have known what is evolution.

adjoviomole:



Can u notice d words like must have been, could have been all ur so called scientist have no idea how it apnd, but dey just imagined and tot up something wich cld b true and could be false, so basically it is not a certainty. So u see how stupid u are . If ordinary bacteria can b blived to b d genesis of all life forms, den regrowing lost limbs shld nt be a problem for evolution to do in humans. now if u av nothn to say go back to bed pls

you have no idea of what you are talking about...
You also have no idea of how evolution works..
Not even the slightest
....
Cheers

What am I reading here? This has to be the most ignorant post I've seen this year. Someone actually typed this and felt that this was a good counter-argument to the Christian God's failure in this department.

There are animals that can undergo regeneration but man isn't one of them because we don't get special treatment.

raphieMontella:

you have no idea of what you are talking about...
You also have no idea of how evolution works..
Not even the slightest
....
Cheers

Lmao it is u dat knows nothing about evolution goan study about evolution n ponder on all dat is written, den u will know of a surety dat evolution can never be true cheers

adjoviomole:



Lmao it is u dat knows nothing about evolution goan study about evolution n ponder on all dat is written, den u will know of a surety dat evolution can never be true cheers

Guy stop embarrassing, you talk like a secondary school drop out. But let me just tell you....
you have the theory of evolution a bit confused. Evolution, put simply, involves adapting to ones environment through genetic mutations that are beneficial for survival. This occurs over a very long period of time. Regrowing limbs is not possible because we do not have the genetic coding to do so. It has nothing to do with evolution. Sure, it would be beneficial for our survival to be able to re-grow limbs, but it is not a common enough occurrence to warrant genetic mutations.
Study and learn.

Demigods666:


Guy stop embarrassing, you talk like a secondary school drop out. But let me just tell you....
you have the theory of evolution a bit confused. Evolution, put simply, involves adapting to ones environment through genetic mutations that are beneficial for survival. This occurs over a very long period of time. Regrowing limbs is not possible because we do not have the genetic coding to do so. It has nothing to do with evolution. Sure, it would be beneficial for our survival to be able to re-grow limbs, but it is not a common enough occurrence to warrant genetic mutations.
Study and learn.

Ok what do dey call the changing of apes to human?

adjoviomole:



Ok what do dey call the changing of apes to human?

Apeman

Demigods666:


Apeman

Lmao na u talk am o

Freksy:


Whenever fruit bearing plants blossom, what do you see on their canopies?

You see flowers and fruits at different stages of development - one thing that will soon become another.

If macro evolution were true, the earth would be littered with all sorts and different stages of intermediary organisms - ALL AROUND US.

It's either it never happened or the tree was chopped off & the chain broken. Who/what hibernated the process?

As insects & bacteria are numerous, so numerous would various intermediaries have been AROUND US.

I don't even get you. If you're implying that you need to see evolution first hand then you will have to check the present lifeforms a million years from now. Since evolution is a long and continuous process, that's why we depend on findings from the past. Read human evolution to understand more. The findings will satiate the rational mind.

adjoviomole:



Lmao na u talk am o

Lol weiten u wan make I talk again na ur matter don tire me

So make we leave am like that for ape-man.

Demigods666:

Lol weiten u wan make I talk again na ur matter don tire me
So make we leave am like that for ape-man.

Aiit bro peace out

adjoviomole:
If evolution was true den, humans should be able to grow back amputated limbs. Since it is blivd dat we evolved frm something dat had no arm or legs nor head, den it should not be impossible for evolution to regrow limbs in human.



Over to the wise men!

Pls what is ur definition of evolution?

DO u mean can science/technology regrow limb or u consciously mean evolution.

if u say science/technology then u av a topic for discussion but if u insist evolution then even me an atheist is ashamed of u been a Christian and I am ashamed of u been an homo sapien.u just display ur ignorance and unwillingness to know what evolution process is, at least atheists take time to read ur bible before concluding it's shit.
answers my question.

oluwaseyi000:



Pls what is ur definition of evolution?

DO u mean can science/technology regrow limb or u consciously mean evolution.

if u say science/technology then u av a topic for discussion but if u insist evolution then even me an atheist is ashamed of u been a Christian and I am ashamed of u been an homo sapien.u just display ur ignorance and unwillingness to know what evolution process is, at least atheists take time to read ur bible before concluding it's shit.
answers my question.

So the changing from home erectus to homo sapien is technology abi ? oya clap for urself