Seun:

Do you know why God allowed those contradictions in the first place, knowing that their existence would cause many people to doubt God?

DeSepiero:


Your response didn't address Seun's question.
" Isn't God's book supposed to be concise, easy to understand and totally explicable without contradictions"?

ayobase:


You among all atheists.

I am so disappointed in you.

Why didn't didn't you bother to confirm how true the contradictions are?


So Goliath and Goliath's brother are the same person abi!

Lennycool:

Who gives a rat's ass if your disappointed? You and your opinions are inconsequential.

ayobase:


You didn't debunk my objective.

Lennycool:
Is that the only contradiction you can address

Nightie:
Lyk if we explain, u wouldn't still doubt.

Sanchez01:
This is funny

saintkash:
gben ghen

moski5:


lol someone answered the op online

OP you need the link?

Lennycool:

Provide it

EyeHateGod:
They saw The Contradictions Clean and Clear Now they are making up excuses For it?

moski5:


http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.debate.org.uk/debate-topics/apologetic/contrads/&sa=U&ved=0ahUKEwjolYSl9fHPAhUoC8AKHW6eDRkQFggLMAA&usg=AFQjCNFWmxJjsAHwzxOrb-2ibZdMdk50gg


http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.biblicalcatholic.com/apologetics/bible.htm&sa=U&ved=0ahUKEwjolYSl9fHPAhUoC8AKHW6eDRkQFggNMAE&usg=AFQjCNH_vDwPDZFT9cmWZg2CIuIkLFRdCQ

http://www.google.com/url?q=https://answersingenesis.org/contradictions-in-the-bible/scripture-index/&sa=U&ved=0ahUKEwjolYSl9fHPAhUoC8AKHW6eDRkQFggTMAQ&usg=AFQjCNHNxMeOME3Aq8txqGsSvZ_o20JOnA

Differences between literary conventions in Bible times and in ours must also be observed: Since, for instance, nonchronological narration and imprecise citation were conventional and acceptable and violated no expectations in those days, we must not regard these things as faults when we find them in Bible writers. When total precision of a particular kind was not expected nor aimed at, it is no error not to have achieved it. Scripture is inerrant, not in the sense of being absolutely precise by modern standards, but in the sense of making good its claims and achieving that measure of focused truth at which its authors aimed

Nowhere in Scripture does it indicate that God is not emotive. In fact, emotions are often ascribed to God in anthropomorphic or anthropopathic language. The Bible describes God’s actions and emotions in terms of human actions and emotions.
God does not change. However, He can change how He chooses to respond to an individual or nation’s actions.

Lennycool:


The links provide inadequate explanations to why an all mighty being couldn't avoid contradictions in his only book. A book in which humans should use to reach enlightenment, its like buying a maths text book and finding that it says 1+1 is 11.
Here are excerpts from your websites to show you their explanations.

He's bending logic to defend the bible. He basically said that " yes the bible has contradictions but it still teaches the moral aims at the end of the story."

Here is another attempt to answer the question about Gods regret

I don't know whether regret can be emphasised in a non human way. Again they are bending logic.
Well any way I'm glad the Christians are now using Google rather than waiting for the holy spirits guidance, because they all know that won't come.