vannessa7:


your cognitive ability is atrophy, recession has befuddled your brain, callous mind. your people owns prostitution industry in Nigeria and everyone knows,

samsam2019:
Some women are devil




They could connive to lie against the man.

Except your moma, right?




I don't think I can ever trust any woman

LecciGucci:
See im ugly face.

BTW...these westerners and forcing young gals to d other room are like 5&6

LecciGucci:
See im ugly face.

BTW...these westerners and forcing young gals to d other room are like 5&6

midolian:
Men and 'shamelessness' are like..

ArabMopol:
I'm not surprise Afonjas has the loosest waist... Tufiakwa

smithsydny:
Ncan south south

We know them A 40-year-old man, Victor Emafolomi

Kakamorufu:
shut up jor

ndcide:
# don't judge him

# everybody have illicit sex

# don't you also do same too?

# how is it your business

# Nigerians are hypocrites.

Etc.

That's the way Nigerians have been hypnotized to think.

I see no difference between rape and homosexuality

Davash222:
Say no to rape.

foody:
If the step father had sex with her for the first time in the month of October at least I heard that it takes the sperm seven days to penetrate into the eggs and sometimes it takes about six to seven weeks before the blood or urine test can prove that there is a conception. my area of thinking is if it happened sometimes in October and today is just Nov. 2 then something must be .....
although I stand to be corrected. just stating my observation.

Davash222:
Say no to rape.

Kgdavid:


Of course we say a mighty, resounding no to rape. But to engage you on the quote you attached:

"if you blame the rape victim because her clothes were provocative, then you must also blame the bank that was robbed because to's contents were provocative"

both the rape victim and the bank have two critical elements: content and covering. You cannot argue as you have done, that in the case of a bank that gets robbed, its provocative content could be likened to the provocative covering of a rape victim.

it is not the content that is provocative, it is the nature of the covering which may provoke. the idea is that if you possess items of value which may be considered attractive to the reasonable man, you should take reasonable measures to protect these. That is why banks do not keep their money in the open, nor transport it using unarmored, nor protected white vans marked "bank money inside", which could be considered the equivalent of an attractive person walking around with their sexual organs exposed.

If you expose your assets (of any type), with the knowledge that such exposure will attract both wanted and unwanted attention, with the further knowledge of the dangers of such exposure, given the known existence of criminal elements within human society, is it morally wrong that you take a share of the blame for the consequences of your actions?

Baddchristy:

No one deserves to be raped and also getting raped is not the victim fault.
someone I know once made a dumb statement like if a lady wear nasty clothes or wears skimpy then she deserves it.
it's just like you saying My natural state is being a rapist so don't wear what will trigger the beast in me,a dress code has to be observed so you won't get to see the real me

Tajbol4splend:


Provocative dress isn't the only reason for rape, some people have extreme libido, more than he-goat

fathomberry:

Bros that picture doesn't make any sense at all abeg.

Davash222:








I almost succumb to your assertions but you still got no point to justify your claim.

Still waiting.

Fourwinds:
what is d meaing of all those nonsense written above

Kgdavid:


Lol ahan oga i'm saying everyone has a duty to take care of their property and their lives. When attacked, you are expected to go out of your way to prevent aggression, which means your first response should not be to retaliate in self-defense, but rather to take steps and measures to retreat from the aggressor. To act otherwise would be to recklessly endanger yourself and your assailant (especially when you cannot prove that your assailant intends to do you serious harm).

This establishes the principle that in certain instances you are expected to incur some measure of inconvenience, in order to protect yourself. Thus i reject the popular argument that people should not be prevented form dressing to their pleasure simply because other people can't control themselves. Every member of a society owes that society a certain measure of self deprivation for the preservation of law and order.

Taking another example, as in the case of theft, do you there is a big difference between a person who walks into your house in day time, through a wide open door, and steals from you, and a person who picks your lock and steals the same item, at night? Same principle at play in different ways.

To dress provocatively when you know that rapists exists, is reckless. It doesn't make rape any less of an offence but the victim still should acknowledge some responsibility i think.

dre11:






http://punchng.com/man-arrested-raping-impregnating-15-year-old-stepdaughter/

Davash222:


Name sake, people 'NEED' to dress appropriate not cos of some retard rapist around them but for humanity sake and for the tender ones around. No reason is enough to justify any rape case, almost every town has two or more brothels around, so if your consent with the girl is negative, visit one.

I repeat, no reason is valid for any rape case.



Shalom.

ndcide:

Get lost.

Zoharariel:
The suspect hails from Delta State and not Ogun

iPrevail:



The man sounds confident he didn't do it. And why is there no mention of the girl being a virgin prior to the incident? At that age she's already seeing someone.. Smh.

stpat1:
I know this guy. So sad he turned out this way. Was a year ahead of me in sec school and we lived in the same street back then at Ogba.

Too bad.